Fakery in Orbit: THE I$$

If NASA faked the moon landings, does the agency have any credibility at all? Was the Space Shuttle program also a hoax? Is the International Space Station another one? Do not dismiss these hypotheses offhand. Check out our wider NASA research and make up your own mind about it all.
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 1292
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by reel.deal »

hollycrap wrote:np fbenario,

Splashdown at Star City: The amazing underwater space facility used by Russian cosmonauts

It looks like the best water theme park ever devised.

But this giant pool is actually used by the Russian Federal Space Agency to train cosmonauts to space walk.

Located a short drive outside Moscow, Star City is a giant Cosmonaut Training Centre where spacemen perform maintenance exercises and develop skills in a shuttle mock-up underwater.

Image

Image

Image

+= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... nauts.html
Image
4b4ce3ba872a0300x160.gif
4b4ce3ba872a0300x160.gif (2.27 MiB) Viewed 4438 times
hollycrap
Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:04 am

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by hollycrap »

INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION goes to the silver screen http://www.imax.com/spacestation/
[ADMIN: Fixing broken links/images pass; above link non-functional. 01-14-2018
Consider WAYBACK ARCHIVE: https://web.archive.org/web/20120420185 ... cestation/
-HP]


Space Station 3D


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrGiq8QJDbg
[ADMIN: YouTube removed this video referenced below. -HP]

Narrated by Tom cruise, he starts by saying ...
Tom Cruise wrote:What an Incredible sight!!! A Hollywood special effect you are thinking? but no, it's for real ..
Image

yeah right!!!! if you say so, Mr Cruise :lol:
hollycrap
Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:04 am

Re: ENDEAVOUR - and the spaced-out NASA efforts

Unread post by hollycrap »

Right on Dcopymope.

And they (Russians and Americans) knew it since the late 1950s. Space was not that profitable amazing promise of endless resources for earthlings anymore, so they decided to keep the secret about space welding and make up sci fi companies to keep sucking money from the public.

Image
Note: you should read telescope photos, as the ranger being another metallic probe would have been welded too.
And they go on stating that ..
L.A.Times wrote:Four years ago when the Apollo project began, the broad "dark marias" which cover half the moon's face promised to be the most hospitable landing site for the first astronauts.
Ranger Photos Change Ideas of Moon Landing
'Dark Marias' First Believed Safe Now Thought to Be Deep Lava or Dust Beds

Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) - Los Angeles, Calif.
Author: ROBERT C TOTH
Date: Apr 11, 1965
Start Page: 14
Pages: 1
Section: A
Text Word Count: 1343

=> http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/acc ... atl=google

Apollo 11, purportedly landed on one of these marias. The Mare Tranquilitatis. Only the surface was not stiff ... but full of dust, like sand on a beach they even gave a fancy name to that sand, "regolith" they called it.

The latest scam agency is called Space X, private space company managed by ex NASA fraudsters. They promise they will take you to Mars and back for US$500.000. They cannot walk but they want to run. :angry:

Those who want to read more about space cold welding ... not caused by radiation but by the vacuum of space

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... &start=780 :D
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Unread post by Dcopymope »

hollycrap wrote:Right on Dcopymope.

And they (Russians and Americans) knew it since the late 1950s. Space was not that profitable amazing promise of endless resources for earthlings anymore, so they decided to keep the secret about space welding and make up sci fi companies to keep sucking money from the public.

Image
Note: you should read telescope photos, as the ranger being another metallic probe would have been welded too.
And they go on stating that ..
L.A.Times wrote:Four years ago when the Apollo project began, the broad "dark marias" which cover half the moon's face promised to be the most hospitable landing site for the first astronauts.
Ranger Photos Change Ideas of Moon Landing
'Dark Marias' First Believed Safe Now Thought to Be Deep Lava or Dust Beds

Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) - Los Angeles, Calif.
Author: ROBERT C TOTH
Date: Apr 11, 1965
Start Page: 14
Pages: 1
Section: A
Text Word Count: 1343

=> http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/acc ... atl=google

Apollo 11, purportedly landed on one of these marias. The Mare Tranquilitatis. Only the surface was not stiff ... but full of dust, like sand on a beach they even gave a fancy name to that sand, "regolith" they called it.

The latest scam agency is called Space X, private space company managed by ex NASA fraudsters. They promise they will take you to Mars and back for US$500.000. They cannot walk but they want to run. :angry:

Those who want to read more about space cold welding ... not caused by radiation but by the vacuum of space

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... &start=780 :D
They may try and get to Mars, if they are completely suicidal and not too concerned about the 100% possibility of getting completely chewed up by the vacuum of space, long before they get anywhere near Mars or any other planet, or even in low orbit. I think all the info about cold welding should be added to the locked thread titled "THE APOLLO HOAX mother of media fakery". This information should now be seen as the foundation of all the research on here exposing space travel as a complete fraud, because we have proven it scientifically.
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Unread post by simonshack »

*

ADMIN NOTICE (simonshack): This thread is now dedicated to NASA's purported INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (and related issues). Please observe this from now on. If you have any info regarding NASA's now defunct SPACE SHUTTLE program, please post it over here.
nonhocapito
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Unread post by nonhocapito »

Amazing work collecting this material, Simon.

About the title, I suggest we change it to something else. Too many things happened between the Moon Hoax and the ISS! The "After the Moon Hoax" part of the title made sense with Skylab, which was officially the continuation of the Apollo missions. But there have been too many different other "projects" in between before NASA and ESA concocted the money-making machine called ISS.

The title could either be something like: "From Skylab to ISS: the scam of the orbiting stations".

Or, we could split back the Skylab part, keeping it as an historical focus on the missing link between Apollo and the whole space stations/shuttle bullshit, dedicating this thread only to exposing the running events related to ISS.

In which case the title could be something like: "Fakery in orbit: The ISS".

Or not... :) :P
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Unread post by simonshack »

nonhocapito wrote: In which case the title could be something like: "Fakery in orbit: The ISS".

Or not... :) :P
I see your point, Nonho - although i will ask you to consider this: to call this thread "AFTER THE MOON HOAX: THE ISS" really puts into perspective the whole thing. After all, it was you who brilliantly coined the "AFTER THE MOON HOAX" sentence. All I did was to update it from the Skylab to the ISS !
nonhocapito
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Unread post by nonhocapito »

simonshack wrote:I see your point, Nonho - although i will ask you to consider this: to call this thread "AFTER THE MOON HOAX: THE ISS" really puts into perspective the whole thing. After all, it was you who brilliantly coined the "AFTER THE MOON HOAX" sentence. All I did was to update it from the Skylab to the ISS !
Yes but then we should have the "after the Moon hoax" sentence in front of the Endeavor thread too, or the Hubble thread etcetera...
It could be a bit confusing that we are singling out only the ISS as a hoax "after the moon hoax".
All I'm saying Skylab was actually the first scam that followed Apollo in time, which is what made that specification relevant.

not that it is so important, both points are valid ...Anyone else has an opinion? :)
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by simonshack »

*

A must read! :lol:

"Space station risks being turned into a ghost town as Russians
delay sending up rocket after recent crashes"


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -town.html


And an interesting reader's comment under that article...
This is just more fake narrative to go along with the other fake photos, video and narrative about the hoax ISS that is nothing but a lighted orbiting prop. You can know the ISS is a hoax because the spacewalks are a hoax because the spacsuits are a hoax. In their more than fifty years of alleged use, not a single spacesuit has ever been demonstrated to work in a walk-in high vacuum chamber here on Earth. In their more than fifty years of alleged use, not a single spacesuit nickel porous plate ice sublimator cooling system has ever been seen. Kinetic Particle Theory of Pressure explains why a spacesuit operating in high vacuum would be impossible. It's interesting that NASA has been foisting the lie that they can demonstrate the effects of a 5psi difference in a space glove pressurized to 5psi operating in a surrounding orbital vacuum near 0psi by mimicing it with a glove at atmospheric pressure (~15psi) within a chamber pumped down to 10psi. ISS is a hoax. Investigate 911

- Neil Baker, Kennewick, WA, USA, 14/9/2011 18:48
( Don't forget to vote Neil Baker's comment UP! - it had 7 thumbs down when I found it today... ) <_<


*************************************************************

And another...uh...'funny' read - (from a 1998 article on "The Washington Pissed") :

Russia Launches First Leg of Space Station Studio

http://c3f.com/nty/nty1120.html
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7345
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by simonshack »

Heiwa wrote: If it works NASA will appoint Space X to carry out another 12 Falcon/Dragon trips at a cost of US$ 1.6 billion.

What supposedly happens today is that rocket Falcon takes off from JFK space centre, Florida, and sends module Dragon, unmanned, up to the ISS with 470 kg of supplies (water and bread for the ISS staff).
Yes, but if it does NOT work? Will the private companies take the blame? And whitewash NASA? How smart!

In fact, today's FALCON 9 first (privatized, non-NASA) take-off reportedly failed. It was embarrassingly aborted:
Image
http://www.universetoday.com/95257/t-0- ... or-dragon/


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kklvj192mQ
At 3:48, announcer informs us that: "The International Space Station crew has been advised that there was a cut-off in the log sequence...and that lift-off did not occur..."

I guess it was due to some sort of BUG ! :P

By the way, do you remember this earlier (alleged) FALCON 9 launch - as documented on Cluesforum?

Image

Let me take a wild guess at what the future, official narrative will be: the FALCON9 will keep failing - and the ISS crew will die a horrible death - due to lack of food supplies (the Russian Soyuz has suffered 4 recent failures - so they can't be relied on...) However, NASA will not be blamed for this sad end to the ISS. Elon Musk's SPACE X will be blamed. How smart! :lol:

I can't help but wondering if our work here has helped accelerate NASA's outsourcing of their hoax-machine ! <_<
LightCone
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:07 am

Falcon9 - bringing food to the ISS crew

Unread post by LightCone »


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kklvj192mQ

I suppose privately built rockets aren't the answer. :lol:
Maat
Member
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:14 am
Contact:

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by Maat »


Yeah, it just can't be due to 'budget cuts' if...
Nigeria To Send Astronauts Aloft By 2015 by EFCC1(m): 9:34am On May 18, 2012

Nigeria says it will send aloft astronauts by 2015 and launch three satellites.

Minister of Science and Technology Ita Okon Bassey Ewa announced this at a briefing here to commemorate Democracy Day 2012 and the anniversary of President Goodluck Jonathan's administration. He said the move was part of government's efforts to boost the economy through space technology.

The minister enumerated the country's space programme from now to 2028 when it expects to launch a Made-in-Nigeria satellite into space, Xinhua reported.

"In 2015 we are preparing to launch NigeriaSAR-1 satellite. The NigeriaSAR is a security satellite with an acronym that stands for Synthetic Aperture Radar," he said on Thursday.

"This satellite will have a very high resolution that can cover many kilometers, and for a backup, there will be NigeriaSat-2 and NigeriaSat-3," Ewa said.

"Also because of the experience we gained in Surrey, we are going to build an Assembly Integration and Testing Center for satellite technology. It is ongoing but this year we will put in more efforts to that technology," he said.

"And before I leave office in 2015 we will send a Nigerian astronaut into space," he said.

The minister said by 2018 Nigeria would launch a manufactured satellite and in 2025 develop a rocket and propulsion system.
http://www.wespeaknews.com/world/nigeri ... 56945.html
http://www.nairaland.com/940888/nigeria ... aloft-2015
https://cricket.yahoo.com/news/nigeria- ... 57910.html
[ADMIN: Fixing broken links/images pass 01-14-2018; replacement link courtesy Courtesy [IANS India Private Limited] Indo Asian News Service -HP]

Seriously! Check out the article :lol: :D ROFLOL

And the front page: WeSpeakNews.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Last year — 2011-12-20:
http://newspapersafrica.com/img/Nigeria_Satlite.jpg
"Nigeria returns to space with Nigcomsat-1R"
@ http://newspapersafrica.com/morenews.ph ... al&id=2332
[ADMIN: Fixing broken links/images pass 01-14-2018; the above story may be found here:
http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/12/nige ... 1r-launch/
http://www.informationng.com/2011/12/ni ... -1r-2.html
-HP]


With help from China :P


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzKKJbmr9EU
Heiwa
Banned
Posts: 1062
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by Heiwa »

SpaceX has repaired its rocket Falcon 9 and a new start attempt is scheduled for Tuesday. :lol:
lux
Member
Posts: 1911
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by lux »

May 15th: The Soyuz spaceship blasts off for the ISS in this amusing clip:

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42N85ho-njY

Note the super high tech procedures used in prepping and boarding the crew and watch closely for the ... eh hem ... exit of the astronauts from the elevator before it reaches the top at 3:57 followed by a close shot of the still-rising elevator with no one in it :o


OK -- buh bye!
Image
aex9
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: Fakery in Orbit: THE ISS

Unread post by aex9 »

I worked on the ISS for several months as a software engineer at McDonnell Douglas in Huntington Beach, CA, during the mid 90's. I remember telling myself (and others) "this thing will never fly." Too many things were too fucked up. Among engineers on govt projects, it's common to badmouth the govt and the project, but this time I was really serious. I'm not saying the thing is a hoax, I'm just saying, at the time I worked on it, stuff that you would expect to work, like the i386 in-circuit emulator, etc., didn't work. It just wasn't there. And you can't develop software for something going into space if you don't have an emulator to test it with. On any other project you would have said, fuck this... call me when you have an emulator. And using HP Unix and Matrix-X to develop the Ada software? It was all buggy, and you had no emulator or simulator to debug it with, and no code trace feature, and no watch windows for variables, so you just used print statements to test your code. The development station with the emulator (with just a plug-in hole that said "emulator") was the size of a refrigerator and very soviet looking. I soon got kicked off the program for lack of a "can-do" attitude. Last thing I heard before I left the program was that they were shit-canning Ada for C++. Ada wasn't the problem.

BTW, I worked with some people (all men) who were so stupid, on the ISS project, like really bad engineers, that I wanted to shoot them in the head. Like when a "hardware engineer" asks: what's a 555 timer?, that guy must be shot in the head to make sure he doesn't reproduce and create other weak minded humans that are not up to snuff when it comes to fighting the NWO.
Post Reply