CGI collapse footage

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info
Post Reply
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:37 am

MarioOnTheFly wrote:
Makkonen wrote:Image

"Hey, the WTC's... how's it going?"

Image
I'm actually having trouble locating the guys (guy behind the bike) left leg. It appears completely obscured by tin bike bars. The bench isn't long enough for his leg to be completely streched out on it, and if it was bent like the right it would have been on the floor and not hanging in mid air. Is he sitting on it? Not sure...


Also his left wrist looks a bit dislocated from the rest of the hand :)
I am not even going to get started on the actual apparent WTC smoke Plume. Which when comparing with the other smoke plume looks like NOTHING alike.

This photo is such a fake... Clouds? Go check out all the other imagery... unless I’m mistaking (and for very good reason) there are NO CLOUDS in the 9/11 Imagery. The footage is always reprehensive of a clear blue sky day. For the very good reason inserting exact matching clouds into the shots would have been such a headache for the perps.
Unless my judgement is "clouded" :lol: some aspiring debunker can show me actual clouds in the sky on 9/11. I am calling this photo (like all the other collapse imagery) for what it’s worth ... Fake. :)

Image

MarioOnTheFly
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:09 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by MarioOnTheFly » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:00 am

It's more pr'tty with clouds :)

sublimity
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:33 am

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by sublimity » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:10 am

Wow, hadn't seen those fantastically sloppy forgeries before. Those photos and video of the men walking and talking nonchalantly are like greenscreen 9/11 "b-roll" and bad terror-porn stock footage. :puke:

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:26 am

AngellDust wrote:
Equinox wrote:
Image

Guy on mobile-- "Hey honey, yes we got knocked of work early today. Something about an explosion or something... hey honey did my Sports Illustrated copy arrive in the mail today? So i will be home soon babe. Oh by the way don't forget to set the TEBO to record Greys Anatomy this evening and record what happens to Grey at the hospital tonight. Im really looking fowared to this episode... been waiting all week. " :P
"... honey, I have to warn you, my left arm was severed. Some nice surgeon er janitor reattached it. He told me to keep looking straight ahead, and whatever I do, to not look at my arm. It kinda tickles though." :lol: :lol:
sublimity wrote:Wow, hadn't seen those fantastically sloppy forgeries before. Those photos and video of the men walking and talking nonchalantly are like greenscreen 9/11 "b-roll" and bad terror-porn stock footage. :puke:



For some fearless souls... 9/11 was just a walk in the park.

Image

Image
source- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDodpec9aHU

More info--- http://septemberclues.info/synthetic_crowds.htm

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6925
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by simonshack » Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:59 pm


AngellDust
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:19 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by AngellDust » Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:02 pm

The gif and original video are full of funny rendering glitches. It seems that half of the people are brown-haired, blue shirt w/khakis clones. Clearly, the GAP must have had a sale! :lol:

In the aforementioned screen grab, I also noticed the guy on the left has a semi-transparent head, and everyone's hands seem to be a bit sloppy. :P

Image

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:48 am

AngellDust wrote:
The gif and original video are full of funny rendering glitches. It seems that half of the people are brown-haired, blue shirt w/khakis clones. Clearly, the GAP must have had a sale! :lol:

In the aforementioned screen grab, I also noticed the guy on the left has a semi-transparent head, and everyone's hands seem to be a bit sloppy. :P

Image
Yes note that the
'pixel shearing' (for lack of a better term) does not always span the entire length of the video frame. It mostly appears to affect the people only - but not the backdrop scenery:
As in the fairbanks video..
Here are a couple extracted from the "Evan Fairbanks" video material:
Image
Image
Image

Located—


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udVbDzN9Cgc
Evan Fairbanks footage-6.54 – 8.31

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI-NY Collapse... "LIVE" on CNN !!!

Unread post by Equinox » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:51 am

Equinox wrote:
reel.deal wrote:EquinoX... this was a PM but you got PM blocked, so putting this here, hope you dig !

Lovin' the video deception thread you got going on LetsRoll, props to ya dude!
I have an addition that i would love to see Matt (911ConspiracyTV / 911CTV)
try and talk his way out of !!!

Ask him to make another youtube debunk-vid out of this one ! ...hahaha !!! :P

from a German Documentary that examines OBVIOUS BLATANT "LIVE" 9/11 CGI-NY, on CNN...
originally linked on RealityShack by Lyrix...
I made the gif... this is killer
!!!
GAME OVER !!!

WHATS THIS THEN ? ...'REAL-TIME' 'LIVE BROADCAST' ...NOT CGI-NY NO WAY ? :blink:
Image
NOT A 'LIVE' 'REAL-TIME' CNN CGI-NYC MASK-LAYER ? ...SO ITS 'REAL LIVE 9/11 (1/2 GONE !!!) NYC' ?!? ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fu7z0zaYKw ...@ 2:47 > 3:34 :huh:


"... I SAW THIS CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COME OUT OF NOWHERE AND JUST REAM RIGHT UP TO THE SITE OF THE CGI-TOWERS, RE-COMPOSITING THROUGH THE OTHER SIDE, AND THEN I WITNESSED CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COLLAPSE, ONE FIRST AND THEN THE SECOND, MOSTLY DUE TO CGI COMPOSITE-LAYER STRUCTURAL FAILURE, BECAUSE THE CGI HALF-MANHATTAN COMPOSITE-LAYER WAS JUST TOO EVIDENT... "

;)


Reel, I had a break from 9/11 but I’m back. I was just to busy with my own life… But I never ever gave up on this… And now my break is finished, More enthused than ever and I can function a whole heap better on this now. I only have noticed this post addressed to me back just under 1 year ago to date.

Yes this, find is killa! Nice work playa!
It’s a real great find. And I am going to reference and also mirror what I see you are demonstrating.


Image

Of course it has to be CGI 100%. I could delve deeper into this monstrous forgery. But the principles and parameters of this find are quite evident.

So as there in an apparent zoom out in the CNN footage. An observation is made @ aprox... @ 3.06 a static glitch of indefinite duration makes a Visual physical appearance. At the bottom of the Zoom out.

The observation to make to determine the hypothesis that this is actually computer generated imagery. Is the fact that whilst the bottom section of the actual shot has paused and no longer working. The actual concurrent zoom (reverse) is still taking place. Whilst this is concurrently occurring the actual picture is remains static.

Static visual computer generated composites are simplistic in making, and a glitch can quite often occur, proving the fraud of the computer generated imagery. Quite often Hollywood fake camera zoom- in are used to attribute a real life scenario to the fake computer generated composite.
In the CNN a zoom out is taken place, as the actual shot is view of the shot is moving backwards in concurrence with the zoom.
However it is observed that the glitch occurs at the bottom of the screen. But in stead of the glitch canceling the shot all together. The Actually Zoom out continues actually zooming out on the glitch.
This does defiantly not make and sense of a real camera as the reverse zoom and the visual aspect of the shot would be working in sync considering the alleged shot would have been live.
A further zoom back of the glitch does not make any logical sense and a conclusion that actual footage is not real world but is instead computer generated imagery, obviously prefabricated at an earlier point in time and being shown live on TV as a current real world visual recording.

REEL and Simon (n others) please keep on contributing great amazing finds such as these. I will archive and put them to good use.


Image


Source--- CNN Sept. 11, 2001 9.29 am - 10.11 am @ 3.07 minutes.
Im Curious.... I know what I see in this find by reel deel, I have explained exactly what I see in the post... Im also looking for more feedback on this amazing find. What EXACTLY do other members here see??? What exactly constitutes this as being fake? And leads us to believe it being pre-fabricated. B)

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:02 pm

simonshack wrote:
kansasinnovember wrote:... the BLUE SKY,CHOCOLATE SKY,ORANGE SKY etc etc....Never mind,just blame it on those brand new hi-tech LSD televisions. :lol:

ORANGE/CHOCOLATE?
(WTC2 collapse as aired by NBC on 9/11)
Image

BLUE? (WTC1 collapse as aired by CBS4 on 9/11)
Image

GREY? (WTC1 collapse as aired LIVE by CNN on 9/11)
Image
Please note that I have speeded up the above gif (only to make it less heavy to upload). The long and slow zoom-in motion actually lasts for all of 18 seconds - thereafter, the zoom-in motion stops and...whoopee, the WTC1 starts collapsing! http://septemberclues.info/wtc_collapses.htm

We are therefore asked to believe that the cameraman in that CNN chopper had some magical intuition that WTC1 was about to collapse - and zoomed in on it ...just by some synchronical, serendipitious happenstance! You're free to believe in the magick! (Please know that this CNN clip is the ONLY LIVE SHOT we have of the WTC1 collapse initiation).
And yellow with CGI distortion.
Image

Lets not forget TV Fakery blue and pink and purple and grey...
Image

all the colors of the rainbow....

Image


:puke: :puke: :puke:

MarioOnTheFly
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:09 pm

Unread post by MarioOnTheFly » Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:10 am

Simon,

Great catch on that beam count...you have a keen eye for detail.

I'm looking at those pics of two of a kind, one with different beam count 39 and 59. Looking and not getting it. Maybe you can shed some light. Why was that done? And how? Is it a simple matter of pasting cropped central beams in the middle of the tower? Do you maybe think it was inserted to add more visual damage to the tower? Concerning the damage, I'm not seeing anything different about them. So I'm trying to grasp what would be the purpose of such crazy image manipulation? Adding/removing beams does not seem to impact the photos in any other way but to make one suspicious.

Was it necessary for some reason? Maybe some plane/building sizing issue?

Thanks

(link for reference: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p2147712 )

Heiwa
Banned
Posts: 1062
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:20 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Heiwa » Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:36 am

I assume the destructions of WTC 2 and 1 shown live on TV and on various photos are 100% CGI in 3-D with cameras recording the Hollywood action of one single tower from 8 sides 45° apart with some sun lighting the model and a wind blowing by, i.e. you view only flat walls or corners. As no structure of any kind can be destroyed by a weak top part dropping down and collapsing (?) the stronger bottom structure, the animators must fake everything of the destruction with smoke, dust, flames and debris added step by step … in 3-D, while the top moves down. The weak top then disappears in the smoke and then there is a fountain of debris and wall panels being ejected, quite easy to animate. Later they add, on different layers, surrounding buildings and lampposts and shadows, etc. applicable to the different angles of view and hand out to complacent photographers that are happy to say they recorded it. It is quite clever done but it does not stand up to careful scrutiny and, evidently, to a real, structural damage analysis of the towers. :rolleyes:
In the photos above of the South Tower (WTC2) viewed from say southeast three of four different photographers have been given the same CGI (from the same SE viewing position) by the perps and maybe they have tried to improve with some own photo shopping. :P

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:53 pm

Equinox wrote:
simonshack wrote:
Luckily, in 2010, the very stupid 9/11 perpetrators decided to release higher-resolution versions of their horrid digital animations. The below HQ frame of this CNN shot is from the NIST-FOIA batch of imagery released in 2010. (Huh? Have you ever asked yourself why NIST would have been sitting on/archiving this 9/11 image pool ? Wouldn't the TV networks have that material stored in their archives? )

Anyways, the below image was supposedly shot from a "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building... How anyone can still believe these are real/genuine images by a broadcast-quality CNN camera is quite beyond me. Note the <<<clear masking line>>> around WTC1:
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u88I0jZ8xYo
Image

Here's a frame of the collapse of WTC2 - supposedly from the same "static camera" placed in the CNN's Penn Plaza building". All I have done here is to apply a brightness/contrast filter to highlight the absurd, pitch black cartoon-outlines around the buildings (and other problems):
source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKyHn8pxGo
Image

The 2 above images naturally lead to the following simple and logical conclusion:

NOT ONLY WAS THE IMAGERY OF AN AIRPLANE IMPACTING THE WTC SHOWN ON TV a digital animation, ALSO THE WTC COLLAPSES were digital animations.


Image

Originally sourced-- 9/11 TV Archives - CNN Sept. 11, 2001 9.29 am - 10.11 am@ 34.45 Minutes

Image
Re- Released NisT --- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5 20
Image


Image

Originally sourced--- CNN Sept. 11, 2001 8.48 - 9.29am@ 22.08 Minutes
Image


Re- Released--- NIST FOIA: WPIX Dub5, Clip 15

Image

Sample---
Image
Image

Image

Some birds,

The 9/11 hoax was all about tv fakery. Faked Manhattan sceneries, fake computer-inserted planes + helicopters and - believe it or not - overlayed birds...

These few seconds alone prove that the LIVE TV broadcasts were digitally manipulated.

Any ornithologists / birdwatchers out there ? Would you please watch this video and tell us what birds fly in flocks over Manhattan, capable of accelerating in close formation (all at once) by a factor of 44% in a split second?

I believe such birds do not exist. What we see here is a good example of the crude video layering technique used by the TV networks to dupe the World.

Why was this done? Most probably (just as all the various fly-by choppers which invariably fly-by perpendicular to the viewer) they were inserted to inject some 'life' to the fake skyline necessary to conceal the incoming 'object' that hit the tower. The masking is evident by looking at the 'linings' around the contour of the towers and smoke.
Image


Conclusive proof of TV fakery.


In-depth research.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU6J_PLHkcU



FOX5 9/11 8:52 - 9:01 am

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Equinox » Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:53 pm

Heiwa wrote: In the photos above of the South Tower (WTC2) viewed from say southeast three of four different photographers have been given the same CGI (from the same SE viewing position) by the perps and maybe they have tried to improve with some own photo shopping. :P
Yes like these shots right??

Image

Image


Could it get sillier than this? YES - IT CAN !
:lol:
Image

Image
BEN REISMAN source video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SD2DBUJl0OM[/quote]

And this
Image

And these....
CBS,WNBC, ABC7, (WABC) ABC, BBC, CNBC, FNN, Japan, FOX, ITN/Reuters, NBC, New York1, Unknown, Unknown 1,Unknown 2, Unknown 3, Camera Planet,

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage

revolutionphase1
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by revolutionphase1 » Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:06 pm

Here is someone who filmed the entire collapse of both towers. If the collapse is fake as you say, then this video is fake. Are they perhaps looking at a green screen the entire time? Its very possible. Whatever the case, watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAxMcJ4j ... plpp_video

Brutal Metal
Member
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:58 am
Contact:

Re: CGI Collapse footage.

Unread post by Brutal Metal » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:08 am

I surely bet the PERPS figured Nobody would go to the extremes of analyzation like the members here have done with video,audio and still pictures as well as all the BS flight logs, firemen and victims death lists etc.. :D

Post Reply