Are you sure because here is the latest number ... Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #91,762 in Booksomaxsteve wrote:Guess which book made it onto the "Movers and Shakers" list :
http://bookstowatch.blogspot.ca/2012/12 ... -foal.html
on December 19th it ranked 3,456 on December 20th 383rd on the list. An amazing 800% increase in sales in ONE day. less than a week after her child died, Mrs Lewis was pretty much doing a book tour.
Funny that there are more than 70 reviews on Amazon but not a single review on books.google.com
Anyway it seems as if the book was published in 2009 by Booksurge LLC.
Pathetic.
Regards,
Steve O.
SANDY HOOK: Newtown, CT—“School Shooting”: December 14, 2012
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
DIVORCE PAPERS FOUND
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
What do you mean ,, by asking if I am sure? The link to the url is right on the page. It seems like the success of the book was just fleeting, my guess is that Mrs . Lewis and her book were showcased on some national media show and many people purchased her book to "honour" her murdered sim child.Ahatmose wrote:Are you sure because here is the latest number ... Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #91,762 in Booksomaxsteve wrote:Guess which book made it onto the "Movers and Shakers" list :
http://bookstowatch.blogspot.ca/2012/12 ... -foal.html
on December 19th it ranked 3,456 on December 20th 383rd on the list. An amazing 800% increase in sales in ONE day. less than a week after her child died, Mrs Lewis was pretty much doing a book tour.
Funny that there are more than 70 reviews on Amazon but not a single review on books.google.com
Anyway it seems as if the book was published in 2009 by Booksurge LLC.
Pathetic.
Regards,
Steve O.
regards,
Steve O.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Ok it is gone ... I have managed to knock that chip on your shoulder off ... Honestly can't believe the hostile tone of the posters on this site ...
What do you mean ,, by asking if I am sure? The link to the url is right on the page. It seems like the success of the book was just fleeting, my guess is that Mrs . Lewis and her book were showcased on some national media show and many people purchased her book to "honour" her murdered sim child.
regards,
Steve O.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Where did u find these?Ahatmose wrote:DIVORCE PAPERS FOUND
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Ahatmose wrote:DIVORCE PAPERS FOUND
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
Seems odd there would be a delineated 'box' into which two children's names may be written.
How many Divorcing Coupled have "two" children? Vis-a-vie, more than two?
Why would the form have that format? And what does the Court do, when there are three or more children?
Anyway, forging an original Document of that kind would not ve very difficult.
Forging a copy based on an image of an original, far easier yet.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Wings wrote:Ahatmose wrote:DIVORCE PAPERS FOUND
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
Seems odd there would be a deliniated 'box' into which two children's names may be written.
How many Divorcing Coupled have "two" children? Vis-a-vie, more than two?
Why would the form have that format? And what does the Court do, when there are three or more children?
Anyway, forging an original Document of that kind would not ve very difficult.
Forging a copy based on an image of an original, far easier yet.
Connecticut Superior Court
You can do a data base search on name or docket number. The docket number is 8 digits and I couldn't find that so I searched on the name Peter Lanza and got a hit. What you are looking for is FA, or Family Court:
http://www.jud.ct(dot)gov/external/super/ Sorry for the inconvenience but I have a personal policy of never "hot-linking" to da man.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:36 pm
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
Thanks for the info on the reported date of birth for Ryan J Lanza. I have now confirmed that there is NO RECORD OF HIS BIRTH ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY.Ahatmose wrote:DIVORCE PAPERS FOUND
Hi all I have no idea who found these or where but here is proof positive one would have to concede that there were indeed two Lanza children. This document would be tough to fake.
Here is one of about 26 pages ...
I can post more if anyone wants them.
However it seems to me we have seen another version of this and there was only one child listed ... although this one looks authentic.
Weird
.
-
- Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
This is what the original form looks like:
http://www.jud.ct.gov/webforms/forms/fm177.pdf
There is a box with five lines available for childrens names.
The copy of the form posted above has been altered, and more important the second page which indicates which parent is to get custody of the child(ren) and the visitation rights has been (purposely?) omitted.
***** Sorry, the link to the form provided byby Ahatmose on February 2nd, 2013, 12:46 pm
Divorce papers can be downloaded here ... http://www.scribd.com/doc/117174624/2687-001
does contain the balance of the form ,and does seem to provide evidence that there were two children)
regards,
Steve O.
http://www.jud.ct.gov/webforms/forms/fm177.pdf
There is a box with five lines available for childrens names.
The copy of the form posted above has been altered, and more important the second page which indicates which parent is to get custody of the child(ren) and the visitation rights has been (purposely?) omitted.
***** Sorry, the link to the form provided byby Ahatmose on February 2nd, 2013, 12:46 pm
Divorce papers can be downloaded here ... http://www.scribd.com/doc/117174624/2687-001
does contain the balance of the form ,and does seem to provide evidence that there were two children)
regards,
Steve O.
Last edited by omaxsteve on Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
My ass.This document would be tough to fake.
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
NY Times interviews first responders:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/nyreg ... ted=1&_r=3&
Of course none of it makes any sense. There's so much BS in this article but I'll just point out the whopper:
“You saw them lifeless, laying down,” Officer Penna recalled. “For a split second, your mind says could this be a mock crime scene, could this be fake, but in the next split second, you’re saying, there is no way. This is real.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/nyreg ... ted=1&_r=3&
Of course none of it makes any sense. There's so much BS in this article but I'll just point out the whopper:
“You saw them lifeless, laying down,” Officer Penna recalled. “For a split second, your mind says could this be a mock crime scene, could this be fake, but in the next split second, you’re saying, there is no way. This is real.”
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
I don't think anyone has posted this yet and I'm not sure what to make of the website either way but perhaps worth discussing. I'm currently looking at the Calendar section:
http://newtown.sandyhook.schooldesk.net/
http://newtown.sandyhook.schooldesk.net/
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: SANDY HOOK Newtown,Ct School Shooting 14 dec 2012
For goodness sakes, can people please stop just posting every single thing about the SANDY HOOK hoax? Let's show a little more restraint than the Internet at large and post some thoughtful critiques.
Posting a black and white document or a website and saying, "I am fascinated by this" does not constitute the purpose of our site.
And please tell me - no wait don't tell me, this is rhetorical - in what way is a text document difficult to fake or an indication of anything when the government controls the entire fucking media and injects hundreds of fake pictures into any given PsyOp to invent personages whole cloth? Why do we keep returning to people finders, government web sites, birth or death or a hundred other "certificates", and/or digital online records and claim this is "evidence"? Have we got Stockholm Syndrome?! Aye aye aye!
Posting a black and white document or a website and saying, "I am fascinated by this" does not constitute the purpose of our site.
And please tell me - no wait don't tell me, this is rhetorical - in what way is a text document difficult to fake or an indication of anything when the government controls the entire fucking media and injects hundreds of fake pictures into any given PsyOp to invent personages whole cloth? Why do we keep returning to people finders, government web sites, birth or death or a hundred other "certificates", and/or digital online records and claim this is "evidence"? Have we got Stockholm Syndrome?! Aye aye aye!