Killings in Jewish Museum the day before Belgian election?

[Seneca]

Main story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Mus ... m_shooting

date 24/5/2014 15:50 , a few hours before the start of the belgian and european elections

There are a lot of suspicious things:
"The Belgian foreign minister, Didier Reynders, saw the two corpses at the entrance and said the two other victims had been shot further inside the museum.

He said he had been strolling nearby when he saw people fleeing and heard shots and rushed to help. When he saw "bodies on the ground in pools of blood" he called the emergency number and rounded up eyewitnesses."
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/m ... s-brussels

-The 'killer' is arrested, is supposed to be incarcerated four times but the only photographs we have are of this quality:

The bottom 3 pictures are from the supposed security camera footage. With these photos the smart cops in France could arrest the "killer".

More info on http://www.deboutlesbelges.be/lattentat ... f-un-fake/ (sorry, it is only in French)

[brianv]

Isn't this the Election in which you are refraining from mandatory-voting in?

[Seneca]

Isn't this the Election in which you are refraining from mandatory-voting in?

Yes it was that election and I didn't go. It was also played out in the media that I refrain from watching. I heard about it because my wife happened to pass by the building two days after the alleged shooting.

[Seneca]

Sorry for my spelling. I also mistakenly wrote that the "killer" was arrested because of the security camera footage. According to this newspaper article: http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20140603_01127845 he took the bus Amsterdam-Marseille to cross the border. These buses are always thoroughly examined for drugs. When the customs officials searched his bag they found a revolver, a kalashnikov and a lot of ammunition. And a baseball cap like seen on the security cameras. And a go procamera and video images in which a man takes credit for the killings. And an islamist flag.

Here are the released video images of the "killer" in action. Do you notice anything strange? A part of the video is made fuzzy were one of the victims is supposed to lie.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duNN200AMq0
http://www.demorgen.be/dm/nl/989/Binnen ... vrij.dhtml
Here is an image of the "victims". Shouldn't there be more blood? Two of the victims were linked to Mossad according to the Belgian media.

[brianv]

I'm getting a bad vibe here. Strange how the poster joins then all of a sudden bingo - right on his doorstep too...and "jew" related bullshit too.
I shan't be posting anymore in this thread.

[Seneca]

I'm getting a bad vibe here. Strange how the poster joins then all of a sudden bingo - right on his doorstep too...and "jew" related bullshit too.
I shan't be posting anymore in this thread.

Right on my doorstep is somewhat exaggerated. I live on the other side of the country. If this is on my doorstep this is also the case for 11 million Belgians and a couple of million French.
But I admit Belgium is a small country and the distances are not impressive.

I understand how Brianv got this conclusion. I wrote

I heard about it because my wife happened to pass by the building two days after the alleged shooting.

My wife was participating in an excursion in the capital two days after the event. They did a tour of the biggest attractions (manneke pis, royal palace, different parliaments..)
This route is obviously not a bad place to locate a museum.

The reason I am investigating this is obviously because it happened in Belgium. Part of the reason is to convince my wife that media fakery is real. Because she said before something like "Maybe it is true but I don't want to look into this because it only happens in countries like the USA, not in Belgium. "
Since I don't want to trust only on my own intuitions and that of the site I linked to I was hoping to get some comments from this forum.

What is Brianv thinking about the elements that I brought up?
a)That this was a real attack? Please try to convince me.
b)That I made it up? But I provided sources?
c)That I took part in the fakery?? What do I hope to get out of posting about it? credibility??

I don't want to be believed. I want constructive criticism. I welcome you to prove me wrong.

What did I write that can be considered "jew related bullshit"?
It is impossible to write about the incident ignoring that it happened in a jewish museum and that at least 2 of the "victims" were from Israel.

It is not difficult to figure out that there is probably some jewish influence in Belgian politics and the Belgium media.

More than 50% of the world’s production of rough, polished and industrial diamond passes through Antwerp.

8 in 10 of all rough diamonds in the world are handled in Antwerp.

1 in 2 of all cut diamonds passes through Antwerp.

The Antwerp diamond sector has an annual turnover of 39 billion U.S. dollars.

The diamond trade is responsible for 8% of Belgian exports, and 12% of the Flemish region’s exports.

