Ahh yes, so true.fred 4 Sep 21 2010, 08:56 PM wrote: I never knew that the edges of shadows should be so much darker than the center of shadows.
Simon I found something Interesting!
Siren script Vs Imagery
Re: Why the perps' "Hail Mary pass" of "Bob & Bri" style" videos is an insidiously persistent obstacle to our primary goal: awakening as many as possible from the 9-11 spell. [Ref My previous posts, & Simon's P1]
What I have been trying to explain, rather inadequately, is why the integral psychological factors that dominate the core of the whole 9-11 mind-control operation need to be better understood in context and application to effectively expose it to a wider audience. As some are already aware, what we perceive and recognize visually is always subjective, dependent upon our personal experience and still further filtered through our beliefs (preconceptions), conditioning and emotional associations.
This of course is why the 9-11 psyop has been so perniciously successful.
Clearly no one has ever personally witnessed a jet liner crash into a skyscraper, but we tend to believe who and what we can personally relate to, i.e. others like ourselves; those we are socially conditioned / indoctrinated / manipulated to trust as 'parental' or 'authority' figures; and things within our personal reference frame.
That is the insidious cognitive dissonance psyoped into "Bob & Bri" with a seductive, suggestive narrative constantly drawing those perceptions back to personal familiarity. Few regular folks view it more than once and rarely notice the visual clues unless prompted by some other factors, and that's what the perps rely upon. **
For example, a person with camera experience may notice the crazy tilting, lens flares etc. on first viewing but still be distracted by the emotive narrative+preconceptions unless prompted to review, while those with no knowledge of video cameras (like me) may miss it completely at first view until pointed out. And, some New York city visitors or residents living in high rise apartments may recognize discrepancies in the buildings and skyline where others would not, but then rationalize it by their own reference and location being different.
Remembering also that what is glaringly obvious as cgi forgery in a still frame, will pass unnoticed in video motion, often lasting a fleeting second or two before replaced by another scene. If we assume that once we can see something that it should then be just as obvious to others, it can hinder our ability to convey our knowledge effectively. Different 'pokes' for different folks.
Note: We do not 'see' what is actually there, we only ever see what our minds have been taught and programmed to perceive. e.g. People blind from birth who have their eyesight fully restored are virtually blind until they learn to see and visually recognize the physical world around them. Desert dwelling Bedouins who had never seen an art image or photograph of a person could not see who or what it represented until shown.
Few of us can personally relate to inanimate objects like buildings, or able to tell real from fake these days without a trained eye (especially saturated with cgi cityscapes in video and photo images already in adverts, movies and "news"). But we can all relate to how real people move and cast shadows.
So, this is why I believe it would be so effective for this particular psyop video to be exposed using the specific content everyone can relate to personally, to counteract the psychologically targeted and hypnotically literal Siren call to "listen only to my voice."
The key factor I see in irrefutably proving the Siren/actress is a liar to the uninitiated, and all those who are not camera buffs, videographers or cgi experts, is to compare her narrative with the "people" imagery she claims the "documentarian" in her is compelling her to record, as "real" in real time, (with a neatly planted reference to the nuclear holocaust movie, "On The Beach"
)
SIM SUNDIALS: In the last 9 minutes of Bob & Bri's What We Saw, sim shadows move almost 90 degrees from horizontal to vertical in minutes, then by 45 degrees and 180 back again!:
**
Contrary to popular assumptions, our cognitive attention span can only consciously register one thing at a time. e.g. You can't read and watch, or listen and see, two different things simultaneously; the brain constantly switches from one to the other. Hence the dominant subjective element will tend to be the more clearly remembered. We can see this effect when we watch a movie more than once, how much we missed on first and even second viewing — more so when in a foreign language with subtitles.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNNTcHq5Tzk
Re: Why the perps' "Hail Mary pass" of "Bob & Bri" style" videos is an insidiously persistent obstacle to our primary goal: awakening as many as possible from the 9-11 spell. [Ref My previous posts, & Simon's P1]
What I have been trying to explain, rather inadequately, is why the integral psychological factors that dominate the core of the whole 9-11 mind-control operation need to be better understood in context and application to effectively expose it to a wider audience. As some are already aware, what we perceive and recognize visually is always subjective, dependent upon our personal experience and still further filtered through our beliefs (preconceptions), conditioning and emotional associations.
