It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info
Re: Why the perps' "Hail Mary pass" of "Bob & Bri" style" videos is an insidiously persistent obstacle to our primary goal: awakening as many as possible from the 9-11 spell. [Ref My previous posts, & Simon's P1]
What I have been trying to explain, rather inadequately, is why the integral psychological factors that dominate the core of the whole 9-11 mind-control operation need to be better understood in context and application to effectively expose it to a wider audience. As some are already aware, what we perceive and recognize visually is always subjective, dependent upon our personal experience and still further filtered through our beliefs (preconceptions), conditioning and emotional associations.
This of course is why the 9-11 psyop has been so perniciously successful.
Clearly no one has ever personally witnessed a jet liner crash into a skyscraper, but we tend to believe who and what we can personally relate to, i.e. others like ourselves; those we are socially conditioned / indoctrinated / manipulated to trust as 'parental' or 'authority' figures; and things within our personal reference frame.
That is the insidious cognitive dissonance psyoped into "Bob & Bri" with a seductive, suggestive narrative constantly drawing those perceptions back to personal familiarity. Few regular folks view it more than once and rarely notice the visual clues unless prompted by some other factors, and that's what the perps rely upon. **
For example, a person with camera experience may notice the crazy tilting, lens flares etc. on first viewing but still be distracted by the emotive narrative+preconceptions unless prompted to review, while those with no knowledge of video cameras (like me) may miss it completely at first view until pointed out. And, some New York city visitors or residents living in high rise apartments may recognize discrepancies in the buildings and skyline where others would not, but then rationalize it by their own reference and location being different.
Remembering also that what is glaringly obvious as cgi forgery in a still frame, will pass unnoticed in video motion, often lasting a fleeting second or two before replaced by another scene. If we assume that once we can see something that it should then be just as obvious to others, it can hinder our ability to convey our knowledge effectively. Different 'pokes' for different folks.
Note: We do not 'see' what is actually there, we only ever see what our minds have been taught and programmed to perceive. e.g. People blind from birth who have their eyesight fully restored are virtually blind until they learn to see and visually recognize the physical world around them. Desert dwelling Bedouins who had never seen an art image or photograph of a person could not see who or what it represented until shown.
Few of us can personally relate to inanimate objects like buildings, or able to tell real from fake these days without a trained eye (especially saturated with cgi cityscapes in video and photo images already in adverts, movies and "news"). But we can all relate to how real people move and cast shadows.
So, this is why I believe it would be so effective for this particular psyop video to be exposed using the specific content everyone can relate to personally, to counteract the psychologically targeted and hypnotically literal Siren call to "listen only to my voice."
The key factor I see in irrefutably proving the Siren/actress is a liar to the uninitiated, and all those who are not camera buffs, videographers or cgi experts, is to compare her narrative with the "people" imagery she claims the "documentarian" in her is compelling her to record, as "real" in real time, (with a neatly planted reference to the nuclear holocaust movie, "On The Beach" )
SIM SUNDIALS: In the last 9 minutes of Bob & Bri's What We Saw, sim shadows move almost 90 degrees from horizontal to vertical in minutes, then by 45 degrees and 180 back again!:
**
Contrary to popular assumptions, our cognitive attention span can only consciously register one thing at a time. e.g. You can't read and watch, or listen and see, two different things simultaneously; the brain constantly switches from one to the other. Hence the dominant subjective element will tend to be the more clearly remembered. We can see this effect when we watch a movie more than once, how much we missed on first and even second viewing — more so when in a foreign language with subtitles.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNNTcHq5Tzk
COOL nonhocapito1 you Da Man!! Loving all the guys who came to my defense, battyone WHERE are you to defend yourself NOW?? Watched it live from your high school in New Jersey huh?? BULLSHIT LIAR!!
Ma'at 4 Sep 25 2010, 08:33 AM wrote:
You know you can thumb yourself up endlessly too -- just love Youtube's system
:huh: Huh? I don't believe you! That's never ever worked for me. Damn, I hope you're wrong - I was just packing my belongings, getting a clean shave and haircut to move into the White House!... :P
Ma'at 4 Sep 25 2010, 08:33 AM wrote:
You know you can thumb yourself up endlessly too -- just love Youtube's system
:huh: Huh? I don't believe you! That's never ever worked for me. Damn, I hope you're wrong - I was just packing my belongings, getting a clean shave and haircut to move into the White House!... :P
Seriously, you can thumb-up your own comments (I'm not sure about the vid rating, I hadn't tried that actually). But I discovered it when I successfully thumbed my own back up to visibility when a shill I was arguing with once before had thumbed me down to hide my replies :D (Ooh, maybe wasn't a good idea to post it here, shills have eyes <_<)
There is a lag on the front page sometimes, but the numbers will show immediately next to them on the all comments page. e.g. I got that 2nd top rated comment on the 9-11 shooter one down to 8 from originally 47 (it was bloody tedious) :P
As much as I agree with the sentiment re "Simon Shack for President", that's a curse in reality I wouldn't wish on a friend! :lol:
[EDIT Update: your reply to the top comment I've bumped from 2 to 15 & your "Presidential" votes from 124 (?) to 133 B)
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ? George Orwell