30.000 people are directly or indirectly employed by the Belgian diamond sector.

source: http://www.photius.com/diamonds/the_dia ... ustry.html

We all know that the Jewish people have taken an active and even dominant role in the diamond sector for hundreds of years.

source: http://www.israelidiamond.co.il/English ... bjid=10240

Do we have to ignore it because it involves jews?

[Seneca]

Here are the only 2 photographs of Alexandre Strens, the only belgian "victim" who worked for the museum


He is supposed to have died a day later in hospital (may 25) but I find no mention whatsoever of his funeral, which would have been an event that got a lot of media attention (the other 3 "victims" were buried abroad).

[Seneca]

coincidence?

Another group of Jews convened nearby for a screening of a film about the Holocaust. The event had been scheduled long before the shootings, but instead of canceling, organizers dedicated the event to remembering the museum attack’s victims — Emanuel and Miriam Riva, a married couple in their 50s from Tel Aviv; Alexandre Strens, an employee of the museum in his 20s; and Dominique Chabrier, a French volunteer at the museum.

http://www.jspacenews.com/belgiums-jewi ... -shooting/

[Seneca]

The Belgian vicsim Alexandre Strens "died" officially on friday 6/6, 12 days after a Jewish source told reporters he was dead.

He was buried on 10/06.


http://www.amazightimes.com/De-Riffijns ... a3284.html

His mother was jewish, His father was from morocco, probably islamitic. The father left his wife and their 7 children years ago. So it makes sense that his youngest son is buried in his fatherland??
Who pays for all this?

So none of the vicsims is buried in Belgium.

[pov603]

In the video above of the 'shooting' is it common for there not to be any smoke residue from the expelled cartridges/bullets?

[Seneca]

Well I am no expert but in this video there is smoke.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GST6ue9_tPM

I don't think the man in the video of the museum is really shooting. Why does he walk backward, is it for the camera? Considering he is supposed to have shot 2 people with a pistol at the entrance, why doesn't he just keep the pistol instead of using the Kalashnikov? What a waste of his time.
Notice what is happening with the car around second 25.

[Seneca]

I think the photo of the two people in the entrance of the museum is also fake. Not only because the lack of real blood but also because the people haven't relaxed their muscles which means they are still alive. The woman holding some brochures, 1 with the words "Ik kies voor kunst .be (I vote for art)

[Seneca]

Do they look like the hands of a 53 year old woman?

Emanuel and Mira Riva of Tel Aviv, aged 54 and 53, were named on Sunday as the two Israelis killed in a shooting attack at the Brussels Jewish Museum that left four people dead on Saturday. http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewis ... iba-353281

[simonshack]

The woman holding some brochures, with the words "Ik kies voor kunst .be (I vote for art)

Oh my - how very artful ...

And I s'pose a shooting victim will fall flat on its back - with hands still clutching onto brochures on top of chest. Happens all the time.

Thanks, Seneca - for your efforts and patience in covering (& roundly busting - all by yourself) this painfully silly little psyop.

[Seneca]

The woman holding some brochures, with the words "Ik kies voor kunst .be (I vote for art)

Oh my - how very artful ...

And I s'pose a shooting victim will fall flat on its back - with hands still clutching onto brochures on top of chest. Happens all the time.

Thanks, Seneca - for your efforts and patience in covering (& roundly busting - all by yourself) this painfully silly little psyop.

You're very welcome Simon. Thank you and your contributors for helping me to finally open my eyes, otherwise I wouldn't have noticed. And it wasn't "all by myself". I have to give part of the credit to Brianv. Because he did correct my spelling mistake and he did discover it was "jew" related.
Thanks pov603 for asking a relevant question.

The photo of the funeral of Alexandre Strens I posted is fake. It was made from the photograph from the "funeral" of the other vicsims, the tourist couple. I don't think it was part of the hoax, maybe just a creative journalist. So there is no evidence at all that he was buried. All in all a very low-budget hoax.

I gave you the exact timing of the event because I had hoped someone would do the number thing for me. But it seems I have to do it all by myself (sorry hoi.polloi)
Date 24/5/2014 15:50 CEST (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Mus ... m_shooting)

2+4+5+2+0+1+4=18 and 1+8=9
1+5+5+0=11