The "ex-NYPD cop" in the case will probably turn out to be frequent Fox News "crime expert" Bo Dietl (or someone of similar trustworthiness) who will "confess" that he once was approached for post 9/11 phone-hacking advice by "someone" he thought worked for Murdoch -- but promptly and valiantly turned him down out of respect for all the "tragic victims and their families"(!)
Murdoch's genuine British political troubles may roil on for a while, since his fading choke-hold on various UK pols is bitterly resented and counter-plotted against, but this opportunistic "ride" on that scandal's coattails is likely to end this way in the USA: Untraceable bribe offer, no actual 9/11-related hacking, and no 9/11-related criminal charges -- but uncountable scads of newsprint, webspace, and broadcast-newstime devoted to reinforcing the "public myth" (thank you, Dr. Zelikow) of all the thousands of "tragic victims and their families". Remember that if any serious criminal investigation-and-trial were to take place, actually following the rules of evidenciary procedure, a lot more (still-vulnerable) fakery would have to be cooked up by the perps to substantiate the existence of real people, with real cellphones, real sim-cards, real service-provider records, and real phone numbers.
Meanwhile, the concomitant Rep. Maloney news story, about her disturbing discovery that the New York State death records for 9/11 were no higher (405) than the average death stats for any other day of the year, gurgles down the memory hole (after she receives a stern warning from her covert superiors and immediately backpedals, to avoid the dreaded, career-dooming label of "conspiracy theorist"). And perhaps the Scripps-Howard reporter who "crossed the danger line" in this sorry instance will be reminded (by some "trusted advisor") of the fate of such reckless reporters of the past as Don Bolles, J.H. Hatfield, Danny Casolaro or Gary Webb.
Anyway, those few Scripps-Howard news syndicate accounts about Maloney demanding (and not receiving) an explanation for the massive absence of 9/11 victims' names in the Social Security death database only appeared (according to Google) in a couple dozen minor papers, while the tale was scrupulously avoided by both the Associated Press and virtually all other mainstream-media news outlets in the States.
And so the "Mighty Wurlitzer" plays on!
Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
-
- Member
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
Interesting you mention Maddy. Since learning about media fakery I've kind of assumed it was a faked incident, but had never analyzed it closely.brianv wrote:Madeleine McCann hoax
One odd thing about this case. The majority of fake personas are not very attractive, most obviously the 9/11 vicsims. You would expect Maddy to be a cute girl, like JonBenet Ramsey (was that also faked?), but Kate McCann to me is really unexpectedly good-looking. Tall, thin, and blond is right up my alley. Kate doesn't look like most other English women, who have none of those qualities. Did they pick good-looking actors to make this story 'matter' more to the public?
Other than her good looks, she does take all the standard faked poses in other images - crying, holding a pic of Maddy, looking oh-so-concerned.
-
- Member
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:17 pm
- Contact:
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
For the casual or newbie reader of CluesForum, who may be at risk of being "put off" by the widely shared opinion here that "the world tells 9/11 lies while we tell the truth," please pause to carefully consider this:
It's been more than a week since the Scripps-Howard News Service first distributed its amazing (in that it was published at all) story about the New York Congresswoman demanding that Social Security explain why most of the 9/11 victims are missing from the agency's Master Death File.
Now that should have been plenty of time for each of the highest-visibility "conspiracy-sleuthing" websites, such as Rense, PrisonPlanet, 911Blogger, etc. (each of whom probably has paid staffers who troll the web hourly looking for suspicious/sensational/inflammatory stories about nefarious plots and cover-ups) to discover and re-post Scripps-Howard's story -- from at least one of the syndicate's few subscriber newspapers that dared to carry the story or from the various search-engine links that were then automatically generated.
But no, you won't find that story at any of these obviously "controlled-opposition" distraction sites, and it doesn't even show up in the embedded, site-only, Google-provided search engine on Scripps-Howard's own site anymore!
Yes, a few, much lower-traffic locations (besides ours) do still have the story posted or linked, such as Dr. Fetzer's and Phil Jayhan's forums, but just like the discovery, several weeks ago, of massive fakery and impersonation in Tuscon, this is a story that all those "gatekeepers wrapped in truther's clothing" clearly have their orders not to touch.
