9/11 MEMORIAL SCAMS

The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.

Unread postby brianv on Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:17 am

excised 4 Apr 7 2010, 12:50 AM wrote:
brianv 4 Apr 6 2010, 11:27 PM wrote:
D.Duck 4 Apr 6 2010, 11:16 PM wrote: [quote="excised 4 Apr 6 2010, 09:31 PM"]
Looky Looky, it seems the work is catching on with others doing there own legwork, Check out this link to The Letsroll community forums of all places where phil jayhan is asking,

Whats in a "Carefully Prepared Alias?" Is Mike Rivero, John Wenckus from Flight 11?

http://letsrollforums.com/another-9-11- ... .html?amp;

Quite a good thread also they are looking into lady booth-barbara olson connectivity.




Why do I get a Jeff Hill feeling on this one?


D.Duck


And rightly so! After all the "NO PLANE THEORY" was invented because Shill Jayhan discovered in 2005 that it was military planes which hit the towers!


But what about the possibility of Mike Rivero being John Wenckus?.
do leopards ever change there spots?.
[/quote]

Oh dear, I didn't go to the link!

One might be tempted to say yes, but I would advise caution if it's coming from Lets Troll!

Mr Wenckus' two-tone facial coloring is a bit weird, I'd say it's a composite photo!

Image
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Unread postby fbenario on Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:31 am

ozzybinoswald 4 Apr 6 2010, 03:14 AM wrote:
It may be that Rachel the party hostess is the foundation actress for all these parts.

Rachel Uchitel can look very different in some photos.




Does anyone have any thoughts on why the Rachel Uchitel simulated person was used to "bring down" Tiger Woods? She supposedly broke the news first about his 'affairs'.

What in the world did he do to piss off the perps?

[ADMIN: please see specific thread on subject: http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shac ... owtopic=63 thanks. -hp]
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2231
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Unread postby antipodean on Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:32 am

sunshine05 4 Apr 7 2010, 02:05 AM wrote:Does anybody have a link to the photos of the 19 "terrorists"? I'm looking at something and I am unable to locate that page that has the photos of all of them. Would appreciate the help. Thanks.


http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am

Unread postby antipodean on Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:15 am

fbenario 4 Apr 7 2010, 01:31 AM wrote:
ozzybinoswald 4 Apr 6 2010, 03:14 AM wrote:
It may be that Rachel the party hostess is the foundation actress for all these parts.

Rachel Uchitel can look very different in some photos.




Does anyone have any thoughts on why the Rachel Uchitel simulated person was used to "bring down" Tiger Woods? She supposedly broke the news first about his 'affairs'.

What in the world did he do to piss off the perps?


Thoughts can generally be regarded as speculation.
You need to do some searches about Rachel Uchitel yourself, you may come across information that could link her to other 9/11 actresses.
We all think differently a bit of cross pollination of our thought processes is what could lead, as to how these molls were recruited.

The Tiger Woods thing is interesting, because the perps were happy to promote this, reminding the populace that there were indeed victims.
If it was a honey trap, why use a high profile 9/11 actress. Tiger must believe Rachel about her perished Fiancee, so therefore the victims must be real.

Another of Ozzie's links lead to this video about Dawn Robinson. (sorry but can't work out how to post a decent photo for comparison)
Pretty much a carbon copy of the Tania Head Template (or possibly the same person, but a long shot) Fat woman escape's down stairwell.
Image
Image
Maybe it was time for a perp publication to call time on the Tania Head story, once it had done it's job of promoting survivors tales, people believing that only Tania's tale was fake.
antipodean
Member
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am

Unread postby brianv on Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:46 am

terence.drew 4 Apr 7 2010, 02:28 AM wrote:Following the paper trail here in Ireland.

Next up is Ruth Clifford McCourt( flight 175). Sister of 'Tie a yellow ribbon around the old fake tree' Ron. There is an entry for this lady in the Register. June 4th 1956. There is also an entry for Ron (Ronald Hans Clifford) for October 9th 1954. Their Mother's maiden name is Eggers ..although she is called Pauline for Ronald's entry and Paula for Ruth's entry.
I have the hard copies of these births Cert entries and Martin Coughlins if yous want them.

Ron and Ruth's Mother 'Pauline Margaret Adelaide Eggers' remarried a man called Leslie Scott when after (I guess?) here husband died in 1994. His name was Valentine Brendan Clifford.


http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/us ... -0037.html





Eggers is rather an unusual name and brings to mind this....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103

Lockerbie, 35 students from Syracuse, Eggers was Chancellor at the time.

Melvin A. Eggers was the 9th Chancellor and President of Syracuse University. Eggers took office in 1971, amidst tumult at Syracuse and other university campuses, and retired in 1991. He is the third-longest serving chancellor in Syracuse history.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melvin_A._Eggers

"Donna Marsh O'Connor's bio
Age: 55
Email: donna@donnamarshoconnor.com
Education/Degrees: BA in English/Writing Arts, SUNY Oswego Attended the Masters Program in Creative Writing at Syracuse University
Experience: I have been teaching writing and rhetoric at Syracuse University for twenty years."

Rhetoric consists of three main parts Logos, Pathos, Ethos.

The second one, Pathos, might interest you ..

"Pathos (pronounced /ˈpeɪθɒs/; Greek: πάθος, for 'suffering' or 'experience') represents an appeal to the audience's emotions. (See Blub McElwhine) Pathos is a communication technique used most often in rhetoric (where it is considered one of the three modes of persuasion, alongside ethos and logos), and in literature, film and other narrative art"

Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Unread postby ozzybinoswald on Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:01 pm

ozzybinoswald 4 Apr 4 2010, 03:44 AM wrote:Here's a sneaky but still laughable backstop story as lacking in credibility as any memorial tribute or shill tale Darren McNulty might have spun:
When Clemens Touched a Family Touched by 9/11

In a nutshell, "the parents" discover a photo of Kevin with baseball's 'beleaguered by steroid revelations' Roger Clemens and Kev's pal then happens to spot Yankee GM Cashman in the subway and asks if he can arrange for Clemens to autograph the picture.

A meeting is set up with the parents and Clemens "asked questions about Kevin."

If there was any meeting at all Clemens' questions would no doubt arise from the fact that he had no recollection of ever meeting this simulated fan.

The photoshop image, autographed as if pre-9/11. There's no room for both men's arms no matter how they might be embraced.
Image


The "friend" said to have spotted Cashman in the subway is named John Dettleff. An image search turns this up which would be correct since our vicsim is said to have attended this school:
Image



There's a second baseball autograph associated with vicsim Kevin Williams.

This time the story goes that on March 2, 2002, a reporter for an alleged The Community Journal of Wading River, N.Y. approached Derek Jeter at a game in Tampa and told him about the eulogy for Kevin delivered by his sim-bro Jamie which revolved around a promise to "bring the ball" to toss around when next they meet in heaven.

Image
http://www.kevinsfoundation.org/press/J ... 202002.pdf

There's not much evidence for the existence of The Community Journal. No online presence. A box number and a phone number. Email may be addressed to: LettersCJ25A@aol.com

It may also be of more than a passing interest to suspicious types that the Long Island community of Wading River is located adjacent to Brookhaven National Labs.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... =firefox-a


But the point is this:

In 2008 Rachel Uchitel is also associated with Derek Jeter, romantically. Small world.


"Rachel liked to rub elbows with New York's rich and famous and to boast about it to others. Besides Tiger Woods she has been connected to Derek Jeter, A-Rod, Woods’ alleged mistress, Bones' star David Boreanaz, Ryan Seacrest and Stephen Dorff."
http://www.seriouslystupid.tv/2009/Dece ... chitel.htm


So, according to this script, both of Rachel/Jillian's contrived fianc?es (James Andrew O'Grady and Kevin Michael Williams) are eliminated together on the 104th floor of WTC 2 in the offices of Sandler O'Neil where they both are alleged to have been employed. I would conclude that this is another example of the pragmatic organizing principle.

And the baseball star who signs a ball for Jillian's almost-brother-in-law winds up dating her alter-ego of Rachel.


Simple enough. Stuff like this happens all the time. <_<
ozzybinoswald
Banned
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:52 am

Unread postby hoi.polloi on Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:15 pm

Exactly right, Oz. As pointed out before, they take shortcuts that will squeeze by on the concept of coincidence, but when taken as an organizational whole, it is obviously a human-made system attempting to coordinate a "real life"-scale fake event.

Speaking of clumps of human data, Long Island seems to be where a lot of back story is formulated for some characters, in minor newspapers. Since AP (associated press) knowledgeably covered for the small Long Island papes, one can assume we were not meant to go back as far as finding the AP source material, which so often appears as contrived as you found it.


There's not much evidence for the existence of The Community Journal.



Good work. I bumped into this "problem" so many times it has become instinct for me to not even point it out. At first glance of these dead end sources, I thought, "Okay this is obviously a web site or quickly set up placeholder like a digital front. But if people never get this far, they will never discover how totally obviously fake everything is."

It is fake. And it is obviously so. But it is hard sometimes for people to actually do the digging. They see a letter head of what is apparently a newspaper and it instantly legitimizes for them that it must be real ... as if graphic design and printing have only ever been exclusively used to pronounce the truth, let alone tiny papers that nobody's heard of. Bah!
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Unread postby fred on Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:09 am

There's some perp mnemonics at work too. Since celebrity bed-hopper "Rachel Uchitel" isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, they need to cut down on the amount of memorization she's required to perform for her various roles. It's a lot easier if all of her fiancees were working at the same floor at the same firm, and then when she's interviewed she can just say "My fiancee was on the 104th floor when the planes hit" no matter which character she's playing on that particular day.

