Thanks for the comment jumpy64.
About Dieudonné: I understand French fairly well and I actually did check Dieudonné out because of his connection to these lawyers. I wrote "comedian" because I he is about as funny as the Charlie hebdo cartoons. But maybe he has to say that he is a comedian to be able to speak the truth. He is a friend of the Belgian politician "Laurent LOUIS
", who I studied more. Laurent Louis is despised by the Belgian media and politicians, that's why I checked him out. But I suspect he is controlled opposition. In 2010 Laurent Louis became the only representative for a political party led by Mischaël Modrikamen
: lawyer, Jewish, politician, Zionist.
In 2010 Laurent Louis started to become discredited by the media when he made some racist remarks against Roma people ("gypsies"). In January 2011 he was kicked out of the party, one month later he started a new political party. (looks planned to me).
Already some 3 hours after the event in the museum he twittered that it could be a false flag. The next day he wrote (I think correctly) that it was fake. He had some good arguments. He had also some inside information, he knew what numberplate was seen by the witnesses and also knew who was the owner of the car. He wrote the hoax was designed to discredit him and his party because the day of the event he was accused in the media of promoting antisemitism. (That was in the link I posted at the beginning of this topic, in French).
In the same article he named other hoaxes that he considered a false flag: 9/11, Boston bombings, Merah (France) shooting, Mali Terrorism, death of Bin Laden. But he thinks this Brussels Hoax was the only one where there were no real victims. He is into media fakery himself, made fake photos and a fake film, pretending he was ambushed by political rivals. http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/fr/1502/Belgiqu ... iege.dhtml
I also don't trust him because he is friends with and was represented by the same lawyers that are representing the alleged killer, Henri Laquay and Sebastien Courtoy (on the photo with Dieudonné). And because of the way he writes his name (Laurent LOUIS). It is possible that he is an actor. There is an article from 29/10/2013 which claims this (http://ploum.net/le-depute-qui-nexistait-pas/
) although it is meant as satire. Maybe this is why he can't get a bank account as he claims? Because he is not a real person?
I am not saying that he doesn't ask the right questions and often draws the right conclusions. But it is possible that he does so to make them sound unbelievable. And to show what consequences telling the truth in Belgium apparently has. I could be wrong about this, if so then I am sorry. One thing is for sure. He or the people around him are intelligent and know how to write.