hoi.polloi 4 Jun 11 2010, 10:11 PM wrote: Can we contact them?
“In a review of Into the Darkness: An Account of 7/7 by Peter Zimonjic, published in ABC on Saturday April 12, it was stated that much of the book was fabricated. We accept that this was not the case and that describing the book in these terms was erroneous, unfair and misleading. We are happy to set the record straight”.
Terence.drew @ Jun 11 2010, 11:36 PM wrote: This is a big question Hoi.
A century ago a man laid it all out and left a warning.
I haven't posted here about this individual because of the dire direction the esoteric/occult threads have gone and the bullying bluster which has engulfed and smothered them. It seems some people here are unmoderateable.
Will give it a go though B)
Terence.drew 4 Jun 11 2010, 10:36 PM wrote: This is a big question Hoi.
A century ago a man laid it all out and left a warning.
I haven't posted here about this individual because of the dire direction the esoteric/occult threads have gone and the bullying bluster which has engulfed and smothered them. It seems some people here are unmoderateable.
Will give it a go though B)
This number spiked wildly after 9/11 because of the presence of the internet allowing those discerning people to share their thoughts with others
hoi.polloi 4 Jun 12 2010, 12:33 PM wrote: Whoever he is, he paints a dour -- nay, realistic -- picture of the media.
.



hoi.polloi 4 Jun 12 2010, 12:21 PM wrote:
Well, Terence.drew ... that's exactly the kind of person I am warning against.
ozzybinoswald 4 Jun 11 2010, 11:44 PM wrote:
Someone toss this mealy-mouthed prick.
Piper 4 Jun 12 2010, 12:07 AM wrote: There's also the alleged Rick Rescorla, already mentioned in a few threads on this forum, who according to his Wikipedia page, "anticipated both attacks on the towers and implemented evacuation procedures that are credited with saving many lives. He died in the attacks of September 11, 2001, while leading the evacuation efforts." But we all know how likely that is to be true.
Then there's the alleged prediction from shill Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks ;)) from July/August 2001, and Bill Cooper's prediction from June 2001, pinning it on OBL. I see these "insider tips" as methods of creating an audience for them. None of the above are really credible, obviously, but as godzilla mentioned someone not involved somehow would be more likely to keep their mouth shut.
I think the number of people able to see through the mirage to the truth underneath started out very low in the early days of propaganda and has been rising steadily ever since, with every new event like JFK and the Apollo scam adding to the numbers of these isolated "conspiracy theorists". This number spiked wildly after 9/11 because of the presence of the internet allowing those discerning people to share their thoughts with others. not to mention the scope of the operation and the number of things that went wrong and caught people's attention. Maybe they tried to do too much on too small an effects budget and second-rate actors, hoping the "reality show" feel of it would compensate, and it did - for a while.
Return to The Question of Fakery
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests