THE NUKE HOAX

Global War deceptions & mass manipulation, fear-mongering terror schemes and propaganda in the Age of the Bomb
patrix
Member
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by patrix » Fri Mar 29, 2019 10:38 pm

The good old fifties when you could buy your very own Atomic energy lab...

Image

SacredCowSlayer
Administrator
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: The MOON HOAX

Unread post by SacredCowSlayer » Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:59 am

[Note by SCS: I moved this post here—given just how much (even more) money is in play concerning this topic.]
Altair » April 13th, 2019, 5:12 am wrote:As much as most of what NASA does is fake, its budget is real for sure. Maybe its just a giant fund diversion scheme . . .
Yes, and you may also consider just where (or, to whom) the money appropriated for “nukes” has gone for however many decades.

Not to derail—as this comment could just have easily been placed in that thread.

Now, I wonder what retail chain(s) (and other ostensibly private businesses) this “diversion scheme” has been used to prop up . . .

pov603
Member
Posts: 848
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by pov603 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:03 am

https://www.oilandgas360.com/bechtel-co ... ompletion/

So the Chernobyl “confinement” comes to an end (or a beginning) exactly 33 years to the day after the event, hmmmm...how apt...
Can’t wait to see the ones planned for Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Fukushima...

Farcevalue
Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:21 am

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by Farcevalue » Mon May 06, 2019 11:35 am

Nice work if you can get it
And you can get it if you try - George Gershwin
https://www.ucsusa.org/publications/ask ... -cost.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/08/heres-h ... costs.html

No "new" bombs since the 1990s, but "refurbishing" (speaking of which, I am hesitant about using refurbished hard drives in critical new computer builds, but whatever. As long as its factory refurbished I guess) an old one costs a mere $20 million.

And $5 trillion to date on nuclear. If you're going to hoax, hoax big.

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6954
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by simonshack » Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:05 pm

*
A pair of Ka-Boom mushrooms B)
Image

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by ICfreely » Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:56 am

File this under:

"Keeping Them Honest!"


Iranian press review: Exiled crown prince's support for US sanctions causes outcry
Meanwhile, interior minister confirms security forces shot at demonstrators' heads during November's unrest, and luxury house market still thriving in Tehran despite sanctions
By MEE correspondent
Published date: 19 December 2019

Iranians condemn crown prince's backing of US embargo

An interview by Reza Pahlavi, the older son of Iran’s last king, voicing support for the US’ policy of maximum pressure on Iran, has caused anger among Iranians.

In an interview with Newsweek, Pahlavi, who resides in the US and is addressed by his supporters as the crown prince of Iran, said that “Iranians understand Trump sanctions” and suggested that the nuclear deal signed by the Barack Obama adminstration had been “disastrous”.


The interview quickly caused a backlash, with many social media users condemning his comments at a time when ordinary Iranians are bearng the burden of a devastating US embargo on Iran.

In reaction to the interview, Iranian foreign policy analyst Amir Ali Abolfath wrote on Twitter: “Those who say today that ‘Iranians understand Trump sanctions’, tomorrow will say that ‘Iranians will also understand Trump bombings’ and also ‘the parade of Trump’s soldiers on Iran’s soil’.

Pahlavi’s comments also renewed speculation about the amount of money that the royal family pulled out of Iran when they fled the country one month before the 1979 revolution.

An Iranian social media user wrote on Twitter that Pahlavi was pleased by the sanctions because “he had pulled out enough [money from Iran] that he has been eating and sleeping for the past 40 years, without the slightest understanding of [what it means to] have hungry children and wife”.

Meanwhile, a BBC Persian journalist posted on Twitter a 2015 interview with Pahlavi in which the former king's son supported the 2015 nuclear deal, saying that he believed that “having an agreement with Iran, is better than no agreement”.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iran ... ses-outcry

Hmmm…

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by ICfreely » Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:49 pm

File this under:


Nukes & Satellites: "you so two-thousand and late"

The Black Eyed Peas - Boom Boom Pow (Official Music Video)

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m48GqaOz90
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m48GqaOz90

Mansur
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: THE NUKE HOAX

Unread post by Mansur » Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:44 am

I don’t know when and how the term “nuke” has been used for the first time, was it contemporary with the after-WWII propaganda or not, but in the following citation seems to be a strange coincidence.

(We are at about 1700 in feudal Japan:)
“…Sekiun was then already past sixty when I, Ichiun, twenty-eight years old, came to him as pupil. During the five years of tutorship under Sekiun, I applied myself most earnestly and assiduously to the art of swordsmanship, which was now taught by the old master in the form newly synthesized with the principle and practice of Zen. When I thought I was finally ready to try my attainment with the master, I challenged him, and at each of the three contests we were engaged in, the outcome was what was called ‘ai-nuke’.”

(Ai-nuke is a new term in swordplay. When the contestants are of equal caliber and proficiency the game as it is generally played finishes with an ai-uchi, which, when it is carried on with real steel, means killing each other. An ai-nuke, however, does not at all involve any kind of killing or hurting each other, as nuke means, not “striking down” as uchi does, but “passing by,” or “going through” unhurt. When, therefore, Ichiun had his tests with Sekiun, his teacher, neither of them was at all hurt though they were of equal attainment. There was no “striking down” on either side. Each “escaped” without being defeated in any sense of the word…)
Also, the Japanese “nuke” is certainly a two-syllable word and its present English spelling may be from later time or simply the author’s invention by writing his book in 1958 (D. T. Suzuki - Zen and Japanese Culture, can be found at the archive dot org); - sorry, I can not check it up.

Isn’t the idea, additionally, of “mutual striking-down or killing” (the “ai-uchi”), too, a really M.A.D. one?

Post Reply