CitronBleu wrote:This person made a presentation last year but I did attend.
I think you might mean "but I did
not attend," right?
CitronBleu wrote:FV I sent you a pm.
I am not completely familiar with the 911 thread.
What is the generally accepted view on CF on the presence of people in the towers upon the described impacts ? And upon the public helping out in any recovery effort ?
Thanks
CitronBleu, please don't play stupid with me if that's what you are doing. By multiple angles I obviously mean get multiple people to be there with their own phones/cameras recording video, as I suggested, so we know you were there instead of just getting assigned to do a video release of a pre-rendered and staged video. That was part of my (perhaps unclear) comment that you should have both multiple angles and multiple people getting them.
Basically, prove you were there recording and that famed poser was there as well, after it happens.
Generally, there is not any particular view we all share. Some people think the towers were empty. Some people think there was some control used to get people out. I think few rational people can assume there was much left to chance in such a huge operation. Stories of people surfing out of the towers on piles of rubble are absolutely rubbish.
For fuck's sake, did somebody behind the curtain push an "activate all hidden shills" button, or what? This should be a relatively straightforward thing, right? If you are curious about the truth and you understand the concept of researching things and providing proofs so that others understand the truth, you go about making sure there is as little room for deception as possible.
Is this difficult to understand?
I appreciate that people are reporting 'local events' and offering to report on them, but just look at the sheer lengths gone to
fake such things in the recent past and you'll understand that all you have to do to prove it isn't faked is just go a
little extra further than
normal behavior would dictate — in any way, considering your own wise judgment and rationale — in showing you are
not faking it, that you have genuinely relevant and informed questions, that you are not being swayed by the lies, and that you can offer something to the public besides more mystery and confusion.
It is not that difficult to see how pathetic the modern media is when they can't even ask a hard question, and they allow themselves to be shamed for asking it. Asking hard questions is exactly what we should be doing.
Not: "Duh, so, are you related to the other sim that shares your same name?"
Fuuuuuck.
More like, hey —
Prove you are who you say you are. Prove you were there. Prove you haven't been paid to stand here and give this spiel to school children. What are you doing around all these people telling them what happened without addressing the proofs of TV fakery? Why are you targeting schools?
Challenge the paid liars, actors and agents, especially when they are trying to take hold of our culture the way they are! Don't be shy. These people are brazen liars. Make them squirm. And get it "on tape" as they say.