ENDEAVOUR - the 30-year Space Shuttle hoax

[reel.deal]

*
Miniatures? Airfix? Hmm... How about Lego ?

...can't wait to see the next-generation, LEGO-developed NASA spacecraft !

Theres only 1 MAN i'd trust to the job of assembling a FULL-SCALE FULLY FUNCTIONING NA$A SPACE-SHUTTLE
...OUT OF LEGO !


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8327914.stm


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... wants.html



I know James is well up for it... i'll give him the call.

* * *

EDIT UPDATE: James sends apologies, he's wrapped up constructing a FULL-SIZE REPLICA MOON - OUT OF CHEESE;
but he did put me onto these guys, who seem pretty good...

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&pq ... a=N&tab=wi

http://www.google.co.uk/search?um=1&hl= ... 24&bih=546

http://www.derekroddy.com/forum/viewtop ... 13&t=15102

[simonshack]

*

SHUTTLE LANDINGS FAKE TOO? (1)

This question is, in view of what we have seen so far, certainly a legitimate one. I trust you will agree that, if we can determine that one video of the many shuttle landings betrays signs of forgery, then all of the landing videos must be questioned. Let us take a look at this one:

ENDEAVOR COMES HOME (STS118 - August 8, 2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyHRnmR8tQM

To expose this video as a forgery is, in fact, not very complicated and requires no special video skills. All we have to do is keep an eye at the clouds:



Please enlarge in your screen the second picture above (0:09). You can do that by clicking on control+ (on most keyboards).
Ugly, jagged pixelation can be seen around the wings - a classic sign of compositing (the shuttle image is inserted over the runway view).

Moreover, check out this 'pixel-flickering' seen behind the rudder in this short segment:

This is also a classic sign of poor/flawed rendering - not any known real-world, visible vortex/wake effect.

Now, please watch - and LISTEN - to that STS118 video ( from 0:56 onwards). A very loud, "steam-locomotive" sound can be heard. What is it? Well, I've been wondering what it was for a while - since I've often heard the same sound at the beginning of several LAUNCH videos, such as this one: "STS-107 Columbia's final launch" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSkPDc0gMr8

Well, believe it or not, I have read that it is some sort of heat-ejection process that the shuttle undergoes after landing ( to cool it down from the 'superhigh temperatures of atmosphere re-entry'...). Allright, but why do we hear it also before lift-off, then? No idea. Anyways, here are two gifs extracted from another 2 landings: both are black/white video segments - and that's odd in itself; well, the first (STS134) may be explained by the use of some infrared camera - since it is a nighttime landing. But the other (STS122) was a daytime landing, so why on Earth do they switch to that black/white shot? Absurd, senseless and inexplicable, if you ask me :

STS134 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBB9sAitVTE ********** STS122 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQkqCCRAa38 (watch from 7:15)



But back to that steamy locomotive sound: my best guess at this point is that it's some kind of silly inside joke - perhaps related to the ASTROTRAIN TRANSFORMER? Astrotrain is a kids' toy that can assume the form of both a steam locomotive and a space shuttle:

The "Astrotrain Decepticon Triple Changer : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AplazGXhBZs


Yes - the clowns behind this longstanding mega-hoax may well be capable of such unspeakable idiocy. Just my opinion + two cents.

[reel.deal]

You Talk to Endeavour: Interview With Mark Kelly and Shuttle Crew (Full HD) ...@ 11:09 > 31:00...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HX096CI ... ed#at=1783
Zero-G goofin' at the end...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I have watched a few many of the videos from the ISS available here: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogal ... n_id=61721
...the people inside the ISS do appear to be in absence of gravity somewhere. From the interaction between them and the general quality, they don't seem to be CGI and they certainly cannot be using the water pool trick inside the station while talking on the mic...
What a waste, no? I mean you are up there and all, give us a glimpse! (or are they on an high-altitude plane?)

dead on! ...people will NEVER question the Shuttle or ISS while (apparently!) 20-minutes +
of unbroken, unedited, ZERO-G floating astronaughts footage exists...



Zero G with Boeing B727-200 at USA VERSUS Life in the Space Station -

The 'vomit-comet' parabolas only give around 20 seconds Zero-G. The 'girlstranaught' emerges
from the 'down-below' hatch before being 'thrown' back down the 'ISS'...
could still all 'just about' squeeze that whole 'ISS scene' into the confines of a hollowed-out 727,
...or rather, a super-classified 727-sized 'stratosphere-skimming' jet...
...BESPOKE TAILORED with 'AUTHENTIC' SHUTTLE-INTERIOR / ISS-INTERIOR FITTINGS... TO SUIT.

reels graphic representation of orbital outer-atmosphere-skimming zero-g hypersonic jet...


London to Sydney in 2 hours flat! ...anybody ?!?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 50040.html


...if anybody does, these guys know 'whats up'...

Peter Diamandis on the X PRIZE and Private Space Flight -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzimgk6FdtY

Virgin Galactic Overview with Richard Branson -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j21nZ3ewJno

i'm guessing that the HYPERSONIC IS HERE, & that ALL ZERO-G NA$A SHUTTLE/ISS INTERIOR VIDEOS...
have all been made that way...

[reel.deal]

thanks! i love 'toons... & i really like those close-up pretty flickering alternating types of bunsen-burner flames.

Do you think theres ANY ISS IMAGERY where the SHADOWS & LIGHTING DOESNT LOOK LIKE
MODEL-REPLICAS UNDER SPOTLIGHTS ? ...and theres actually STARS IN SPACE ?!?

[simonshack]

*

SHUTTLE LANDINGS FAKE TOO? (2)

I will now firmly submit that the answer to this question is: YES.

As anyone following this thread will know, my initial working theory was that the Space Shuttle imagery of the various launches and landings are nothing but a series of re-cut, re-edited and re-rendered video animations. Each time, the template clip gets of course slightly rotated, cropped and retouched - to make it appear as different shuttle missions.

Here we compare four landing videos - from four distinct shuttle missions in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2011:

STS118 (August 2007)_____________________________STS124 (June2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyHRnmR8tQM___ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbfH5pOsOVA


STS119(March 2009)______________________________STS133(March 2011)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqEx5RQLRz0 ____ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3fMJmoX-2Y




In order to believe/accept that the three above shots are authentic, you would have to ascribe to coincidence/ happenstance (or stunning 'routine precision' on the part of NASA, its shuttle pilots, fire crews and cameramen) the following aspects:

1: The cameraman is always placed at the same spot of the runway - and always catches the firetruck in his lens
2: The firetruck always moves forward each year at practically the same phase of the shuttle landing. Its cabin roof lines up each time (horizontally) with the edge of the shuttle's right wing and (vertically) with the left edge of the runway.
3: All the shuttle pilots always touch down (and deploy their drag chutes) at virtually identical runway lenghts (and timelines).

Wow. Those NASA folks are quite the reliable sort of people... Can you say:" Astronomical odds" ?

(Consider that I have so far only been able to find and analyze approx 6/7 shuttle videos of landings (at the Kennedy Space Center). Heaven knows how many more of the 134 space shuttle landings feature this 'firetruck sequence'...)
***************************************************************************************************************************************************

IMAGERY OF COLUMBIA STS4 - back in 1982 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45XpHuUNQVQ
What on Earth is that 'chase jet' doing? Is this for real?


COLUMBIA STS4 - July4, 1982

The bottom line is that all this appears to have been going on ever since day one. This 1982 version suffers from the low quality rendering available at the time. Note the inexplicable flickering of the "UNITED STATES of AMERICA" lettering (and of those pixels only) - and how it continues to do so even after the shuttle has grinded to a halt:

COLUMBIA STS4 - July4, 1982

[reel.deal]

'3.1167265440.fake-space-shuttle'

...'FAKE' ?!?

[burningame]

Thanks for this thread.

As important as 911 is for the current state of the world, the whole idea that ‘space’ has been faked is so much harder to get my head around than 911. That was all about the ‘earth’ - destruction, base human power, greed and lies. One didn’t need a brain to see ‘cui bono’ - who benefitted - when the whole ‘War on Terror’ show began (and it sure as hell wasn’t gonna be the Moslem world). And let’s face it, compared with the Shuttle, the science of 911 can be worked out by a child; buildings just don't fall down like that without ‘help’.

But space is an altogether different realm: we have to trust our scientists, because… “can you do it, schmuck?” How the hell do we know what is right? All we have to go with is the visual evidence. And thanks to Simon et al we can now see that the same 911-style fakery is going down with the Shuttle too. Not to mention the Moon landings. That means uninterrupted YEARS of fakery… 911 must have seemed like a godsend to the fakery boys, they had something new to work on! One of these guys could have worked his whole life on this stuff. What would he tell his grandchildren? “Yep, sonny, I faked some of the greatest missions we’ve [n]ever done!”

But really, it’s sickening to think all this is bullshit. Because these things are like foundation stones in our concept of civilization – pull ‘em out, and the whole building starts to shake. I’ve been heavily into David McGowan, Michael Palomino, David Percy etc on Apollo, and I’m still trying to come to terms with it. The weight of evidence for fakery is just as strong as for 911. I guess what I’m suffering from is a ‘crisis of faith’ – in humanity, basically. I don’t care that the guy next door is a decent guy; most normal people are ‘nice’ – maybe because they don’t have any real power, compared to our rulers? What I need is the “truth”… but I got an awful feeling I can’t handle it...

[simonshack]

Thanks for this thread.
(...)
What I need is the “truth”… but I got an awful feeling I can’t handle it...

Burningame,

On behalf of all contributors to this thread - you're welcome. Thanks for the thanks.

As for your feeling that 'you cannot handle it', let me try and ease your mind - or at least try and convey my personal feelings regarding this awkward, shall we say, 'philosophical quandary' which you raise. As you may imagine, it is one that I've heard a lot in the last few years : "how can I handle all this disturbing info? How do I deal with my new-found awareness? Damn - it is just too much to bear!"

The way I see it, that very problem has to be turned on its head. Personally, I cannot stand (as in 'cannot bear') being deceived and pushed around by a bunch of arrogant fools - just because they have seized control of the world's media channels and use them to manipulate the public (NASA, it now appears, is nothing else than another 'media' channel - disguised as a scientific enterprise). The daily load of bullshit and silliness regurgitated by the newsmedia is for everyone to see, and it surely can't be wise to simply ignore it altogether. See, I don't subscribe to the notion that 'ignorance is bliss' - coz I've paid dearly my ticket to ride on this planet (many worthless school years) and I want my money back. I'm not going to look the other way now that I realize to have been roundly duped - for the best part of my life. Can I handle this realization, this awakening? Yes. Can I handle (as in 'bear' or 'tolerate') seeing that this relentless and pathetic dupery goes on and on? No.

Just as an example/case in point (and to tie this little rant with the topic of this thread) here is the sort of bullshit-silliness no sane and self-respecting individual should allow to go unchallenged :

SUICIDE BIRDS CRASHING INTO DEPARTING SHUTTLE


Well, in my world (or rather, in my garden) birds fly as far away as possible - the moment I clap my hands. Yet, in the NASA Fantasy World, birds are attracted by the deafening, lethal 200dB sound of roaring rockets and actually fancy crashing into them - to their tragic death.

"The sound intensity of large, high performance rockets could potentially kill at close range.
The Space Shuttle generates over 200 dB(A) of noise around its base."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket

Now, if you can handle even further raving silliness, dear Burningame, take a look at this old TV news feature:

Bird Scare Eye - NASA - 1994 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLQa53QWPIw

"Breaking News: Shuttle launch delayed due to woodpeckers punching 195 holes in fuel tank." (I kid you not : NASA says it!)

So, in the NASA Fantasy World, birds are kept clear of the Space Shuttle with painted balloons (to keep woodpeckers from punching holes in its steel fuel tank) yet other suicide birds will happily plunge straight into it - as it roars off in a lethally loud, 200dB wall of sound.

Can you handle that?



NASA terrorist:

[reel.deal]

Thanks for this thread.

NASA terrorist:

[nonhocapito]

meanwhile, the "new age" occult bullcrap naming so dear to NASA continues:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquarius_% ... trument%29

[reel.deal]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquarius_% ... trument%29

I dont know why all these IDIOT ARTISTS insist on putting STARS in their pictures !!!

EVERYONE KNOWS... YOU CANT SEE ANY STARS IN SPACE !!!
...or THE SUN, or MARS, or VENUS, ORIONS BELT, THE PLOUGH/GREAT BEAR, etc etc etc...
( ...ITS TOO DARK !!! )

FOOLS !

[simonshack]

*

SPACE SHUTTLE LAUNCH DELAYS

As I briefly mentioned in a previous post in this thread, the Space Shuttle seems to have a true 'tradition' of having its launches delayed - for one or the other reason. "What reasons?" - you may ask. "What could possibly delay, after decades of development, such a perfect machine?" I have compiled a shortlist (no doubt incomplete) of some of the reported reasons along the years - just for the hell of it:


- Launch delayed due to "bad weather"
- Launch delayed due to "11 lightnings" (or 9 lightnings - depending on what news outlet you trust most) ramming the launch pad
- Launch delayed due to "Hurricane Erin/Tropical Storm Klaus/Hurricane Bertha/Hurricane Fran/Tropical Storm Ernesto".
- Launch delayed due to "electrical problem in backup controller for one of the shuttle’s three main engines"
- Launch delayed due to "trouble with heaters in the power system"
- Launch delayed due to "blown circuit inside a switch box"
- Launch delayed due to "failure of a a high-pressure ammonia jumper hose"
- Launch delayed due to "hydrogen gas leaking from a vent line"
- Launch delayed due to "helium and nitrogen leaks in one of the shuttle's engine pods"
- Launch delayed due to "commander John Creighton coming down with the flu"
- Launch delayed due to "4,000 pounds of liquid oxygen accidentally been drained from the fuel tank (discovered 31 seconds before lift-off)"
- Launch delayed due to "private planes straying into the area around the Kennedy Space Center"
- Launch delayed due to "the risk of meteors damaging the Shuttle - waiting out the Perseids meteor shower." (1993)
- Launch delayed due to "woodpeckers punching 195 (or more than 200) holes in the insulating foam covering the fuel tank"(1995)

Pardon me - but does this look like "insulating foam"?
WOODPECKER ATTACK
THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL confirming many of the above delays:
http://dsc.discovery.com/space/top-10/s ... elays.html

...aaand who's been paying the bills - in those 30 years of delays, hmmm?
Endeavour Launch Delay Comes With $500000 Price Tag – Fox News
http://www.flagstaffonlinenews.com/ende ... -fox-news/

[heshdog]

I dont know why all these IDIOT ARTISTS insist on putting STARS in their pictures !!!

EVERYONE KNOWS... YOU CANT SEE ANY STARS IN SPACE !!!
...or THE SUN, or MARS, or VENUS, ORIONS BELT, THE PLOUGH/GREAT BEAR, etc etc etc...
( ...ITS TOO DARK !!! )

FOOLS !

Why can't we see stars or planets in pictures?? it's too dark as in no flash is powerful enough to eliminate them from earth or space? or we can shoot them from earth not space? So NASA adds the stars?

[fbenario]

The daily load of bullshit and silliness regurgitated by the newsmedia is for everyone to see, and it surely can't be wise to simply ignore it altogether. See, I don't subscribe to the notion that 'ignorance is bliss' - coz I've paid dearly my ticket to ride on this planet (many worthless school years) and I want my money back. I'm not going to look the other way now that I realize to have been roundly duped - for the best part of my life. Can I handle this realization, this awakening? Yes. Can I handle (as in 'bear' or 'tolerate') seeing that this relentless and pathetic dupery goes on and on? No.

Totally agree.

Burningame, and anyone else wondering, we keep at this because, as loving, caring humans, we don't have any choice. My hope, and main remaining goal in life, is to help expose whatever fakery we can SO THAT fewer civlians overseas get killed by foreign occupying militaries, which are always led by the U.S. There is no such thing as 'collateral damage' deaths when America attacks 'enemies' overseas - they are real, live, innocent human beings, and they deserve to be called murder victims (not the bloodless, inhumane term 'collateral damage').

[reel.deal]

"Breaking News: Shuttle launch delayed due to woodpeckers punching 195 holes in fuel tank."

Left_bipod_foam_ramp ...FOAM ?!?



NA$A'S WOODPECKER PROBLEMS CAUSING LAUNCH-DELAYS ARE UNFORTUNATELY NOTHING NEW, NA$A ACTUALLY
CO-ORDINATED IN THE RELEASE OF A DISCONCERTING FILM ON THE VERY SAME SUBJECT WAY BACK IN 1966...
APRIL FOOLS DAY...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t46Hz4-W ... re=related
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0149724/releaseinfo