Ebola baloney

Historical insights & thoughts about the world we live in - and the social conditioning exerted upon us by past and current propaganda.
brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by brianv » Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:42 pm

I have a Google bar in my Firefox, I just typed in the words "how is". Try it! The worms have been busy!

pov603
Member
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by pov603 » Thu Oct 09, 2014 4:15 pm

Seneca wrote:
Image
Leaking from every orifice too, no less, as Ebola sufferers are wont to do?...

Critical Mass
Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:33 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by Critical Mass » Thu Oct 09, 2014 7:30 pm

Hospitals secretly send in actors to fake symptoms, test staff
There hasn't been a single confirmed case of someone being infected with Ebola on U.S. soil
Wenzel, the infectious disease specialist at Virginia Commonwealth University, said that to truly be prepared against the virus, officials may want to think beyond health care facilities.

For instance, he suggested that cab drivers might be given pamphlets urging them to ask sick passengers on the way to the hospital the same question being posed now by ambulance drivers and triage nurses: Have you traveled to West Africa lately?

"I wouldn't put it in terms that are going to make people panic," he said. But he said that, at the very least, drivers should know that cleaning up a mess left by a sick passenger could carry a health risk.

lux
Member
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by lux » Thu Oct 09, 2014 9:49 pm

An amusing media story here.

"On Saturday evening, a mob attacked an Ebola Treatment Center in central Monrovia, the capital of Liberia and one of the areas hardest hit by the outbreak. Brandishing clubs, they broke through the police lines, freeing those in the isolation ward and looting everything they could on the way, including hospital equipment and soiled sheets. There are conflicting reports over how many patients escaped from quarantine, but there could be 17 still at large in Monrovia.

"Apparently, the attackers believed Ebola is a hoax ..."



Another similar article here.

"People in the affected regions have become especially distrustful of doctors, with some suggesting the disease is a hoax. A resident of a heavily affected area in Liberia told The Wall Street Journal last week: 'I’ve never seen anybody die of Ebola. I’ve only heard of it. So it’s a rumor.' These beliefs are often based on conspiracy theories that the disease was invented by national governments in search of international aid or political power."


And, another.

"... 92 percent of people [in Monrovia] said they did not believe Ebola existed, according to a recent survey of 1,000 people conducted by Samaritan's Purse. In fact, many in the capital initially viewed the virus as a hoax created by the government to generate and "eat money" from aid donors."

bostonterrierowner
Member
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by bostonterrierowner » Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:15 am

More and more people are waking up, I found reference to this video on Zerohedge.com :


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZonCVRQ-2s

Makkonen
Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:21 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by Makkonen » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:34 pm

Science journalism is no more valorous for truth and integrity than any other form of media:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2 ... D5nw_SsVxI
Where are we with an Ebola vaccine? That's how we beat other viruses.
Indeed, and thanks to fears after 9/11 about Ebola's use as a bioweapon :rolleyes: , researchers have developed some promising vaccines. But funding dried up as those fears faded.
So, basically a near-straight admission that pharma benefits greatly from scaremongering media fabrications.
Why do we care about side effects? What harm could this vaccine do that's worse than getting Ebola?
That is exactly why the Geneva meeting could recommend giving the vaccine to high-risk people in the epidemic zone before large safety studies are done. But they also need large safety trials now, because to make a difference to this epidemic, companies will have to make millions of doses.
Of course...
Shouldn't we just throw all the vaccine we have at this as soon as possible, never mind licensing?
Unless isolation and quarantine start significantly slowing transmission – and they haven't yet – there could be a million cases of Ebola by JanuaryImage. An extra 5000 doses of vaccine won't make a dent in an epidemic that big (and won't help the bottom line as much, but eh, what can you do).

***


The article also mentions Peter Piot, "co-discoverer" of Ebola, of which Wikipedia has this to say:
Baron (I kid you not!) Peter Piot, MD, PhD FRCP FMedSci (born 1949) is a Belgian microbiologist known for his research into Ebola and AIDS. After helping discover the Ebola virus in 1976 and leading efforts to contain the first-ever recorded Ebola epidemic that same year, Piot became a pioneering researcher into AIDS. He has held key positions in the United Nations and World Health Organization involving AIDS research. He has also served as a professor at several universities worldwide.

...


In 1976, while working at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Piot was part of a team that discovered the Ebola virus. A Belgian doctor working in Zaire had sent a blood sample from a Belgian nun Image who had fallen ill for further research after he could not identify the disease. Piot and his colleagues discovered the virus, and subsequently traveled to Zaire to help quell an outbreak which was spreading in the country. Piot's team made key discoveries into how the virus spread, and traveled from village to village, spreading information and putting the ill and those who had come into contact with them into quarantine. The epidemic was stopped in three months, after it had killed almost 300 people.

...


In the 1980s, Dr. Piot participated in a series of collaborative projects in Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, Tanzania and Zaire. Project SIDA in Kinshasa, Zaire was the first international project on AIDS in Africa and is widely acknowledged as having provided the foundations of science's understanding of HIV infection in Africa.

...


In 2014, in the face of an unprecedented virulent Ebola outbreak in western Africa, Piot and other scientists called for the emergency release of the experimental ZMapp vaccine for use on humans before it had undergone clinical testing on humans.
"ZMapp" is
manufactured in the tobacco plant Nicotiana benthamiana in the bioproduction process known as "pharming" by Kentucky BioProcessing, a subsidiary of Reynolds American.
Reynolds American is the second-largest tobacco company in the United States.


******


So, a 'pioneering' Ebola/HIV/AIDS researcher endorses a 'vaccine' being 'made' by a tobacco megacorporation. And that's just one facet of this whole farce.

Ecam
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:10 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by Ecam » Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:36 am

I'm surprised there is not more on the forum regarding ebola, and please forgive me in advance if I make any mistakes in my first post.

Ebola has infected social media all around me..so far, that's all it's infected. The latest news breaking here in cleveland, with the nurse from texas flying through cleveland/hopkins airport. Almost every person in my social feed is scared out of their minds with this.

The latest, I'm now seeing a video from the nurse now quarantined, with the camera man saying "no crying" wtf? The patient looks happy, and healthy. Thoughts?

http://www.businessinsider.com/video-ni ... al-2014-10

guivre
Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by guivre » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:03 am

Image

^^^ Not a parody.

http://goldenveroleumliberia.com/

Just one excerpt from the news articles on that site:
Francis Mondubue, paramount chief of Chu-chu Chiefdom has praised GVL for the move. This she said is a powerful tool for convincing residents of her chiefdom. “Most of my people don’t know how to read and write. So when they see the movie show Ebola victims and how deadly the virus is, they believe it instantly,: she said.
http://goldenveroleumliberia.com/index. ... ommunities
Last edited by guivre on Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

brianv
Member
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by brianv » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:13 am

guivre wrote:
Just one excerpt from the news articles on that site:
Francis Mondubue, paramount chief of Chu-chu Chiefdom has praised GVL for the move. This she said is a powerful tool for convincing residents of her chiefdom. “Most of my people don’t know how to read and write. So when they see the movie show Ebola victims and how deadly the virus is, they believe it instantly,: she said.
It appears that the author of the article can't read or write either. "Francis" (Frank), is a man's name, and the article goes on to refer to a woman. "Frances", is the female form.

fast67vellen2o
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:38 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by fast67vellen2o » Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:53 pm

I just caught this clip in the news.

A "clipboard" man who doesn't need the protective suit!


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PySetiKkOA



Here is an article from the New York times as well.

http://nypost.com/2014/10/16/man-with-n ... a-patient/

gwynned
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:12 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by gwynned » Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:10 am

I did a search on Youtube for Ebola hoax and found DOZENS of videos, one with over 1/2 million viewers already. I used to have to hunt for hoax videos and now I can't watch them all. Given the large numbers of both viewers and videos, I think we can safely conclude that there are an unprecedented number of people questioning the official story.

So are people getting smarter or are 'they' becoming more obvious? And, if they are becoming more obvious, we have to ask why? What are they trying to accomplish?