In addition to generating additional 'human interest' through fascinatingly tragic coincidences, it's why the 'significant life events' for the various fakes center around 9-11. Flying to younger daughter's 9th birthday party on September 11... etc.

They've set up a lot of this in Mickey Mouse fashion to make it easier on the shills.

Famous people who never existed:

Kennedy, Robert Clinton
Rockefeller, Laura

Absurd duplication:

1469. Lynch, Farrell Peter
1470. Lynch, James Francis
1471. Lynch, Jr., Richard D
1472. Lynch, Jr., Robert Henry
1473. Lynch, Louise A.
1474. Lynch, Michael Cameron
1475. Lynch, Michael Francis
1476. Lynch, Michael Francis
1477. Lynch, Sean P.
1478. Lynch, Sean Patrick
fred
Banned
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:43 pm

Unread postby simonshack on Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:47 am

*

Re: The 2750 list (see previous page of this thread)


At first glance, I can't find any "names of flight 93" (Beamer, Bingham, Wainio, etc.)

At first glance, I can't find any "names of flight 77" (Burlingame, Charlebois, Barbara Olson etc.)


At first glance, I can find "names of flight 11"(the Angell's, Lewin, Ogonowski, Betty Ong, etc)

At first glance, I can find "names of flight 175"(Victor Saracini, Ruth McCourt, Lisa Frost, Louis Neil Mariani, etc)


So I guess this is the reason we have that 2750/2752 figure. Flight 93 ("44victims") and 77("64victims") passengers + the "PENTAGON CASUALTIES"("125 victims") are not included in the New York Office of Chief Medical Examiner's list.


So if we take the OCME's total of 2752 and add 44+64+125 we get " 2985".

That would jive with the CNN memorial (only) <_< :

Reported TOTAL death tolls of 9/11 2001:
Sept11thmemorial - 3181
Prayersforpeace - 3042 http://www.prayersforpeace.org/wall.shtml
9-11-2001.org - 3031 http://www.9-11-2001.org/victim_lists.html
SOS-ATTENTATS.org - 3028 http://www.sos-attentats.org/fiche-list ... victime=24
CNN memorial - 2985
911families - 2976 http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?page_id=889
Wikipedia - 2973 + 19 hijackers (=2992) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks
Rememberseptember11 - 2935
Fox News (article Sept11 2002) - 2812
La Repubblica (article Sept11 2009) - 2752
Navy Times - 2750
Le Monde - 2749
Wall of Americans - 2534
America Forever - 2467

This is interesting in the sense that the OCME seems to be going with the CNN memorial figures.
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread postby Realism911 on Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:18 am

simonshack 4 Apr 8 2010, 09:47 AM wrote:


So I guess this is the reason we have that 2750/2752 figure. Flight 93 and 77 passengers + the "PENTAGON CASUALTIES" are not included in the New York Office of Chief Medical Examiner's list.


Thats what I what concluded to myself today as well Simon. thats defintly why the discreptincy with the 2752 figure. I orignally posted the number 2752 a few days back. Because That is the number that the mayors office is officially quoting In the final search for the victims of WTC ..l I believe it goes for a few months. So offically to date thats the number of vicsims that died in wtc.
I'll Place the article up again. All media sources report only the same paragraph below...

Forensic experts to reexamine WTC rubble
Thursday, April 1st, 2010 -- 7:30 pm

New York forensic experts will start a major new search Monday through debris from the World Trade Center for remains of people killed in the 9/11 terrorist attack, officials said.
About 844 cubic yards (645 cubic meters) of material recovered from the reconstruction site at Ground Zero will be combed for bones and other remains of the 2,752 people killed when hijacked airliners slammed into the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001.
"That material is going to be sifted to see if there are any human remains," said Jason Post, a spokesman for Mayor Michael Bloomberg. "We're taking every step we can to recover the remains of 9/11 victims."

(Below Video shows all the cars and fire trucks that blew up to)
Link to video to WTC forensic investigation site (Fresh Kills Landfill) Staten Island.
25 Jan 2002 ( first fly over over Manhattan after FAA lifts WTC flyover ban) -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U37j8G6J9Z0
Realism911
Member
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:45 am

Unread postby simonshack on Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:13 pm

Realism911 4 Apr 8 2010, 09:18 AM wrote:

Forensic experts to reexamine WTC rubble
Thursday, April 1st, 2010 -- 7:30 pm





You've got to love their choice of date. :P
Image
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

PreviousNext

Return to VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest