Search found 7 matches: challenger astronauts

Searched query: challenger astronauts

by simonshack
Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:48 pm
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

*

IS THE "DEAD CHALLENGER CREW" STILL ALIVE AND WELL?


Image

I would like to invite our readers to assess and evaluate for themselves whether or not it is a realistic possibility that (almost) ALL of the purported victims of the 1986 "Challenger disaster" are still alive and well - by reading the last four pages or so of this thread, starting from here - including this present post, which I submit as a 'summary' of sorts. I find this particular line of research quite interesting, insofar that it may help us all understand the mechanisms of 'psy-op vicsim creation' - as well as the astonishing boldness (or carelessness / arrogance?) with which they are concocted and carried out. To be sure, out of the many topics debated on Cluesforum, this particular investigation has had (as they always should) its fair share of controversies - even within the ranks of our most trusted contributors; I think that this 'check-and-balance-methodology' we keep observing on this forum is all-positive and, in fact, essential to uphold a high level of discourse and objectivity. So thanks to all.

Let me now take you through the latest findings concerning the "Challenger crew" which supposedly perished back in 1986. So far, we have been concentrating on the two lady "crew members", Judith Resnik and Sharon 'Christa' Mc Auliffe. We have seen that the two "female NASA martyrs" appear to be still alive and well, both enjoying successful Law University positions and careers - while (astonishingly enough) still using pretty much their own names - i.e. the names & surnames with which they briefly became international celebrities - as the "NASA martyrs of the Challenger disaster". So what about the five male members of the "ill-fated crew"?

Well, it so appears that four of them may possibly also still be quite alive and well - but let's take a look at them, one by one.

MICHAEL J. SMITH____________ Michael J. Smith (UW University)
Image

A fellow named Michael J. Smith - who bears a striking resemblance to "NASA Challenger pilot Michael J. Smith" (30-year timelapse considered), is to be found alive and well, teaching at UW (University of Wisconsin, Madison): http://directory.engr.wisc.edu/ie/faculty/smith_michael
And: http://www.engr.wisc.edu/smith/

If he were still alive, the Challenger pilot should be 69 years old today. Well, there just happens to be a 69-year-old "Michael J. Smith living in Madison, Wisconsin": http://www.lookupanyone.com/results.php ... cusfirst=1

Interestingly - for our regular Cluesforum readers - UW (the University of Wisconsin, Madison) is the workplace of the 'controversial conspiracy-Professor' Kevin Barrett: http://www.news.wisc.edu/barrettissue/ As some will know, Barrett and his buddy Jim Fetzer regularly give lectures at the UW - about 9/11 conspiracies and such crazy things... http://mujca.com/bbc.htm


RICHARD "DICK" SCOBEE________Richard Scobee (Cows in Trees ltd.)
Image
source of picture at right; https://www.linkedin.com/pub/richard-scobee/18/754/238

A fellow named Richard Scobee - who bears a striking resemblance (30-year timelapse considered) to the "Challenger's Commander Richard 'Dick' Scobee" is to be found, alive and well, as the CEO of a company called "Cows in Trees". Here's the company's website intro, featuring a rocket-powered cow swirling around smoke in the sky - much like the Challenger Shuttle as it was seen exploding in mid-air (on TV) :
Image
http://www.cowsintrees.com/

Incidentally yet interestingly, the son of "Challenger Commander" Richard Scobee (Brigadier General Richard W. Scobee, USAF) is, today, the deputy director of operations for NORAD (which, of course, was 'accused of having failed to intercept the hijacked planes on 9/11"). Small world.

Now, the next two (seemingly-still-alive-Challenger-crew-members) are a bit of a different matter: these two look-alikes both claim to be BROTHERS of the two respective Challenger martyrs - yet both bear a striking resemblance to their allegedly deceased-back-in-1986 brothers. Could the two of them possibly just pretend to be ... the brothers of themselves?