This of course is why the 9-11 psyop has been so perniciously successful.
Clearly no one has ever personally witnessed a jet liner crash into a skyscraper, but we tend to believe who and what we can personally relate to, i.e. others like ourselves; those we are socially conditioned / indoctrinated / manipulated to trust as 'parental' or 'authority' figures; and things within our personal reference frame.
That is the insidious cognitive dissonance psyoped into "Bob & Bri" with a seductive, suggestive narrative constantly drawing those perceptions back to personal familiarity. Few regular folks view it more than once and rarely notice the visual clues unless prompted by some other factors, and that's what the perps rely upon. **
For example, a person with camera experience may notice the crazy tilting, lens flares etc. on first viewing but still be distracted by the emotive narrative+preconceptions unless prompted to review, while those with no knowledge of video cameras (like me) may miss it completely at first view until pointed out. And, some New York city visitors or residents living in high rise apartments may recognize discrepancies in the buildings and skyline where others would not, but then rationalize it by their own reference and location being different.
Remembering also that what is glaringly obvious as cgi forgery in a still frame, will pass unnoticed in video motion, often lasting a fleeting second or two before replaced by another scene. If we assume that once we can see something that it should then be just as obvious to others, it can hinder our ability to convey our knowledge effectively. Different 'pokes' for different folks.
Note: We do not 'see' what is actually there, we only ever see what our minds have been taught and programmed to perceive. e.g. People blind from birth who have their eyesight fully restored are virtually blind until they learn to see and visually recognize the physical world around them. Desert dwelling Bedouins who had never seen an art image or photograph of a person could not see who or what it represented until shown.
Few of us can personally relate to inanimate objects like buildings, or able to tell real from fake these days without a trained eye (especially saturated with cgi cityscapes in video and photo images already in adverts, movies and "news"). But we can all relate to how real people move and cast shadows.
So, this is why I believe it would be so effective for this particular psyop video to be exposed using the specific content everyone can relate to personally, to counteract the psychologically targeted and hypnotically literal Siren call to "listen only to my voice."
The key factor I see in irrefutably proving the Siren/actress is a liar to the uninitiated, and all those who are not camera buffs, videographers or cgi experts, is to compare her narrative with the "people" imagery she claims the "documentarian" in her is compelling her to record, as "real" in real time, (with a neatly planted reference to the nuclear holocaust movie, "On The Beach"
)SIM SUNDIALS: In the last 9 minutes of Bob & Bri's What We Saw, sim shadows move almost 90 degrees from horizontal to vertical in minutes, then by 45 degrees and 180 back again!:
**
Contrary to popular assumptions, our cognitive attention span can only consciously register one thing at a time. e.g. You can't read and watch, or listen and see, two different things simultaneously; the brain constantly switches from one to the other. Hence the dominant subjective element will tend to be the more clearly remembered. We can see this effect when we watch a movie more than once, how much we missed on first and even second viewing — more so when in a foreign language with subtitles.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNNTcHq5Tzk
Maya for the virtual cityscape in the News archives and an Avid console for the sim broadcast! IMO of course!reel.deal @ Sep 22 2010, 02:18 PM wrote: composite masking. LA without cars.
http://rossching.com/running-on-empty
'realistic' looking 'video', made out of stills.
kind of like a contemporary updated 'flickbook'.
cool radiohead track too.
what were the (VR-?!?) CGI programs '9/11' was made from?
director? avid? premiere? maya? prisms? houdini?
Thanks Reel, beautiful work there and perfect example of the "beauty of our weapons" now (when not used against us). :)reel.deal 4 Sep 22 2010, 07:18 AM wrote: composite masking. LA without cars.
http://rossching.com/running-on-empty
'realistic' looking 'video', made out of stills.
kind of like a contemporary updated 'flickbook'.
cool radiohead track too.
Love that Radiohead track too; my favorite of theirs is, "You and Whose Army?"
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ? George Orwell
reel.deal,
I dont know if you are familiar with this technologie but please check it out and see if any bells are ringing.
AMD Cinema 2.0:
Part 1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5yVjHaJ0PI
Part 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnihU4zCXe8
Best
D.Duck
I dont know if you are familiar with this technologie but please check it out and see if any bells are ringing.
AMD Cinema 2.0:
Part 1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5yVjHaJ0PI
Part 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnihU4zCXe8
Best
D.Duck
-
Brutal Metal
- Member
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
- Contact:
I'm REALLY OVER these fuckers making a mockery out of our research!
Simon feel free to defend yourself!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAWLD_b2 ... ture=email
battyone's reply to me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYkHAmLw ... ture=email
Simon feel free to defend yourself!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAWLD_b2 ... ture=email
battyone's reply to me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYkHAmLw ... ture=email
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 6944
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Wow!Brutal Metal 4 Sep 23 2010, 06:30 PM wrote:
battyone's reply to me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYkHAmLw ... ture=email
That Camera Planet video has over 1,8 million views....
Yet look who's got the Highest Rated Comment ! :) (22 thumbs up! - and it was posted only 17 hours ago!!!)
nonhocapito1
this is an hired actor. and a bad one at that. the tears are fake. the words are fake. the jumpers are fake.
relevant info => google september clues
Bravo, nonhocapito! Way to go!
And everyone: thumb it up, thumb it up and up! Everything helps in this unequal battle !
http://www.septemberclues.info
-
Brutal Metal
- Member
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
- Contact:
Yeah, I'm 'guilty' of a lot of those thumbup-refreshs (and of course the multi thumb-downs on the shills & dopes ;)simonshack 4 Sep 24 2010, 12:48 PM wrote:Wow!Brutal Metal 4 Sep 23 2010, 06:30 PM wrote:
battyone's reply to me...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYkHAmLw ... ture=email
That Camera Planet video has over 1,8 million views....
Yet look who's got the Highest Rated Comment ! :) (22 thumbs up! - and it was posted only 17 hours ago!!!)
nonhocapito1
this is an hired actor. and a bad one at that. the tears are fake. the words are fake. the jumpers are fake.
relevant info => google september clues
Bravo, nonhocapito! Way to go!
And everyone: thumb it up, thumb it up and up! Everything helps in this unequal battle !
I'm JehanneDeLys there by the way :D
You know you can thumb yourself up endlessly too -- just love Youtube's system :lol:
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ? George Orwell
-
simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 6944
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
:huh: Huh? I don't believe you! That's never ever worked for me. Damn, I hope you're wrong - I was just packing my belongings, getting a clean shave and haircut to move into the White House!... :PMa'at 4 Sep 25 2010, 08:33 AM wrote:
You know you can thumb yourself up endlessly too -- just love Youtube's system
http://www.septemberclues.info
Seriously, you can thumb-up your own comments (I'm not sure about the vid rating, I hadn't tried that actually). But I discovered it when I successfully thumbed my own back up to visibility when a shill I was arguing with once before had thumbed me down to hide my replies :D (Ooh, maybe wasn't a good idea to post it here, shills have eyes <_<)simonshack 4 Sep 25 2010, 02:56 AM wrote::huh: Huh? I don't believe you! That's never ever worked for me. Damn, I hope you're wrong - I was just packing my belongings, getting a clean shave and haircut to move into the White House!... :PMa'at 4 Sep 25 2010, 08:33 AM wrote:
You know you can thumb yourself up endlessly too -- just love Youtube's system
There is a lag on the front page sometimes, but the numbers will show immediately next to them on the all comments page. e.g. I got that 2nd top rated comment on the 9-11 shooter one down to 8 from originally 47 (it was bloody tedious) :P
As much as I agree with the sentiment re "Simon Shack for President", that's a curse in reality I wouldn't wish on a friend! :lol:
[EDIT Update: your reply to the top comment I've bumped from 2 to 15 & your "Presidential" votes from 124 (?) to 133 B)
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ? George Orwell