WHY did the New York Times show this absurd and unseemly video of a nearly naked guy with ebola but showing no symptoms other than what appears to be smeared shit on his pants? What about the kid that casually walks up and 'faints'?

http://www.nytimes.com/video/world/afri ... -door.html

Any high school kid could make a more convincing video. Why so obvious?

Those that believe that 'they' do not have our interests in mind could conclude that 'they' are merely baiting us, demonstrating their power over us, laughing at our inability to respond. A sadistic streak, perhaps. Seems a bit risky to me.

And who are these video makers who appear out of nowhere with very professional videos and voice overs? Are they just random folks with a sudden interest in fakeology or are they PART of it? Are they part of a grand ongoing and well coordinated effort to demonstrate in real time how it all works? How people will relinquish common sense and clear thinking in favor of 'authority.' Are they showing how the wool can be pulled over the sheeple's eyes, while at the same time gradually waking them up. Are 'they' preparing us for a grand revelation by planting seeds among the general public so that when the moment comes, people will be somewhat prepared? If so, where is this all leading?

hoi.polloi
Administrator
Posts: 5061
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:42 am

Demographics is one the most incredible new sciences of mind control developed yet. You may suspect everything has some end goal, but I say that is what Alex Jones wants us to buy.

When you wonder why they are doing something that seemingly helps the population they otherwise like to control and herd, I think you must understand that the Internet is the single most incredible form of demographics data aggregation methodology ever invented. They get more information. If it's their undoing, that's fate, but in the past more accurate knowledge has helped them rule over us. So, they don't expect that to change and they constantly seek to study what they see as their potential enemy.

Here is just a single example of how the data can be used to study us, and I am sure there are many more: look at, for example, the faces of those sims that are crooks and you are probably looking at the features and physiognomies of those they wish to demonize, and cause subconscious mistrust of, within the general public. Perhaps it used to be town criers and witch hunters. Now it's just an anonymous office drone with fake good looks reading a report about a dumb crime attached to the fictional face of their enemy's impossible offspring, which murdered the impossible simulated offspring of their favorite slave prostitute actors. It is a kind of eugenics of trust. The bad conspiracy theorists are terrorists that want to kill your favorite Hollywood star! Only subconsciously. Everything is presented "fair and balanced" of course. The undiscussed, unanalyzed imagery is the weapon, the weapon we insolently discuss and analyze. We don't know exactly who these baddies and goodies are that they are injecting into our skulls, but it's definitely a psychological study with hidden injection methods and hidden data collection methods. Haven't you seen a simmad — simulated terrorist — or two that looked vaguely like Simon or some young, free-thinking, truth-seeker type person?

In other scenarios, they paint their enemies as the victims and see how people react to that on Facebook, over their fully monitored cell phones, Skype accounts and over Gmail exchanges. Robots probably just scan for code words, sounds and images to add to the AI database, which is why some of the characters have such ridiculous seemingly-out-of-the-blue names easy for AI to pick up on. They would do this to measure what would give their enemies any sort of support in their active STOW. Synthetic Theater of War.

By gathering ever more data about those that are waking up and doing this, they can "ultimately" destroy and corner and oppress more of those people. The people they dislike. Us, apparently, as test subjects. But in the future, anyone that would oppose their power. And they can continue to rule over human kind as they have done in the past centuries. And if it's never a fully realized genocide, it's a protracted torturous preying. I don't know if they are consciously trying to awaken anything. They are definitely forced by circumstance to lead the opposition, and that seems to be well within the patterns of their standard behavior.

Are you saying there is no hope? I say there is hope.

Saying there is hope, and doing so specifically here — in this little realm of conscious, active truth-seeking, and not the fake truth they present to us in the alternative media — is one of the single most powerful combinations of activities possible. We might all be agents of a positive change to the world merely by recognizing the hard truths Simon exposes and yet, not losing hope.

^_^

Critical Mass
Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:33 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by Critical Mass » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:29 am

So are people getting smarter or are 'they' becoming more obvious? And, if they are becoming more obvious, we have to ask why? What are they trying to accomplish?
I often hear this thing about them becoming 'more obvious' with their latest psyops or making 'more mistakes' with some even speculating they're deliberately trying to 'wake up' a segment of the population.

I have to admit it I don't see it at all.

Was Tony Arrigo not 'obvious'? The 'Harley guy'? 'Nose out'? Re-watch their old Atom bomb movies... their fraudulent nature was & is obvious. The Russians released an official space station docking video where the craft rock back & forth like they're on strings. Was that not obvious?

Now I grant you they do a good job here & there and they certainly produce a lot of bullshit... and quantity has a certain quality all of its own.

However in general it has always been obvious. That's perhaps whats most galling about all this. We've all repeatedly been fooled by poor quality, government standard work.

The people of Earth have a lot of humble pie to eat... going forwards no-one should ever again trust these self proclaimed 'lords', 'masters' & 'betters'.


As for people being 'smarter'. On some level even people who aren't yet 'awake' to all this must sense the bullshit. The willing suspension of disbelief can only go on for so long. A recent conversation I had at work...


Colleague: ISIS have killed that Brit!
Me: Hmmm I wouldn't believe anything you saw on TV.
Colleague: Yeah I suppose... look what they can do with movies nowadays.

gwynned
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:12 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by gwynned » Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:30 pm

Critical Mass wrote:
So are people getting smarter or are 'they' becoming more obvious? And, if they are becoming more obvious, we have to ask why? What are they trying to accomplish?
I often hear this thing about them becoming 'more obvious' with their latest psyops or making 'more mistakes' with some even speculating they're deliberately trying to 'wake up' a segment of the population.

I have to admit it I don't see it at all.

However in general it has always been obvious. That's perhaps whats most galling about all this. We've all repeatedly been fooled by poor quality, government standard work.

The people of Earth have a lot of humble pie to eat... going forwards no-one should ever again trust these self proclaimed 'lords', 'masters' & 'betters'.


As for people being 'smarter'. On some level even people who aren't yet 'awake' to all this must sense the bullshit. The willing suspension of disbelief can only go on for so long. A recent conversation I had at work...
Really? So the day of 9-11 you realized it was fake because it was obvious? Yes, there were things that had people scratching their heads - like passports that survived! - but I know NO ONE who called 'fake' immediately afterwards, nor do I recall - and please correct me if I'm wrong - accusations of media fakery immediately after 9-11. Yet, with the ebola crisis still in full swing :rolleyes: , we have dozens of videos and hundreds of thousands of viewers. And again, who are these video makers?

As for the NY Times, they were also the ones who published the Obama Baphomet photo after his 9-11 speech, altering the background so that the curtains behind looked like devil horns. I have theorized for some time that ownership of the media has changed hands and that the methods used to conceal the truth are now being used to reveal them, and make a mockery of the 'revered institution' that provided so much valued and honest information for so long. :P

gwynned
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:12 pm

Re: Ebola baloney

Unread post by gwynned » Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:50 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:Demographics is one the most incredible new sciences of mind control developed yet. You may suspect everything has some end goal, but I say that is what Alex Jones wants us to buy.

When you wonder why they are doing something that seemingly helps the population they otherwise like to control and herd, I think you must understand that the Internet is the single most incredible form of demographics data aggregation methodology ever invented. They get more information. If it's their undoing, that's fate, but in the past more accurate knowledge has helped them rule over us. So, they don't expect that to change and they constantly seek to study what they see as their potential enemy.

Are you saying there is no hope? I say there is hope.

Saying there is hope, and doing so specifically here — in this little realm of conscious, active truth-seeking, and not the fake truth they present to us in the alternative media — is one of the single most powerful combinations of activities possible. We might all be agents of a positive change to the world merely by recognizing the hard truths Simon exposes and yet, not losing hope.

^_^
With all due respect - and I mean that sincerely - your theory doesn't really answer the question, though I am sure it's true the internet is, as you say, an 'incredible form of data aggregation.' That being the case, they would KNOW that more people - the enemy - are waking up and questioning the media. Why would they do that? Just because they can??

As for hope, while I agree we can be agents for change merely by being here and keeping the faith, so to speak, we alone are completely inconsequential, and they could cut us off in a heartbeat. But they don't. Why?

Post Reply