RONALD MC NAIR_______________________________Carl Mc Nair
Image

ELLISON ONIZUKA___________________________Claude Onizuka
Image

Here we have an article featuring both Carl and Claude- in Space Science Week:
"Carl McNair and Claude Onizuka will celebrate the heroic legacies of their respective brothers, Ronald McNair and Ellison Onizuka, NASA astronauts who perished in the 1986 Challenger mission. They have championed their astronaut brothers as role models and have encouraged students from disadvantaged backgrounds to enter academic programs in science, technology, engineering and math."
http://www.hawaii.edu/news/2012/03/02/s ... ence-week/
And if you're interested in what "inspirational speaker Carl Mc Nair" is up to: http://www.montana.edu/news/12347/found ... ure-jan-21

Last - but not least, of course, here are two side-by-side / "timelapse-picture comparisons" of the two ladies we have amply debated about in the previous four pages of this thread. I submit to your judgment that, however hard it is to determine whether these two face-comparisons depict the same two women (30-year timelapse considered), it is not beyond the realm of plausibility that they could indeed be the very same individuals:

JUDITH RESNIK___________________Judith Resnik (Yale Law University) http://www.law.yale.edu/faculty/JResnik.htm
Image

SHARON ("CHRISTA") MC AULIFFE _____Sharon Mc Auliffe (Syracuse Law University) http://law.syr.edu/profile/sharon-mcauliffe1
Image
source of image at left: https://www.pinterest.com/maureen0901/s ... hallenger/
source of image at right: http://bhlawpllc.com/attorneys/sharon-a-mcauliffe/


Oh - and btw, here's what appears to be "Christa's" most memorable quote. You've gotta love it :
Image
http://izquotes.com/quote/122379

That's all for now, folks - I just thought that a little "Challenger Disaster summary / overview" was in order.

And watch out for those University Professors, dear students / sophomores... they may be dying to deceive you ! :P
by simonshack
Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:00 pm
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

*
Image
Sean O'Keefe, former NASA administrator, appointed university professor at SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY

"O'Keefe, former administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), is the 17th person in Syracuse University history to hold the title of University Professor."
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/ ... at_su.html
As previously mentioned, Sean O'Keefe is the NASA administrator who, back in 2002, announced (at Syracuse University) the upcoming Space Shuttle flight of "space teacher" Barbara Morgan - the designated successor of "space teacher and Challenger victim" Sharon Christa Mc Auliffe:
NASA boss names next teacher in space

SYRACUSE, N.Y. (AP) — Sixteen years after Christa McAuliffe and six other astronauts died in the Challenger explosion, NASA announced Friday that McAuliffe's fellow teacher and one-time understudy Barbara Morgan will ride aboard a shuttle in 2004.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nat ... eacher.htm
But perhaps this lady named "Sharon A. Mc Auliffe" - attorney at the Syracuse University College of Law, is just a coincidental namesake of NASA-space-teacher Sharon Christ-A Mc Auliffe? Sure, why not? Everything is possible. <_<
SharonMcAuliffe_SYRACUSE_01.PNG
It may also be entirely coincidental that SYRACUSE-Sharon (pictured above) is a cousin of Terry McAuliffe, the current governor of Virginia who was co-chairman of President Bill Clinton's 1996 re-election campaign, and was chairman of Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign."

To be sure, Terry Mc Auliffe is apparently very much concerned about NASA funding issues...

McAuliffe wants risks shared for future rocket launches at Wallops Island
http://www.richmond.com/business/articl ... 9c119.html

"Gov McAuliffe meets w/ NASA Administrator Bolden on building stronger partnerships between NASA & VA. "
https://twitter.com/governorva/status/5 ... 8223190016

Image
"Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe [pictured above], U.S. Reps. Scott Rigell and Bobby Scott and a host of other dignitaries converged on NASA’s Langley Research Center Oct. 17 [2014] to mark the ceremonial opening of the Integrated Engineering Services Building."
http://www.nasa.gov/larc/nasa-langleys- ... in-review/

Duh - I wasn't aware that NASA has a research center in Langley, Virginia - home of the CIA... I guess you learn something every day.
by Maat
Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:55 am
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

*
The 1st Scuttled Shuttle Scam: Challenger

When I started looking into the "Challenger" and its "Disaster" (of a) story, a number of things hit me like a "flying brick"!
i.e. The repetitively familiar numbers (starting from Apollo 11 on) in dates, times etc., crew members' origins, and implausible 'events' in the plot lines. Quite apart from every "photo" being a lousy shoop job!

Image
@ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Space ... TS-6._.jpg
Space Shuttle Challenger (NASA Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV-099) was NASA's second Space Shuttle orbiter to be put into service, Columbia having been the first.... Its maiden flight was on April 4, 1983 [=11], and it completed nine missions before breaking apart 73 seconds after the launch of its tenth mission, STS-51-L [51+L=3=9] on January 28, 1986 [1+28=11], resulting in the death of all seven crew members.
The "Challenger Disaster":
The spacecraft disintegrated over [*9 miles above] the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of central Florida at 11:38 am [11 + 11=22] EST (16:38 UTC) [7+11].

On March 8 [3+8=11], 1986, a search team found the crew cabin; it had not been destroyed in the explosion. The bodies of all seven crew members were found, still strapped into their seats....
Autopsies were done but exact cause of death was inconclusive.
* 48,000 feet = 9.09090909 miles
NASA history: Kerwin, Joseph P. (1986). "Challenger crew cause and time of death"

Image
@ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... 001867.jpg – Ref http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2000-001867.html
[Update note: http://www.challenger.org/about/gallery.cfm has been removed]

Crew members:
Francis R. Scobee – Mission Commander — Apparently no life or pictures outside NASA (very 'vicsimmy')
Michael J. Smith – Pilot — Same + "Smith was portrayed by Brian Kerwin in the 1990 TV movie Challenger".
Judith A. Resnik – Mission Specialist 1 — First American Jewish astro-not; 1st Jewish woman 'in space'. Recruited by "Lt. Uhura" of Star Trek, Nichelle Nichols, for NASA
Ellison S. Onizuka – Mission Specialist 2 — 1st Asian American 'in space'
Ronald E. McNair – Mission Specialist 3 — 2nd African-American astronaut. Also recruited by Nichelle Nichols
Gregory B. Jarvis – Payload Specialist 1 — **
Christa McAuliffe – Payload Specialist 2 — 1st "Teacher in Space" & subject of full scale media propaganda campaign for the "mission".
**The remains of all seven astronauts from the Challenger disaster were discovered in the crew decks on the ocean floor. Gregory Jarvis' remains were discovered in the lower mid-deck along with fellow astronaut Ronald McNair and school teacher Christa McAuliffe. During salvage operations to raise the crew deck from the ocean floor, Jarvis' body escaped from the wreckage, floated to the surface, and disappeared back into the sea. On April 15, 1986 [=7], on the last scheduled attempt to recover wreckage, Jarvis' body was rediscovered and returned to shore.
From Time Magazine:
[Dr. Marvin Resnik, father of Judith Resnik]. The Resniks want no funeral service; they have asked NASA to cremate their daughter's remains and scatter them over the ocean, where Challenger met its end. [ :blink: ]
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... -4,00.html

'Scraping the bottom' with more grotesque idiocy from MSNBC:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3078060#.To_wOnL7_kU

Main indoctrination center:
http://www.challenger.org/

Photos of the Challenger crew in 'training' at NASA: http://www.challenger.org/about/gallery.cfm
(Note: that 'photo gallery' is very hard to find on the site, 1st found via Google images!)


Nichelle Nichols, NASA Recruiter:
Image
@ NASA's GRIN site (Great Images in NASA)
Actress Nichelle Nichols was born in Robbins, Illinois on December 29, 1936. She played Lieutenant Uhura the Communications Officer on the U.S.S. Enterprise in the original series, Star Trek. ...
From the late 1970's until the late 1980's, NASA employed Nichelle Nichols to recruit new astronaut candidates. Many of her new recruits were women or members of racial and ethnic minorities, including Guion Bluford (the first African-American astronaut), Sally Ride (the first female American astronaut), Judith Resnik (one of the original set of female astronauts, who perished during the launch of the Challenger on January 28, 1986), and Ronald McNair (the second African-American astronaut, and another victim of the Challenger accident).
Wiki:
After a 32-month hiatus, the next shuttle mission, STS-26 [7th flight of the Discovery], was launched on September 29 [9+11], 1988
Where it began: Space Shuttle Enterprise

Image
@ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enter ... flight.jpg
The Space Shuttle Enterprise (NASA Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV-101) was the first Space Shuttle orbiter. It was built for NASA as part of the Space Shuttle program to perform test flights in the atmosphere.[2] It was constructed without engines or a functional heat shield, and was therefore not capable of spaceflight....

Construction began on Enterprise on June 4, 1974. ...originally planned to be named Constitution and unveiled on Constitution Day, September 17, 1976 [hidden 22]. A write-in campaign by Trekkies to President Gerald Ford asked that the orbiter be named after the Starship Enterprise, featured on the television show Star Trek. Although Ford did not mention the campaign, the president—who during World War II had served on the aircraft carrier USS Monterey (CVL-26) that served with USS Enterprise (CV-6)—said that he was "partial to the name" and overrode NASA officials.
That's their story :P
On January 31, 1977 [=11], it was taken by road to Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base, to begin operational testing.
[...]
The initial nine-month testing period was referred to by the acronym ALT, for "Approach and Landing Test". These tests included a maiden "flight" on February 18 [=11], 1977 atop a Boeing 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) to measure structural loads and ground handling and braking characteristics of the mated system.
[...]
On August 12 [=11], 1977, the space shuttle Enterprise flew on its own for the first time.

Retirement:
With the completion of critical testing, Enterprise was partially disassembled to allow certain components to be reused in other shuttles, then underwent an international tour visiting France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the U.S. states of California, Alabama, and Louisiana (during the 1984 Louisiana World Exposition). It was also used to fit-check the never-used shuttle launch pad at Vandenberg AFB, California. Finally, on November 18 [=11+9], 1985 [total=7], Enterprise was ferried to Washington, D.C., where it became property of the Smithsonian Institution.
Beginning as an imaginary spaceship on a TV series,
Star Trek did continue: written and produced by NASA!


Image
@ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_S ... 001363.jpg
The Shuttle Enterprise rolls out of the Palmdale manufacturing facilities with Star Trek television cast members. From left to right they are: Dr. James D. Fletcher, NASA Administrator, DeForest Kelley (Dr. "Bones" McCoy), George Takei (Mr. Sulu), James Doohan (Chief Engineer Montgomery "Scotty" Scott), Nichelle Nichols (Lt. Uhura), Leonard Nimoy (the indefatigable Mr. Spock), Gene Rodenberry (The Great Bird of the Galaxy), and Walter Koenig (Ensign Pavel Checkov). Date: 17 September 1976. Author: NASA
Source: Great Images in NASA
And they're obviously still 'grinning' from ear to ear <_<

If their obsession with 7, 9, 11 numerology isn't bad enough, the fact that they would actually need or use a Sci-Fi TV actress to recruit astronauts should be enough to know just how 'real' the "Space Shuttle Program" was. :rolleyes:
by Maat
Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:45 pm
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

*
Can a brick fly?

I've only started catching up on this NASA "space shuttle" topic, having been preoccupied with the Arizona & Norway PsyOps, and just realized that not only is the entire shuttle fleet and ISS a sham, but the Challenger "disaster" and Columbia "accident" had to be hoaxed!

Funny thing is, NASA's claim that the shuttles actually "glide" to land had always struck me as preposterous, having flown real gliders, but I never pursued the thought or examined it further since I presumed there must have been something else they just weren't telling us, with all that American 'rocket science' and government secrecy type of stuff (duh!). It was only when I started looking at everything else propagated by the same apparatus that pulled off the "moon landings" and 9-11, did I begin to consider the entire "Space Program" equally bogus.

It stands to reason that, having already faked it with the moony toons, there's no way they would have suddenly gone legit and thereby proved they really weren't that 'advanced' after all. So, how they began was the only way they could proceed without admitting they'd hoaxed the "moon missions", and that no vehicle yet invented could sustain and protect real astronauts from the radiation or projectile hazards of space.

It is therefore also highly unlikely that the Apollo 11 crew were even sent into Low Earth Orbit at all; movie makers never risk the life of their cash-cow stars either — it's made more doubtful still by the controlled opposition's practice of reinforcing that assumption, e.g. Bart Sibrel (And remembering Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey had a very convincing 'floating pen' in 1968 too)

But to convince people a "brick" can fly is quite a feat! There's just not enough wingspan to body ratio in the "shuttle" to provide the required lift, it would drop like a stone! Hughs' huge "Spruce Goose" flew (albeit briefly) because it had the necessary wingspan, just as 747s can. Sure, there are oddly shaped bodies in nature that can fly, like a duck or a goony bird — but this "shuttle" thing is a penguin!

Here's a particularly stupid shoop job of it supposedly "gliding" in to land (also note opposing shadows of the sims & vehicles):
Atlantis-shuttle-5-26-2010.jpg
*"Space shuttle Atlantis glides by rescue vehicles before landing on Kennedy Space Center's runway 33 Wednesday, May 26, 2010 in Cape Canaveral, Fla. (AP Photo/Terry Renna)"
@ https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texa ... 615206.php

For comparison, the old Grunau Baby glider (designed in 1931) is a dumpy looking thing compared with modern high performance, aerobatic ones, but it flies just fine (my father built one of these for himself):
Image

Even the heavier, partially aluminum-skinned Blanik 2-seater (that I learned to fly in), can go long distances cross-country:
Image


Well, whatever they might launch rockets for, if anything, Simon's exposure of the same faked launch shots they've recycled year after year was enough to confirm the "space shuttle" story busted to me, never mind the magical "bolt" that can withstand massive G forces with nothing to keep it aerodynamically stuck to its giant gas tank.

That's my 2 cents. Let your con-science be your guide...
ImageImage
by reel.deal
Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:12 am
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Re: Space Shuttle Hoax -Light Reflects off Disney/NASA Fake Earth Models -Walt Disney Bullshit For All Mankind Quote [+] #

exposed 2006
Shuttle Challenger in 1986 versus shuttle Columbia in 2003: Typology of Illuminati Theatre


Disaster of the (model of) Shuttle Challenger in 1986 and "disaster" of the "shuttle Columbia" in 2003 are two examples related to the fraud of the" International Space Station " ISS (1), illustrating the same category of theater, from the point of view of frequency and duration: both had a special representation only. (2)

Interestingly from the perspective of the classification depending on whether the first act is staged or not, shuttle Challenger in 1986 and shuttle Columbia in 2003 do not belong to the same base category:
- NASA had to stage the "death" of "astronauts" in 1986, due to a real first act, the explosion of the rocket after being launched. The goal of staging the "death of astronauts" act is obviously to cover up the fraud. Reminder: the "Space Shuttle" visible on launch attached to the rocket is only a model made of composites (reduced: plastic), with no "astronaut." In fact the interior is completely empty.
- In the case of Columbia in 2003 it was staged by NASA from the beginning, the goal of of the screenplay was to sell the credibility of the fraud, by adding hazards to the hoax. Reminder: the Space Shuttle is only packaged as a special airplane, the public can not attend the landings because it is necessary to cover-up the noise of the jets.

Notes
(1) Angel Vladimir Putin, sent by God, and end the fraud of the ISS in the words of the Prophet of the End of the Era:
nasa hoaxes at blogspot

(2) More examples of using the ISS hoax to illustrate categories of theater in terms of frequency and duration:
Google
Introduction to illuminati theater at blogspot

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 451995/pg1
;)
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 451989/pg1
:P
by nonhocapito
Thu May 26, 2011 7:48 pm
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - & other modern NASA efforts

Brutal Metal wrote:OK so NOW there's gonna be a discussion on the Challenger crash being Fake and none of those Astronauts dying? PLEASE Don't even!!
uh? Why not?
by Brutal Metal
Thu May 26, 2011 6:07 pm
Forum: Apollo, and more space hoaxes
Topic: ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax
Replies: 793
Views: 1145853

Re: ENDEAVOUR - & other modern NASA efforts

OK so NOW there's gonna be a discussion on the Challenger crash being Fake and none of those Astronauts dying? PLEASE Don't even!!