I see Simon hasn't re-posted the links to his prior radio interviews yet.
But while we're waiting, here's a curious excerpt from the most recently archive-posted episode of Jim Fetzer's radio program. The guest identified himself as Onebornfree (OBF) an “independent researcher” who also said he was definitely NOT part of the established 9/11 truth community.
JIM FETZER interviews ONEBORNFREE
http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20 ... fakery.mp3
Fetzer: “...what we're talking about here (the CBS dive bomber shot) is a fabricated image.”
OBF: “I believe it is. It's totally fabricated. I believe what Simon Shack has uncovered. I believe that everything in that original CBS footage is a part of a video composite. No part of that video is real. The buildings are fake. WTC Two is fake. The (WTC) One is fake.”
Fetzer: “What do you mean when you say that the buildings are fake? (Do you mean) there were real buildings there (in lower Manhattan) but you don't think that those were what is seen in the videos?”
OBF: “No. They are video composites.”
Fetzer: “Could that have been done in advance?”
OBF: “Yes. The whole video would have been made in advance, including the plane. There's no plane insert. The plane is part of the original construction. The whole thing is a construct. The sky, the background, the foreground of the other buildings, the WTC Two, the two towers, and the plane itself –everything – and the smoke coming out. Because the first alleged strike has occurred by this time. This is the second strike.”
Fetzer: “Okay... okay. I'm open to the possibility that that particular piece of footage was done in advance. And that they played it. And that it wasn't quite consonant with what it was they were actually going to project. Maybe they weren't confident the hologram was going to hold... so they had that (CBS video) available and they ran it.”
OBF: “Jim, none of them are (real). If you look at Simon Shack's work – I can give you a link if you want – the original networks' footage, all of the major networks that broadcast, none of them really broadcast the strike. That's only available on the so-called amateur footage of Hezarkhani and
Fairbanks and similar. But the original networks' footage is not really (genuine), except for maybe the Fox 5 footage, but even (on) that you can't really see the plane clearly striking on the actual face (of the building). But regardless of that, 175 is portrayed in every one of them as taking a different path. So they're all in opposition to each other – if you totally disregard the amateur footage.”
Dr. Fetzer, obviously distressed and perplexed by the guest's direct assertion of TOTAL TV fakery, recovers his composure and says he (Fetzer) is going to supply a copy of the interview to researcher Richard Hall (whose recent hologram-supporting “findings,” strongly criticised by the current guest, are based on assuming that the videos are real) to come on the program to respond. Fetzer then goes on to express his profound disappointment that Simon Shack, however, has refused “for his own reasons” all previous requests to be interviewed on the show.
The program concludes with the guest pointing Fetzer to a website exposing major impossibilities in the Hezarkhani footage and Fetzer seeming to be genuinely impressed with “how the building appears to be moving to meet the perfectly centered plane”.
Sadly the guest OBF (an obvious fan of September Clues) never does get around to raising the vicsim issue before the time runs out, but despite the contentious nature of his conversation with Fetzer in the early sections of the broadcast (with way too much arguing over why ANY media images or official flight data should be believed) Fetzer's initial, less-than-cordial attitude toward the Clues fan softens and warms markedly – after the above-quoted exchange takes place and the expose' of the bogus Hez. footage is examined. Fetzer ends the show by stating that he wants to have the (rather soft-spoken) Clues fan (whom Fetzer had earlier treated quite dismissively) return as a guest very soon!
Although it all could be just an “act” on Fetzer's part, he certainly did speak during this particular episode as if he were only superficially aware of the septemberclues.info research, depending instead on the recommendations, attacks, summaries and oversimplifications of others. It seemed as if he had not yet taken the time to actually read the detailed articles on the site and watch the videos carefully and completely.