At this point I think discarded Hollywood scripts are actually sold to news media to make news.
Documented on wickedpedia here: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attentat_ ... du-Rouvray and in numerous PR articles such as this: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/ ... du-rouvray
So, nothing in this story makes much sense. Starting from the fact that these ISIS kids decided to attack the church on a Tuesday, rather than on a Sunday. At 9:25, 5 hostages were taken, we are told. "A couple of parishioners and three nuns" says wickedpedia.
You can immediately see how this was a very controlled, closed environment with no risk of unwanted witnesses.
One of the nuns is interviewed here: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/26/europ ... index.html (sorry I cannot embed this for some reason)
In her deadpan report, Delafosse ("from the pit") says that the priest had just celebrated mass. However wicked and other sources state that it all happened before or during mass...
There's one unnamed parishioner among the victims, apparently, but the relevant victim is supposed to be one 86 yo Jacques Hamel (Jacques, what better name?), who appears to actually be a retired priest substituting the actual curate of the church, one "Auguste Moanda-Phuati", who "was on holiday". Jack Ham can actually be seen in a few videos around the media and on youtube.
from http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2 ... _3224.html
Here's a profile by France 24:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHmrRH7bKpM
The thing to notice is that such videos appear to be all very recent, despite the fact that the guy was retired and had a long history as a priest. So why all this late attention? Frankly I would expect much more material about a priest from Africa, who instead leaves only feeble traces of himself before this event.
On the church page Auguste Moanda-Phuati is indicated as a "redeemer". The redimeers are a religious order, that's all I find out... Here he is in a video giving interviews about the events:
from http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/27/it-should ... d-6033730/
As to the ISIS kids, pictured below, as usually they were "killed by police" at the end of the event. This is SO ridiculous as it is convenient!
from http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/27/it-should ... d-6033730/
Serious police and a serious government would make sure the the assailants are taken alive, for the obvious reasons that...
1) you don't want to make martyrs out of them and
2) you want to actually interrogate these people and learn about this theoretical network they rely on. Besides,
3) a trial by the rule of law would only enhance the image of "civilization" as opposed to the barbaric methods of the "terrorists".
Of course none of the above happens or can be even applied since these events are staged and largely or entirely faked: but noting this serves to show how the response of the police is yet another hollywodesque element which does not belong to reality. The same goes for the idotic marches the french politicians subject the country to. In the real world, Hollande would already have been replaced by a more effective leader, and nobody would march around broadcasting the message of the "terrorists" large and wide, which at the end of the day seems to be the only purpose everyone agrees on.
)
