Germany, Nazism, and Germanic people in general have come up a lot in the perps' plans (major bank transfers?) in the fog of war. We've had the sinking of the Lusitania (we can probably assume was as fake as the Titanic myth), the Hindenberg mock disaster (only ever with similar "photos" of the so-called event), the rise and fall of the Reichs, central roles in the Great War and its sequel, and to this day we are bombarded with "evil Nazi" propaganda in the movies of our times. Our times, which is a good half-century since the end of World War Deux!
Lately, one can see a spate of strange but subtle demonizations of Germany in the news, and I wonder if this is another wave of subconscious vitriol spat at the high-drama nation or if it is part of a concerted effort.
In alleged history of the "modern world", Germans are famously tied to the biggest hoaxes of the biggest wars — including perpetuation of the 'Holohoax', helping the U.S.A. launch NASA, and giving us the atomic prankster Albert Einstein. In even the most modern of children's cartoons, we still find it easy to create evil mad scientists with Germanic/Jewish sounding names for the hero characters to humiliate for sounding German, or pummel. In the news, we see Merkel dramatically "exposing" the NSA wire-tapping (if that was even a real exposure or meant to be another dividing incident for American/Western polarization) and "American spies" caught giving "secret documents" to the United States as if to divide German interests further from Israel/U.S.A. In sports, we are now seeing old World War 2 drama rivals Germany and the Netherlands conveniently entering the World Cup's semi-finals together, presumably to face off.
It makes me wonder: just what is it about the German character that makes the Anglo-Israeli-Zionist empire seethe with hatred and mistrust of Germans throughout its culture? Is this rivalry real, fake or somewhere in between? Is it comparable to the other strange pseudo-rivalry of U.S.A.-Russia?
---
It makes me wonder if government leaders pretend to collude on big hoaxes for the sake of setting the stage for their truly hostile negotiations between one another. In other words, I'm speculating that "leaders" of all countries actually are the rather nasty, power-hungry people we oft expect them to be, there is some truth to the rivalries depicted in war scenarios, but each of their mutual enemies is a united population against their antics reorganizing just who those "leaders" will be. As such, to retain their position as lead actor in the game, their goal as "leaders" is to retain perfect poise between appearing to be peacemaking, trustworthy people by maintaining the fear-mongering hoaxes that cause people to elect them, and at the same time, playing cutthroat with their fellows all maintaining the same mob-belief in the hoaxes (the 'base' for their so-called power) and trying to 'knock them out of the ring' by releasing PR campaigns against one another using military intelligence.
If this is what leaders get caught up in doing, just to maintain their tenuous jobs, you can imagine why it would be easy for a colluding world press and banking system to control all world leaders. Propaganda is the biggest power of them all.