Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Anything on the news and elsewhere in the media with evidence of digital manipulation, bogus story-lines and propaganda

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby reel.deal on Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:35 pm

shootfucgurs ...(sho) O (t) FUC (g) URS ...surcouf ... OH FUC YERS ?!?!? :P

shootfucgurs, kcud.d, (in cahoots) ...so what if they plonked a plane in the Hudson,
then half-painted out the logo? the 2 or 3 CCTV !/ 'amateur' 'crash-landing' vids
make Herzakhani & Fairbanks 'vidz'. LOOK REAL, by comparison...

Get a grip, if the Hudson landing was FOR REAL, what kind of drag d'ya think
rolls royce jet engines have once they hit deep water ?
I mean, c'mon! If that flight really hit & landed 'ON', NOT 'IN' - The Hudson,
the engines, AND WINGS, woulda been RIPPED RIGHT OFF.
If a 'birdstrike' can mash up FIBREGLASS/ALUMINUM fuselage, or take out a jet-engine,
what impact effect do you really think LANDING ON DEEP WATER would have on '1549' ?
You've all landed on a tarmac runway, felt the intense braking deceleration,
transfer those forces onto a water-landing, viola, NO ENGINES LEFT, NO WINGS LEFT, SUNK.

OF COURSE they put a REAL PLANE in the water, & took/photoshopped pictures/video, but seriously,
exactly Which "FLIGHT 1549 LANDING 'ON' THE HUDSON VIDEO" do you think SERIOUSLY LOOKS REAL ?

Doesnt matter whatever photos are real, the 'crash-landing' '1549'... is PURE BULLSHIT...
9/11 'plane-crash' vids fake / flight 1549 'Hudson Happy-Landings' vids REAL ?!?!? :blink:

:lol: :lol: :lol:
HAHAHA ! haha... !!!
ZOOT ALORS !
:P
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby simonshack on Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:47 am

Just go to 1:47 of this video and see the 3D matrix used for this hoax:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZPvVwvX_Nc

It's IN-YOUR-FACE fakery. That's what it is.

The whole episode has gone down as a popular joke. Here are a few samples (found on other websites) making fun of it all:
Image

Image

Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6612
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby Terence.drew on Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:48 am

Image


Q. Where does the plane 'happen' to land?
A. Directly in front of Intrepid Air and Space Museum NY.

Q. What is on Intrepid Air and Space Museum.
A .Large aircraft. Concorde is much longer than an A320.

Q. How do you get your dummy mock up of an A320 into Hudson without everyone noticing?
A. Easy. A little trojan horse number. Intrepid is taken away in 2006 and refurbished (112million no less!). It's then placed back on it's birth and reopened on NOV 8th 2008, 4 days AFTER the US presidential election. A Dummy float-able Plane is easily stowed away somewhere on the 42,000 ton ship during refurb or attached to the bottom and later floated. Come the day of the big show and amid all the hub a bub the plane only needs to travel the length of a few football pitches to the point of it's 'miraculous' splash down.

Q. Why use dummy mock up plane and actors?
A. Why not..a bit of realism. The full monty digital 911 turned out to be an eyesore and as believable as a Yeti/Lough Ness monster Opera duet. A mixed bag of actors and faked footage and photos this time to at least get nominated for an Emmy. Hence the lack of people as the actor's union wouldn't let more on the dummy mock up plane for health and safety reasons.

Q. Why set this up?
A. For reasons discussed earlier. Obama the sun God blah blah maker of miracles. His (fluffed) Inauguration takes place 5 days AFTER this 'miracle'.( His own rise to the top turns out to be equally miraculous..)

Elementary.
Terence.drew
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby reel.deal on Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:00 am

yeah. the animations more real than the 'videos'. the 'birdstrike' that took out "BOTH ENGINES",
left BOTH engines trailing BLACK SMOKE. Also, the animation accurately re-creates how -
ALL 'FLIGHT 1549's' ALWAYS EJECT BOTH ENGINES when LANDING @ SEA, TO TURN INTO A BIG GLIDER,
THAT FLOATS LIKE A BOAT, if they dont EJECT BOTH ENGINES, THE NOSE WILL "NOSE-DIVE"...
SNAPPING "1549" UP AS THE ENGINES-DRAG INEVITABLY CREATES A DEAD-HALT.

Image
Surcouf, care to throw up some of the "1000's" of 'amateur' '1549' "VIDEOS" ? just ONE will do.
Those mile-off CCTV ones dont count, they're TOO SHIT.
forget the photos...
lets see the 'REAL MIRACLE' 'HUDSON HAPPY-LANDINGS' FILMS.
WITH ALL THE TRAILING BLACK SMOKE ?!?!? ...YEAH ?
Image
:huh: :blink: :mellow: :wacko: ;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby nonhocapito on Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:08 am

Terence.drew wrote:Q. Why use dummy mock up plane and actors?
A. Why not..a bit of realism. The full monty digital 911 turned out to be an eyesore and as believable as a Yeti/Lough Ness monster Opera duet. A mixed bag of actors and faked footage and photos this time to at least get nominated for an Emmy. Hence the lack of people as the actor's union wouldn't let more on the dummy mock up plane for health and safety reasons.


Thanks for your q&a...! Pretty useful. It's true, the intrepid museum might as well have had a part in this.

The only thing I don't necessarily agree is the presence of actors. Because rescue boats where supposedly there in minutes, surrounding the plane, there is no real document of the presence of people aside of four of five shots that we all know of. You can photoshop the actors, why bother with getting people wet?

But it's true that there might have been an actual plane floating there, even though this does not really explain why the need to go and retouch the pictures of the plane in waters.

But Simon is correct in saying that this is a non-event. The fakery is obvious, reality does not work that way, this is Hollywood crap. To debate too much about this today I am afraid has the same value as debating Khalezov... Plain distraction, hijacking of the research, etc.
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2554
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby brianv on Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:42 am

Well the two scenarios just posted by reel.deel contradict each other! The mile-off images shows a nose/belly drop entry and the Boyd systems shows a smooth tail-first entry! Neither look plausible!

I'm also with terence on the inflatible!

ImageImage
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby reel.deal on Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:00 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:
DONT GET CAUGHT "HIGH & DRY" !...
FLY AEROFLOT / THOMAS COCK !!!
:P
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby brianv on Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:18 pm

List of "jet age" aircraft accidents - water landings:

1959
February 3 – American Airlines Flight 320 crashes into the East River, New York City, due to pilot error. 65 passengers and crew are killed.
1960
October 4 – Eastern Air Lines Flight 375 crashes on takeoff from Boston's Logan International Airport. The aircraft had struck a flock of starlings seconds after lifting off, damaging three engines, clogging the Pitot tubes, and obstructing the pilots' view. The aircraft crashes into Winthrop Bay; 62 of 72 aboard die.
1962
March 1 – American Airlines Flight 1, a Boeing 707, crashes in Jamaica Bay, Queens, New York, killing 95.
1970
May 2 – ALM Flight 980, a Douglas DC-9 operated by Overseas National Airways, ditches near St. Croix, Virgin Islands, killing 23 including 2 infants and 1 crew member; 40 including 4 crew members survive.
1977
December 4 – Malaysia Airlines Flight 653, a Boeing 737, is hijacked under mysterious circumstances. Minutes later, the airliner strikes the ocean at a steep angle, killing all 100 people aboard
1978
January 1 – Air-India Flight 855, a Boeing 747, crashes into the Arabian Sea due to instrument malfunction and pilot error. All 213 passengers and crew die.
May 8 – National Airlines Flight 193, a Boeing 727, lands short on approach to Pensacola, Florida in Escambia Bay due to pilot error. Three passengers out of 58 people on board drown.
1980
June 27 – Aerolinee Itavia Flight 870 crashes into the sea near Italy in controversial circumstances.
1985 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerolinee_ ... Flight_870

