VIA Rail plot derailed? 04/22/2013

Historical insights & thoughts about the world we live in - and the social conditioning exerted upon us by past and current propaganda.
Sisterlover
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:49 pm

VIA Rail plot derailed? 04/22/2013

Unread post by Sisterlover »

Just the words "Al Qaeda" make this a prime candidate for a psyop. Where it goes from here is anyone's guess (but I think we can safely assume...)

Once again, the mounties got their men, when two suspects allegedly plotting to derail a passenger train (huh?) in the name of Jihad were thwarted.
Both CBC and the Canadian equivalent of USA Today, the National Post, were quick to convict the two men, from Montreal and Toronto, in the press.
By this afternoon, the FBI had weighed in, accusing the RCMP of acting hastily and possibly ruining the case being built south of the border. C'est la vie.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/201 ... -plot.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/22 ... onto-area/

Anyhow, I doubt this will amount to much. We Canadians are much to apathetic and uninterested in anything not related to curling or back bacon to commit to any one news story, but we're probably on some kind of psyop quota. Having said that, this has definitely been a record couple months for all things terror. Boo!

Image Image
Sisterlover
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:49 pm

Re: VIA Rail plot derailed? 04/22/2013

Unread post by Sisterlover »

And, just like that....
"...It would bring back two central provisions that were originally instituted by the Jean Chrétien government after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York in 2001 but were "sunsetted" after a five-year period.

One allowed for "preventative detention," meaning someone can be held without charge for up to three days just on suspicion of being involved in terrorism. The person can then be bound by certain probationary conditions for up to a year, and if he or she refuses the conditions, can be jailed for 12 months.

The second provides for an "investigative hearing" in which someone suspected of having knowledge of a terrorist act can be forced to answer questions. The objective is not to prosecute the person for a criminal offence, but merely to gather information."


From:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2 ... -vote.html
omaxsteve
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:44 am
Contact:

Re: VIA Rail plot derailed? 04/22/2013

Unread post by omaxsteve »

Sisterlover wrote:And, just like that....
"...It would bring back two central provisions that were originally instituted by the Jean Chrétien government after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York in 2001 but were "sunsetted" after a five-year period.

One allowed for "preventative detention," meaning someone can be held without charge for up to three days just on suspicion of being involved in terrorism. The person can then be bound by certain probationary conditions for up to a year, and if he or she refuses the conditions, can be jailed for 12 months.

The second provides for an "investigative hearing" in which someone suspected of having knowledge of a terrorist act can be forced to answer questions. The objective is not to prosecute the person for a criminal offence, but merely to gather information."


From:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2 ... -vote.html
The timing of the announcement that they "caught" the terrorists coincided with the debate in parliament to pass the anti-terror legislation. How convenient.

someone suspected of having knowledge of a terrorist act can be forced to answer questions

I assume by "forced" they are talking about being held in "contempt of court" versus waterboarding? This is Canada we're talking about, eh?

regards,

Steve O.
Post Reply