The CORONAVIRUS circus

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Thu Dec 30, 2021 8:19 pm

The picture is a joke, but the news story ... no, wait. they are both jokes...no, wait. They are both real...

Image

The Nutwork are really showing what they came for.

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Thu Dec 30, 2021 8:39 pm

Since we are in the grotesque department, here is a snapshot of the new morona science that´s been sitting on my desktop for a while.

Image

antipodean
Member
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean » Mon Jan 03, 2022 9:06 am

Looks as though (Reed) Elsevier up to their old tricks lending a hand to promote the nutwork's narrative.

In this video below, Elsevier are taken to task for withdrawing a report of adverse effects from the jab.

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXH573bRSZQ

Here is a link to the withdrawn report.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 0621002267

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:13 pm

After a couple of years of trying very hard, the "Chief Medical Advisor to the President" has made this brilliant discovery:

https://rumble.com/vrxmfl-january-4-2022.html

Meanwhile, in Holland, the police are teaching good manners to pesky citizens:

https://rumble.com/vrxmv5-january-4-2022.html

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:47 pm

The BMJ has published an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg (or his creator) complaining about how FecesBook's "fact checkers" have been labeling as misinformation a paper revealing serious data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vax trial.

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

It would be very useful to make a survey of who owns/sponsors/mentors the major "fact checkers". Or perhaps someone has already done that.

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Wed Jan 05, 2022 3:29 pm

https://journal.rajeshtaylor.com/life-i ... n-indiana/

On webcam, Scott Davison, CEO of OneAmerica Insurance, says death rates are up 40% over what they were before the 'pandemic'. People in the insurance business and the funeral business would know a thing or two about that.

Image
"We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica”, the Company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business”.

OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company headquartered in Indianapolis. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and has sold life insurance, including group life insurance to employers in the state since 1877.

Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers”, and that it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.

gitarrmannen
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 6:30 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by gitarrmannen » Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:10 pm

My first post in the great forum and it’s going to be a small, but rather amusing, (for some people) post.
Under the category, you can’t make this shit up, we have the latest mutation on this virus. And of course, the people that came up with the name should have some sort of price. :rolleyes:

IHU is the brilliant name. And if you say it fast enough it’s going to sound like ‘I Hate You”. Nah, you don’t even have to say it fast,

Oh my good. Please pinch my arm and wake me up.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 87716.html

Edit. Some spelling errors.

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:55 pm

Merriam-Webster´s dictionary has updated their definition of "anti-vaxxer".

Image

So people who are not against vaccines in general but are opposed to forced vaccination of children with an unlicensed product are now simply labeled "anti-vaxxers".

Image

By the way, the US "declaration of emergency", which has so far served as pretext to foist lockdowns and clot shots on the population, expires on 15 January 2022.

antipodean
Member
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:24 pm

Can it get any more scary than this. They would rather not have us on the planet if unjabbed.
This lady's description of her anaphylactic attacks, is similar to my own past anaphylactic attacks. Although fortunately for me my allergies are no where near as severe as hers.
She's been advised that she now has the option of taking the alternative Astrazeneca for her 2nd shot.
My employers have offered me this option (for both jabs), my cut off date is tomorrow.

https://odysee.com/@FreeNZ:d/gemma-stratford:4

kickstones
Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by kickstones » Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:39 am

antipodean wrote:
Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:24 pm
Can it get any more scary than this. They would rather not have us on the planet if unjabbed.
This lady's description of her anaphylactic attacks, is similar to my own past anaphylactic attacks. Although fortunately for me my allergies are no where near as severe as hers.
She's been advised that she now has the option of taking the alternative Astrazeneca for her 2nd shot.
My employers have offered me this option (for both jabs), my cut off date is tomorrow.

https://odysee.com/@FreeNZ:d/gemma-stratford:4
Dear antipodean, in the UK there are a few things going on behind the scenes in regards the jabs, and I am not sure anything will come about from them, but one is a criminal complaint that has been lodged at at Hammersmith police station on Monday the 20th of December 2021, by an ex policeman, Dave Sexton, for Misconduct in public office and Gross negligent manslaughter.
The complaint has been acknowledged by the police and has been issued a Crime reference number. 6029679/21.


Part of the statement...

1, evidence is being sent by Philip Hyland PJH Law, Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law, Dr Sam White and myself to and collated by The Metropolitan police at Hammersmith CID.
.
.
.
.
.

14, CARE WORKERS, DOCTORS AND NURSES.

if you have already been sacked or forced to leave your job because you refused to take the V you have been blackmailed.
This is a criminal offence. (See below).
Nobody has a right to demand you take any kind of intrusive medication, V or gene therapy and then sack you or threaten you with losing your livelihood.

Again we are advising you to go to your local police station and make a criminal complaint as a victim of blackmail against the person who dismissed you. Saying it’s a government mandate is no excuse and this is unlawful. The individual is responsible for their actions in making unlawful demands causing you loss, not an organisation or government body.

Again, cite the crime recording standards. If that fails request that a victim statement is taken including a victim personal statement and ask for it to be forwarded to, The CID department at Hammersmith police station using crime reference number;6029679/21.

15, it is not possible (due to the sheer volume) to respond to personal messages and requests.
We are working flat out with a large number of people to obtain as much evidence and information as possible in order to assist the Metropolitan Police with this massive criminal investigation.

Please remain positive and supportive, we know the nature of the beast and dismissive or negative comments don’t help. There is huge interest in this criminal complaint from many countries around the world and we are encouraging them to do the same.

Rest assured the work to stop this and bringing those responsible to justice will continue unabated.
We need everyone to pull together and work together, if you get knocked back be persistent and insistent and remember the police work for us.

We are also asking for now, avoid sending links, videos and documents because we have thousands of these already and they are very time consuming to go through.

As soon as there are any other notable updates or developments we will let you know.
Please share this post far and wide.

Thank you.
Happy new year.

I cannot give any direct links because Facebook have deleted Dave Sexton's account I took screen shots of the all statements posted before it was deleted. For recent info I go on PJH Law Twitter account.

Here is one for example that may be of help...

PJH Law
@pjhlaw
·
4 Jan
Looking forward to a zoom call with lawyers in New Zealand. Real head of steam building up internationally, lots of progress and collaboration.

kickstones
Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by kickstones » Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:47 am

Flabbergasted wrote:
Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:47 pm
The BMJ has published an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg (or his creator) complaining about how FecesBook's "fact checkers" have been labeling as misinformation a paper revealing serious data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vax trial.

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80

It would be very useful to make a survey of who owns/sponsors/mentors the major "fact checkers". Or perhaps someone has already done that.
Who Funds Lead Stories’ ‘Fact Checks’?

**Via Lead Stories’ “Our Funding” page:
https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/

“We do not accept funds from corporations with the exception of Facebook, which provides funding as part of Facebook’s initiative to debunk viral deceptions, and Google, which provided a one-time grant to support our COVID-19 coverage in 2020. Neither corporation seeks nor is given any control over our editorial decisions.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-01- ... check-scam

From comments.....

op Facebook (Meta) Shareholders


Vanguard Group Inc.

Vanguard is one of the world's largest investment management companies with about 440 low-cost traditional funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).14 Vanguard is primarily a mutual fund and ETF management company and has about $7.2 trillion in global assets under management (AUM).15 The Vanguard Communication Services ETF (VOX), with $ 4.6 billion under management, is one of many Vanguard fund's holding Meta shares. Meta is the largest holding in this fund's portfolio, at about 17.1% of total invested assets.16

BlackRock Inc.

BlackRock is one of the world's leading asset and investment management firms with approximately $8.7 trillion in AUM as of Dec. 31, 2020.17 The company offers a wide range of mutual funds, iShares ETFs, and closed-end funds.18 The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is among one of BlackRock's largest ETFs with approximately $286.7 billion in AUM. Meta is the fourth-largest holding of this fund, at about 2.2% of invested assets.19

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/i ... ook-fb.asp

Top Google (Alphabet) Shareholders

Alphabet Inc. (GOOG, and GOOGL) is a holding company and parent of Google.

Top 4 Institutional Shareholders

Vanguard Group Inc.

Vanguard holds 22.8 million class A shares representing about 7.6% of total class A shares outstanding, and 21.3 million class C shares representing about 6.6% of total class C shares outstanding, according to its 13F filing for the period ended June 30, 2021. In total, Vanguard holds more than 44 million Alphabet shares.

BlackRock, Inc.

In total, BlackRock holds 39.3 million Alphabet shares.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/m ... s-goog.asp

Top Pfizer Shareholders

Vanguard Group Inc.

Vanguard Group owns 456.2 million shares of Pfizer, representing 8.1% of total shares outstanding, according to the company's 13F filing for the period ending June 30, 2021.10 The company is primarily a mutual fund and ETF management company with about $7.2 trillion in global assets under management (AUM).11 The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is one of the company's largest exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with about $256 billion in AUM. Pfizer comprises nearly 0.7% of VOO's holdings.12

BlackRock Inc.

BlackRock owns 407.0 million shares of Pfizer, representing 7.3% of total shares outstanding, according to the company's 13F filing for the period ending June 30, 2021.10 The company is primarily a mutual fund and ETF management company with approximately $8.7 trillion in AUM.13 The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is among one of BlackRock's largest ETFs with approximately $305 billion in AUM. Pfizer comprises nearly 0.7% of IVV's holdings.14

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/c ... er-pfe.asp

Nefilimp
Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 7:43 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Nefilimp » Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:11 pm

gitarrmannen wrote:
Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:10 pm
My first post in the great forum and it’s going to be a small, but rather amusing, (for some people) post.
Under the category, you can’t make this shit up, we have the latest mutation on this virus. And of course, the people that came up with the name should have some sort of price. :rolleyes:

IHU is the brilliant name. And if you say it fast enough it’s going to sound like ‘I Hate You”. Nah, you don’t even have to say it fast,

Oh my good. Please pinch my arm and wake me up.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 87716.html

Edit. Some spelling errors.
Welcome gitarrmannen! I saw it too and thought it was 'I hatchoo'! But yeah, they are just making fun of the masses with a silent m.

antipodean
Member
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:53 am
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by antipodean » Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:47 am

Hi Kickstones, thanks for the heads up/ advice. I attended a protest today and mentioned your advice to people who are about to be mandated out of a job, quite a few are keen to give it a go.
Again we are advising you to go to your local police station and make a criminal complaint as a victim of blackmail against the person who dismissed you. Saying it’s a government mandate is no excuse and this is unlawful. The individual is responsible for their actions in making unlawful demands causing you loss, not an organisation or government body.

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:29 pm

I don´t know if this has been mentioned before. It´s an "FDA briefing document" about the use of the clot shot in children. There is a lot of different stuff in it if you have the necessary patience, but my attention was drawn specifically to Table 14 which models the "benefits" of poisoning children.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nncSZq ... sp=sharing
The results of the benefit-risk assessment are summarized in Table 14 below. The results predict that under Scenarios 1 (Sept 11, 2021 Incidence), 2 (Delta surge peak incidence), 4 (high efficacy), and 5 (higher COVID-19 death rate, per the CDC COVID-19 Data Tracker), the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine 2-dose primary series clearly outweigh the risks for ages 5-11 years. Under Scenario 3 (lowest incidence), the model predicts more excess hospitalizations due to vaccine-related myocarditis/pericarditis compared to prevented hospitalizations due to COVID-19 in males and in both sexes combined. However, in consideration of the different clinical implications of hospitalization for COVID-19 versus hospitalization for vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis, and benefits related to prevention of non-hospitalized cases of COVID-19 with significant morbidity, the overall benefits of the vaccine may still outweigh the risks under this lowest incidence scenario. If the myocarditis/pericarditis risk in this age group is lower than the conservative assumption used in the model, the benefit-risk balance would be even more favorable.
Image

So, considering Scenario 1, if you "fully" jab a million boys, you will prevent 1 death and 67 ICU admissions due to a short-lived influenza-like condition, while creating 179 cases of potentially chronic heart disease, 57 of which will require ICU admission. Note that no excess ICU myocarditis patient is expected to die.

Am I getting this right?

Even if we added all the other documented severe adverse effects (paralysis, infertility, loss of natural immunity, blindness, etc.), the FDA would find a way to argue that "the overall benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks".

Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:51 pm

Flabbergasted wrote:
Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:29 pm
Note that no excess ICU myocarditis patient is expected to die.
Speaking of which, the number of vax-terminated athletes is now at 253, and counting:

https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athlete ... ovid-shot/

Post Reply