Observer,Observer » November 17th, 2018, 10:04 am wrote:
. . .
And yes, it turns out Kham did indeed speak about this on the CluesChronicle #23 on October 17th 2017.
And on that CluesForum podcast - Kham mentioned she even "revealed on a previous audio" before too.
I believe her when she explains to Hoi in the podcast, she saw "both the female -- they died, at the scene."
The only problem is Kham must have honestly witnessed & honestly reported, a long-con CF-dividing hoax.
Notice I said honestly witnessed & honestly reported, I want to make that clear . . .
[Even] The media reports say NOBODY died at the 1:30am July 24th 2011 shooting at Galaxy Nightclub in Seattle.
. . .
They want us to say, "Kham lied, or is stupid, burn the witch, ban her, and if you don't, Simon must be bad too."
C'mon folks it's quite possible this whole "news doesn't match Kham's report" is a long-con hoax to divide us.
. . .
Either way, as Simon rightly said, nothing can take away from, much less nullify, Kham's contributions here.
I hereby rescind my previous rude demands for Kham to answer the 15 questions - answering them is moot.
. . .
So - keeping all of that in mind - here is the 5:34 extract, from the Clues podcast - which UNreal sent me by PM:
http://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploa ... xtract.mp3
http://septclues.com/theclueschronicle/ ... he-vacuum/
. . .
Thank you for breaking that down for us. And I really appreciate you linking the relevant podcasts. I was trying to find which one it was, but didn’t quite have enough time to pick through everything. So, my sincere gratitude to UNreal for finding those and sending them to you.
That makes me feel better about my own memory here, since I had sent you a PM whereby I essentially said that I had heard her speak to this, but wasn’t 100% sure if it was recorded or not.
Seriously, tremendous job.
My own instinct here (based largely on experience) was that, regardless of the underlying story, Kham is (and was) being honest.
There is a big difference between a person being deceptive versus simply being mistaken. Such is the human experience. Nuance is rarely pleasant, and few people have the patience for it.
I have no doubt that many of the psy-ops run on us include efforts to ram the “reality” of the event into various communities by directly (or indirectly. . . depending) sewing in disinformation and/or perception fodder for otherwise innocent and honest people to disseminate.
After all, what better way to convince the “locals” (and then some) than to use a person with pre-existing credibility to recount his or her experience so as to further muddy the waters.
It’s quite nasty. There’s no doubt about it.
In any event, I’m certainly in agreement with the sentiment you expressed:
I couldn’t have said it better.The End, or really the beginning of us uniting, surviving, thriving!
Now can folks please post some VISUAL hoax-busting like we love?