The Holocaust Under Review

Global War deceptions & mass manipulation, fear-mongering terror schemes and propaganda in the Age of the Bomb
ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:46 am

ICfreely wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 2:14 am
Trump warns Iran if it hits any Americans or American assets 'we have targeted 52 Iranian sites'
By Jeremy Diamond, Caroline Kelly and Greg Clary, CNN
Updated 8:38 PM ET, Sat January 4, 2020

(CNN)Donald Trump on Saturday drew what may come to be seen as the most significant red line of his presidency in a three-part tweet, vowing specific military action against Iran if it "strikes any Americans, or American assets."

"We have ... targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture" and "if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets... Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD," Trump wrote in a series of tweets.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/04/politics ... index.html


Meh.. It won't be Iran's first time that's for sure.

ICfreely wrote:
Sat Nov 23, 2019 7:38 am
Can Russia (Or Iran) Survive Without China?
The Saker • November 21, 2019
https://www.unz.com/tsaker/can-russia-o ... out-china/

Is water wet?


What's that old saying about rodeos and cowboys?

Win lose or draw, Iran is still here!

How many of the other nations/empires on that list can make the same claim?

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:29 pm

File this under:


When you come to my ‘hood…

Iran - People of the Flames Zoroastrians Full Documentary 2017 HD

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmOFwpqthU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmOFwpqthU

17:17 - Solomon's Throne
Takht-e Soleymān (Persian: تخت سلیمان‎), is an archaeological site in West Azarbaijan, Iran from Sasanian Empire. It lies midway between Urmia and Hamadan, very near the present-day town of Takab, and 400 km (250 mi) west of Tehran.

The fortified site, which is located on a hill created by the outflow of a calcium-rich spring pond, was recognized as a World Heritage Site in July 2003. The citadel includes the remains of a Zoroastrian fire temple built during the Sassanid period and partially rebuilt (as a mosque) during the Ilkhanid period. This temple housed one of the three "Great Fires" or "Royal Fires" that Sassanid rulers humbled themselves before in order to ascend the throne. The fire at Takht-i Soleiman was called ādur Wishnāsp and was dedicated to the arteshtar or warrior class of the Sasanid.[1] A 4th century[citation needed] Armenian manuscript relating to Jesus and Zarathustra, and various historians of the Islamic period, mention this pond. The foundations of the fire temple around the pond is attributed to that legend. Takht-E Soleyman appears on the 4th century Peutinger Map.

This site got its biblical name after the Arab invasion of Iran in the 7th century. Folk legend relates that King Solomon used to imprison monsters inside a nearby 100 m deep crater which is called Zendan-e Soleyman "Prison of Solomon". Solomon is also said to have created the flowing pond in the fortress.

Archaeological excavations have revealed traces of a 5th-century BC occupation during the Achaemenid period, as well as later Parthian settlements in the citadel. Coins belonging to the reign of Sassanid kings, and that of the Byzantine emperor Theodosius II (AD 408-450), have also been discovered there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takht-e_Soleym%C4%81n

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:45 pm

File this under:


When you come to my ‘hood…

Iran - People of the Flames Zoroastrians Full Documentary 2017 HD

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmOFwpqthU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNmOFwpqthU

10:10 - Lair of the Assassins - Alamut Castle - Eagle's Nest

17:17 - Solomon's Throne
Takht-e Soleymān (Persian: تخت سلیمان‎), is an archaeological site in West Azarbaijan, Iran from Sasanian Empire. It lies midway between Urmia and Hamadan, very near the present-day town of Takab, and 400 km (250 mi) west of Tehran.