June 23 – Air-India Flight 182, a Boeing 747, is bombed by Sikh extremists. It crashes into the ocean near Ireland, killing all 329 people on board.
1987
August 31 – Thai Airways Flight 365, a Boeing 737, crashes into the ocean off the coast of Thailand due to pilot error. All 83 passengers and crew perish
1989
September 8 – Partnair Flight 394, a Convair 580, crashes into the North Sea after its tail section falls off in midair. All 55 people on board perish.
1996
February 6 – Birgenair Flight 301, a Boeing 757 with 189 people on board, crashes into the ocean off Puerto Plata in the Dominican Republic shortly after taking off. All of the passengers and crew members on board are killed.
October 2 – Aeroperú Flight 603, a Boeing 757, crashes into the ocean off Pasamayo, Peru, due to a maintenance error. All 70 people on board are killed.
November 23 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961, a Boeing 767, is hijacked over Kenya. The aircraft runs out of fuel, and the pilot attempts to ditch the aircraft in the ocean off Moroni, Comoros. Of the 175 people on board, 123 are killed.
December 19 – SilkAir Flight 185, a Boeing 737, crashes abruptly into the Musi River near Palembang, Indonesia, killing all 102 people on board.
1998
September 2 – Swissair Flight 111, a McDonnell Douglas MD-11, crashes into the sea near Halifax, Nova Scotia in Canada, due to an onboard fire. All 229 people on board perish.
1999
October 31 – EgyptAir Flight 990, a Boeing 767 on its way to Cairo, Egypt, is deliberately crashed into the Atlantic Ocean off Nantucket, Massachusetts. All 217 passengers and crew members on board are killed.
2000
January 30 – Kenya Airways Flight 431, an Airbus A310, carrying 169 passengers and 10 crew members, crashes into the Atlantic Ocean off Côte d'Ivoire after takeoff from Abidjan. Only ten people survive.
January 31 – Alaska Airlines Flight 261, an MD-83, crashes into the Pacific Ocean off Point Mugu, California after problems with its horizontal stabilizer. All 83 passengers and 5 crew members are killed.
August 23 – Gulf Air Flight 072, an Airbus A320, crashes into the Persian Gulf off Manama, Bahrain while attempting to land. All 143 passengers and eight crew members are killed.
2004
January 3 – Flash Airlines Flight 604, a Boeing 737, crashes into the Red Sea, killing all 135 passengers and 13 crew members.
2005
December 19 – Chalk's Ocean Airways Flight 101, a Grumman Mallard, crashes off the coast of Miami Beach, Florida, killing all 20 on board.
2007
January 1 – Adam Air Flight 574, a Boeing 737 with 102 people on board, crashes into the ocean off the island of Sulawesi in Indonesia, killing all on board.
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby Terence.drew on Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:59 pm

Image

For the love of God Brianv take this topic seriously will you!! :angry: ;)

One shower gone brian and the other in at home! Musical chairs for the elite as Hoi superbly put it.
Terence.drew
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby reel.deal on Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:31 pm

reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby shootfucgurs on Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:52 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?
by fbenario » February 26th, 2011, 2:54 am

... whoever you are, shootfucgurs ? ...

:unsure: ??

A tentative explanation below ...

by simonshack » February 26th, 2011, 11:32 am
... No mystery here ... French phonetic spelling for "shoot fuckers"). In fact, 'shootfucgurs' is exactly how one would spell (phonetically) the sound of a Frenchman attempting to pronounce these two menacing English words.


or this one ...

by reel.deal » February 27th, 2011, 12:35 am

shootfucgurs ...(sho) O (t) FUC (g) URS ...surcouf ... OH FUC YERS ?!?!? :P


Maybe, maybe ... or could it just be a more simple answer... where "Shootfucgurs" is just the basic anagram for "Surcoufghost" :) ?

