I propose a game. A game however with an instructive purpose. A person can say a name and the next person posting has to decide whether this person is a perp, shill, dupe or a sim and write some reasons why. The person can be drawn from any field of public life whatsoever. They then, at the bottom of their own post, post another name.
It would go a little like this
someone would start by posting something like.
Then next post should say
There is nothing real about this person. She does not even look real and her writings are just written by a team of perps to piss off everybody and confuse feminists.
(they would then at the bottom of their post propose the next person)
(then the next post would be something like)
Richard Rorty=dupe (but not totally clear, might just be a coward)
Either he is taking instructions to stay away from controversial themes, or is blinded by his own arrogance and his academic prestige. Perhaps one needs to read his books 'closely'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingen ... Solidarity. Hmmm. Irony as philosophy. Could indeed even be a perp. Not clear.
(then they would post the next name)
Ok. I will begin
The rev. Stephen L. Anderson
How the controlled opposition was designed to be part of the 9/11 hoax