I've been watching a lot of 'Zombie glitch' youtubes through the day and I have also found a few that seem to affect faces without affecting background movement.
I have always put it down to compression artefacts and just moved along, but the twelve year old in me isn't going to rule out zombification followed by reptilian/demonic possession of political or media personalities, especially given the extraordinary crimes of these people and the forces they must be opening themselves up to. Shape-shifting alien possession is always going to be the one of the best explanations for Alex Jones, and he has a few clips with reptoungue, repteeth and slit eye effects. I have to say, some of these eye 'morphs,' while they could be fake, are very creepy and often seem to suit the people showing them better than human eyes.
Today I learned that the latest AAA video game release, Grand Theft Auto 5 has a plot involving reptilian conspiracies and is also full of 'Illuminati' symbolism. It is the fastest selling entertainment release in history, and that includes movies, CD's, everything. It made 10 billion dollars in three days. That means that a storyline born of Ickean style alien or transdimensional covert invasion conspiracy has become, within a few days, one of the most popular storylines in modern history, and it's interactive. In addition, it is married to a transgressive, trauma based, open world experience in which you play a criminal who can commit literally any crime. It includes a scene in which your character tortures another person at length. You really have to ask why they are main-streaming this. But then, they don't have a lot of original ideas, do they? Conspiracies are 'cool' now, but GTA was always known for realism, not sci-fi.
Predictive programming? Revelation of the method? Dis-information? Recruitment tool?
Now, I know I watched too many freakish videos today, and maybe I got a bit zombified myself, but there are some strange patterns that emerge. One is that, while compression anomalies are a decent initial explanation, you have to wonder why the features so often still maintain a vague coherence. I mean eyes, lips, chins etc. They warp and meld and generally look wrong, but are often still identifiable as the things they are. This, even when there are large movements of the head where you would expect a general smearing over of everything as the errant pixels did their thing. What you often find is that the distortion follows the facial feature it affects, overwriting areas it moves into. To put it another way, it seems to apply to a region of the face, rather than a region of the frame. Almost as if it is 'face' data that is being transmitted, rather than 'frame' data, if you get my drift.
There is also often a degree of transparency involved, or a hind of 'halo' effect (described by some monster hunters as an energy or holographic field) and it seems to me this cannot be a software issue as it almost certainly points to the CCD failing to pick up photons (if such things exist) when it should. I even saw one video where Obama's hand was almost transparent. I find it hard to believe that software can fail in this way. It can't be interference in wired or wireless transmission because that would effect the entire frame, I think. It could be a failure in the CCD itself, but this is solid state tech that has existed for decades and surely any such issues have been resolved, and why would it be intermittent?
It's a bit like if you record background noise on a music recording. If you can rule out a faulty recording device, it could be the sound of the internal mechanism, but this seems hard to conceive of in the case of digital video. If you were able to rule that out, you would probably next assume a second sound source in the studio or whatever. I wouldn't rule out something existing between the subject and the CCD, but without a PHD in exobiology, I'm at loss to explain what that could be. Just thinking about how these systems work, I can't see it being compression, I can't see that software 'fails' in this way, like other mechanisms, but I could be wrong. I would add that these people have the best cameras, the fastest computers (including live real-time CGI overlay, I hear) and a monopoly on bandwidth, so the claims of low bit-rate, bad compression and such don't do it for me, but again, I might be wrong, I'm no expert, just observing and thinking for now.
Why does it happen to faces, hands, and other body parts, but not trees, cars, etc? I have yet to see a home video with this going on. It always seems to happen to people who are lying criminals. Surely by now someone would have debunked it with footage of something other than a person.
For now, I'm keeping an open mind, but I'm going to start analysing the bunch of vids I downloaded and make some .gifs and stuff and work on this some more.
Another possibility is that the Illu-media-ti wasted half my day chasing a deliberately created myth they wrote into their video compression algorithm.