Hello all,
I feel obliged to give a response to the latest "exposès" on this forum. Simon asked me to "start by explaining what on Earth he is up to". Many other people of varying integrity are wondering about the answer to the exact same question! (Just to make sure I am not booted from the forum for disobeying the demands put forth by admin of this forum: Scroll down to "police-video" for a response to the question posted by Simon)
Apparantly, there is a theory floating around cyberspace which is spreading suspicion about your humble servant?
Fascinating! Let's see if it has any merit, or not.
Michael Gallagher
The basis for this theory is centered around my written statement on the 10th of December 2009. This is what I wrote back then:
I'm 80% certain I saw that Michael Gallagher and another english-speaking individual on my tube-station here in Oslo yesterday. I guess we know who to blame if there is any bombings there...
Up until today, I had completely forgotten about this incident, so I am glad you made me aware of it.
This statement begs the question: Am I prophetic? Am I just very perceptive? Was I paranoid? Or am I a part of the conspiracy?
I already know the answer to the above questions, but there is no way for the rest of you to know, so I am glad you asked.
Brianv proceeds to say/ask:
"I found it strange at the time how MartinL could recognise Michael Gallagher (was it from the photo I had just posted?)
Of course it was. I had no knowledge about the guy before he was brought into focus on this forum, so I had the guy fresh in memory.
Another part of the story, which might be relevant, but which I failed to inform you about back then, was the fact that the two english-speaking people I observed, one of which I "was 80% certain was Michael Gallagher" back then (english-speaking people stick out in Oslo), was spotted on the "Stortinget" tube station, the nearest tube-station to the blast-site we are all familiar with from 22/7.
This might of course all have been a coincidence, a result of my "paranoid-mind", like I said in the post, "I am 80% certain", meaning a 20% possibility of error. Still, I am fascinated by the fact that this was posted by myself back then, especially because of the sarcastic comment regarding who to blame "if there is any bombings" (in Oslo in the future).
Maybe this Michael Gallagher character, who is already connected to two different terror-events needs to be researched on a bit more?
I am not up for any more cluesforum-work, but the members here might be interested?
The 22.july 2011
When it comes to the victims/vicsims on 22/7, all my comments on that are factual and true. I do know several people who have informed me that they lost relatives/friends on that date. I even brought one of these people to this forum, so he could answer for himself, since my only knowledge about victims come from "people who lost people". I am in no way a first hand source in this matter, so I gave the forum access to someone claiming to be a first hand source. If I violated any sacred rule by doing so, I apologize.
OK. So based on the above, forum-member pdgalles, an internet-character who is praised by Mr. Simon Hytten for his "sharp contributions" to the forum, manages to pull this conclusion from his hat:
...this forum member had an ulterior motive all along and that "Breivik" was planned in 2009, at least.
Not only did yours truly, according to pdgalles hypothesis, have an ulterior motive all along (for posting tons of research here?). He is also "calling me out". Hence this (hopefully) clarifying forum-post of mine.
Folkets Info
Shall we move on, Sherlock? Let's look at Simon's posts regarding yours truly and our webpage Folkets Info. According to Shack, I have some explaining to do. Hence, this post!
Regarding our webpage, I agree it looked amateurish and that was of course conterproductive to our aims of raising the political and judicial consciousness of our fellow Norwegians. So we got some help from a skilled friend of ours, and so our site went from amateurish to professional looking, but not without lots of hard work, formatting all our articles from wordpress to joomla, long days and even longer nights, all done in our own sparetime, as a service to our fellow Norwegians, who we as Norwegian nationals care about the most. I want to direct a THANK YOU to Simon for the kind words regarding our current webpage, and I would also like an apology from Simon for him having the audacity of comparing yours truly to that vile controlled-opposition fearmongering retard, Alex Jones.
Next point, J.E. Malde. Who is this character? Is he my handler? The co-intel boss in Norway? Of course not. The guy is the owner of our domain-hostwebsite, and all sites hosted by his company (which is totally unconnected to our site) has the same "billing adress" in the WHOIS information. This goes to show how quick one can make a mess out of the research, if assumptions is made based on flawed understanding.
Is my take on 22/7 a naive one? Maybe! But if you go out and ask my fellow countrymen, I am sure I am no exception. We are known for being "blue eyed", meaning naive and always willing to let the benefit of the doubt befall our enemies. Our webpage is an effort to combat this dangerous Norwegian naivity.
We have however exposed some very interesting things regarding the manifesto that was released in connection to the 22/7-attack.
Read the article here:
http://www.folkets.info/component/conte ... vik-kopier
We have also shed some light on a couple of strange events surrounding the 22/7-attack here:
http://www.folkets.info/component/conte ... ose-trader
Our opinion of the event is that most people in Norway would like to forget the whole 22/7 ordeal, because we have so many other, and more pressing issues and challenges that needs to be adressed in public. Our country is being sold piece by piece by a government that can only be described as hostile towards ethnic Norwegians. One Norwegian lawyer recently stated that our government have instituted judicial segregation in Norway, where there is one set of rules for the rulers, and a completely different set of rules for the Norwegian population.
Simon "reminds" the reader that I personally "knew one or two victims/vicsims". This is simply not true. I only know people who have told me about friends and relatives who they claim died on 22/7. Show me a quote where I actually say anything close to this, or be a man and apologize for misquoting me!
Regarding the quoted text from the Breivik-article:
What exactly is so darn funny about it? Are you contending that the Norwegian political class are not inspired by Marx and Lenin?
You Sir, might have lived too long on an Italian island! I am more than willing to have a skype-discussion with you regarding this issue.
The quote is true, and I am not planning on changing the wording of it even one tiny bit.
The manifesto
I am not sure if you guys have actually read anything from this 1500-pages long document. It speaks about killing women, about how to build terrifying weapons and cause immense physical and mental damage to other human beings. I am in no way being sarcastic or "cheeck in the tounge" when I am saying that it appears "detailed and cold-blooded". Read it yourself, before you conjure up any more conspiracy theories regarding yours truly!
Utøya-police-video
In reference to the NRK-clip showing how the police (intentionally?) made a huge de-tour when trying(?) to get to Utøya, which meant they arrived at the island much later than they would had they taken the most obvious route to the Island, Simon writes:
For MartinL to post this idiotic news media tale on his website - without a single word addressing the utter phoniness of this story - is frankly all I need to know about MartinL - or, to put it more lightly, makes me strongly question his media fakery awareness. If MartinL will return here anytime in the future, he will have to START by explaining what on Earth he's up to - and what his role is in upholding the Breivik saga.
Well, the video is exactly what it is. It shows the ridiculousness of the whole 22/7 scenario. Simon even write on the videoframe he has posted, as a comment, "We the public are asked to believe in all of this." That was the point of posting the video to begin with. No one really believes the police are that incompetent. Consider the posting of the video in question as an "ask-questions-stimulation" to the Norwegian public.
In conclusion,
Whether you believe my "media fakery awareness" is out of tune, or I am duped, or maybe I am a "blinder-wearing useful idiot", or if I am "on a CoIntelPro payroll", is totally dependent on your own ability of critical thinking. If you want to save yourself the time you will waste while speculating on the above, I suggest you read what Simon has quoted from "the horses mouth":
.....we contend that the solution and salvation lies in a Norwegian-ruled Norway, wherein Norwegian values and a Norwegian rule of law is elevated to a socially bearing factor, where the main role of the State's primary mission is to facilitate the individuals' and the soul's free and natural development. Thus, the complete opposite of the innovation/development-inhibiting regulations we unfortunately have in our present Marxist-Lenininst Norway.