OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Discussing the most relevant "sequels" or "reminders" of 9/11. The so-called "War On Terror" is a global scam finalized to manipulate this world's population with crass fear-mongering tactics designed to scare you shitless.

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby bostonterrierowner on Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:02 pm

Breivik is a bad ass motherfucker , who chased and killed 77 or some kids on Utoya island within an hour , I suspect he farted in this building and that was exactly what we are seeing on this video :)

Forgive me this outburst of low quality humor .
bostonterrierowner
Member
 
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby Libero on Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:21 pm

I didn't know that the Breivik story had a California connection until just recently. It looks like Anders' half sister, Elisabeth was very open with him about the lovers in her life. :rolleyes: :D

"My half-sister, Elisabeth was infected by chlamydia after having more than 40 sexual partners (more than 15 of them Chippendales' strippers who are known to be bearers of various diseases)," he writes in 'How STDs ruin people's lives', in the 1492-page manifesto he published hours before his attack.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... s-ago.html

One of the people commenting at the bottom of this story posed a rather interesting question:


"Why would the sister's surname either before or after marriage be 'Breivik' when that is the surname of ABB's dad and not hers? Presumably her maiden name would've been 'Behring' (the name of ABB's and Elizabeth's shared parent - the mother) or whatever her dad's surname was, if the naming system pre and post marriage is the same in Norway as in the UK."
Libero
Member
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:21 pm

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby Fred54 on Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:04 pm

brianv wrote:
I love the little white panel thing that lands beside the first tree on the left! :lol: :lol:

No massive shock wave from the 1000kg [was it? lbs,kgs?] bomb, no camera shake, no ground shake.

Bombs, when they go off, initiate a huge vacuum, the rushing air to fill the void causes the "bang"!

They do not resemble a large gust of wind!

I rather fancy that this is a little model studio of some sort! Scale looks weird!


I started to read this topic I got through about 15 pages and decided to skip to the end and see what any current posts contained and came upon this one. It is 100% false and not only false but directly opposite reality. Are the administrators of this forum going to allow a post like this to stand on the forum for all the world to see and attempt to have any credibility whatsoever to the casual observer and or the hardened critic? If the poster truly believes what he posted is fact shouldn't some one explain to him that when a rifle bullet is fired it is an explosion and if it creates a vacuum how does the bullet come out the end of the barrel? This is very unsettling to me to say the least.
Fred54
Banned
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:23 am

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby brianv on Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:29 pm

Fred54 wrote:
brianv wrote:
I love the little white panel thing that lands beside the first tree on the left! :lol: :lol:

No massive shock wave from the 1000kg [was it? lbs,kgs?] bomb, no camera shake, no ground shake.

Bombs, when they go off, initiate a huge vacuum, the rushing air to fill the void causes the "bang"!

They do not resemble a large gust of wind!

I rather fancy that this is a little model studio of some sort! Scale looks weird!


I started to read this topic I got through about 15 pages and decided to skip to the end and see what any current posts contained and came upon this one. It is 100% false and not only false but directly opposite reality. Are the administrators of this forum going to allow a post like this to stand on the forum for all the world to see and attempt to have any credibility whatsoever to the casual observer and or the hardened critic? If the poster truly believes what he posted is fact shouldn't some one explain to him that when a rifle bullet is fired it is an explosion and if it creates a vacuum how does the bullet come out the end of the barrel? This is very unsettling to me to say the least.


Image

At the explosion site, a vacuum is created by the rapid outward movement of the blast. This vacuum will almost immediately refill itself with the surrounding atmosphere. This creates a very strong pull on any nearby person or structural surface after the initial push effect of the blast has been delivered. As this void is refilled, it creates a high-intensity wind that causes fragmented objects, glass and debris to be drawn back in toward the source of the explosion."


Link

I first read about this effect in Toby Harndens "Bandit Country", a British Officer, recounting the effect of IRA bombs in the South Armagh area!

Feel free to disagree!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby Fred54 on Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:51 am

You have taken frame 6 from the little cartoon and moved it to the first position from that starting point you generated this statement.
Bombs, when they go off, initiate a huge vacuum, the rushing air to fill the void causes the "bang"!
Some how you overlooked the term in frame 6 that says "blast wind" and I have no idea how you came up with this totally false statement
They do not resemble a large gust of wind!
Now if you are using the little cartoon as a source of information let me advise you it is very misleading and and only about half true
Frame 1 False. When an explosion is initiated either the explosive solid, liquid or gas creates an exothermic reaction (produces heat) and generates more gas. The blast wave is the result of the reaction (explosion). Frame 2 some what true, replace energy with heat. Frame 3 false. Over pressure or force causes fragmentation. Frame 4 true. Frame 5 true. Frame 6 false.
The Quote.
"At the explosion site, a vacuum is created by the rapid outward movement of the blast. This vacuum will almost immediately refill itself with the surrounding atmosphere. This creates a very strong pull on any nearby person or structural surface after the initial push effect of the blast has been delivered. As this void is refilled, it creates a high-intensity wind that causes fragmented objects, glass and debris to be drawn back in toward the source of the explosion."

Possibly it can create an under pressure relative to the atmosphere I am not sure but the rest is false, and here is why. You can solicit my good friend Heiwa to explain to me the following phenomena that is purported in the quote. How does a particle(shrapnel) in motion cease motion and reverse its course with less force than what initially propelled the particle? The high-intensity wind can only be 14.7 psi relative to 0 psi where as the initial explosion can be hundreds or thousands of psi relative to 14.7 psi.
Now if you leave your post intact with out any correction to it I will be forced to believe that this forum does not seek out and dispel disinfo, because what I have just read is promoting it. The best way to undermine a cause is to champion it poorly.
Fred54
Banned
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:23 am

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby simonshack on Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:16 am

Fred54 wrote:Now if you leave your post intact with out any correction to it I will be forced to believe that this forum does not seek out and dispel disinfo, because what I have just read is promoting it. The best way to undermine a cause is to champion it poorly.


Well, Fred54. I don't really think we need your warped, incomprehensible NASA-style crap disinfo tactics here. Goodbye.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby brianv on Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:33 am

Fred54 wrote:You have taken frame 6 from the little cartoon and moved it to the first position from that starting point you generated this statement.
Bombs, when they go off, initiate a huge vacuum, the rushing air to fill the void causes the "bang"!
Some how you overlooked the term in frame 6 that says "blast wind" and I have no idea how you came up with this totally false statement
They do not resemble a large gust of wind!
Now if you are using the little cartoon as a source of information let me advise you it is very misleading and and only about half true
Frame 1 False. When an explosion is initiated either the explosive solid, liquid or gas creates an exothermic reaction (produces heat) and generates more gas. The blast wave is the result of the reaction (explosion). Frame 2 some what true, replace energy with heat. Frame 3 false. Over pressure or force causes fragmentation. Frame 4 true. Frame 5 true. Frame 6 false.
The Quote.
"At the explosion site, a vacuum is created by the rapid outward movement of the blast. This vacuum will almost immediately refill itself with the surrounding atmosphere. This creates a very strong pull on any nearby person or structural surface after the initial push effect of the blast has been delivered. As this void is refilled, it creates a high-intensity wind that causes fragmented objects, glass and debris to be drawn back in toward the source of the explosion."

Possibly it can create an under pressure relative to the atmosphere I am not sure but the rest is false, and here is why. You can solicit my good friend Heiwa to explain to me the following phenomena that is purported in the quote. How does a particle(shrapnel) in motion cease motion and reverse its course with less force than what initially propelled the particle? The high-intensity wind can only be 14.7 psi relative to 0 psi where as the initial explosion can be hundreds or thousands of psi relative to 14.7 psi.
Now if you leave your post intact with out any correction to it I will be forced to believe that this forum does not seek out and dispel disinfo, because what I have just read is promoting it. The best way to undermine a cause is to champion it poorly.


Hold all my calls someone on the internet is wrong...possibly.

I will reply to you when you have stopped raving like a lunatic with your claims of disinfo.

PS, I see Simon has just posted before me. I have no problem with being proven wrong on such a minor point. The manner of the criticism was a little hard to digest though! Maybe his "good friend Heiwa" can interject on his behalf now that he's gone. Please enlighten me!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby Flabbergasted on Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:55 am

The Norwegian Spike-in-Forehead Case
Pictures of a woman with a spike driven through her head were posted earlier on this thread.

Image

It looks pretty lethal to me, but - lo and behold! - there is actually a curious precedent for it: The American Crowbar Case!

Image

Phineas P. Gage (1823–1860) was an American railroad construction worker who had a large iron rod driven completely through his head due to an accident with explosives, destroying much of his brain's left frontal lobe.

Image

Six months later (some say, fully recovered), he was examined by a physician who noted that "upon the top of the head [was] a deep depression, two inches by one and one-half inches wide, beneath which the pulsations of the brain [could] be perceived." He died twelve years after his injury.

Apparently, "Gage is a fixture in the curricula of neurology, psychology and related disciplines, and is frequently mentioned in books and academic papers; he even has a minor place in popular culture."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage

Also, like Ms. Nersnaes, Gage's entry wound healed very quickly. No need for plastic surgery! :P
Flabbergasted
Member
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: OSLO and UTØYA, 7/22 2011

Postby Sisterlover on Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:49 am

Sources (never cited) now indicate that Adam Lanza was in direct competition with Breivik. Damned video gamers...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5 ... urces-say/
Sisterlover
Member
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:49 pm


Re: Anders Breivik in the news again...

Postby simonshack on Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:14 pm

*
It's like a tongue-twister of sorts... :rolleyes:

The mother of Anders BB, who killed 77 people on July 7/22/11, dies at age 66.
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Anders Breivik in the news again...

Postby brianv on Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:20 pm

simonshack wrote:*
It's like a tongue-twister of sorts... :rolleyes:

The mother of Anders BB, who killed 77 people on July 7/22/11, dies at age 66.


Will Anders be released under guard to attend the fun eral of his dearly departed? Will the media be in attendance? Have they got a CGI dog and pony show lined up?
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: Anders Breivik in the news again...

Postby DeeJay on Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:49 pm

brianv wrote:
simonshack wrote:*
It's like a tongue-twister of sorts... :rolleyes:

The mother of Anders BB, who killed 77 people on July 7/22/11, dies at age 66.


Will Anders be released under guard to attend the fun eral of his dearly departed? Will the media be in attendance? Have they got a CGI dog and pony show lined up?

****************
Well, we finally have the response we were waiting for:
http://global.christianpost.com/news/norwegian-killers-mother-dead-anders-breivik-not-permitted-to-attend-funeral-92672/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/9955101/Anders-Behring-Breivik-denied-permission-to-attend-mothers-funeral.html

Whatever happened to that request to visit Anders in jail Simon? Did they ever reply?

DeeJay
DeeJay
Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Anders Breivik in the news again...

Postby simonshack on Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:41 pm

DeeJay wrote:Whatever happened to that request to visit Anders in jail Simon? Did they ever reply?

DeeJay

Actually, I never made that request - discouraged by the fact that they (the Norwegian Police Dept) never replied to THIS basic question (which I mailed three times or more to Mrs Unni Grøndal ):

Image
Unni Grøndal - head of the Oslo Police information department

viewtopic.php?p=2363496#p2363496
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Anders Breivik in the news again...

Postby DeeJay on Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:32 pm

simonshack wrote:
DeeJay wrote:Whatever happened to that request to visit Anders in jail Simon? Did they ever reply?

DeeJay

Actually, I never made that request - discouraged by the fact that they (the Norwegian Police Dept) never replied to THIS basic question (which I mailed three times or more to Mrs Unni Grøndal ):

Image
Unni Grøndal - head of the Oslo Police information department

viewtopic.php?p=2363496#p2363496

****
It might be interesting, if we could get a few people from different countries for perhaps different reasons: saving his soul, psychological reasons for crime, how is he being treated, to ask to visit. I am not employed at present, so such a trip would not be an easy one financially for me but I am still interested about this guy. Are there any other persons who would make a commitment?
DeeJay
Member
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests