Part I - in which he tries to convince CluesForum readers 9/11 Twin Tower destruction footage is real, not CGI:
... to write ... that ... no one died ... would be ... lying about my own beliefs ...
... There is no evidence that zero people died on 9/11
... Most [of the 3,000 official 9/11 victims] had time to evacuate
... OK, so how did towers go from being there one minute and gone the next?
... The buildings were never there? ... NO!
... they also made the demolition videos? ... NO!
... they hoped that no one recorded the actual demolition from the right angles? ... NO!
... Did they demolish building #7 using the regular method, but the [sic] create CGI of that too? ... NO!
... And then did they demolish the twin towers the traditional way and then spread a CGI video of them blowing up that looks special? ... NO!
... I would be shocked if I really am the only one on this forum to believe [that the top-to-bottom destruction footage is real, not CGI]
... I bet a lot of people [on this forum] are holding their tongues [about the belief that the top-to-bottom destruction footage is real, not CGI] or they have merely not used hundreds of hours of their own time to research this directly.
... I am not saying your research [which concludes in 9/11 destruction footage being CGI] is stupid or invalid - but I wish for you to respect my research [which concludes in 9/11 destruction footage being real] as well.
... I will make sure I am familiar with all of that information [like Simon's Intro Tour Guide, and Simon's September Clues videos] within a reasonable amount of time [but not yet, not today.]
... I ... stand by ... the destruction footage.
... I still believe this not to be an example of CGI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HbD_Q6kmh8
... these videos do not look fake to me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft2uIYucsXo
... You're saying this video and ones like it are fake?
... Why would they make those poofs of smoke shooting out of the building ?
... they pull off false flags.
... they cannot control people recording videos from every angle
... I don't think the buildings collapsing videos are CGI covered up by fake smoke.
... the videos of the collapse look exactly like controlled demolitions (if you wanted to start the demolition from the damage area near the top).
... If the twin tower collapses were CGI, then they would have at least slowed down the collapse a little
... witnesses and firefighters saying they experienced and saw explosions before the planes hit & during the collapse seem genuine.
... Furthermore, the firefighter testimony and engineers who signed 9/11 re-investigation petitions seem to think thermite was used
... The videos showing molten metal coming out of the building near the damage zone on the upper half does not seem like ... CGI ... but rather video evidence
... your image labeled "fake smoke" could be related to those shorter buildings being demolished
... it is clear to me that they blew up the twin towers starting at the damage zone
... blowing up the buildings from the top to the bottom
... Why are you trying so hard to make everyone adhere to the belief that no one died on 9/11?
... I don't see why the "nobody died on 9/11" needs to be so absolute
... Certainly there were a few people killed
... some or potentially many
... why so many were risking telling their allies not to go to work
... a controlled demolition in a new way (from top to bottom)
... The twin tower demolitions were very unique
... a very messy [from top to bottom] style of demolition was used.
... The smoldering of the fires on the upper 1/3rd of the twin towers ...
... I had read this forum for weeks before posting
Part II - in which he tries to prove manmade Satellites orbit Earth (though rocket launches are fake)
... I believe the satellites issue is a lynchpin in the understanding and substantiation of the truth behind human success with: rockets, space travel, and technology in general.
... I've not seen any reasonable explanations for how GPS works from those who do not believe in satellites.
... As an engineer, I feel the need to show that you can take apart GPS receivers or build open source ones that run software that have equations that only make sense if GPS works as officially explained. [Satellites]
... Just a quick synopsis on how GPS works... Each satellite has a very accurate clock on it. These clocks are synced. Each one is constantly broadcasting its time. Because of the # of GPS satellites, almost anywhere on earth (except very close to the poles) you are within range of at least 3 of them at once. Therefore, receiving the time stamp from 3 satellites uses relatively simple trilateration math to measure your distance.
... For example, if satellites are real, then the ISS could be real - but just a 'dud' - or it could be the directed energy weapon some think exist. Huge solar panels for charging a super capacitor and a microwave laser to start fires and whatnot ...
... It would be nice to look for early evidence leaked by scientists involved in rocketry & satellite engineering who did not yet [sic] within establishment control.
... what happened to the first rockets that NASA tried to send outside of geosynchronous orbit? Based on what happens to objects leaving the Earth's domain can tell us things about our solar system
... satellites - an example of how we can ... send things ... into space
... Anders Bjorkman ... believes satellites exist.
Final verdict, regardless of his silly conflicting Satellite posts (i.e. "rockets fake, but Satellites real")
this "too smart for the Tour Guide" character thinks "the 9/11 destruction footage is real, not CGI."
He has spent thousands of hours telling himself "I'm watching real unique top-to-bottom destruction!"
He has no idea what this forum is, he hasn't watched any of Simon's videos, not even September Clues.
PS - here's a kind summary: we all (except for bv) had years of wrongly assuming "some footage real."
We scolded you not for your lack of knowledge, but for your refusal to read the Tour Guide. Go read.
And watch Simon's Movies, seriously, the movies you already know, simply pointing out ALL CGI proof.
When you finally sit down in a mellow mood preferably with some good bud, you will enjoy all 3h54m.
And the soundtrack happens to be 'da best, now go young one, don't be sad: be strong, learn, return.
Real people, old or young, are warmly accepted here the moment they realize all (all) 9/11 is CGI.
Nevermind the satellite question (which actually a few well-respected folks here feel is "yet proven".)
100% of members here cannot unsee the many unarguable flaws in the 9/11 "destruction/victims" CGI.
Be happy, if you're real, after watching Simon's 3h54m Movies, you too will laugh at your old beliefs.
Again, if you're real, you'll overcome the shock of years wasted analyzing a CGI animation, and laugh.
Dude, I'm usually very serious, but I had so many hearty happy laughs about the above & you will too!
I know it's hard to realize now, but over time, slowly or quickly, it's up to you, you'll see - all CGI bro.
My past 7 posts were expended altruistically to help you - a possible human - to help you become Irie.
I'm a DMT-knower, legal bud toker & grower, so vape-bong it get mellow & enjoy the movies brother.
This Intro thread is for CluesForum to warmly welcome ALL CGI 9/11 realizers. All else is derailing.
And note to SCS, about the clean-up you mentioned above, yes please do feel free to move all mine.