When you have the information, it's always easier than any speculation, whatever it pretends to be smart, right ...<_<
Indeed, a ghost because it seems that Surcouf of RealityShack former forum hasn't even existed. More than being just banned (for unknown reasons), his name would have been deleted from the members' list ! But if you scroll page per page in the archives, you may still find some rare posts under his pseudo...It has to be an internet conspiration :D !

Going back to the point, this US 1549 story remains strange ...

Image


Image


Image

Why those cops hide behind scarf and glasses, and even drive at night ... ?
It would be a far-fetched explanation to say it is a cold winter and where sunset goes early !
And where the hell would they drive to ??

Oh by the way, anyone has heard once about Kearny ?
shootfucgurs
Banned
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:31 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby Terence.drew on Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:16 pm

nonhocapito wrote:
Thanks for your q&a...! Pretty useful. It's true, the intrepid museum might as well have had a part in this.

The only thing I don't necessarily agree is the presence of actors. Because rescue boats where supposedly there in minutes, surrounding the plane, there is no real document of the presence of people aside of four of five shots that we all know of. You can photoshop the actors, why bother with getting people wet?

But it's true that there might have been an actual plane floating there, even though this does not really explain why the need to go and retouch the pictures of the plane in waters.

But Simon is correct in saying that this is a non-event. The fakery is obvious, reality does not work that way, this is Hollywood crap. To debate too much about this today I am afraid has the same value as debating Khalezov... Plain distraction, hijacking of the research, etc.


I agree with most of what you say here Nonho and you raise the very valid point of why use actors at all? This is a question the hoaxinators ask themselves (and with good reason after reviewing the 911 performances). Why use actors like Obama and all the rest of the deluded/ambitious egotists either? They haven't reached that stage yet but I am sure would like to.


The list of actors involved in this hoax includes the following..

- The pilot - Sullenberger (Texan Republican. Financial interest in plane safety through his company)
- The passengers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6NvmT2Huig . No fawning emotional passengers no hero.
- Rescue workers (these are easily photoshopped I guess)

I totally take your point that there are only a handful of easily shopped photos of people getting wet)


It is interesting to note also that the Intrepid was 'in cahoots' with those other hoaxers NASA as a recovery ship during the 1960s.
Image
It wouldn't surprise me if there was some sort of hidden opening capable of dropping something very large into the water in case of something going wrong on one of their missions. There was so much at stake around that time with so many Government contracts and in modern terms trillions of dollars involved, that hoaxing a project was always on the cards.

Overall I think this has been a very fruitful thread and well worth pushing over the finishing line. It has been like 'the anatomy of the hoax' class ;)
Terence.drew
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby brianv on Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:28 pm

Image

This alleged photograph has got nothing to do with an airplane - it's a visual record of the homosexual police-state nazification of America. Even the photo is entitled "cops".
Last edited by brianv on Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby reel.deal on Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:29 pm

great photos ghost ! ...such a shame then, they botched & betray the whole sham...
with the INEPT, INCOMPETENT, UNREAL... "CRASH-LANDING" "VIDEOS"...
amateurs !
EVERYONE had a camera-fone by 1/13/09...
There should be 500 amateur "videos" of "1549" "landing ON the Hudson"... non ?
"THE MIRACLE ON THE HUDSON"...
A REAL "FAIRYTALE OF NEW YORK"
Image
Image
Shane MacGowan should write a song about it...
;)
reel.deal
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: Crash of US 1549 flight in Hudson river - Fake or Real ?

Postby kcud.d on Sun Feb 27, 2011 4:20 pm

RD,

EVERYONE had a camera-fone by 1/13/09...


You say you are from England, so could you please explain the spelling " Camera-fone" and since Simon is the spelling police around this place, I am sure he wants to know too.

This one is for you Simon cos that idiot D.Duck has stopped looking after things,lol.

If I am not getting banned in a heartbeat for no reason, I like to come back and comment on a few things later.


CaRamBa
kcud.d
kcud.d
Banned
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:32 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Worldwide media deceptions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests