Engineering 'disease'

[dblitz]

Kham, you said:

Each cell in your body has the same fuel requirement: fruit sugars.

Can you explain how you came to that conclusion?

[patrix]

In short:
Eat whole foods as fresh and organic as possible
. . .

Would these be RAW foods or COOKED foods?

. . . and initially we may feel better. And it may be things that are healthy to do during limited periods, but not for a prolonged time. And if we’ve had an initial positive experience we then tend do more of the very thing that makes us sick.

How long would you say someone needs to be on what they determine to be the healthy way to live before they may take a turn for the worse, i.e., how long of a proof of health do you need to see that what this person is doing may be something at which we should all take a look?

Let's not have a "flame war" again. You know my views and I know yours. And I've noticed many people have strong feelings attached to diets. I guess it's no coincidence most religions contain dietary restrictions. But to answer your questions raw or cooked doesn't matter if you have a reasonably varied diet. But (real) pemmican
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pemmican
can be used as a single source food indefinitely because it's based on fat and dried raw meat which means all vitamins are preserved.

Disease because of malnutrition typically takes a few years. The canary is usually bad dental health.

Edit:

I know many people feel they are entitled to voice strong opinions on medicine and nutrition without having done any proper homework and a two hour long video may be much to ask. But just to grasp the consequences of this ignorance I kindly ask you to fast forward 52 minutes into this video and watch
https://youtu.be/uJ0WJOQzrgg

[HonestlyNow]

Would these be RAW foods or COOKED foods?

How long would you say someone needs to be on what they determine to be the healthy way to live before they may take a turn for the worse, i.e., how long of a proof of health do you need to see that what this person is doing may be something at which we should all take a look?

Let's not have a "flame war" again. You know my views and I know yours. And I've noticed many people have strong feelings attached to diets. I guess it's no coincidence most religions contain dietary restrictions. But to answer your questions raw or cooked doesn't matter if you have a reasonably varied diet.

Disease because of malnutrition typically takes a few years. The canary is usually bad dental health.

Sorry to inform you, but that question is of the utmost importance, hence my reason for asking. There's a world of difference between raw and cooked. I do have to address this at another time though due to my current time constraint.

I asked a specific question, and I received a non-specific answer. What number of years do you think would prove the worth of a certain way of living?

[patrix]

I asked a specific question, and I received a non-specific answer. What number of years do you think would prove the worth of a certain way of living?

Mmm, I understand perfectly well that people get upset by Flat Earthers, but an upside with them is that they at least cannot cause any physical damage with their delusions.

[HonestlyNow]

*
At this moment, I take the time to answer this post by patrix:

Let's not have a "flame war" again.

Define flame war:

flame war
noun

a lengthy exchange of angry or abusive messages between users of an online forum or other discussion area.

I conducted a search on this site for my posts in Engineering Disease. My search indicates that I made 23 posts in this thread. Not even one of those posts is either abusive nor of an attacking or angry nature. Search Link. The flame war, my dear patrix, is in your imagination.

[patrix]

*
The flame war, my dear patrix, is in your imagination.

My dear Honestly now,

Flame war might be a bad choice of words, but it’s besides the point. The point is that people like you pisses me off for a very good reason, and that is that you promote malnutrition because of your ignorance. You feel you are morally in the right to promote avoidance of animal products against better knowledge and actively tries to question and discredit anyone that says otherwise. You are like a Flat Earther but with the important difference that anyone exposed and convinced by your delusions risk health problems.

You ask me silly questions and argue like I’m in some kind of obligation to answer them. Does it make me less credible if I choose not to?

Lets turn this around. Lets do Jeopardy instead. Here’s an answer I want the question for and if you don’t know it without google you are obliged to put your delusions about nutrition where the sun don’t shine.

His book The Critic as Artist contains the quote “There is no sin except stupidity”

[HonestlyNow]

You feel you are morally in the right to promote avoidance of animal products against better knowledge and actively tries to question and discredit anyone that says otherwise.

What I have seen to be the truth of the matter in regards to the health of the homo sapien, is that we are a frugivore species, and that the cooking of our food has proven to be the downfall of mankind.

“There is no sin except stupidity”

Agreed.

[patrix]

“There is no sin except stupidity”

Agreed.

Well then grab some eggs and butter and get your brain and serotonin levels up to a working condition again.

We’ve all been fooled in some way. The important thing is to be honest enough with yourself to see that.

The vego-/vegetarian psyop/social engineering has a long history. Disney has made animals children's soulmates. Before Donald, duck fat was one of the most commonly used fats in American homes. Then we have all kinds of hoaxes after that like Cowspiracy, Mad cow disease, the list goes on.

I guess this truth has yet to pass the three stages of acceptance:
First we ridicule it, then we fight it, then we proclaim – That is what I’ve always said.

[HonestlyNow]

Well then grab some eggs and butter and get your brain and serotonin levels up to a working condition again.

You're making the assumption there's a problem with my brain and serotonin levels. I've made no such claim here, and it's also not the case that I'm having that problem. Thank you, anyway.

We’ve all been fooled in some way. The important thing is to be honest enough with yourself to see that.

Again, agreed. You and I differ on how we are being fooled.

Disney . . .

As I've mentioned during our last exchange months ago, I've no interest in Disney, and he/it is not in any way the guiding force upon the knowledge I have gained on this subject.

[patrix]

We’ve all been fooled in some way. The important thing is to be honest enough with yourself to see that.

Again, agreed. You and I differ on how we are being fooled.

Which makes me sad, because I do care.
Let me finish by linking to a part of a video I advise everyone to watch interested in staying healthy
https://youtu.be/SEE-oU8_NSU?t=31m5s

[agraposo]

Let me finish by linking to a part of a video I advise everyone to watch interested in staying healthy
https://youtu.be/SEE-oU8_NSU?t=31m5s

Is this guy somewhat stressed in the conference? He doesn't breathe normally. Maybe because he is speaking nonsense?

I wouldn't have much confidence in someone speaking on health matters, who doesn't know how to breathe and who wears glasses. All the health gurus should know that a fast magically empowers the sight and hearing!

[agraposo]

Dr. Morse Herbal Clinic website
https://www.drmorsesherbalhealthclub.com/pages/clinics

That guy is a quack, see for example the remedy for lung diseases:
https://www.drmorsesherbalhealthclub.co ... 1128965404

By the way, another health guru wearing glasses

[agraposo]

Kham, you said:

Each cell in your body has the same fuel requirement: fruit sugars.

Can you explain how you came to that conclusion?

dblitz, that's an important question, because everybody presumes that the body extracts energy from the food, whereas the food only gives the material that the body uses. The body uses energy from the atmosphere, and has repositories of energy, but it doesn't transform fats or sugars into energy. This is proved during fasts, as the body becomes stronger and healthier, without consuming any calories from food.

See for example this book:

Hereward Carrington - Vitality, Fasting and Nutrition (written in 1908! This is not a new concept!)
https://archive.org/details/vitalityfastingn00carrrich

And:

Isaac Jennings - The Tree of Life (1867)
https://archive.org/stream/treeoflifeor ... 0/mode/1up

No kind of aliment can carry life force into the system, or by any action, severally or jointly, create it within the body.

neither exercise nor eating adds a particle of vitality to the stock in store, but diminishes it.

Jennings was the inventor of the term "orthopathy", or right action, which considers disease as a state of feeble vitality.

His system is so good that we can throw modern medicine and all those quack's youtube videos to the dustbin.

[patrix]

Is this guy somewhat stressed in the conference? He doesn't breathe normally. Maybe because he is speaking nonsense?

Gee I don't know. Maybe he's a bit emphatic about the fact that he's researched cancer for 20 years and showed with controlled experiments that the ruling genome theory, that current cancer therapy is based on, is simply wrong. But despite that he's received practically no attention for his research.

Instead we have geniuses like you that obviously don't know anything about medicine but nontheless feel you can make a contribution here by letting us now that he's probably not credible because he's a mouth breather...

[Kham]

SUGARS AND THE HUMAN CELL

dblitz » 06 Dec 2017, 20:02 wrote:
Kham, you said:

Each cell in your body has the same fuel requirement: fruit sugars.

Can you explain how you came to that conclusion?

Human cells use simple sugars or monosaccharides as their major fuel component. Monosaccharides are the most fundamental units of all sugars and cannot be further hydrolyzed or broken down into simpler compounds. Fructose is a monosaccharides which is found in fruits can pass through the lining of the mouth and stomach, as well as small intestines, just as it is and provides fuel directly to cells. All other sugars, disaccharides and polysaccharides, must be broken down first, meaning they must go through the digestive process and converted into monosaccharides before cells can absorb them for fuel and so must undergo the digestive process. Disaccharides and polysaccharides are broken down into glucose, which is a monosaccharide. Glucose, unlike fructose or fruit sugar, needs a carrier unit, insulin, to transport them into the cell but fruit sugars or fructose needs nothing.

Modern biology would agree with the above paragraph so it is not in dispute.

The fact that fruit sugars don’t need to be broken down, don’t need a carrier unit and can be readily absorbed into the blood stream as soon as one starts chewing is significant. This means when fruit is eaten the body does not have to spend valuable resources on the complicated digestive process and can instead work on repairing and regenerating the body.

Modern medicine does a real good job of ignoring how easily absorbable are fruit sugars and assuming that many other sources of sugars are needed as found in the disaccharide and polysaccharide groups so that the body gets all its chemicals as needed by the human body. What modern medicine is also ignoring is the fact that the liver is an amazing chemical factory and does this job all by itself using the carbon, oxygen and hydrogen from fructose and a few other elements found in fruits to supply the human body with all the chemicals it needs, generally speaking.