Yes, it's in the BATMAN threadPug wrote:Anyone seen this?
Nurse Who “Saw Everything” At Hospital After Suspicious Batman Shooting Found Dead at 46
Jenny Gallagher, a nurse who treated victims of the highly suspicious “Batman” shooting in Aurora, Colorado last month, is dead at age 46. The reported cause of death: drowning.
http://www.theendrun.com/batman-shootin ... d-drowning Source: The END RUN
The video below is a very fitting subject to what you are talking about here. To put it all into perspective, the majority of the people claiming to be abducted by "aliens" were also all engaging in some form of occult practice, the obvious reason is because doing these things is like asking to be contacted as the video below discusses.FakeWorld wrote:Hello,
The research regarding the NASA fakes here in this forum is close to the truth but the most important thing is to draw the conclusion why they are doing this to us.
As far as I can see is this an atheist forum not discussing the satanic roots at the top of the conspiracy with secret societies who have occult knowledge to contact the "Fallen Angels/Demons" that are in the dimension we cant see.
This satire (assuming this is what this is) isn't far off, because it is America afterall where most of the UFO and alleged abduction reports are happening, the obvious reason is because it is America where you will also see the most occult/satanic activity as that article I linked pointed out.reel.deal wrote:
"Alien Logic"
Going on about the appearance of these grey "aliens", it is amazing to me how much is actually in the Bible. Here is part of an article that discusses a Biblical scripture in Revelation that seem to be describing the appearance of these 'unclean' or 'evil' spirits that the likes of Aleister Crowley and numerous other people claimed to have had an encounter with.reel.deal wrote:
"Alien Logic"
Source: http://www.alienresistance.org/arstrongdelusion.htm1. Aliens in the Book of Revelation?
"The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up to prepare the way for the kings from the East. Then I saw three evil spirits that looked like frogs; they came out of the mouth of the dragon, out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet. They are spirits of demons performing miraculous signs, and they go out to the kings of the whole world, to gather them for the battle on the great day of God Almighty... Then they gathered the kings together to the place that in Hebrew is called Armageddon."
- Rev 16:12-19, 21
Dr. David Allen Lewis & Robert Shreckhise postulate,
“In Chapter Sixteen it speaks of three alien beings who go forth to deceive the rulers of the Earth. [The three aliens in Revelation Sixteen have an amphibian or reptilian appearance... So here we read about three frog-like unclean spirits… They are not actually frogs, but “like” frogs. Probably that describes their alien features or appearance..."
- Dr. David Allen Lewis & Robert Shrekhise, UFO: End-Time Delusion , pgs. 46-47
Their description is of these frog-like entities leading the kings of the earth together, prior to Christ’s return, preparing for the battle of Armageddon.
Paradox Brown, expounding upon this possible connection, similarly writes:
"...But note that John doesn't say the three evil spirits "ARE three frogs". He says they "looked like frogs"... Let's say that John was shown in his Revelation vision an image of something he had never seen before... It makes sense that if John didn't know what this creature was, and had never seen anything like it, that he would describe it as "looking like" something he was familiar with. John chose a frog. But if John had never seen this creature before, that doesn't mean we never have. Closer to Jesus' return in linear time than John, and closer to the book of Revelation being fulfilled, it stands to reason that we may have become familiar with this frog-like creature, even though John was not...
I propose that the culturally common image of a "gray alien" looks much like a frog...
"1. Frogs and “gray aliens” both have large eyes, and similar facial features.
... large heads and black "wrap around" eyes... slit mouth and no nose to speak of...
"2. Frogs and gray aliens have similar hand and finger structure....From Wikipedia on Gray aliens, "Hand is generally described with four fingers and no thumb with slight webbing between fingers. Two fingers appear longer than the others...
Alien hand artist depiction Frog feet
"In "Space Travelers and the Genesis of the Human Form", by Joan D'Arc, she says, "...the alien gray... fingers are long and thin, and generally with rounded pads or bulbs at the end... There are usually 4 fingers and a thumb, but sometimes 3 fingers and a thumb are noted." Frogs also are known for having rounded pads or bulbs on their fingertips... Below a frog is compared to a sketch by abductee Colin Wright, who sketched a "gray alien’s" hand based on what he saw during his “alien abduction” experience in 1992 with a “gray alien”. The resemblance is striking, note the long fingers and bulbs.
"3. Both “gray aliens” and frogs have no distinguishable external genitalia...
