Yankee451 user on YouTube

How the controlled opposition was designed to be part of the 9/11 hoax
daozen
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:12 pm

Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by daozen » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:57 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn3a--hf7_s

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Unread post by simonshack » Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:56 am

*

Oh dear...

That's Yankee 451 - who once called me a "lying goat-fucker"! :lol:

I call him "Dave Von Kleist v.2.0" <_<

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p2369098

daozen
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:12 pm

Unread post by daozen » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:01 am

simonshack wrote:*

Oh dear...

That's Yankee 451 - who once called me a "lying goat-fucker"! :lol:

I call him "Dave Von Kleist v.2.0" <_<

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p2369098
So what was the big deal about the gash, or damage pics being being real or not? Even if they were? what would that prove? Do you think he's a shill or what's the deal? what kind of shill tactic would that be! haha :lol:

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Unread post by simonshack » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:45 am

*


Oh - I'm sooo excited! We will finally be able to prove scientifically and beyond resonable doubt that a plane wing crashing into a steel structure does not look like THIS...

Image

... but rather like THIS :

Image

What a joke. :rolleyes:

hoi.polloi
Administrator
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:33 pm

I am renaming the topic to the subject at hand, as "Have you guys seen this?!" didn't seem to be very descriptive.

:lol:

lux
Member
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by lux » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:21 pm

So, what is this guy's angle exactly? "No planes but the vicsim idea is crazy?" Is that his position?

daozen
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by daozen » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:56 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:I am renaming the topic to the subject at hand, as "Have you guys seen this?!" didn't seem to be very descriptive.

:lol:
sorry, thanks, very appropriate!

daozen
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by daozen » Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:00 pm

lux wrote:So, what is this guy's angle exactly? "No planes but the vicsim idea is crazy?" Is that his position?
yeah, I spent a while looking at his posts yesterday, couldnt make much of it. :huh: but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by simonshack » Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:22 pm

daozen wrote: ...but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.
Well, daozen - I do hope you truly got my point.

Again, THIS is how the proposed "re-enactment of a 767-slamming-into-steel-skyscaper" is illustrated ...

Image

I sincerely hope you're not going to waste a cent on this farcical experiment which, I have good reasons to suspect, will end up being deemed 'inconclusive' - only to be used as a (stoopid) debunking argument by the plane-huggers...

Btw, here's how a 200mph aluminum projectile reacts when striking a speedway wall:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJPkbhx5LpI

Do you think that this Indycar chassis (undoubtedly stronger than a Boeing767) would have sliced right through the wall if it had been doing 500mph? And do you think it would have looked much different if it had struck THIS obstacle ? :

Image

Image

And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image

daozen
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by daozen » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 am

simonshack wrote:
daozen wrote: ...but Simon's got a point, maybe we don't need to give him all of our moneys... :lol: I still find it would be interesting to see how the wing reacts in non-cgi life.
Well, daozen - I do hope you truly got my point.
Oops! :unsure: , I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough Simon! sometimes my sarcasm comes out a bit ambivalent. haha :P I really think you would have been better of making music with the ol' Social Service than prolonging this thread. Or better yet a new documentary that exposes some of our beloved media fakery ;)

Again, THIS is how the proposed "re-enactment of a 767-slamming-into-steel-skyscaper" is illustrated ...

Image

I sincerely hope you're not going to waste a cent on this farcical experiment which, I have good reasons to suspect, will end up being deemed 'inconclusive' - only to be used as a (stoopid) debunking argument by the plane-huggers...
I wasnt being sarcastic about my interest to see how that plane would have actually reacted though! Not that I think it would be too different to throwing a soda can into a concrete wall... <_< but yeah as for this particular fund-raising, I couldn't agree more thinking that whatever happens when they finally get their "tens of thousandths" :lol: it still would somehow not prove that planes dont melt into buildings. :huh:

Btw, here's how a 200mph aluminum projectile reacts when striking a speedway wall:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJPkbhx5LpI

Do you think that this Indycar chassis (undoubtedly stronger than a Boeing767) would have sliced right through the wall if it had been doing 500mph? And do you think it would have looked much different if it had struck THIS obstacle ? :

Image

Image
I actually mentioned an F1 car with my father a couple days ago! on my tenth attempt to explain the real 9/11 to him. Couldn't get past the "but it was going at 500 mph" and "but it's made differently" bullshit arguments... :(

And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image
I'm still puzzled by this one though? :huh: Is it real? How come it didn't go all the way in? Ah!... wasn't going fast enough probably... B)

agraposo
Member
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:48 pm

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by agraposo » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:24 am

daozen wrote:
And of course, the one that struck my bathroom on September 11 2011 did NOT cause my house to collapse! :P
Image
Did the nose emerge from the other side? :P

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by simonshack » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:50 pm

*

Can anyone explain to me why, when image-goo-gling "simon shack", the first picture / portrait to appear is one of Yankee451?


https://www.google.it/search?q=simon+sh ... 60&bih=613


:blink: :huh: :wacko:


As a matter of fact, Yankee451 is even BOASTING about this horrible google-glitch:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 1061910541


Please check out the post above the one I linked to. Yankee451 actually states that :

"Simon Shack is a charlatan whose work helps protect the media."

In hindsight, I still think we did well to ban this Yankee451 clown from this forum. <_<

fbenario
Member
Posts: 2231
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by fbenario » Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:31 am

simonshack wrote:*

Can anyone explain to me why, when image-goo-gling "simon shack", the first picture / portrait to appear is one of Yankee451?


https://www.google.it/search?q=simon+sh ... 60&bih=613


:blink: :huh: :wacko:


As a matter of fact, Yankee451 is even BOASTING about this horrible google-glitch:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 1061910541


Please check out the post above the one I linked to. Yankee451 actually states that :

"Simon Shack is a charlatan whose work helps protect the media."

In hindsight, I still think we did well to ban this Yankee451 clown from this forum. <_<
What was synergetic67's username here before he was banned?

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by simonshack » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:28 am

fbenario wrote: What was synergetic67's username here before he was banned?
Dear Fred Benario,

Hmm - I just wish he would e-mail me at simonshack@libero.it - (or call me on Skype - my Skype username is "simon.shack") as we certainly need to work this out. We all make mistakes - and if we've banned synergetic67, this seems to be one of them!

As for those snowed-in fear-mongers warning us all about posting our personal contacts on the internet, I say: to heck with that. Time has come for us to laugh away such silly warnings. We have nothing to fear - but fear itself (as someone once said).

simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 6776
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Yankee451 user on YouTube

Unread post by simonshack » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:08 pm

If you'd be interested (but perhaps you wouldn't) I have - reluctantly - registered at the David Icke Forums - only to "defend myself" against Yankee451's silly accusations of me being some sort of disinformer/ shill/ agent/ whatever... <_< ... and, of course, to gracefully respond to all of his questions regarding the September Clues /Cluesforum research.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthre ... 648&page=7




Yankee's droll multiple-missile theory: :lol: (our ol' "buddy" ozzybinoswald thinks that "it's cool"...)


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd4CYAVfI8M


Image
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost ... stcount=33

Post Reply