Are Movies Unwatchable?

A place to relax and socialize - to muse, think aloud and suggest
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

burningame wrote:Keen perceptions, dcopymope. I like his list of major human achievements:

“…19th century: Eureka! the light bulb!; 20th century: the automobile, televison, nuclear weapons, spacecraft, the internet; 21st century: biotech, nanotech, fusion and fission and m-theory[?]…and that was just the first decade!...”

I bet m-theory stands for media, and no, I don't wanna look it up.

But I am curious as to how you think they'll bring it off. How do you think they'll engineer it to make it believable? Do you think it will be evil, malicious aliens of the 'Alien' type (aka 'reptilians')? Or more 'humanoid' type? What state would the peoples of the world have to be in to believe it? Do you think it would happen before or after some kind of financial collapse or Third World War, i.e. when we're in a general state of confusion?


God help us if Ronald Reagan's speech where he talked about mankind coming together in the face of an alien threat, was true - a for-real warning, another foreshadowing from the perps, like the PNAC.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6PhtrRAXzU
They have to convince us that there is life on other planets to begin with, and this is where NASA and other similar groups comes in. They will provide us with the "clue to the origins of mankind on Earth", starting, I believe, with the Mars Curiosity Rover (its been rumored that this "clue" to our origins is found on Mars in the movie Prometheus as well). They have made it very clear what state the world would have to be in for people to accept the New World Order. Their motto is "Ordo AB Chao", latin for order out of chaos. It will come in out of the ashes of the current world system and pose as the savior, the solution to all our problems, as Alice Bailey wrote in her book titled 'The Externalization of the Hierarchy'.
The new world order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience. The new world order must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding. - Pg. 191
If people are still wondering where the terms "New World Order" & "New Age" originally came from, it came from satanists like Alice Bailey, who founded the U.N's Lucifer Trust, now called the Lucis Trust, for obvious reasons. So the alien deception won't be sold to us as a threat to our existence, it would be best if it is sold to us as coming to save us from ourselves.

Edit: Are we to believe it is a coincidence that the History Channel's ‘Ancient Aliens’ show is produced by a company called 'Prometheus Entertainment'?

Link: http://www.prometheusentertainment.com/ ... ientaliens
fbenario
Member
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by fbenario »

CTGal1011 wrote:Pretty sad when the awful exploiting business of porn is the most realistic "movie" nowadays. They don't usually try to engage you in a serious plot, other than how much time until everyone takes their clothes off. Although, they do a good job at brainwashing the audience that the activities portrayed in said video are fun, liked by everyone involved and take a REALLY long time to complete. This is not how it is in the real world. ;)
No kidding. We now know that the porn industry, like every other industry built on the pretty face, is terribly exploitative of women, using rape as the favored tool to force women to continue doing what they're told to do without question.
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

Transformers 3 - Chicago under attack:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WbL1IlwSI4
Men Who Plotted To Blow Up Cleveland Bridge Had Eyes On Chicago

The self-described anarchists charged with plotting to blow up a bridge outside Cleveland also talked about plotting acts of terror in Chicago during the NATO summit, according to a criminal complaint......

a criminal complaint suggests at least one of the suspects also had his eye on staging or participating in some kind of attack or disruptive action in Chicago. The men had purchased inert improvised explosive devices, protective gear and smoke grenades previously, and Wright indicated that the group planned to come to Chicago after they destroyed the bridge in Cleveland.
CBS - Milwaukee Red Cross Told To Prep For Chicago Evacuation During NATO Summit:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPP1Dekzq3A

You never know for sure when and where they may stage another false flag event, just pointing this out as something to watch for just in case.
disinpho
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by disinpho »

Dcopymope wrote:You never know for sure when and where they may stage another false flag event, just pointing this out as something to watch for just in case.
Ron Paul actually alluded to a false flag in his speech to a rally in Austin, Texas april 26th (last month). Watch and listen here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbWyO6HOFgY&t=35m45s.

CBS claims Milwaukee Red Cross where told to plan for a mass evacuation of Chicago during the NATO conference.

Both of the above news items have been covered by Infowhores/Bill Hicks II

I doubt such an event would happen in the same place as the Chicago NATO conference, but what an excellent distraction if it where to happen at he same time (May 20-21), but at a different location. Exactly as with the 7/7/2005(2+0+0+5=7) false flag in London and the G8 summit at Gleneagles in Scotland (July 6-8, 2005).

There are also a number of occult reasons to place an 'event' around May 20-22, but I think expanding on those would take this thread waaay off-topic.
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

disinpho wrote:
Dcopymope wrote:You never know for sure when and where they may stage another false flag event, just pointing this out as something to watch for just in case.
Ron Paul actually alluded to a false flag in his speech to a rally in Austin, Texas april 26th (last month). Watch and listen here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbWyO6HOFgY&t=35m45s.

CBS claims Milwaukee Red Cross where told to plan for a mass evacuation of Chicago during the NATO conference.

Both of the above news items have been covered by Infowhores/Bill Hicks II

I doubt such an event would happen in the same place as the Chicago NATO conference, but what an excellent distraction if it where to happen at he same time (May 20-21), but at a different location. Exactly as with the 7/7/2005(2+0+0+5=7) false flag in London and the G8 summit at Gleneagles in Scotland (July 6-8, 2005).

There are also a number of occult reasons to place an 'event' around May 20-22, but I think expanding on those would take this thread waaay off-topic.
Well, I found another movie called 'Source Code' that also alludes to Chicago being the next city for another 9/11 style event.

Source Code - "downtown Chicago is the next target":
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5Tc3k4JpVI

Here is one individual that goes into the subliminal messages of this film:
So I just so happened to see "The Source Code" yesterday and may I first say it was a good movie, although it had propaganda written all over it. Basically, the movie is about a guy who's sent on a mission (sort of) back in time to find out who the bomber was in order to stop an even bigger future terror attack. From what I've noticed, the movie breaks up into 3 main Subliminal Messages:

1) Top Secret experiments on Soldiers by the Government (MK Ultra-esque) - The main character was a soldier who wakes up in the body of an unknown man and discovers he's part of a mission to find the bomber of a Chicago commuter train. as the story goes along we find out that he actually had already died, (yet they were able to keep his brain functioning) a few months back and the government retrieved his body to use his brain in an experiment called the "Source Code". This enabled him to cross over into one of the unknown passenger's mind and revisit the last 8 mins of his life before the detonation. He keeps going back "in time", gathering clues until he finds out who the bomber is so that they can stop the bomber from completing his next target.
After the first explosion, he's brought back to another setting. The setup reminded me of "Call of Duty: Black Ops" where he was strapped in a chair with an unknown military personnel asking him questions in order to retrieve some information. When he wouldn't cooperate she would blurt out a sequence of parables & numbers while on the screen they showed a sequence of playing cards, which all together triggered his memory and calmed him down. He was applied to the experiment unknowingly against his will.

2) The Threat on America from within - So as he began to understand his mission, he began to become suspicious and started singling out passengers on the train. I find it interesting the the first person he singled out was a middle eastern man, who turned out to not be the terrorist. in the middle of the movie he finally finds out the terrorist was actually a young, caucasian, liberal american college student. For the short lived part that he received, they depicted him sort of sadistic and psychotic, smiling even when Jake Gyllenhaal's character pointed a gun to his head.
The most important part out of that scene was when the main character, Colter Stevans, asked why he was doing this. the chump's reply was somewhere on the lines of "Why I'm doing this?...because, this world....is hell!.....but we can start over...make a new world out of the rubble!" This is a blatant message of the Globalist' agenda of "Order out of Chaos".
(I actually chuckled sarcastically when he said that, only because I knew what the underlying message was really about)
The "terrorist" had about 5 lines. They really spent no time explaining the characters background. They really wanted to focus on that message.

3) Staged Terror Attacks At the end, Colter Stevans gets the information for them but goes back to save the girl against their orders. He winds up saving the entire train thus creating an alternate universe we're that terror attack didn't occur. At the end, the scientist's (in charge of the program) last line was something like "the perfect crisis will emerge where we can test the source code". Behind that lies the interest of the government in terror attacks in order to swoop in and "save the day". But their true desire is not of our safety but of their own agendas.


a sub propaganda throughout the movie was patriotism. Every time Colter would try and not cooperate, they would remind him how good it is to serve our country. He had so much pride that even after he got the information, he wanted to go back and save the passengers just for self-gratification as a soldier, fighting the war against terror.

link: http://www.collativelearning.com/mybb_1 ... hp?tid=597
Given that there seems to be plenty of recently released movies that alludes to an attack being staged in Chicago, I personally think it would be appropriate to go into the occult reasons why they would stage an event around May 20-22. As far is dates is concerned, lets take a look at another movie called 'Trespass'. I've posted this video before, but it still might have some importance to it, given the movies dialogue itself.

Next 9-11 attack flagged in Nicolas Cage movie "Trespass"?
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mGDHWF5keQ

At the 1:03 mark of this video the numbers '7, 4, 6, 5' are given. I'm going to assume this movie is giving away a date for when they may stage their next 9/11 event. The poster of this video decoded the numbers in the video's description box to mean 11/11/11 (7 + 4 = 11, 6 + 5 = 11), which is obviously wrong. I instead simply added them all together which equals 22. If we want to assume that this means May 22, then it seems that instead of spoonfeeding us the entire agenda in one propaganda piece, they scatter their intent across different movies, leaving you to figure it all out yourself.

Article of interest: chicago's willis tower: on 'the ledge' with echoes of the world trade center
whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:56 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by whatsgoingon »

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on Fri May 24, 2013 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

whatsgoingon wrote:I have a question. Who really knows the Globalist agenda anyway? That is like knowing the inside baseball of an organization that is not publicly acknowledged. Perhaps I am too out of the loop.
The agenda is well documented by the perps themselves through key individuals like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Carroll Quigley and groups like the CFR and the United Nations itself. It may not be publicly acknowledged, but this doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If you are asking who or what group is at the head of it all, well after a few years of researching the material concerning the "new world order" agenda as they often call it, I can say that there is no way of knowing for sure who is directing this at the top of the pyramid. The further up the Pyramid you go, the vaguer it gets as to who is ultimately in control, that is, unless you want to go beyond direct physical control and conclude that an ancient entity typically known as Satan is directing this through indirect means, since this is the entity they in fact worship in their Masonic lodges as Lucifer, symbolized as the eye on the American dollar bill, the "god they trust".
disinpho
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by disinpho »

Dcopymope wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:I have a question. Who really knows the Globalist agenda anyway? That is like knowing the inside baseball of an organization that is not publicly acknowledged. Perhaps I am too out of the loop.
The agenda is well documented by the perps themselves through key individuals like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Carroll Quigley and groups like the CFR and the United Nations itself. It may not be publicly acknowledged, but this doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If you are asking who or what group is at the head of it all, well after a few years of researching the material concerning the "new world order" agenda as they often call it, I can say that there is no way of knowing for sure who is directing this at the top of the pyramid. The further up the Pyramid you go, the vaguer it gets as to who is ultimately in control, that is, unless you want to go beyond direct physical control and conclude that an ancient entity typically known as Satan is directing this through indirect means, since this is the entity they in fact worship in their Masonic lodges as Lucifer, symbolized as the eye on the American dollar bill, the "god they trust".
The agenda is very complex and layered, with many different agendas/justifications. Below is a possible outline of the hierarchy. This is my current and imperfect picture of the power-structure. This is a simplified and shortened version based on 2-3 years of study and a good many books, I'd be happy to share. I expect this picture to change as I continue my research.

A pan-germanist man or a religious jewish man might think he is doing his part as a part of a "race" in it's "homeland".
A jacobin or communist might be fighting for "equality" or "solidarity" in a workers heaven, to liberate his fellow men.
A theosophist might be fighting for "enlightenment" and "unity" in spiritual matters.

On the level above, a Masons would know that this is not really for a specific class or race and not for the jewish religion per se. The agenda here might be Zionism or "Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort" or maybe Illuminism

On yet another level above (or maybe besides) a Catholic Priest might think that hes working to build the kingdom of Jesus christ on earth, fighting heresy among Protestants, Jews and Muslims or uniting the world under the pope.

On yet another level you find Jesuit Priests, Dominican Priests, Ancient Knightly Orders, high ranking Catholic Priests and high ranking Freemasons observing strange catholic religious traditions, they are the authors of "The Protocols of the Elders of Sion", and many of these Knightly Orders revolve around a mythical "Sion".

Above that you find hereditary fraternities and immensely powerful families observing even stranger religious traditions. The master string-pullers. Once you have done your homework some of these families are very easy to spot. You rarely hear about these people, but they give name to countries like Somalia and and concepts like Medicine. From birth they are placed strategically in powerful but low-profile positions in religious institutions, government/intelligence agencies, large corporations, secret societies etc.. Often you will find members of the same family playing on both sides of the fence. Eg. influential Muslim Imams and influential Catholic Priests in the same family. The Jesuit Order is rumoured to be the most strict and powerful control-structure and many influential families have their children trained as or by Jesuit Priests. Jesuits routinely work in political, educational or corporate positions.

The higher you reach in this pyramid of ideologies the weirder and fussier it gets. Some of the books I recommend on this subject are;

Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith by James H Billington
The History of Tammany Hall by Gustavus Myers
Occult Theocracy by Lady Queenborough and Edith Starr Miller
The Secret History of The Jesuits by Edmond Paris
Between Two Ages and The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniev Brzezinski

I have recently acquired many new books on the subject, but haven't found time to read them yet. It is a fascinating subject (to me).
disinpho
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by disinpho »

Dcopymope wrote:As time goes along, I keep hearing the Luciferian philosophy being preached more frequently in various ways, the core belief of the U.N supported New Age movement. One such recent example from the movie industry is the viral advert created for Ridley Scotts movie 'Prometheus'.

'And ye shall be as gods':
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GROrp3XBRrE
That is one creepy speech.

Here's a summary of James H Billington's take on Prometheus (the mythical character), and additional research by Jordan Maxwell:


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiPUhLLVNmc
lux
Member
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by lux »

I just noticed that the recent spate of movies with brain tumors as plot elements mostly began the same year that "smart phones" began. The first smart phone being the IBM Simon released in 1993.

One notable brain tumor movie (and the only one on the list I actually saw) was "Phenomenon" with John Revolta playing a guy with a tumor that gave him super-human abilities. He played such an endearing character that we almost wanted to have a tumor too. Even his death at the end of the movie was conveyed in such a glorious manner we almost wanted to die too (sniff, sniff). Anyway "Phenomenon" was released in 1996 and the first device to actually be called a "smart phone" was released in 1997.

But, I'm sure it's all just a coincidence. B)
fbenario
Member
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by fbenario »

disinpho wrote:Above that you find hereditary fraternities and immensely powerful families observing even stranger religious traditions. The master string-pullers. Once you have done your homework some of these families are very easy to spot.
Lots of powerful families listed here, crossing borders and wrapping the world in their tentacles.
The 13 Illuminati Bloodlines

The Astor Bloodline.
The Bundy Bloodline.
The Collins Bloodline.
The DuPont Bloodline.
The Freeman Bloodline.
The Kennedy Bloodline.
The Li Bloodline.
The Onassis Bloodline.
The Rockefeller Bloodline.
The Rothschild Bloodline.
The Russell Bloodline.
The Van Duyn Bloodline.
The Merovingian Bloodline.
The Disney Bloodline.
The Reynolds bloodline.

http://nwomirror.tripod.com/13bloodlines.html
Illuminati? Not a chance that that is their level; they are all likely much higher on the perp pyramid.
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

disinpho wrote:
Dcopymope wrote:You never know for sure when and where they may stage another false flag event, just pointing this out as something to watch for just in case.
I doubt such an event would happen in the same place as the Chicago NATO conference, but what an excellent distraction if it where to happen at he same time (May 20-21), but at a different location.
If we are to assume that a false flag event being planned for the NATO meeting in Chicago is a distraction, then the recently released movie called 'Battleship' may have given us a clue as to what that other location may be as the individual in the video below points out.

Yacatisma - "Its still unclear exactly what it was that hit Hong Kong":
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-s3t4blXMaU

Given that the news concerning the Chicago NATO meeting has become suspicious by plenty, it may very well be a distraction.
Dcopymope
Banned
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:59 am
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by Dcopymope »

disinpho wrote:There are also a number of occult reasons to place an 'event' around May 20-22
Could this occult reason have something to do with this?:

Solar Eclipse in the USA:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YX2blo1eRk
fbenario
Member
Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by fbenario »

Hilarious.

Image
New Oliver Stone 9/11 Film Introduces 'Single Plane' Theory

Academy Award-winning director Oliver Stone said Monday that his new film World Trade Center unveils "compelling and controversial" new evidence that a single plane was responsible for all four collisions in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001.
...
"World Trade Center, which stars Nicolas Cage as a dedicated Port Authority officer who stumbles on secret evidence amid the rubble and carnage of the terrorist attack, tells a story quite different from what Stone called "the official government line" about the event. According to the film, at 8:46 a.m., a lone commercial airliner flew diagonally through the North Tower of the World Trade Center, maintained a circular holding pattern for approximately 17 minutes, then struck the South Tower before heading to the Pentagon.
...
In a gripping sequence, undercover agents transmit pre-recorded cell-phone messages intended to fool loved ones and relatives with a false cover story as the aircraft heads to its final, prearranged crash site in the fields of southwestern Pennsylvania.
...
Early public reaction to the film has been skeptical. Many 9/11 conspiracy theorists claim Stone is presenting an exploitative, far-fetched, and manipulative Hollywood version of the pain and suffering—including eye strain and carpal tunnel syndromethey have undergone during their countless hours on the Internet in the tragedy's aftermath.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-ol ... lane,2017/
sentientlinergy
Banned
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:24 pm

Re: Are Movies Unwatchable?

Unread post by sentientlinergy »

fbenario wrote:I'm aware this is only tangentially related to this thread, but I was wondering if anyone else has developed a severe dislike/distrust for ALL movies. Ever since learning the truth about 9/11 media fakery, I find acting so distasteful I can't watch it anymore, since by definition it involves simulating reality. Right now I think all actors, and everyone else involved in tv/movies, are liars - and I despise lying with everything in me.

Anyone else find movies unwatchable now?
I feel exactly the same, its like why am I losing my life watching stupifiers!
Post Reply