"4. Frogs and gray aliens both have no hair. "Frogs have no hair." [6]
Wikipedia says of gray aliens, "Head generally described as hairless, sometimes a slight fuzz. Bodies are hairless." So both “gray aliens” and frogs are hairless.
... Additionally, I do want to add a couple equally strange similarities, going beyond the topic of just appearance:
"5. Both frogs and “gray aliens” absorb through their skin.
From Wikipedia, "Greys reportedly absorb food as well as excrete waste through the skin, which makes them emit a foul odor." Of frogs, Wikipedia says, "... oxygen can pass through their highly permeable skin. This unique feature allows frogs to "breathe" largely through their skin."
"6. Both frogs and “gray aliens” reproduce through external reproductive means. Grays are said to reproduce their own kind by cloning, which is an external non-mammalian reproductive method which would take place in a lab, and growth would occur in an artificial womb environment. Frogs also reproduce externally, the male and female components issuing out of the body and fertilizing, then growing in an external environment like a pond."
- Paradox Brown, A Modern Guide to Demons and Fallen Angels , pgs. 255-260
This speaks much about you. Better to refrain from false apologies than claiming them.scud wrote:I apologise most humbly to ‘Geocentrists’ everywhere and slap myself round the chops repeatedly with a fillet of frozen fucking haddock for poor choice of words
No, I haven't. I haven't agreed with your physics (what physics??), and I certainly haven't agreed with you claiming all sorts of conspiracy things without evidence (your links really lack; but anyway I am not interested in this part).scud wrote:But since you seemed to have agreed with virtually everything that I have said
Exactly with the same physics as in heliocentrism. Apparently you have no idea what relativity means.scud wrote:how NASA might be expected to safely land an object on Mars since we’re static and the red planet is reckoned to be scorching through space at 58,000 Mp/h.
What about it? Each time thousands of people watch that, and they see nothing wrong.scud wrote:Not forgetting the standard procedure of launch
Actually, if gravity was that strong as you seem to believe, we wouldn't be able to move. At all.scud wrote:and the problems of escaping the effects of Earth’s gravity.
I read that one (selectively) long before reading anything of yours. And there is GOOD HUMOUR in that thread (as in many on this forum), unlike yours. As for your calculations, I didn't even read them, because, trust me, whatever you do, they'll do it better. Been there, seen that. Won't waste any more time on this.scud wrote:All mused over here.. viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1391&start=240 but unfortunately delivered in a superior and all-knowing tone.
What answer are you waiting for?scud wrote:hoping that in the mean time we receive a satisfactory (and beautifully eloquent ) answer from Alex
Of course it wouldn't mean such a thing.scud wrote:If a geocentric Universe is correct then every single achievement announced by NASA (and others) must be a lie as we do not have a method of matching, let alone surpassing any of our Planets or Moon’s orbital speeds.
Now I finally understand that the moons of Jupiter in fact orbit planet Earth at a far distance, while also orbiting planet Jupiter that doesn't orbit the Sun but orbits planet Earth that is not really a planet but something flat that we walk on or swim in except the Aussis that hangs on to it someway or another like taking a shower down under while NASA sends it fireworks upwards into a very hot sky and the aussies downwards also into a hot sky except at night when the sky is not hot and all this stuff was created by G in six days. It would mean an awful lot to me if you would post everything you know that might objectively prove the timeline of the Bible. Thank you very, very much.alex_ro wrote:If you further divide that by an expansion rate of 70, you obtain a figure less than 10,000 years as age for the Universe. Pretty much what the Bible says. How interesting, isn’t it? Especially since it obviously says farewell to evolution.
No, that's just silly. Hebrew did not define Gen 1:1 'days' as our modern 24-hour days; rather, Hebrew defined 'days' as similar to our modern geological eras, epochs, ages, etc. Please don't purposely muddy everyone's understanding. This stuff is hard enough to understand with everyone doing their best to post in good faith.Heiwa wrote:all this stuff was created by G in six days.
The timeline of the Bible? You mean, to prove that Adam lived for 900 and then some years? I can't.fbenario wrote:It would mean an awful lot to me if you would post everything you know that might objectively prove the timeline of the Bible. Thank you very, very much.
Of course it's not. It's the truth.fbenario wrote:No, that's just silly.Heiwa wrote:all this stuff was created by G in six days.
Of course they did. They still do. By their calendar it's about year 5800. About 2 centuries until the end of the world.fbenario wrote:Hebrew did not define Gen 1:1 'days' as our modern 24-hour days
Does this idea apply only to the human species or also to the ants? I'm just curious.alex_ro wrote:Within evolution theory, there can be no answer other than aliens.
