"FALLING MAN" - the phony jumpers

The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.
Post Reply
Thunder
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:32 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by Thunder » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:22 pm

She is, here she's talking about it: http://www.history.com/videos/caroline-dries-on-911

MrSinclair
Member
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:29 am

Re: MISSING!

Unread post by MrSinclair » Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:37 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8oXH9TdDuc

During the video an instrumental version of the BeeGee's "How Deep Is Your Love" starts to play. One of the lyrics in this song is "you're my Savior when I fall".

fbenario
Member
Posts: 2232
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by fbenario » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:27 am

reel.deal wrote:Image
Yep, as I've said repeatedly, even a single faked image/video means The Event, as described by the media, DID NOT OCCUR. PERIOD.

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6783
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by simonshack » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:31 am

Just for the record:

Binladen's name was actually provided to us 41seconds after the 2nd "strike" - which is roughly 18minutes after the 1st "strike" (not 45min).

Proof here - at 4:40 into SEPTEMBER CLUES D: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuB4jLAuVLk

SmokingGunII
Member
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 am
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by SmokingGunII » Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:31 pm

As one who estimated that one of the featured jumpers in your montage was 8' tall in an earlier post in this thread, I have to say I just love this GIF RD! :lol: :blink: :D

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6783
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by simonshack » Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:27 pm

reel.deal wrote: shit ! the telephoto zoom nearly got crushed !!!
:o
Great one, reel deal! :lol:

This goes straight into our collection of slam-dunk proof of 9/11 image fakery.

KING KONG-------------------versus-----------------DANNY DE VITO?
Image

Does any photographic wiz wish to challenge this? Is anyone going to bring up "focal distortion" issues here? Let's hear from you!

icarusinbound
Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:49 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by icarusinbound » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:21 am

2003 release? Kind of close to the main event, I mean for 'reverence and respect' purposes (though I suppose 18months-2yrs might be the standard Hollywood sequel release lag-time...)

But from your last link...am I being taken in by this, surely this is parody? Subjective message broadcasting... is that the overt equivalent of subliminal messaging? Is this a gamers' RPG equivalent of 'Brass Eye'?
Classification

SERIOUS GAME

Purpose

Besides play, this title features the following intents:
Subjective message broadcasting
Market

This title is used by the following domains:
Politics
Audience

This title targets the following audience:
Age : 17-25 / 25-35
General Public
Gameplay

The gameplay of this title is Game-based
(designed with stated goals)

nonhocapito
Administrator
Posts: 2555
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by nonhocapito » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:50 am

reel.deal wrote:Image
Image

The '93 WTC TruckBomb 'workers @ windows' are fake as fuck aswell, btw...
<_<

I've never seen these ones, rd, where do they come from? Are both of them from 1993?

lux
Member
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by lux » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:59 am

FYI - it is common practice in Hollywood when a distant group of people is to be represented, such as spectators at a sporting event, to use lots of 2D cutouts with real extras interspersed amongst them. The cutouts are life-sized enlarged photos of real people. The real extras amongst them add motion to the scene and complete the illusion. There are agencies that provide these cutouts for movie productions. The effect works surprisingly well as it's hard to tell a life size photo of a person from a real person at a distance. They've been used in many movies that you've probably seen without noticing. It also saves lots of money on pay and meals for extras.

SmokingGunII
Member
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 am
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by SmokingGunII » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:23 pm

LOLOLOL.

These 93 fakes are horrendous! I think it is slowly becoming clear that 93 was not only the precursor to 9/11, but a trail run for some of the fakery!

I confess that I don't know the composition of the WTC glass, but I would be surprised if it was less than 10mm thick and either laminated or toughened (which shatters to safe particles when impacted).

Whatever the composition, one would expect to see the suspended ceiling panels through the holes rather than the "black" caused by the eraser tool in Photoshop! :lol: :P

hollycrap
Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:04 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by hollycrap » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:07 am

Image

Image

:blink:

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by Equinox » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:14 am

hollycrap wrote:
Image

:blink:
Image
Austin Powers??
:lol:

whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:56 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by whatsgoingon » Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:19 pm

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on Fri May 24, 2013 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by Equinox » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:22 am

hey Reel or (anyone)
have you done a post on this falling image accredited to Allan Tannenbaum ? Much help would be appreciated B)
Image

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6783
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: FALLING MAN

Unread post by simonshack » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:30 am

*

EDNA CINTRON ABERRATION

This image is impossible - for one simple reason:

THICK SMOKE WAS SEEN GUSHING OUT OF THIS GASH FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE MORNING !

Image

Therefore, the above image is impossible. And so is the below image:
THERE IS HARDLY ANY SMOKE TO BE SEEN AT ALL!!!


Image

In fact, this may be one of the worst cock-ups by the "9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" ! As they decided to release (at some later stage) these close-up images of the gash (with people seen standing in it!), they completely forgot about the fact that the 9/11 TV imagery showed, uninterruptedly, thick smoke gushing out of the gash...

for the entire duration of their 102-MINUTE made-for-TV Hollywood movie!!!


...from start...
Image

...to finish...
Image

Post Reply