Unleashed wrote:It didn't get much traction on the net, but again, I think it should have.
Now, if it is a name change, isn't the appropriate steps to publish it in a newspaper somewhere for a length of time?
So and so petitions the court for a name change, anyone opposed respond to thus and so atty. at law office by such and such a date?
Surely there is a paper trail in some backwater newspaper regarding this back in 2009?
All good questions. Several hours after I posted this info, I did see it on other, less-reputable forums. I didn't recall seeing it here before, however.
If this was all a part of something that was orchestrated by a group who has the means to change someone's identity, I suspect nothing was done through legal channels. On a side note, were any other victims an "only child"?
This is the first time posted here.
My thinking is that every psy-op is customized. They all employ some of the same tactics and methods. Also, there are several layers of objectives.
For 9/11, there was the military-industrial complex goals, the financial arm had it's objectives,
the insurance industry theirs, the unloading of a white elephant property motive, etc.
There seems to be an aspect of this that targeted the Lanzas. Like Peter Lanza being reportedly found dead in Ryan's apartment. Ryan, at first, being named the culprit. These seem to be about
some sort of blackmail.
I don't remember off hand about any being an only child. But, going back to Jesse Lewis, I found it odd that his "brother" was always designated JT. Even in formal obituaries where you'd think his actual name might be used to ID him.
So, it struck me as entirely possible that in a similar way, while "Jesse" is killed off J
T, lives on. Same person?