AngelDust wrote:Herr der Elf, you shilly boy! These boats were pasted on the Hudson River, hence their square-ish pixel outlines on zoom in.
Dear AngelDust,
Awesome postings about the square-ish pixel outline (in the fifth picture)! I knew the advanced digital editing skillset of this forum would come in handy. With regards to the smoke itself, anything unusual about it?
The third picture from James Nachtwey ought to be an easy candidate to knock off as fake.
nonhocapito wrote:We are not here to perform for you any sort of demonstration. We are not here to convince you of anything. This never ending Judy Wood issue you guys try to shove down our throats is getting to be seriously emetic, bothersome, pointless and inconclusive, in other words a waste of time -- and our forum has had enough of it.
Don't do anything for me.
Do it for the Truth.
Do it for your own reputations.
Simon Shack is rather forceful with his conclusions that none of the 9/11 imagery can be trusted. The distrust has been proven to be well-earned. But he goes on to insist that
all of the 9/11 imagery was faked.
I'm just humbly asking that it be proved.
And I'm making the task a little bit more manageable by limiting it to just those images Dr. Wood employed.
If the topic of Dr. Wood is truly so
"seriously emetic, bothersome, pointless and inconclusive", then consider the boost in Clues Forum credibility with the mainstream truthers when your crew
legitimately takes out of commission some of the pictorial evidence used by Dr. Judy Wood to support some of her
"zany" theories. That ought to count for something!
Mr. Shack's and your negative opinions regarding Dr. Wood are well known. I'm not here to convince you or this forum of anything. Through your diligence in this task, maybe you'll convince me via the undermining of her evidence that your negative opinions have validity. I welcome such a day!
Alas, even limiting the source images to that re-used by Dr. Wood, I have my doubts that 100% fakes will be reached. I can't even guess what the faked percentage will be, but it'll put everything on more solid footing to know which images are definitely tainted and which images are such great fakes that they are still in the running for depicting reality.
nonhocapito wrote:If you find it more reasonable, more plausible, more likely, more feasible, safer and cheaper to imagine unprovable alleged energy weapons to explain a series of controlled demolitions, rather than simply realizing that anything we have been shown could easily be faked with Hollywood/newsmedia manipulative methods -- then I don't think you belong to this forum, nor you can claim any understanding or appreciation of September Clues. I suggest you go elsewhere.
I'm not here to argue the feasibility of faking imagery. That's not my realm of expertise.
Let's also not have you argue about
"unprovable alleged energy weapons to explain a series of controlled demolitions". This is neither the purpose of this forum nor quite obviously within the realm of your expertise.
Legitimately take out what you can of Dr. Wood's pictorial evidence. The chips will fall from there where they may. That'll be a big accomplishment for which the 9/11 Truth Movement and I will be eternally grateful.