Oh, to be a "fly on the wall" in the offices of Rep. Carolyn Maloney or Scripps-Howard reporter Thomas Hargrove -- when the edict came from "on high" to DROP IT NOW!!!
Of course, there's always the possibility the perps will, at some point in the future, come forth with a semi-plausible "explanation" for all the missing names, but since at present they weren't ready to do so -- THE STORY HAD TO DIE QUICKLY.
It's been more than a week since the Scripps-Howard News Service first distributed its amazing (in that it was published at all) story about the New York Congresswoman demanding that Social Security explain why most of the 9/11 victims are missing from the agency's Master Death File.
Now that should have been plenty of time for each of the highest-visibility "conspiracy-sleuthing" websites, such as Rense, PrisonPlanet, 911Blogger, etc. (each of whom probably has paid staffers who troll the web hourly looking for suspicious/sensational/inflammatory stories about nefarious plots and cover-ups) to discover and re-post Scripps-Howard's story -- from at least one of the syndicate's few subscriber newspapers that dared to carry the story or from the various search-engine links that were then automatically generated.
But no, you won't find that story at any of these obviously "controlled-opposition" distraction sites, and it doesn't even show up in the embedded, site-only, Google-provided search engine on Scripps-Howard's own site anymore!
Yes, a few, much lower-traffic locations (besides ours) do still have the story posted or linked, such as Dr. Fetzer's and Phil Jayhan's forums, but just like the discovery, several weeks ago, of massive fakery and impersonation in Tuscon, this is a story that all those "gatekeepers wrapped in truther's clothing" clearly have their orders not to touch.
Oh, to be a "fly on the wall" in the offices of Rep. Carolyn Maloney or Scripps-Howard reporter Thomas Hargrove -- when the edict came from "on high" to DROP IT NOW!!!
Of course, there's always the possibility the perps will, at some point in the future, come forth with a semi-plausible "explanation" for all the missing names, but since at present they weren't ready to do so -- THE STORY HAD TO DIE QUICKLY.
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
Kate and Gerry McCann go straight to Gordon Brown in search for more powerful backers
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 477770.ece
In blue football shirt as oppossed to Holly and Jessica in red. The crown Chakra colour. Do you think Labour/Conservative, Chelsea/Man U are accidents.
Look into my eyes!
And the offshoots - of course an angel called Rose
The UK's Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), has also launched a web-based appeal and poster campaign to help find Madeleine.
Look into my eyes!
Ceops
Book, Movie, countless TV interviews but no prosecution for leaving their child unattended to go out drinking. Had she existed she would have been taken away from them!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 477770.ece
In blue football shirt as oppossed to Holly and Jessica in red. The crown Chakra colour. Do you think Labour/Conservative, Chelsea/Man U are accidents.
Look into my eyes!
And the offshoots - of course an angel called Rose
The UK's Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), has also launched a web-based appeal and poster campaign to help find Madeleine.
Look into my eyes!
Ceops
Book, Movie, countless TV interviews but no prosecution for leaving their child unattended to go out drinking. Had she existed she would have been taken away from them!
-
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
To this day, in all this Murdoch story, I still have to find one news item trying to explain why he would have spied on 9/11 "victims". To what end?
It is absurd how they make you focus on certain unconsquential parts of the story, like "he is finished", "fox is finished", skipping on the really interesting investigative clues.
If the Maloney story is connected to this one, someone seem to be playing the 9/11 fake victims card on a few tables... as a "hint", naturally: as a message. Not as an authentic effort to reach the truth.
Just like DSK was pushed out of the FMI framing him for his sexual predatory style, and, once achieved his demise, the frame was lifted, so Murdoch might be under pressure to let go of his empire, and the 9/11 victims card is being used in this game to that end -- but the story will be buried once his defeat will be accomplished.
Of course, it still lives the flimsy possibility that this is an orchestrated attack against the people of the 9/11 scam. But in that case it is not very decipherable...
It is absurd how they make you focus on certain unconsquential parts of the story, like "he is finished", "fox is finished", skipping on the really interesting investigative clues.
If the Maloney story is connected to this one, someone seem to be playing the 9/11 fake victims card on a few tables... as a "hint", naturally: as a message. Not as an authentic effort to reach the truth.
Just like DSK was pushed out of the FMI framing him for his sexual predatory style, and, once achieved his demise, the frame was lifted, so Murdoch might be under pressure to let go of his empire, and the 9/11 victims card is being used in this game to that end -- but the story will be buried once his defeat will be accomplished.
Of course, it still lives the flimsy possibility that this is an orchestrated attack against the people of the 9/11 scam. But in that case it is not very decipherable...
-
- Member
- Posts: 5060
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
That's actually a good point. It's interesting to see in the media who is allowed to "touch" the untouchables and who isn't. Is Fox more "in line" for going where other networks won't? ("spew[ing ...] "venom" directly at Kevin Barrett) Or is Fox a bit of a wild card sometimes for even allowing such folks? Sometimes I think Fox is deliberately, cartoonishly self-mocking and the perps don't like Murdoch's arrogant tease of their very serious plans. It's a natural selection for them to try to push out his attitude and humoring of fake 9/11 truthers like Jesse Ventura and go for a more straight-faced propaganda approach like CNN.Yes, a few, much lower-traffic locations (besides ours) do still have the story posted or linked, such as Dr. Fetzer's and Phil Jayhan's forums, but just like the discovery, several weeks ago, of massive fakery and impersonation in Tuscon, this is a story that all those "gatekeepers wrapped in truther's clothing" clearly have their orders not to touch.
Just a thought. I am sure the whole thing is an orchestration, but I wonder if there are subtle preferences at work here.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7341
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
nonhocapito wrote:To this day, in all this Murdoch story, I still have to find one news item trying to explain why he would have spied on 9/11 "victims". To what end?
It is absurd how they make you focus on certain unconsquential parts of the story, like "he is finished", "fox is finished", skipping on the really interesting investigative clues.
If the Maloney story is connected to this one, someone seem to be playing the 9/11 fake victims card on a few tables... as a "hint", naturally: as a message. Not as an authentic effort to reach the truth.
Yes Nonho,
The whole saga is absurd - and those foxy folks are pretty good at storytelling.
So, why not play along with their own game? Here's a saga I just wrote for you. Hope you enjoy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE HORSE'S ADVICE - a media saga by Simon Shack
Murdoch has had, for about a decade now, a pile of equine excrement (a.k.a. horseshit) lying on his lush office carpet. It's a pretty big load of crap - weighing in at approximately 63 kilos (or the weight of 3000 souls X 21g ). Rupert has - of course - tried to remove it, or at least sweep it under the rug - time and again. In vain. One of the problems is that the wicked Webfairy has cast a spell on the dung pile - since she believes the soul of her dearly missed 'Edna Cintron' lies in there.
So poor Rupert has been forced to find a way around the problem. With his own magic Spin Wand (stolen from an Aboriginal sorcerer), he has spun hundreds of spider webs around his office ceiling. This way, whenever someone enters his office, the visitors' attention will be drawn to the ugly spiders crawling on the ceiling - and pay little attention to the horsecrap on the carpet. Rupert, ever the quirky Aussie joker, gives his spiders funny names such as 'Sun Scam', 'Wire Tap', 'Spy-Der', 'Fall Guy', 'Maddof' - or girls' names such as Maddy, Holly, Jessica, Myriam, etc...
So how, you may ask, did that monstrous pile of crap get there? This goes back to a meeting sometime in early 2001. Rupert had invited to his office all his media-mogul cronies and other goons in high places. George Bush Junior, ever the cow-boy prankster, arrived on horseback. They had this plan to pull off a gigantic false-flag attack - as huge as their combined egoes - to fool the public, enable profitable wars and a myriad of murky business opportunities. They all chuckled merrily and slapped high-fives at the prospect. Meanwhile - back in an office corner - Bush's hungry stallion was being fed with majestic stacks of hay brought in from the Queen's stables.
It was a bold plot: they would bring down the old, decrepit - and empty - World Trade Center complex, and tell everyone that 'Binladen' was to blame for the killing of thousands of fictional office workers. But all of a sudden, as they kept planning away, Rupert and his fellow conspirators ran into a deadlock: to their general embarrassement, they had come to realize that none of them was smart enough to come up with a way of generating such a mass of fictional organic matter. So they turned around and called upon the horse for advice. The horse delivered.
In a recent party in Rupert's office, something terrible happened. As the guests were, as usual, looking up in the ceiling, arguing about the spiders( "that's the ugliest one!" - " No, that one down there is uglier!!") a tipsy American congresswoman tripped over a caviar case and landed face first into the nasty manure. "Yeech!" - she gasped. "What's this?!" A nearby guest exclaimed : "Gross!" A butler rushed to her rescue, wiping the dung off her face. Murdoch himself rushed to the scene to help pull her out - "I'm so sorry, Madam Malone"! But the damage was done: Rupert promptly ordered his butler to set all his ugly spiders free - to divert the attention out of his office. The butler stuttered: "But,but... Sir...What will The Public say?" The foxy mogul growled back like a wolf: " Throw them spiders OUT! In the street! My shitty media empire can fall - but if this crap comes out, the Whole Wide West will collapse! Just do it!"
(spoof frontpage montage by Reel Deal)
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
How predictable, just like David Kelly. Ludicrous. Since the top two cops on London had just resigned, it was easy to see this coming.
Police: Phone-hacking whistleblower found dead
Police say Sean Hoare, the whistleblower reporter who alleged widespread hacking at the News of the World, has been found dead.
Police said Hoare's death at his home in England was not considered to be suspicious [FMB - Bullshit.], according to Britain's Press Association news agency.
http://news.yahoo.com/police-phone-hack ... 11003.html
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
.
Last edited by reel.deal on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
.
Last edited by reel.deal on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
.
Last edited by reel.deal on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
.
Last edited by reel.deal on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:51 pm
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
It's looks like there was a crack in the dam, and the engineers had to call in the "Master Craftsman" to plug the hole.by repentantandy » July 18th, 2011, 5:45 am
e: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
For the casual or newbie reader of CluesForum, who may be at risk of being "put off" by the widely shared opinion here that "the world tells 9/11 lies while we tell the truth," please pause to carefully consider this:
It's been more than a week since the Scripps-Howard News Service first distributed its amazing (in that it was published at all) story about the New York Congresswoman demanding that Social Security explain why most of the 9/11 victims are missing from the agency's Master Death File.
Now that should have been plenty of time for each of the highest-visibility "conspiracy-sleuthing" websites, such as Rense, PrisonPlanet, 911Blogger, etc. (each of whom probably has paid staffers who troll the web hourly looking for suspicious/sensational/inflammatory stories about nefarious plots and cover-ups) to discover and re-post Scripps-Howard's story -- from at least one of the syndicate's few subscriber newspapers that dared to carry the story or from the various search-engine links that were then automatically generated.
But no, you won't find that story at any of these obviously "controlled-opposition" distraction sites, and it doesn't even show up in the embedded, site-only, Google-provided search engine on Scripps-Howard's own site anymore!
Yes, a few, much lower-traffic locations (besides ours) do still have the story posted or linked, such as Dr. Fetzer's and Phil Jayhan's forums, but just like the discovery, several weeks ago, of massive fakery and impersonation in Tuscon, this is a story that all those "gatekeepers wrapped in truther's clothing" clearly have their orders not to touch.
Oh, to be a "fly on the wall" in the offices of Rep. Carolyn Maloney or Scripps-Howard reporter Thomas Hargrove -- when the edict came from "on high" to DROP IT NOW!!!
Of course, there's always the possibility the perps will, at some point in the future, come forth with a semi-plausible "explanation" for all the missing names, but since at present they weren't ready to do so -- THE STORY HAD TO DIE QUICKLY.
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
Lulz also allegedly hacked the UK Census Details, if you believe that anyone is so stupid as to store the UK's entire census data on a server. More wikileaks type horseshit I'm afraid!
Re: Murdoch spied on relatives of 9/11 victims? What gives?
.
Last edited by reel.deal on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.