CGI collapse footage

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Heiwa on March 19th, 2012, 11:31 am

That infamous Thomas Nilsson's photo below:
Image
is a fake is easy to see as there are no buildings left/right of WTC2 ... i.e. Thomas forgot to copy/paste something there. Thomas only managed to paste some tree leaves at the bottom. Pathetic! :P
Evidently, the centre - WTC2 top tilting ~20° with smoke pouring out below is 100% CGI! I have asked Thomas where he got the CGI from! No answer ... of course. :lol:
Heiwa
Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 7:20 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Equinox on March 19th, 2012, 11:24 pm

Brutal Metal wrote:If this case EVER does go to trial I nominate Equinox to handle the faked TV collapse footage for the Prosecution...Alongside Simon of course :lol:



Clues Court!



Image

Ahem, And concludes the Irrefutable evidence of CGI planes on 9/11.
And now I present exhibit B, The WTC 2 collapse shot angle….
The WTC2 collapse shot angles are in conflict with each other as I demonstrate….
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby truthseeker on March 20th, 2012, 8:35 pm

ABC has released new photos recently. Has anyone disected these new photos?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYeyHSdeA24
truthseeker
Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 8:51 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby simonshack on March 20th, 2012, 10:31 pm

truthseeker wrote:ABC has released new photos recently. Has anyone disected these new photos?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYeyHSdeA24


Yes - this has all been dissected here: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... r#p2351188
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby truthseeker on March 20th, 2012, 11:25 pm

Dam Simon. It,sso difficult to make a contribution, as you guys are on top of everything.

I will keep trying.
:D
truthseeker
Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: June 30th, 2011, 8:51 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Equinox on March 26th, 2012, 5:36 am

simonshack wrote:I sometimes wonder - after almost half-a-decade of analyzing the 9/11 imagery, just why it took such a long time or me (or anyone) to notice the atrocious crassness of it. There are mysteries aplenty in this world, but this particular mystery (why I didn't fully grasp the evident bogusness of the entire pool of 9/11 imagery) has had me scratching my head for a long while. I now realize that this was all part of the 9/11 plotters' plan.

Back in 2007, I made my very first 9/11 imagery analysis: The Grand TV Illusion. Of course, I wasn't quite content with it: the poor quality video resolution at hand left me wondering if I had pushed too far my interpretation of the given visuals. Perhaps I was just looking at standard video artifacts - caused by digital conversions/compressions?

Luckily, in 2010, the very stupid 9/11 perpetrators decided to release higher-resolution versions of their horrid digital animations. The below HQ frame of this CNN shot is from the NIST-FOIA batch of imagery released in 2010. (Huh? Have you ever asked yourself why NIST would have been sitting on/archiving this 9/11 image pool ? Wouldn't the TV networks have that material stored in their archives? )

Anyways, the below image was supposedly shot from a "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building... How anyone can still believe these are real/genuine images by a broadcast-quality CNN camera is quite beyond me. Note the <<<clear masking line>>> around WTC1:
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u88I0jZ8xYo
Image

Here's a frame of the collapse of WTC2 - supposedly from the same "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building". All I have done here is to apply a brightness/contrast filter to highlight the absurd, pitch black cartoon-outlines around the buildings (and other problems):
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKyHn8pxGo
Image

The 2 above images naturally lead to the following simple and logical conclusion:

NOT ONLY WAS THE IMAGERY OF AN AIRPLANE IMPACTING THE WTC SHOWN ON TV a digital animation, ALSO THE WTC COLLAPSES were digital animations.



