UNMASKING 9/11

[reel.deal]

.

[XxCeltics34xX]

http://letsrollforums.com/breaking-news ... 22909.html

9-11 WTC Attacks Original Sound. Steve Vigilante
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwKQXsXJ ... embedded#!
@ 06:52 >...

So thats what a plane crashing into a building sounds like. I just wish 1 person on earth caught the "item" that hit this god damn building.

P.S.- i thought naudet was the professional, why does this average joe have a better camera?

[reel.deal]

.

[XxCeltics34xX]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bllrX4mOP7o

This guy does a radio show. i think some of the stuff he says makes sense, but some of it is stetching it. Any thoughts?

[reel.deal]

.

[hoi.polloi]

What is that a zoom in of? Is it supposed to be the corner of a tower on the day of 9/11?

[reel.deal]

.

[reel.deal]

.

[hoi.polloi]

lol

Awesome - they moved that bit in the lower right a bit more to the lower right as well. Nice catch. It's all been photoshopped! Awhoo hoo hooo!

[Heiwa]

Amazing! Congratulations. Any more finds?

[simonshack]

Wow. Quite a magnificent find, Reel deal - a real deal you are indeed.

Your find is yet another perfect example of the dreadful problems caused by the 9/11 fakery team's adopted chain-assembly methodology. Just imagine for one moment the difficulties they faced: to produce the amount of collapse imagery "that would be expected to exist" was certainly a daunting and perilous task. Thus, to keep this formidable operation 'manageable', they worked with a limited set of photographic 3D models, altering them just enough to make them appear a little dissimilar from each other - so that they could be "credited" to different cameramen - seemingly placed at (slightly) different vantage points. Here's a case in point (as illustrated in September Clues part F) :

Three shots credited to three professional news photographers:

Of course, you may ask: why not do a better job and make all the collapse shots drastically different? Well, this would have involved infinitely more efforts, calculations and computing power. As we know, it was hard enough for them to make the "plane" shots match in space/time/trajectories with each other (and they even botched those relatively simple composites badly). Now, imagine making all that collapsing debris MATCH in space/time from different points of view...An animator's nightmare! So they went with the "lesser headache", i.e. producing a 'reasonably varied' assortment of shots by toggling/rotating their Auto-Cad settings (or whatever platform was used) by a limited amount of degrees/alterations to obtain the desired quantity of imagery.

[reel.deal]

.

[hoi.polloi]

Please, ANYTHING i raise, thats valid, please use as is, or develop further,
whatever you think.

In that spirit, let me develop the findings you already did so well and point out a few more little "flaws" in this set.

[reel.deal]

.

[hoi.polloi]

Wow - the upper-right 3 columns actually *repair themselves* on the way down to the Marriot. I guess they're getting dressed up to enter the hotel lobby?

What a joke - great find again, reel.deal.