Science Fiction v. Fiction Science
Addendum
I should like to add an addendum to my last essay.
My list of indefensible 'theories' missed three very important subjects, viz:
Dentistry
Eye care
Veterinary
Dentistry
As with general health, dentistry (in its present form) is yet another devastation of health. It is pretty obvious that if we do have a dental problem, (caused by the ingestion of materials not conducive to our particular teeth) that we acquire problems which need to be rectified. This notion may be a given.
However, when we visit a person claiming to alleviate a damaged tooth, mouth ulcer or whatever (and has the tools and the ability for the alleviation of same, for example) we are presented with all sorts of other notions about 'tooth care' that are patently engineered to keep us on a one-way train track backwards and forwards to the station of 'our' dentist for further 'treatments'.
For example, on my birth date (5th July, but in 1948) The National Health Service Act (N.H.S.) was enacted in Britain/England/U.K., It was the precursor to permanent health deprivation and an abomination of Nature by an allegedly elected 'government'. It (the N.H.S.) was based on already untenable theories but which were then (and still are) acted upon as 'truths'.
I was four years old. I managed to evade 'vaccinations' but when presented to dentists (who were now being paid by the 'government' (from public funds) and therefore at no loss for their ill-gotten gains) thousands of children had their teeth drilled and filled with mercurial-based fillings on the notion of 'tooth decay'). I can still remember the tingle of the fillings as I write this and it was difficult to avoid this 'new visitor' in your mouth from your tongue. (Of course, the 'notion of 'tooth decay' was a marvellous invention since it was gleaned from thin air)...
However, a 'dentist' then made his/her living from only one thing... making a living from finding/creating an apparent or derived anomaly within the cavity of the mouth (the first response to necessary fodder) and was paid a fee without having to send a bill to the recipient but to the 'government' for payment. The payment was derived, as all medical care, from the extraction of geld from the public via their wage-packet without prior consent under some political guise of 'National Health', or, in reality, the opposite as already stated above.
Dentistry...Once the first tooth is compromised (or even extracted for a sensible reason), the other teeth are compromised. Eventually, you end up with no natural teeth and only manufactured ones. 'How,' (clack, clack) are you?'
Ha! Ha! You say; (invoking the tooth-paste hoax).
You may like to follow this link to the origins of toothpaste at our great friend (or foe) the Wickedpeedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothpast ... oothpastes
However, my concern (whatever is 'in' toothpaste) is also that a form of fluoride which was added to such pastes (about the 1950's) and which originated from the use of the substance used by the aluminium industry and is a highly toxic version of apparent natural fluoride in some well waters. The toxic waste of the aluminium industry had to be got rid of by some means.
You will have to research this for yourselves. Warning: It is quite heart-rending. However, a problem arises that the fluoride found in tooth-paste is not of any natural variety.
Another problem also arises: is tooth-paste a necessity, since few (if any) are of natural origin and why do we need them anyway if we eat a diet correct for us personally?
Tooth-paste, in my view at least, is a medication not prescribed by Nature. Why do not my stray feline creatures have such things as 'tooth-decay' unless they are not subject to their natural foods?
It is essential to maintain a balance in all things. The body needs to maintain a certain balance to operate for longevity so far as is possible. Maintaining a balance of ingested nutrients is essential for 'health' based on personal requirements.
Toothpastes (for example) must be natural products which maintain the balance. Most tooth-pastes are abrasive in the negative. Using a natural substance, such as sea-salt (which is a slightly natural abrasive) will eliminate the possibility of damaging the teeth.
Implications
As with everything else about your person, it is up to you to determine what is best for you. This can only be discovered by your own input and output of your person upon the factors which affect you. Without outside interference you would learn on your own for survival. With the help of others concerned with your welfare, you may learn before you full foul to the machinations of others who do not have your welfare at heart for whatever their reason/s.
*See end of essay
Eye care
As stated before, the N.H.S. in the U.K. (Britain/England or whatever), came about after I was 4 years old.
I was not blessed with a squint in one eye but it remains with me into my 70's even though I had an operation to correct this when I was seven years old. I was also not blessed with 'glasses' either. Being called 'four eyes' was not an appellation I enjoyed at school. We weather the storm partially, when we can regard the offending items not as 'glasses' but as 'spectacles' (which sounds a bit better for some reason), especially when we can accommodate our eyes to a better view of the world. Nevertheless, we did not enjoy the stigma from bullies.
However, we may find that none of these spectacular feats of ocular enhancement may have never been necessary!
It is pretty obvious that any of our sense faculties may be compromised in some way. That is a given.
However, with institutions coming under a central control banner and funded by mandatory 'contributions' from the general public to fund such institutions, the general public, now bereft of a good deal of their wages/salaries, have given probably unwilling consent to their 'health' being taken over by others for their own ends, not yours. Thus the engineering of 'disease' or whatever.
'Your Life in Their Hands' was an old television programme in the U.K. in the 1950's (if memory serves me) which was all about surgical procedures (and given my interest in medicine, I watched avidly). However, in the context of this essay, I refer it to all forms of 'medical' treatment.
No longer, it seems, are we 'allowed' to take our health into our own hands without being labled as some sort of 'nutter'. I despair but retain my own (thankfully) personal welfare.
I offer this link for your perusal:
https://www.central-fixation.com/stren ... -the-eyes/
Veterinary
So human creatures, so others.
Veterinary is yet another branch of mostly fake administrations to animals other than what we call 'Man'.
Once was a time when all creatures lived together (or apart) for their own 'reasons'. It might be called co-existence. Nothing knew why we were all 'here' (and still don't).
It appears from 'Nature', that anything which we call 'living' is subject to maintaining its own existence to the point which it requires the 'use' of another life-form to perpetrate its own longevity. Everything needs a 'feed' of some kind. Such is Nature.
Enter the 'man' creature, able to exploit other flora and fauna to bend them to its will. Food is one thing, exploitation is another.
This particular issue (Veterinary) is singularly important in all terms of human creature endeavours...
I used to enjoy the James Herriot (All Creatures...etc) books and have read the series a few times. I also enjoyed the stories in the television series. However, as I gradually learned the negative machinations of prescribed 'medicines' (anti-biotics etc.) I felt something was not correct. More reliance was placed upon pharmaceutical drugs than what might be called 'farm management' (a.k.a. 'First Aid').
I have no interest in diatribes against the use of animals for the purposes of food, as all animals seek food from other animals (as well as flora). That is Nature and we cannot, in honesty, make a lawsuit against Nature when 'laws' are a construct of 'human' behaviours.
The fact of the matter is that we appear to no longer have 'farm' management given the advent of untold numbers of 'human' planetary occupancy.
To sustain the 'human' occupants of this planet we have engineered the use of both flora and fauna. To do this, we have pretended that the behaviour of herding both flora and fauna into enclosures where we can 'mine' them is acceptable. This is an issue that is purely 'human'.
Since the outcome of this 'farming/herding' activity will result in nothing but harm to anything and everything on this planet, we resort to attempt to manufacture ways to prolong these activities.
Because flora and fauna are herded into 'special' areas that are unnatural to them, they succumb to the same problems that occur when herding 'humans' in the same manner. All sorts of anomalies occur.
Given fake notions of 'disease' thus resulting from alien incarceration, all flora and fauna are subject to the same mores, problems associated with incarceration, much, of course like prisoners in a jail. These problems are called 'Diseases' which must be eradicated other than the separation into more conducive environments which might be managed.
It is mostly forgotten (or not recognised) that proper sanitation (the ridding of excreted material of all kinds, which is of no use to confined spaces of flora or fauna) led to a release of 'diseases'. Sanitation may be regarded as easing the herd confinement of flora and fauna.
Introducing 'medication' has done nothing to alleviate the notion of herding. Herding can only be managed by, excuse me, management.
Allopathic medication answers no questions. Medication only produces more problems and asks more questions.
*
toothache.pdf
Be well.
Sharpstuff
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
