JR seems to point in the direction of media fakery in his writings but then veer away from it as a possibility leaving very incomplete conclusions in all his writings on Sandy Hook. Time and again I've read this stuff expecting him to draw the obvious conclusion but he conspicuously fails to do so. What the reasons are for this don't matter to me, whatever they are his writings while somewhat compelling remain an obstruction to getting to the heart of the matter.Utah wrote:Res,resolution wrote:An interesting article from John Rappoport:
John doesn't seem to understand media fakery, but he is very much against psychiatry and thinks it will be used to diagnose large proportions of the population with mental illnesses to prevent them from getting access to guns. Unfortunately he seems to still believe in Alex Jones's crew. Someone like him would be useful if he supported September Clues.Sandy Hook: Mind control achieved through the “information flicker effect”
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/ ... er-effect/
While this article does make some interesting points about the tactics of manipulation employed by the news media, we would be fools not to recognize this clown as a gatekeeper. Rappoport:
1) runs a site called nomorefakenews.com, but doesn't understand media fakery???
2) vouches for Asshat Jones??
3) highlights media manipulation of the Newtown 'shooting', but ignores that the event itself is a fabrication, asserting that the smiling Newtown parents are brainwashed ((i.e. not actors in a fraud)
And, for only $125, he will reveal to you the secrets of the Matrix
Just as with 9/11 those writers who advocate "conspiracy" as the cause for the events serve only to preclude any discussion of whether on not such events in fact happened. The perps behind this event want the focus to remain on shooters, manner of death number of bullets etc rather than on the larger question of Real vs Fake.
There was some speculation as to whether or not Carver is the real Medical Examiner or an actor. The more I view his behavior it is easy to see it as that of someone forced to lie on a massive scale to a worldwide audience.
For me one of the most ludicrous parts of the story is the notion that all 20 "children" were cremated without the parents having the opportunity to see the bodies. In real life were that to have happened 20 Newtown families would retain 20 or more of the most rabid pitbull lawyers in the NYC area and begin suing everyone in sight. Rather than bullshit about visions and closure they would be funneling their inexhaustible grief into a blinding seething rage directed at every institution and individual in the least way responsible for this happening. It would be brutal and ugly and there would be no happy talk if this were real. There would be no laughing kids on the Obama's lap and smiling parents, some would end up detained for going off verbally on the President if in fact any of this garbage were real.
The Diane Sawyers and their bosses are trying to rewrite our understanding of death and grief with this endless stream of brave smiling vicsim survivors finding "hope" in their bullshit foundations and memories and smiling recollections. In total it numbs and further dumbs an already stupid and exhausted populace and sets us up for the next round. They know that whatever they have scripted can not be refuted by way of texts and tweets and these along with grunts and crotch grabbing are pretty much the only means of communication available to a large and rapidly growing segment of the populace.