The fortified site, which is located on a hill created by the outflow of a calcium-rich spring pond, was recognized as a World Heritage Site in July 2003. The citadel includes the remains of a Zoroastrian fire temple built during the Sassanid period and partially rebuilt (as a mosque) during the Ilkhanid period. This temple housed one of the three "Great Fires" or "Royal Fires" that Sassanid rulers humbled themselves before in order to ascend the throne. The fire at Takht-i Soleiman was called ādur Wishnāsp and was dedicated to the arteshtar or warrior class of the Sasanid.[1] A 4th century[citation needed] Armenian manuscript relating to Jesus and Zarathustra, and various historians of the Islamic period, mention this pond. The foundations of the fire temple around the pond is attributed to that legend. Takht-E Soleyman appears on the 4th century Peutinger Map.

This site got its biblical name after the Arab invasion of Iran in the 7th century. Folk legend relates that King Solomon used to imprison monsters inside a nearby 100 m deep crater which is called Zendan-e Soleyman "Prison of Solomon". Solomon is also said to have created the flowing pond in the fortress.

Archaeological excavations have revealed traces of a 5th-century BC occupation during the Achaemenid period, as well as later Parthian settlements in the citadel. Coins belonging to the reign of Sassanid kings, and that of the Byzantine emperor Theodosius II (AD 408-450), have also been discovered there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takht-e_Soleym%C4%81n

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:36 am

File this under:


On the Jews and their LIES!

1913: When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all lived in the same place
By Andy Walker Today programme, BBC Radio 4
18 April 2013
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21859771

The more you try to help them, the more they hurt you. They can't help themselves.

I GIVE UP(giving them the benefit of the doubt or trying to help them)!

SacredCowSlayer
Administrator
Posts: 795
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by SacredCowSlayer » Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:41 am

ICfreely wrote:
Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:36 am
File this under:


On the Jews and their LIES!

1913: When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all lived in the same place
By Andy Walker Today programme, BBC Radio 4
18 April 2013
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21859771

The more you try to help them, the more they hurt you. They can't help themselves.

I GIVE UP(giving them the benefit of the doubt or trying to help them)!
One truly cannot be helped (in any sort of enlightened sense) if he doesn’t realize his ignorance. Then there are those who know better, but will actively resist and do everything imaginable to try and derail those who wish to do good.

I’ve had a couple of “I give up” moments, so I understand the sentiment. Instead, I’ve had to sort of customize my efforts such that I can make at least some difference, but not allow myself to get knee-capped in the process.

I can’t speak for our other members, but, I suspect we have all had to find some balance in how we go about our lives . . . amongst the 99.999999% of people who have never heard of cluesforum.

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Sat Feb 01, 2020 4:47 pm

File this under:


Fuck it, I'll do it myself!


ICfreely wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:35 am

[If anyone finds the name of the book/author, I’d greatly appreciate it.]


Reckless: Henry Kissinger and the Tragedy of Vietnam – Robert K. Brigham
https://www.amazon.com/Reckless-Henry-K ... 1610397029

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:28 pm

File this under:


Donald Ducks: The Synagogue of Satan’s Shabbat Goys

Trump Green Lights Greater Israel
Palestinians lose again
Philip Giraldi • February 4, 2020
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/trump-gree ... er-israel/
Trump Has Given Israel Immunity to International Law
Paul Craig Roberts • December 18, 2019
https://www.unz.com/proberts/trump-has- ... ional-law/
Remarks by Vice President Pence at the Fifth World Holocaust Forum | Jerusalem, Israel
January 23, 2020
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-st ... em-israel/

ICfreely
Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by ICfreely » Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:05 pm

ICfreely wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:35 am
A statement such as ‘the Jews are in control’ only tells a fraction of the story.
Would you please provide clarification on that simplistic quote, Kham? Is that your personal stance or do you mean to (wrongly) imply/insinuate that it's mine?

I appreciate your response but your working definition of "empire" doesn't work for me. IMO, it's too vague. It's impossible for two people to have a meaningful discussion on a given topic if they can't agree on the meaning of words (too Noam Chomsky-ish).

Anyhow, with your permission, I'll elaborate a bit on my Billy Graham/Christian Zionism post.
(viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1528&start=120#p2411999)

Billy Graham-Richard Nixon tapes: The one time Graham’s image was tarnished
Feb 21, 2018
By Debbie Lord

As Americans mourn the death of evangelist Billy Graham, you would be hard-pressed to find a time where “America’s Pastor” was held in anything other than the highest regard.

Graham managed during 60 years of preaching the Gospel to sidestep even a hint of scandal -- sexual, financial or otherwise.
However a revelation in 1994 of a conversation he had with then-President Richard Nixon turned out to be a source of embarrassment for Graham – not at the time it was disclosed by Nixon Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, but years later when a tape of the conversation was released by the National Archives.

At first, Graham denied comments Haldeman made in his book, "The Haldeman Diaries" that Graham and Nixon had disparaged Jews in a conversation following a prayer breakfast in Washington D.C. on Feb. 1, 1972. Haldeman said Graham had talked about a Jewish “stranglehold” on the country.

''Those are not my words," Graham said in May 1994. ''I have never talked publicly or privately about the Jewish people, including conversations with President Nixon, except in the most positive terms.''

Graham was believed and the matter dropped until 2002 when tapes from Nixon’s White House were released by the National Archives. The 1972 conversation between Nixon and Graham was among those tapes, and Graham had to face the fact that he had been recorded saying the things of which Haldeman accused him.

The tapes proved damning.

''They're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff,'' Graham had said to Nixon. The Jewish ''stranglehold has got to be broken or the country's going down the drain,'' he continued.

Graham told Nixon that Jews did not know his true feelings about them.

''I go and I keep friends with Mr. Rosenthal (A.M. Rosenthal) at The New York Times and people of that sort, you know. And all -- I mean, not all the Jews, but a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine, they swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I'm friendly with Israel. But they don't know how I really feel about what they are doing to this country. And I have no power, no way to handle them, but I would stand up if under proper circumstances.''

Rosenthal was the Times' executive editor.

After the release of the tapes, Graham was horrified, according to Grant Wacker, a Duke Divinity School professor who wrote a book about Graham. He publicly apologized and asked for forgiveness from Jewish leaders in the country.

"He did not spin it. He did not try to justify it," Wacker told NPR. "He said repeatedly he had done wrong, and he was sorry."

''I don't ever recall having those feelings about any group, especially the Jews, and I certainly do not have them now,'' Graham said in 2002 when the tape was released. ''My remarks did not reflect my love for the Jewish people. I humbly ask the Jewish community to reflect on my actions on behalf of Jews over the years that contradict my words in the Oval Office that day.''

https://www.ajc.com/news/national/billy ... a30cLawWL/

President Richard Nixon, the Shah of Iran and Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat worked tirelessly, behind the scenes, on the Israeli Peace Process to no avail. Nixon resigned (to avoid impeachment) in 1974, The Shah abdicated his throne (to avoid bloodshed) in 1979 and Sadat was assassinated in 1981.

Henry “the ruthless pragmatist” Kissinger was Nixon’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State (No one before or since Kissinger has held those two posts concurrently) and stayed on with Gerald Ford’s administration after Nixon resigned. A few weeks ago I watched a fascinating interview with a professor who’s written a new book about Nixon, Kissinger and Vietnam on C-SPAN. The author's conclusion, based on a tedious review of previously classified transcripts, was that Kissinger misinformed Nixon (thereby leading him to make horrible decisions) every step of the way on the war.

[If anyone finds the name of the book/author, I’d greatly appreciate it.]


Anyhow, Kissinger passed the NSA baton to Zbigniew “Green Islamic Belt” Brzezinski (without whom the “War on Terror” against “Radical Muslim Extremists” wouldn’t be possible). Zbigniew's daughter, Mika, is an MSNBC presstitute co-hoast with Joe Scarborough (the congressman who resigned because he was "fed up with DC politics" shortly before 9/11 when a female staffer "committed suicide" in his office).

Kissinger on Iran: Belts, Empires, and Getting it Wrong
by John Limbert

Henry Kissinger may be the grand old man of US foreign policy, but when it comes to understanding Iran, his analytical skills have begun to fade. In his NPR discussion with Scott Simon, broadcast Sept. 6, Kissinger got it monumentally wrong. One can only be grateful he is no longer making policy.

What is it about being national security adviser that leads to ill-advised “belt” meta¬phors? In the late 1970s, President Carter’s adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski famously (and incorrectly) spoke of a geographic “green belt” of Islam that would defend the Middle East against Soviet aggression. It turned out that, if such a belt existed, its inhabitants in Iran and Afghanistan—no matter how much they disliked the Soviets—inflicted serious damage on the United States. In the Iranian case, they toppled one American president (Carter) and nearly brought down another (Reagan).

Now Kissinger is talking not only of belts, but also of Persian empires. He told NPR that Iran is a “bigger problem” for the US than the vicious Islamic State, which is commonly referred to as ISIS. “There has come into being a kind of a Shia-belt from Tehran through Baghdad to Beirut,” said Kissinger. “And this gives Iran the opportunity to reconstruct the ancient Persian Empire, this time under a Shia label.”

Nonsense. As a scholar of history and a Harvard PhD, Kissinger should know better…

https://lobelog.com/kissinger-iran-belt ... -it-wrong/

I’m sure Kissinger & Brzezinski had America and Iran's best interests at heart. Surely they meant well. They just got the calculus wrong that’s all. And I'm positive that their hearts bleed for all of their fellow Jews.

'It Wouldn't Be U.S. Concern if U.S.S.R Sent Jews to Gas Chambers', Kissinger Told Nixon
https://www.haaretz.com/1.5151896

Nothing to see here, folks, keep it movin’.

File this under:


American Psychos

Trump tweet calls for investigation into Scarborough's dead staffer while in Congress
By Joe Concha - 11/29/17
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3623 ... r-while-in

White American Devils doin' what they do best! :puke:

Mansur
Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:22 pm

Re: The Holocaust Under Review

Unread post by Mansur » Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:51 pm

The following is an article (actually a review) from around 1946, by R. Guénon, it can be found with other reviews appended later to his book Theosophy: History of a Pseudo-Religion [1921] pp 312-314 (originally one single paragraph):
I Protocoli dei Savi Anziani di Sion, Versione italiana con appendice e introduzione (Rome: La Vita Italiana, 1921). This Italian translation of the famous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, published in 1921 by Dr Giovanni Preziosi, director of Vita Italiana, has just been re-edited with an introduction by J. Evola who tries to put some order into the endless discussions generated by this 'text'. He distinguishes two different and not necessarily connected questions, one concerning 'authenticity' and the other 'veracity', the second being the more important in his opinion. Authenticity is not really tenable for a number of reasons which we will not examine here, but we should draw attention to one point, which, although perhaps the most decisive, seems not to have been sufficiently taken into consideration: an organization that is truly and seriously secret, whatever its nature, never leaves a trail of written documents.

Moreover, 'sources' have been found from which many passages of the Protocols are borrowed almost word for word, for example, the Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, by Maurice Joly, a pamphlet aimed against Napoleon III and published in Brussels in 1865, and the speech attributed to a Prague rabbi in the novel Biarritz, published in 1868 by the German writer Hermann Goedsche under the pseudonym Sir John Retcliffe. Another 'source' which to our knowledge has never been pointed out is a novel entitled Le Baron Jéhova, by Sidney Vigneaux, published in Paris in 1886 with the curious dedication: 'to the true gentleman A, de Gobineau, author of the Essai sur l’négaliti des races humaines, who entered Valhalla on October 13, 1882.' It should also be noted that according to information given in Miss Hersilie Rouy's Mémoires d’une alienée [Memoirs of a Deranged Woman], published by E. Le Normant des Varannes (Paris, 1886, pp 308-309), Sidney Vigneaux, like the latter, was a friend of Dr Henri Favre, whom we mentioned earlier. This strange story mentions the name of Jules Favre, who is also found to be involved in so many matters of the same kind that it is hard to see it as mere coincidence. . . In Le Baron Jéhova (pp 59-87) we find a so-called 'Testament de Ybarzabal', which presents quite striking similarities with the Protocols, except for the remarkable fact that in it the Jews only appear to be instrumental in carrying out a plan that was neither conceived nor intended by them.

We also note certain similarities with the introduction to Alexander Dumas' Joseph Balsamo, although here it is no longer a question of Jews, but of an imaginary Masonic assembly. We will add that this assembly is not unconnected with the pseudo-Rosicrucian 'Parliament' described at almost the exact same time by the American writer George Lippard in Paul Ardenheim, the Monk of the Wissahickon, and this description was reproduced by Dr Swinburne Clymer in The Rosicrucian Fraternity in America.

There is no doubt that in their more or less 'romanticized' form, all these writings draw their overall inspiration from one and the same 'current' of ideas, that their authors either approve or disapprove of these ideas, and in addition that, according to their sympathies or particular prejudices, they attribute without rhyme or reason the origins to Jews, Masons, or still others. Finally, what is essential in all this, and could be said to constitute the element of 'veracity', is the assertion that the entire orientation of the modern world conforms to a 'plan' established and imposed by some mysterious organization. Our own thoughts on this subject are well-known, for we have spoken so often of the role of the 'counter-initiation' and of its conscious or unconscious agents that we need not emphasize it further.

In truth, it did not take a 'prophet' to notice these things at the time when the Protocols were compiled, probably in 1901, nor even at the time when most of the other above-mentioned works were first published, that is to say around the middle of the nineteenth century. At that time, although these matters were less obvious than they are today, even a little perspicacious observation was already sufficient.

But here we must make a remark less than flattering to the intelligence of our contemporaries, that if anyone honestly expresses what he sees and what can be logically inferred therefrom, nobody believes him, or even pays attention. If, on the contrary, he presents the same thing as coming from an eccentric organization, it soon figures as a 'document', and as such sets the world in a bustle. How strange is the effect of the superstitions instilled into modern people by the too famous 'historical method', superstitions which themselves are definitely among the suggestions necessary for the accomplishment of the 'plan' in question!

It should be further noted that, according to the fabrications of the Protocols themselves, the organization responsible for inventing and spreading modern ideas in order to achieve world domination is perfectly aware of the falsity of these ideas. This must quite obviously be so, for it knows only too well where it stands in this regard, but then such an undertaking of lies could not in itself be its true and unique goal. This leads us to consider another point noted by Evola in his introduction and further developed in the November issue of the Vita Italiana in an article signed 'Arthos', entitled ‘Transformazioni del "Regnum"’. Indeed, the Protocols contain not only an exposition of 'tactic' directed at the destruction of the traditional world, which is only a negative aspect corresponding to the current phase of events, it also contains the notion of the merely transitory nature of this phase itself, as well as the idea of a subsequent establishment of a supranational Regnum. This last can be considered a deformation of the idea of the 'Holy Empire' and other similar traditional conceptions which, as the author of the article recalls, we ourselves have expounded in The King of the World. In order to explain this, 'Arthos' has recourse to deviations, or even real 'subversions', undergone by certain elements that at their origin were genuinely traditional but that then survive on their own, as it were, once the 'spirit' has left them, and in support of this view he quotes what we recently wrote regarding 'psychic residues.' The reflection that can be found elsewhere concerning the successive phases of the modern deviation and the possible constitution of a real 'counter-tradition' as its final term—the distorted Regnum being precisely its expression in the social order—will perhaps contribute further to elucidate more completely this aspect of the question which, quite apart from the special case of the Protocols, is certainly not without a certain interest.
[Formatting fixed - FG]

Post Reply