Original Frame-- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5, Clip 20 (WTC2 Collapse, 9:59am) CNN
Source--- CNN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKyHn8pxGo
Time--- 0.10 seconds

Original Frame-
Image

A brightness/contrast filter added.
Image

All horizontal/ vertical masking lines/layers now visible.
Image

A zoom in on “WTC1 and 2” And “WTC7”

Image


Highlighted all the masking layers/Lines.
Image

Notice how edge of the “WTC7” roof naturally obscures the “WTC2”
Image

Layers "C" and "D" do actually appear through the WTC-7.
Image


The CNN shot is a fake because-
A)--- It is filled with "horizontal" and "vertical" CGI with masking lines which are clearly visible.
B)---The vertical masking lines “C” and “D” of WTC-2 appear transparent through what is meant to be an obscured section of façade on “WTC- 7 face.”


Image


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cityscape Tutorial---
Understanding how to use layer masks is one of the keys to unlocking the true potential of Photoshop. Once you’ve mastered the use of Layer Masks, the doors to Photoshop are wide open for you to explore.
What are Layer Masks?
Layer masks are key to a versatile, non-destructive workflow. A layer mask is used to mask, or hide, the contents of a layer. A mask can hide the corrections on an adjustment layer, or can hide pixels on a pixel layer. It is important to remember that the masked pixels aren’t eliminated, they are simply hidden. This allows you to refine your layer mask an infinite number of times without damaging your image.

Photoshop Tutorial - Masking the Cityscape
---------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... vtZ0sv94j8

Website--- http://www.mahalo.com/photoshop-tutoria ... cityscape/
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Brutal Metal on March 27th, 2012, 8:43 am

Equinox wrote:
Brutal Metal wrote:If this case EVER does go to trial I nominate Equinox to handle the faked TV collapse footage for the Prosecution...Alongside Simon of course :lol:



Clues Court!



Image

Ahem, And concludes the Irrefutable evidence of CGI planes on 9/11.
And now I present exhibit B, The WTC 2 collapse shot angle….
The WTC2 collapse shot angles are in conflict with each other as I demonstrate….

haha This is Awesome.. SO who is Atta testifying for the prosecution or defense? Give him immunity (since he didn't do anything :lol: ) to spill the beans on the Whole ShhBangg!! :D
Brutal Metal
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: July 22nd, 2010, 4:58 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Equinox on March 27th, 2012, 10:41 am

If Atta was actually a real person… (hmmm was he?) :ph34r:
He is there representing his defense, from these crazy accusations that he flew a 767 commercial airliner…

To propose that a Boeing 767 airliner exceeded its designed limit speed of 360 knots by 127 mph to fly through the air at 540 mph is simply not possible. It is not possible because of the thrust required and it's not possible because of the engine fan design which precludes accepting the amount of dense air being forced into it.

Great read--- viewtopic.php?f=17&t=467&start=195#p2367249



My post on the subject--- viewtopic.php?f=17&t=467&start=195#p2367250
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Equinox on March 27th, 2012, 12:19 pm

simonshack wrote:*
ENJOY... <_<



Image



Image

Would not be suprised... B)
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Ugo_da_Lugo on March 30th, 2012, 1:28 pm

Brutal Metal wrote:
Equinox wrote:
Brutal Metal wrote:If this case EVER does go to trial I nominate Equinox to handle the faked TV collapse footage for the Prosecution...Alongside Simon of course :lol:


Clues Court!

Image
haha This is Awesome.. SO who is Atta testifying for the prosecution or defense? Give him immunity (since he didn't do anything :lol: ) to spill the beans on the Whole ShhBangg!! :D


Falsis in unum, falsis in omnibus
You ask - "SO who is Atta testifying for the prosecution or defense? "
The answer is he is NOT testifying at all - he isn't even there!
Examine the so-called "courtroom" scene photo more carefully and you will see that the entire image is a Photoshopped FAKE. A COMPOSITE - Look at the FAKED in yellow shirt. Look at the fingers of the prosecutor holding the photo - its shopped in. I contend that there NEVER WAS A TRIAL. There was NO Atta trial becuase there's NO ATTA. It was a CGI confabulation just like everything else.
Image
Image
Image
Ugo_da_Lugo
Member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: March 28th, 2010, 12:11 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby simonshack on March 30th, 2012, 1:48 pm

Ugo_da_Lugo wrote:Image
Examine the so-called "courtroom" scene photo more carefully and you will see that the entire image is a Photoshopped FAKE. A COMPOSITE - Look at the FAKED in yellow shirt.


No kidding, Ugo? FAKE, is it? Hmmmm.........But that doesn't necessarily mean that the ENTIRE picture is fake , does it? What if ATTA is real - and all the rest of the picture is fake? :lol: :lol: :lol:

( Oh wait...*urghh* - didn't Mr. Atta vaporize as he slammed into the WTC with his hijacked Flight 11? Damn - I'm confused! :P )

Dear Ugo: I dearly hope your post was sarcastic - and that I AM the one that didn't get it( the subtle humor involved).
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby hollycrap on March 30th, 2012, 2:05 pm

Image


:P
hollycrap
Member
 
Posts: 223
Joined: March 25th, 2012, 2:04 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby reel.deal on March 30th, 2012, 2:57 pm

MOHAMMAD ATTA - WAS FAKED !!!! ??? !!! :huh: :blink: :o

Image
check it out ! 2nd drivers licence expires same day as MATRIX Neo's passport ! B)
waddaya mean yr not gonna need to renew ?!?
:huh:

Image

Image
wassa matter, M.Atta ? nah! the new hair takes years off ya !
'nother 'virgin screwdriver', hamed ?


http://www.cluesforum.info/posting.php? ... &p=2362191

:P
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1295
Joined: August 15th, 2010, 1:42 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby Equinox on March 31st, 2012, 11:30 am

Equinox wrote:
simonshack wrote:*
ENJOY... <_<



Image



Image

Would not be suprised... B)


not suprised slightly

number 9 --
Image

source- Barry Weiss http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZUcom0hUxk
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Postby simonshack on March 31st, 2012, 3:28 pm

*

DUST IN THE WIND

Allright folks: we are going to make a chronological comparison of the dust seen (or not seen) on the MILLENIUM HOTEL's eastern façade in various WTC2 collapse images. The first two images below (3 and 5 seconds into the WTC2 collapse) show the dust allright - although it is inexplicably quite differently distributed on the MILLENIUM east façade. So these first two images are already in absurd conflict with each other:

Image
"BEN REISMAN" video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SD2DBUJl0OM

Next, here are two frames from a video credited to "Barry Weiss". At approx 9 seconds into the WTC2 collapse, there seems to be no dust whatsoever to be seen on the Millenium's eastern façade!
Image

In fact, the dust starts appearing progressively only a few seconds later. Here is a frame from approx 15seconds into the collapse:
Image
"BARRY WEISS" video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZUcom0hUxk
(NOTE: the WEISS video starts with the collapse already underway. However, it is possible to make out with reasonable accuracy that the video starts between 5 or 6 seconds into the collapse.)

Ok: so far, we may say that all of the three above shots are in conflict with each other. Who of the three authors credited with these images is a fraud?
AMY SANCETTA? BEN REISMAN? BARRY WEISS? Or perhaps - all three of them? Well, if we are to believe that TOM MIUCCIO's footage of the WTC2 collapse is real and legit - ALL THREE OF THEM must be frauds:

Image
"TOM MIUCCIO" video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN95E76mtMM

TOM MIUCCIO shows us a spotless MILLENNIUM hotel - NO DUST AT ALL appears to have reached its eastern façade during the first 17secs of the WTC2 collapse! But hey, would you buy a used car from TOM MIUCCIO ?... <_< Could possibly ALL FOUR be frauds? Is this not the most plausible conclusion?

Maybe we should print out some new T-shirts, folks?
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

PreviousNext

Return to SEPTEMBER CLUES: the 9/11 psyop exposed: the media aired a "Made-for-TV Hollywood movie"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests