Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$

[rusty]

Weightlessness occurs only, when distance to the center of gravity diminishes with exact acceleration of free fall. Period.

Just adding "Period" to the end of a sentence doesn't make it so.

Back to empirical reasoning, for a heavier father the shoulder harness will have to work harder, than for a little child. Meaning, the centrifugal forces are not equal for objects of different mass.

Nor are the gravitational forces. Mass is absolutely irrelevant here, as it is can be removed from the forces on both sides of the equation. I know this can be tricky to figure out. The centrifugal force, in vector terms, is just the difference between the straight line (the route the object wants to travel due to it's current velocity) and the curved line (the one it is forced to travel).

Oh, by the way, the Moon also orbits the Earth and the "canceling out" should take place there, as well. Where is the "weightlessness" here? Conclusion - weightlessness has nothing to do with the "cancellation", only with "falling" (in relative terms).

The moon, in this prevalent model, is an object with enough mass to create its own gravitational field (as opposed to any artificial spacecraft). But yes, due to orbiting, neither earth's gravity nor its centrifugal force play any significant role.

Trust me, the theoretical model of all this has thoroughly been checked and I doubt it will be possible to find any significant flaw with it. The only flaw is....at least as far I believe...it does probably not match reality.

[sharpstuff]

It will be interesting to see how this plays out:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinas-out-of-control-19000-pound-space-station-crashing-to-earth-in-march_2406638.html

We might find a few bits for the mantle-shelf, or not...

[hoi.polloi]

It will be interesting to see how this plays out:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinas-out-of-control-19000-pound-space-station-crashing-to-earth-in-march_2406638.html

We might find a few bits for the mantle-shelf, or not...

Once more, the "space programs" are about politics and not science. The end of the article clearly tells us what this "science event" is really meant for us to think about:

The incident was also taken as a military threat. The Chinese regime’s space program is run by its military. The regime’s willingness to cause this kind of destruction in space without warning was seen as a threat to satellites belonging to countries around the globe, The Washington Post reported.

“It’s unfortunate that China is going down this path,” said a U.S. official after the incident, via the Post. “No one has done this in over 20 years, and in that time, international cooperation in space has come so far. It is a bustling commercial, scientific and research arena. This sort of thing is such a throwback to the Cold War.”

The first paragraph reads:
A 19,000-pound space station that the Chinese regime admits to having lost control of in 2016 will crash land somewhere on Earth this March, experts predicted.

If the article had any truth to it, it would be more likely to read:
A 19,000-pound space station story that the Chinese regime admits to having thematically written to have lost control of in 2016 will is being directed to crash land somewhere on Earth this March, experts global military intelligence propaganda sphincters predicted directed for purposes of psychological manipulation of the world population in conjunction with many other congruent operations, that help the population swallow the idea that erratic and chaotic events necessitate their own parasitic positions.

[pov603]

The Tiangong-1 space station was launched in September 2011. It is China’s first space station

Arrgghhh...In September 2011 a 19,000lb spaceship launched...

I find it somewhat incredulous [that is if the "google translate" is correct] that a Chinese/Communist Government would allegedly send a Satelite/spaceship into "space" whose name translates into "Temple", what, with its theistic connotations.

https://translate.google.com/#zh-CN/en/tian%20gong

Then there is an entry [no pun intended...] in iMDB for a Chinese animated movie entitled "Da Nao Tian Gong" which iMDB states was either called "The Monkey King" or "Uproar in Heaven", which, under the current premise, seems rather appropriate...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059855/

[hoi.polloi]

I think you mean you find yourself incredulous, pov603!

I know what you mean, though. You raise a very good point.

[pov603]

I will find myself incredulous if the said object "lands" on 04-Apr-18...
It will be "interesting" to see where and when it "lands", North Korea? Iran?

[milesker]

Hi,
do you know how they could realise this kind of tricks with water?
It seems it cannot be Cgi, see at the end when the astronaut got water on his face
Thanks for your explainations.

https://youtu.be/s63JXdsL5LU

[Altair]

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zbpL3LeW7k

1:30

That was in 1989, so it shouldn't be that difficult nowadays.

[Flabbergasted]

How they made these tricks on the ISS?

Milesker, I suggest you post this kind of stuff in the Fakery in Orbit thread instead of littering the forum with half-baked topics.

[milesker]

How they made these tricks on the ISS?

Milesker, I suggest you post this kind of stuff in the Fakery in Orbit thread instead of littering the forum with half-baked topics.

Ok, but I did knew where let this question.
Perhaps you know I have already made lot of video to explain the Iss fakery, but in french. And people ask me about this water bubble in this video.
So, if you have an answer....thanks

My channel:
https://youtu.be/UB_8GpFSY4Y
https://youtu.be/D3gGFHr2w8w
https://youtu.be/lRN79LvW0lw
https://youtu.be/KLUjHC-XRkg
https://youtu.be/shyAgM0aOsQ

[milesker]

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zbpL3LeW7k

1:30

That was in 1989, so it shouldn't be that difficult nowadays.

Ok ok, it's look like right.
Thanks

[kickstones]

It will be interesting to see how this plays out:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinas-out-of-control-19000-pound-space-station-crashing-to-earth-in-march_2406638.html

We might find a few bits for the mantle-shelf, or not...

This weekend apparently...

TIANGONG 1 - Time to Reenter: 5d 6h 27m 40s

Keep track here...
http://www.satview.org/?sat_id=37820U

[kickstones]

From Scientific American...

Chinese Space Station Tiangong 1 Falls to Earth

By Mike Wall, SPACE.com on April 2, 2018

The space station disintegrated in the atmosphere over the South Pacific

China’s prototype space station, whose name translates as “Heavenly Palace 1,” met a fiery end in Earth’s atmosphere today (April 1), breaking apart and burning up in the skies over the southern Pacific Ocean at about 8:16 p.m. EDT (0016 April 2 GMT), according to the U.S. Strategic Command’s Joint Force Space Component Command (JFSCC).

“The JFSCC used the Space Surveillance Network sensors and their orbital analysis system to confirm Tiangong-1’s re-entry,” U.S. Air Force officials wrote in a statement.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... -to-earth/

Pity they did not have any Space Surveillance Network camaras tracking it, instead they had to use this 2008 image below to demonstrate its burn out:


An image of an uncrewed cargo vessel breaking apart as it re-enters the Earth’s atmosphere in 2008, after a resupply mission to the International Space Station. Tiangong-1, China’s prototype space station, met a similar fiery fate on April 1. Credit: NASA, ESA; Bill Moede and Jesse Carpenter

Over at Space Com they give us a little more detail with this illustration below:

In Photos: Tiangong-1, China's Space Station That's Falling to Earth

https://www.space.com/13119-photos-tian ... atory.html


In 2016, China's Manned Spaceflight Engineering group lost control of Tiangong-1, sealing the spacecraft's fate. Left uncontrolled, the space station module will fall to Earth and burn up in the atmosphere as in this illustration.

Whilst newspaper online magazine ABC posted this apparent radar composite below to convince us there was a space station falling:



This radar image shows the shape of China's space station Tiangong-1 as it began its fall.


However there does appear to be video evidence because Thierry Legault managed to capture these shots on 2018. ápr. 1.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L04sEG0fJmc

[hoi.polloi]

Hmm, I'm not sure that's a super convincing evidence of the story. We can definitely see some stuff and twinkly lights up there but there's so much evidence that there is a deliberate PR deception about satellites and space stations that we are not sure what the true connection is yet between the stories of these objects and the actual technological mechanisms. It probably doesn't involve rocketry being above the atmosphere for longer than a very short flight of "a minute or three". Everything else with guaranteed sustainability involves lighter-than-air craft.