reel.deal wrote:so... regarding the no plane/no missile/no drone/no nothing at the NYC WTC on 9/11...
none of us will ever know, for sure; thats the bottom line.
so if i'm at 25/75, Simons at 50/50, maybe, everyone else 100/0 % 'no nothing'...
why so 100% 'no nothing' at the WTC ? to extend the same principle surely
then applies to the Pentagon aswell, no ?
I always have been 50/50 on the missile. Actually I'm 50/50 on pretty much anything may have gone down At the WTC complex that morning.
That' s right we will never know for sure. Its good enough just sharing our theories on it what might be feasible. Each and every one of the views in regards to the Missile/ EMP/HERF/ Smoke Obscurants/ No Projectile/ Evacuated Area I have read on this forum all seem quite feasible.
reel.deal wrote:WTC '93... 9/11 prelude... truck bomb softened up foundations, then just plastered them over...
some guy is doing zoomed-in 9/11 details gifs & vids on youtube, will find link later...
i liked this one, of the chopper... something very 'classic 9/11' about it,...
made a remix: "9/11 NO SMOKING"
I always think the helicopter shots are the most artificial featuring shots...
And these long shots of the “smoking WTC” have these big odd protruding divided clusters of CGI smoke. I'm sure clone tool was used , And easily and soon enough can be be detected.
Do they realistically look like real life smoke trail to you?
And these helicopters shade and detail for a bright blue clear morning in September. Look so artificial.