Arctic News and the Diagram of DOOM

[hoi.polloi]

Atop the highest heights of global warming or climate change fear rests the doom date of 2031 for the beginning of extinction of all life on Earth.


http://arctic-news.blogspot.com.au/p/gl ... human.html

According to this article entitled Global Extinction within one Human Lifetime as a Result of a Spreading Atmospheric Arctic Methane Heat wave and Surface Firestorm by a Sam Carana,

The life time from the almost instantaneous injection of methane into the atmosphere in 2010 is also shown ... this has been extended by 6 percent to 15.9 years to take account of increased methane concentrations in the future (IPCC, 1992b). This data set can be used to set up the likely start position for the extinction event from the large methane emissions in 2010.

Important data was discovered by those harbingers of plastic optimism that brought us the space program, the cold war, the communist scare, the nuclear weapons hoax (and on and on, et cetera, et cetera) Russia and the United States:

The cause of this sudden anomalous increase in the concentration of atmospheric methane at Svalbard has been seen on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf where a recent Russian - U.S. expedition has found widespread, continuous powerful methane seepages into the atmosphere from the subsea methane hydrates with the methane plumes (fountains or torches) up to 1 km across producing an atmospheric methane concentration 100 times higher than normal (Connor, 2011).

Well, folks, what is the solution besides kissing our asses good-bye? According to Arctic News, the United States and Russian governments might be able to save us all if those two countries specifically ...

immediately develop a net of powerful radio beat frequency transmission stations around the Arctic using the critical 13.56 MHZ beat frequency to break down the methane in the stratosphere and troposphere to nanodiamonds and hydrogen (Light 2011a) . Besides the elimination of the high global warming potential methane, the nanodiamonds may form seeds for light reflecting noctilucent clouds in the stratosphere and a light coloured energy reflecting layer when brought down to the Earth by snow and rain (Light 2011a). HAARP transmission systems are able to electronically vibrate the strong ionospheric electric current that feeds down into the polar areas and are thus the least evasive method of directly eliminating the buildup of methane in those critical regions (Light 2011a).

The warning about extinction is stark. It is remarkable that global scientists had not anticipated a giant buildup of methane in the atmosphere when it had been so clearly predicted 10 to 20 years ago and has been shown to be critically linked to extinction events in the geological record (Kennett et al. 2003).

Well I'll be! So, HAARP must expand its program to the arctic circle. To save the world!

Contributors to this site include the following thumbnails, though shy Sam apparently decided to skip out for lunch on 'send in a tiny, awkward, highly compressed photo' day:

Contributors237x588-Oct-2013.jpg (48.84 KiB) Viewed 10963 times

Sam is also the author of the Diagram of Doom, given here:

Diagram of Doom (white), Sep 9, 2012.jpg (60.28 KiB) Viewed 10962 times

(http://arctic-news.blogspot.com.au/2012 ... -doom.html)

Is this one news item avoided for any particular reason? Besides possibly causing mass suicide?

From a traditional conspiracy standpoint (okay, that is a hilarious term), if there really is an elite plan to curb population growth, would informing people of this not help their plan? Would it not inspire birth control? Or is the idea that it would cause 'panic sex' and a generation of panic babies? (Or are we the generation of 'panic babies', if you know what I mean?)

[bostonterrierowner]

It's the beginning of extinction of all life in our wallets

For the time being let's just start wrapping our asses in plastic bags to curb "emissions"

[hoi.polloi]

Don't you know bostonterrierowner, this is how the astronauts — sorry — dinosaurs went extinct as well? By farting the Earth up into flames. So with any luck, the liquid slime of all life on Earth will be refined into the plastic bags wrapped around the next species' asses.

[brianv]

This data set can be used to set up the likely start position for the extinction event from the large methane emissions in 2010.

They've been reading Fetzer or maybe measuring his emissions.

[simonshack]

*

Funny - I just noticed we don't even have a general / specific "CLIMATE CHANGE" or "GLOBAL WARMING" thread on this forum.

So I'll just post this little "educational" clip here - it's kinda cool... er, I mean, hot.

Video description:

This exerpt is from the well known educational documentary "Unchained Goddess" produced by Frank Capra for Bell Labs for their television program "The Bell Telephone Hour." It was so well made, that it went on to live a continued life in middle school science classrooms across the nation for decades.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lgzz-L7GFg

Funniest (or saddest) of all is that the person who uploaded this on Youtube seems to imply that this old 1958 propaganda trash is ...uh... damning proof that (in his own words) "for FIFTY YEARS scientists have known about global warming."

[Critical Mass]

*
Funny - I just noticed we don't even have a general / specific "CLIMATE CHANGE" or "GLOBAL WARMING" thread on this forum.

Incredible when you think about it isn't it... in 'the Matrix' climate change is still an ongoing (& never ending) 'debate'.

Yet on this site the whole thing is so obviously media driven we don't even bother to point out it's probably a total hoax!

There's probably a whole range of topics like that... hoaxes so obvious (or longstanding... or forgotten) that they're not even on this site.

Yet when you think about it they're probably 'easy wins' to prove (or disprove)... I'm reminded of how quickly you ended the Moon Hoax 'debate' or the JFK 'debate'.

[ICfreely]

The Myth of the ‘Greenhouse Gas Effect’

Question: What do you get when you cross a mountain climber with a mosquito?

Answer: Nothing. You can’t cross a scalar with a vector!

NASA’s high priest of climatology (James E. Hansen) is full of hot air (pun intended). He used math-a-magics to create the illusion of GHE.

“Now this is where the 'joke' comes into play and we need to remember the old saying: “You can’t mix apples with oranges.” Hansen's team took the 288°K scalar number (the 'apple') with a one-dimensional basis and put it alongside the 255°K vector number (the 'orange'), the product of a flow field in three dimensions. “So what?” you may say. Well, remember what was stated at the top of this article? Hansen had *forgotten* that “you can't cross a scalar with a vector." Again, please remember this is an axiomatic principle from Physics 101: “vector and scalar quantities cannot be added together.”” – John O’Sullivan
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com ... e-gas.html

The result, of course, is the all too familiar Masonic 33 Degree K ‘Greenhouse Gas Effect.’ Climate Change/Global warming is based on absolute nonsense. Any self-respecting science-minded person who does not acknowledge the absurdity of ‘GHE’ is a victim of the Cult of Scientism (A Religion based on lies)!

The Religion of ‘Climate Change’

“Man-made global warming is an earth-worshiping religion. The essential feature of any religion is that its pronouncements are to be accepted on faith, as opposed to hard evidence. And as with most religions, it is susceptible to the earthly temptations of money, power, politics, arrogance, and deceit.” – W.A. Beatty
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles ... rming.html


“Only the relatively elderly can remember the cynical haste with which the scaremongers dropped the “coming ice age” and embraced exactly the opposite prediction, but aimed at the same culprit – industry. This was in Britain, which was the cradle of the new belief and was a response to the derision resulting from the searing summer of 1976. The father of the new religion was Sir Crispin Tickell…” – John Brignell
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/religion.htm

You know for a fact that Global Cooling, Global Warming, Anthropogenic Global Warming, Climate Change or whatever the Church of Scientocracy decides to call it this week, is a RELIGION when you come across articles like this from the BBC, and the Guardian:

Religious talk to fight climate change - BBC
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pageto ... 3.stm?ad=1

Global warming tribunal may stoke debate that climate change is based on belief, not science – The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... ge-beliefs

And you know the high priests of the Church of Scientocracy are feeling the heat when they concede:

Royal Society issues new climate change guide that admits there are ‘uncertainties’ about the science – The Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z111OVL0ja

There are no uncertainties about their ‘science.’ The only certainty is they will continue their non-stop production of pseudoscience.

When someone - brainwashed by the liars - calls you a denier take it as a compliment!

[ICfreely]

On a website which boldly claims to be “The world’s most viewed site on global warming and climate change” two high priests of climatology (Ben Herman & Roger A. Pielke Sr.) attempt to explain misconceptions on “The Greenhouse Effect.” They repeat the same old & tired mantra:

“For those that might still question this conclusion, consider taking away the atmosphere from the Earth, but change nothing else, i.e., keep the solar albedo the same (the lack of clouds would of course change this), and calculate the equilibrium temperature of the Earth’s surface. If you’ve done your arithmetic correctly, you should have come up with something like 255 K. But with the atmosphere, it is about 288 K, 33 degrees warmer. This is the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere.”

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/23/q ... se-effect/


They make no mention of scalars/vectors. What’s up with that? I suppose petty algebraic incongruities are beneath master math-a-magicians such as themselves. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, two climatologists have this to say about the pontiff of climatology's doomsday CGI models:


“As the head of NASA's Weather and Climate Research Program from 1982 to 1994, John Theon was James Hansen's supervisor. Theon says that Hansen's testimony in 1988 was "a huge embarrassment" to NASA, and he remains skeptical of Hansen's predictions. "I don't have much faith in the models," Theon says, pointing to the "huge uncertainty in the role clouds play." Theon describes Hansen as a "nice, likeable fellow," but worries "he's been overcome by his belief--almost religious--that he's going to save the world."”

“William Gray, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University, also describes Hansen's belief in a man-made global-warming catastrophe as "almost religious" and says he "never understood how [Hansen] got such a strong voice" in the debate. Gray's efforts to predict hurricanes also lead him to question Hansen's computer models. "He doesn't have the clouds in right, and he doesn't have the deep ocean circulation," Gray says. "It's a giant scam in my view."”

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/06/ ... aster.html


I agree with Dr. Theon. It is a huge embarrassment to NASA. No one does a better job of discrediting NASA than NAS-holes themselves. And, no, it’s not almost religious. It’s the epitome of faith-based religious dogmatism. I agree with Dr. Gray as well. It most certainly is a giant scam!