The CORONAVIRUS circus

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda
glg
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:48 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by glg »

patrix wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:16 am Blood and other tissue is slightly magnetic, so I'd say an unvaccinated control group would also have a magnet stick on some individuals
So you think those showing cell phones or cuttlery sticking to their arms, must be fake?
kickstones
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by kickstones »

simonshack wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 3:11 pm
We live in extremely silly AND truly dark times - that much is for sure.
Indeed Simon, however, if last Saturdays turnout at the LONDON FREEDOM RALLY is anything to go by there is a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. And predictably the protest march didn't get a mention on the BBC, despite being basically on their doorstep.



full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb0Gjb-_wSU
patrix
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by patrix »

glg wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 8:17 am
patrix wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:16 am Blood and other tissue is slightly magnetic, so I'd say an unvaccinated control group would also have a magnet stick on some individuals
So you think those showing cell phones or cuttlery sticking to their arms, must be fake?
No I'm not saying they must be fake, but I try to stick to what we can actually know and confirm about this - No virus has ever been proven to exist which explains why no vaccine has ever been proven to be effective. DNA/rDNA are also unconfirmed and in many aspects disproven hypotheses. So I don't give much for spike proteins, shedding, nanoparticles etc. We have little way of knowing what's actually in the shots but my guess is that it's a potent poison (more vaccine deaths reported now in US than total reported since the VAERS registry was created) and that the second shot will really kick you in the butt which seems to be confirmed by some reports. A nurse said all patients at the Covid ward had taken the second shot.
Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted »

patrix wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:16 am Blood and other tissue is slightly magnetic, so I'd say an unvaccinated control group would also have a magnet stick on some individuals
Have you tested sticking a magnet on yourself or on family and friends?
If blood and tissue are slightly magnetic by nature, why would a magnet only stick on some individuals?
glg
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:48 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by glg »

patrix wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:01 pm
glg wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 8:17 am
patrix wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:16 am Blood and other tissue is slightly magnetic, so I'd say an unvaccinated control group would also have a magnet stick on some individuals
So you think those showing cell phones or cuttlery sticking to their arms, must be fake?
No I'm not saying they must be fake, but I try to stick to what we can actually know and confirm about this - No virus has ever been proven to exist which explains why no vaccine has ever been proven to be effective. DNA/rDNA are also unconfirmed and in many aspects disproven hypotheses. So I don't give much for spike proteins, shedding, nanoparticles etc. We have little way of knowing what's actually in the shots but my guess is that it's a potent poison (more vaccine deaths reported now in US than total reported since the VAERS registry was created) and that the second shot will really kick you in the butt which seems to be confirmed by some reports. A nurse said all patients at the Covid ward had taken the second shot.
I think I hear you implying that this magnet issue is a distraction? It may very well be just that, unless of course there's some reality to this phenomenon which would imo exactly point towards some nasty poison laced probably with ferromagnetic nano particle dirt.
I agree with you about the virus, the shedding, the spike asf. but oviously if there's anything in those vaccines it would be nanoscale, whatever it is.
I'm just saying, I find it hard to debunk some of those videos even though some may be simple adhesion, others trickery, some just look legit.
So idk. (?)
kickstones
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by kickstones »

This guy seemed to be on the ball...

Dr Pierre Gilbert in 1995:

"In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is a contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind, creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people. The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro-receivers of electromagnetic fields where waves of very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you’ll be turned into a zombie. Don’t think of this as a hypothesis. This has been done. Think of Rwanda"


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mav2dZqQOcE
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by simonshack »

kickstones wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 3:51 pm This guy seemed to be on the ball...

Dr Pierre Gilbert in 1995:

"In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is a contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind, creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people. The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro-receivers of electromagnetic fields where waves of very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you’ll be turned into a zombie. Don’t think of this as a hypothesis. This has been done. Think of Rwanda"
Dear kickstones,

Since I speak fluent French, I just wished to provide a more accurate translation (of my own) of this speech by the French-Canadian Pierre Gilbert. Here goes:

"There is more than just organized storms in the magnetic fields, there is also the pollution that will be put into the blood and veins of mankind by creating infections, and as a result of that, having created these infections voluntarily, laws will be created that will force the population to take these vaccines - and in these vaccines there will be everything needed to control you. Liquid crystals will be introduced into these vaccines; these crystals will be lodged in your brain cells and become micro-receptors of electromagnetic fields sent out by very, very low frequency subsonic waves. And with these very low frequency waves it will be possible to prevent you from thinking - and to turn you into zombies. Don't think that I'm at a stage where I think this is a hypothesis, what I'm telling you is (fact?). Remember Rwanda."

A most interesting speech, I must admit... "What a kooky, tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory!" - some people might say! -_-
anonjedi2
Member
Posts: 860
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:50 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by anonjedi2 »

And with these very low frequency waves it will be possible to prevent you from thinking - and to turn you into zombies.
:rolleyes:

As opposed to what? As if the majority of human beings on this planet are not already zombies?

Sounds like a bunch of Hollywood, Bruce Willis, Sci-Fi nonsense to me. Why would you need such technology to "prevent people from thinking" - when this has been accomplished with the age old technology of television? People are fast asleep and have been for over a century. There's no need for all these dramatics, other than to spread more fear and propaganda.
glg
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:48 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by glg »

anonjedi2 wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:40 pm
And with these very low frequency waves it will be possible to prevent you from thinking - and to turn you into zombies.
:rolleyes:

As opposed to what? As if the majority of human beings on this planet are not already zombies?

Sounds like a bunch of Hollywood, Bruce Willis, Sci-Fi nonsense to me. Why would you need such technology to "prevent people from thinking" - when this has been accomplished with the age old technology of television? People are fast asleep and have been for over a century. There's no need for all these dramatics, other than to spread more fear and propaganda.
- Hey Ronnie how's your Zombies? Still feed'em expensive goodnight stories?
-. Oh shut up Joe! That remote control... it's a pipe dream.
- Yeah well Ron... thanks for the input.
M159
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 11:22 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by M159 »

Why would you need such technology to "prevent people from thinking" - when this has been accomplished with the age old technology of television? People are fast asleep and have been for over a century. There's no need for all these dramatics, other than to spread more fear and propaganda.
It's an easy method of prisoner control; anyone who is rounded up and put into a camp won't try to get out.
sharpstuff
Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by sharpstuff »

patrix wrote: ↑
Thu Jun 03, 2021 7:16 am
Blood and other tissue is slightly magnetic, so I'd say an un-vaccinated control group would also have a magnet stick on some individuals
glg wrote:

So you think those showing cell phones or cutlery sticking to their arms, must be fake?
As far as magnetism is concerned, of course and with the knowledge that we live in an electrical universe, it is obvious, I would have thought that magnets would stick to certain areas of the body, which can be observed and given that we are all different the actual locations/ strength of 'attachment' will be variable.

The notion that so-called 'nano-objects' are injected into the body by 'vaccinations' and thereby 'proven' to exist is therefore nullified.

Personally, I have never been convinced of the notion of nano-particles as it allies itself with atomic theory, of which I have doubts based on the notion of processes of Nature (and those we can create to some degree outside of Nature, if you will). Perhaps the notion of nano-particles is yet another 'invisible enemy' to deal with?

In the respect of 'atomic' theory I discovered in my HD 'library' this little book:

Buddist Atom Theory in the Light of Modern Physics

which I found to be enlightening and well worth a read and more to my own way of thinking.

For a taster, below is the Introduction.

The full file can be downloaded from here:

https://mega.nz/file/C8QURZ5A#m5UOCv9sk ... AUaW3NxcY0


Buddhist Atom Theory in the Light of Modern
Physics

Lalini K. Pedris


Upon hearing of the denial of physical objects or of the non-existence of the atomic particle, one would speculate that a thorough study of physics would refute these claims; however, it appears that an analysis
of Buddhist atom theory may paradoxically reveal the unreality of physical science itself. What Buddhist atom theory argues against is not simply the possibility of an atom’s existence, but on an even deeper
level, the notion of the ‘point particle’ (also known as a ‘point-like particle’). According to modern physics, the point particle is a hypothetical particle that is so infinitesimally small that it cannot be
divided and cannot contain parts, as it has no spatial extension’.
****************************************
Be well.
glg
Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:48 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by glg »

sharpstuff wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 6:41 am
Personally, I have never been convinced of the notion of nano-particles as it allies itself with atomic theory, of which I have doubts based on the notion of processes of Nature (and those we can create to some degree outside of Nature, if you will). Perhaps the notion of nano-particles is yet another 'invisible enemy' to deal with?
?
After Patrix you are the second member here that raises doubts on the notion of particles around a hundred thousand to one million times smaller then a millimeter - that's definitely interesting. Leaving atomic theory aside, you speak of 'point particle' quoting a buddhist text but you leave us without a clue as to the possible size of this point particle which supposedly cannot be further divided.
Said particle must, I assume, be bigger then nanoscale - how much bigger do you reckon does it have to be?
I'm reading an interesting book where the author tries to speculate if it was/is possible for amerindian shamans to see viruses by way of entoptic vision. Regardless of the non existence of viruses, the point is to see what claim can be made as to what size is actually detectable by our own sensory organ, the eye and this by way of entoptics.
It becomes quite clear, that amerindian shamans could absolutely detect the size of bacteria (thousand times smaller then a millimeter) and may have used entoptics frequently to check environmental status. In fact an old trick to determine blood flow is by way of the blue field effect where white blood cells (7 to 15 micrometers) can be seen refracting and can be counted passing the retina when one stares into the blue sky.
At any rate, where do you think 'point particle¨ size is reached?
Or in other words, @Flabbergasted has left us the following pdf recently on the topic of Micro-and Nanocontamination of vaccines where we find electron microscopic plates claiming to show us various metallic particles hundred thousand times smaller then a millimeter. What do think is the actual size of those particles photographed if not 100nm?
http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by simonshack »

anonjedi2 wrote: Thu Jun 03, 2021 11:40 pm
And with these very low frequency waves it will be possible to prevent you from thinking - and to turn you into zombies.
:rolleyes:

As opposed to what? As if the majority of human beings on this planet are not already zombies?

Sounds like a bunch of Hollywood, Bruce Willis, Sci-Fi nonsense to me. Why would you need such technology to "prevent people from thinking" - when this has been accomplished with the age old technology of television? People are fast asleep and have been for over a century. There's no need for all these dramatics, other than to spread more fear and propaganda.
Dear anonjedi, I hear you - and probably need to clarify my thoughts about this...I didn't mean to imply that I believe in these sort of technologies, but since there's currently so much debate and speculation as to what exactly is being injected into people (including these novel magnetic 'phenomena' & the timeworn 'microchipping' discourse) I nonetheless found Mr. Gilbert's 1995-vintage fearporn interesting. See, these days (which are, quite frankly, truly dramatic to me - what with some friends of mine mindlessly taking the jab) I've been musing at how to diffuse what one may call "benevolent fearporn"; this, in order to increase so-called "vax-hesitancy" among my friends, acquaintances and assorted TV-zombies I know of...I know, this may sound silly (and manipulative) but consider that we are at war - and it's, undeniably, a war of the minds. So yesterday I posted that Pierre Gilbert clip on my FB wall just for the hell of it - in the (feeble) hope to make some folks think twice before deciding to get jabbed. Again, this may sound pretty silly and futile - but what to do? :(
kickstones
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:15 pm

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by kickstones »

More than likely bullshit, but it's what's out there and is published in many mainstream scientific journals....

Nat Neurosci

Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system

Michael A Wheele et al

2016 May;19(5):756-761.
doi: 10.1038/nn.4265. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26950006/

Abstract

Optogenetic and chemogenetic actuators are critical for deconstructing the neural correlates of behavior. However, these tools have several limitations, including invasive modes of stimulation or slow on/off kinetics. We have overcome these disadvantages by synthesizing a single-component, magnetically sensitive actuator, "Magneto," comprising the cation channel TRPV4 fused to the paramagnetic protein ferritin. We validated noninvasive magnetic control over neuronal activity by demonstrating remote stimulation of cells using in vitro calcium imaging assays, electrophysiological recordings in brain slices, in vivo electrophysiological recordings in the brains of freely moving mice, and behavioral outputs in zebrafish and mice. As proof of concept, we used Magneto to delineate a causal role of striatal dopamine receptor 1 neurons in mediating reward behavior in mice. Together our results present Magneto as an actuator capable of remotely controlling circuits associated with complex animal behaviors.


In vivo manipulation of zebrafish behavior using Magneto2.0

From Wheeler, et al. (2016). Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHTpJNSNFlc


edit = bold headline
Flabbergasted
Administrator
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The CORONAVIRUS circus

Unread post by Flabbergasted »

kickstones wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:38 am Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system
More recently (2019), Wang and coworkers reevaluated the magnetic properties of Wheeler's "Magneto2.0", but were unable to replicate the magnetically-induced behavioral effects reported in the original study.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31570862/
(can be viewed with www[dot]sci-hub[dot]se)

Two other studies also found Wheeler's "Magneto2.0" to be ineffective. Here is Wheeler´s response to all three:
https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi. ... /31570860/

Image
Illustration from a 2016 comment by Sian Lewis (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27040906/)
Post Reply