What is Gravity?

If NASA faked the moon landings, does the agency have any credibility at all? Was the Space Shuttle program also a hoax? Is the International Space Station another one? Do not dismiss these hypotheses offhand. Check out our wider NASA research and make up your own mind about it all.

Re: What is Gravity?

Unread postby patrix on Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:14 am

Another interesting video about Eric Laithwaite who lifted a 20 kg weight effortlessly on national British TV. The Royal Institution were not amused. Start at 12 min.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1CD3J-2VAo

https://youtu.be/f1CD3J-2VAo

"When you are invited to be thus feted by your fellow members of the Royal Institution and to deliver a Discourse from the spot where Faraday and Davy stood, it is usually the prelude to collecting the rewards of a lifetime of distinguished public service: Fellowship of the Royal Society; Gold Medals; perhaps even a Knighthood. In keeping with such a conservative occasion, those invited to speak generally choose some worthy topic on which to discourse -- the future of science, perhaps, or the glorious achievements of the past. But Laithwaite chose not to discourse on some worthy, painless topic but instead to demonstrate to the assembled bigwigs that Newton's laws of motion -- the very cornerstone of physics and the primary article of faith of all the distinguished names gathered in that room -- were in doubt."

https://electricitybook.com/gyroscope-antigravity/
patrix
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: What is Gravity?

Unread postby patrix on Tue Apr 30, 2019 12:22 pm

Greetings Dear Cluesforumers,

Been doing some studying on gravity and aether physics the last few days and I'd like to share some musings. Please know that I'm not native English so the wording my be crappy.

I think the view of the aether as a kind of fluid that electromagnetic waves propagate through is correct. And like any fluid its density can change which in turn affect molecular materials. If for example the water at the bottom of a lake has a higher temperature than the water above, then neutrally buoyant objects in it tend to stay there. This is because that water becomes less dense.

And using that analogy, this could be the reason for gravity. The density of the aether is not affected by heat, but by electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic activity of Earth, "heats up" its surrounding aether, thus causing a bubble of lower aether pressure around it. And the air we live in gets affected by this thus keeping our atmosphere in place.

Magnets and electromagnets do the same thing, and this causes aether vortexes when the surrounding aether starts moving because of the changes in density. The "black hole" that can be seen when a magnetic field is viewed through a ferrofilm is the low pressure bubble that the magnet creates. In the case of Earth and its gravity we are inside this low pressure bubble and do not detect or get affected by the vortexes and commotion outside because of it.

If a strong enough local aether bubble with even lower pressure could be created and maintained, then you would in effect have an anti-gravity device and if you could control it so that the vortex created in the higher pressure aether outside it either pushes or pulls you, then you would have a vehicle that moves in defiance of Newtonian physics.

Now this may sound like Science Fiction BS but it seems that there already exists such a proof of concept. This can be done with gyroscopes. Take a look at the videos below. But do mind that this is a mainstream media production so the space travel and nuclear physics hoaxes must of course be enforced. A significant part of it is also devoted to explain to ordinary folks that trying to make new radical inventions puts a horrible strain on your family and otherwise nice life... Oh and my references to Simon has of course nothing to do with this "Professor Simon".


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5qlOahrQJ8

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAckjYtdig0

One might wonder why this type of technology is so suppressed. I believe one reason is the TYCHOS research project Simon has embarked on with my assistance as the digital artisan.

If the physics of aether and electromagnetism became correctly understood, then it would eventually also become clear that the Earth is in fact NOT moving at ninety times the speed of sound around the Sun just as the Michelson-Morley experiment indicated and Simons research vindicates. So this area needs to be kept under the covers at all cost.

And just like the lying child the Nutwork lie has become taller and taller. We've had Einstein and now we have the nuclear, space and terrorist hoaxes just to mention a few. Anything goes to maintain the position and prestige that they in turn use to cause trouble and harm for the rest of humanity. Need I say vaccines? I hope some day enough will be enough.

Peace and may reason prevail /Patrik
patrix
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: What is Gravity?

Unread postby patrix on Mon May 06, 2019 4:52 pm

So, I've been doing some more digging on the subject of gyroscopic propulsion and it seems like others have been following the tracks of Prof. Laithwaite or have come up with similar things independently. But established science/media/NASA is not very supporting it seems.

It becomes pretty obvious that these systems are affecting something, otherwise the so called Newtonian laws of inertia would be violated, but this "something" is obviously not air, water or expelled mass (which by the way is the unphysical and unprovable explanation to why rockets would supposedly create propulsion in space).

And I believe this "something" to be the substance Einstein removed from physics a century ago - the Aether. Inertia is probably aether friction and with the right type of motion this friction can be utilized to create motion in a specific direction without any need to interact with molecular materials which any other type of propulsion system of course have to (including rockets).

The last three videos leave me puzzled. It seems like some guy started a company called International Space Agency and one of it's research projects was an inertial propulsion engine. I have no idea what to make of it.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKUrKHQDO4c


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIt661hfr9c


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFtkFRUDAbE


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lMcnMgjq78


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thAsLC1YE2Q
patrix
Member
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Previous

Return to Apollo, and more space hoaxes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests