*
THE CORTLANDT 3D ENVIRONMENT
At this stage, I believe we have determined beyond resonable doubt that the 9/11 Ground Zero rubble imagery was entirely staged and/or digitally composited. It seems likely, in fact, that it was both staged (filmed on some location such as Oliver Stone's "Rubblefield" in LA)
and successively composited in post-production, in order to produce a wider variety of shots - yet limited to a handful of 3D environments and (apparent) vantage points.
The view from Cortlandt street (simulating the rubble of WTC4) is a prime example of the "9/11 Fakery Team's" production pattern. I have put together an overview of the observations and wish to thank our member reel-deal for brilliantly pointing out this particularly phony 9/11-imagery environment. As it is, I recently took a new look at Steven Rosenbaum's "7 DAYS IN SEPTEMBER" propaganda movie. Rosenbaum purportedly
"marshalled the resources of twenty-seven different filmmakers that recorded what they saw throughout the city on 9/11 and beyond". http://www.steverosenbaum.magnify.net/?f_id=45
Here are three frames extracted from Steven Rosenbaum's umpteenth 9/11 hoax reel:
Here we compare a shot of "7 DAYS" to a picture credited to "Robert Segal". (Among other things, you may ask yourself: Why is water being sprayed on some utterly flameless rubble? In fact, no flames are ever to be seen in this - or any other - 9/11 'firefighting' sceneries. Could it perhaps be because flames/fires are a little trickier to animate?..)
True to form, Rosenbaum's movie contains the by now familiar, dreadful renderings seen in virtually all the available 9/11 footage (including the Naudet movie "911" and the alleged 9/11 "amateur" footage). To be sure, sheared-off noses, limbs and faces are a common, frequent feature of the 9/11 image pool - and of the 9/11 image pool
only. By now, it should be clear that these 'glitches' can
not be ascribed to any sort of 'video compression artifacts'. They appear to be a distinct, consistent 'signature defect' of whatever animation software was used to produce the earlier (2001-2004) animated 9/11 video material:
It should also be clear by now that, by playing around with foregrounds/backdrop layers with their flawed 3D-imaging software, the 9/11 Fakery Team ended up with perspective aberrations far beyond what may be explained by normal focal distortions occuring due to different lenses/or viewing angles. No comments necessary here - but take your time to verify this issue for yourself :
We then have the usual chromatic absurdities seen in so many 9/11 photos & videos. Since we can rule out that the white areas pointed out below can not be reflections of any kind, we are left with just two options to explain this visual fact: 1- Someone splattered chalk/or white paint on the black façade sometime between the two shots. 2 - An error was committed either on the 9/11 movie set (clumsy prop management) or in the digital realm (clumsy post-production/photo-retouching). You decide:
In the next picture below, the uncharred and upright NYPD police car (see above) appears burned out and flipped on its rooftop. To be sure, its location (intersection of Cortlandt & Church streets) is the same as in the above picture. Again, it is up to you to choose :
Alternative 1 - Is it more likely that this happened in real life? If so, WHY?
Alternative 2 - Is it more likely this was decided on a movie set (by a silly B-movie director) or during computerized post-production ( by a silly video editor/art director?) :
Lastly, here are two shots credited to two pro-photographers - manifestly shot at the same time of day (note diagonal lightpole-shadow cast across the foreground steel beams). Now, even allowing that focal distortion (two diverse lens types) might account for the apparent, quite different sizes of the steel beams, three questions remain: 1- What chances that two photographers snapped a man walking by the exact same scenery at a very similar angle at the same time of day? 2- What chances that someone dragged/displaced that lonely beam (
see red arrows) in the timelapse between the two shots? 3 - What exactly is going on around the black man's feet?
9/11 was a "Hollywood" production and - as all special fx movies are by definition - a simulation of reality.