The Banks' War Against Us

Historical insights & thoughts about the world we live in - and the social conditioning exerted upon us by past and current propaganda.
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm

I apologize too. I contributed to the tangent there.

Let me do my best to get this back on topic.

The reason I believe the banking and money issue is so central to our problems with hoaxes is because they basically finance and make possible value that isn't real - or rather, value that is constantly promised beyond what seems feasible.

Before the assurances of the banks, though, you still had Religions promising the very extreme versions of this: you will get your just reward in "heaven" or whatever. The Bank is kind of an Earthly Religion.

Something interesting too, to me, is that the way people behave in banks is like everyone is a suspicious bank robber. Everyone could be taking your money or fooling you, which is why you go to a bank to have someone else take care of it for you, and on top of that promise you more money in exchange for trusting them a bit (depending on the arrangement. Some banks seem to just take and take.)

Anyway, my point is to present the following paradox:

On the one hand, it is somewhat necessary to be insecure about others if they are capable of pulling such enormous hoaxes and walking around with so many skeletons in their closets, so to speak. So many lies of all kinds to help prop up unjust wars, for example. On the other hand, if we ask people to be aware of this, we are also asking people to be very mistrustful of their neighbor, in such a way that one can never really feel totally safe without the need for stressful secrets - such as where one hides their valuables and their loot.

This is why, it seems, on the surface, our asking people to be mistrustful (or "thinking critically" for themselves) also asks people to put themselves in a situation where a bank offers a very attractive solution: you don't have to trust people but you don't have to keep track of their lies either. Because the bank, ultimately, keeps those people out. You don't have to be "on guard", which can be exhausting.

So I guess, ideally, we shouldn't just keep our local physical community in close bonds of trust (I don't consider any aspect of the Internet to remotely compare (no pun intended) to real community), but we should also exercise our discernment of others and not place that responsibility on the banks. That is where we run into so much blind trust in banks. I think it comes from a desire to "fake trust" those around you. Hence, some politeness in our society stems from a healthy mistrust that lies beneath the surface, but which is unhealthily buried and muffled and numbed by artificial "security measures" in place by those whose job it is to pretend to trust you: bankers.

Maybe that isn't put very elegantly, but I'm tired. Food for thought, anyway.

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:49 am

Outline of main points made for the second audio I posted a few days ago:

Spingola Speaks 10 / 01 / 2012

Deanna Spingola interviews Stephen Goodson, a former (non-executive) Director of the South African Reserve Bank ... .10.01.mp3

The bank of England's hidden origins

Goodson resigned in May of 2012 after being a board member of the South African Reserve bank for 12 years.

The dispute that caused the resignation was not over what they accused Goodson of but what Goodson accused them of.

How central banking has deeply affected our lives, particularly in the last 100 years.

The key bank is the Bank of England

1492: The Spanish expelled the entire Jewish community including Christopher Columbus.

This was one of many expulsions, there have been around 109 expulsions since 250 AD, usually for usury and anti-social behavior but the tipping point in the Spanish expulsion was ritual murder, the same reason the English expelled the Jews in the year 1290

An Israeli professor named Ariel Toaff wrote a book calle "Blood Passover" about Simon of Trent and the ritual murders of Italy. He confirmed that they did take place. Toaff was the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome, and a professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval History at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, just outside Tel Aviv.

If this book had been published in Israel, in Hebrew, no one would have cared. There are large bodies of literature in Hebrew that Jews do not wish Gentiles to know about. But Dr. Toaff’s publication of this book in Italy, in Italian, raised a worldwide firestorm of fury. Under unbearable pressure, the book was withdrawn from publication, and is not to be re-issued.

BLOOD PASSOVER - by Ariel Toaff - Complete English Text
translated by Gian Marco Lucchese and Pietro Gianetti
can be read here:

After this Jewish community was expelled from Spain, quite a number of them went north since they weren't allowed to settle in France. They set up a community mainly in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

When Charles V became king of Spain he expelled them from South Netherlands too so they became concentrated in one small part of Holland.

From that small base of operations they started their banking and usury, financing shipping companies like The Dutch East India Company, but their ultimate objective was to return to England.

England had the attraction of being an island and therefore less likely to be involved in a war and it also had a very strong navy, the strongest navy in the world which had defeated the Spanish Armada in 1558. So the English navy, both the Royal and Merchant navy were ideally suited for pursuing their business interests.

Forcing wars on countries could very well be part of this 'ritual murder' psychosis

Antonio Fernandez Carvajal was a Portuguese Marano Jew (practicing as a Catholic outwardly) who helped finance Cromwell's army, receiving his funds from Holland. This war killed about 190,000 people or almost 4% of the British population at that time and lasted from 1642 to 1648

Cromwell won and eventually on a trumped up charge they accused Charles I of treason, in a sort of a first version of the 'Nuremberg Trial' from centuries later, in which EVERYTHING was concocted. Charles I refused to plead and he was duly found guilty and beheaded on January 16, 1649.
Cromwell To Ebenezer Pratt of the Mulheim Synagogue in Amsterdam,
16th June 1647:

— “In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.” —

To Oliver Cromwell From Ebenezer Pratt, 12th July 1647:
— “Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.” —
Nuremberg The Last Battle by David Irving can be read here:

Cromwell tried to make it possible for the Jews to return but this wasn't easy because there were statutes on the books from 1290 that the Jews may not live in England under any circumstances.

So Cromwell convened a meeting in London where he asked all his supporters, many lawyers, merchants and priests to discuss the matter and then pass a motion agreeing to the return of the Jews and strangely enough THEY ALL SAID NO. They believed that the return of the Jews would be a menace to the government and the Christian religion and they also were worried that the whole ethos of commercial life in England would be seriously undermined.

So Cromwell had to give up and just allow the Jews to come in surreptitiously in steadily increasing numbers. They didn't make their move until the last of the Stuart kings had been removed in 1688. Along came the new king, William of Orange and within 6 years the Jews were able to get back in and establish the Bank of England on July 27, 1692 which would be their private bank, although outwardly called The Bank of England. That date marks the end of English independence, the start of the modern New World Order and the subjugation of the English people.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." ~ Josiah Charles Stamp, a director of the bank of England

With the establishment of the Bank of England, there arose things that were never heard of before such as:

bank notes
national debt

Plus, in order to pay the INTEREST for the money that the Bank of England was now LENDING to the king and the treasury, in order to fund that interest the people had to be taxed. So a whole bunch of new taxes were introduced:

Tax on land
Salt tax
Poll tax
Stamp tax
Window tax
Paper tax
Tax on births, marriages & death
Tax on peddlers
Tax on hackney coaches

On every conceivable thing there was a tax. And if that wasn't enough an income tax was also introduced at 20%

Soon inflation also became a problem. Then poverty became a widespread problem which before had barely existed. When Benjamin Franklin visited England in 1764, he was amazed at the poverty of the English, the people walking around in rags whereas in the American colonies none of that existed.

Bank of England became the blueprint for central banks throughout the world

With the control of the banks and the influx of the Jewish businessmen, one of the first things they did was to start the Slave Re-trade whereby they would use British ships with British captains and crew. They would send these ships out to the coast of West Africa and remove these negro slaves first to the Caribbean and then later to the Southern states of America.

At the same time there were large number of white slaves that were being sent to America

The slaves in the Caribbean sugar plantations also produced rum and this rum would then be sent back to pay for more slaves.

One of the chief islands there in the Eastern Caribbean is the Island of Nevis which also happens to be the birth place of Alexander Hamilton (real name Levine, half-Jewish, half-mulatto). There is a small mountain there called Mount Zion and the remains of a small synagogue. This Island was populated by Jewish plantation owners with their black slaves. Goodson has visited this Island personally and checked out the cemetery which has many Jewish names there like Moses Menendez, Israel Gonzalez and other names of Portuguese Jews who had settled there.

Alexander Hamilton’s True Identity ... -identity/

So in the late 17th century this small island of only 56 square miles had a bigger economy than New York.

Hamilton drafted the United States Constitution and when they put in the clause that congress would have the right to coin money and regulate the value thereof, Hamilton deliberately omitted the creation of paper money. Thomas Jefferson wanted to include the creation of paper money but he was away in Europe on diplomatic business and they did all this behind his back. Jefferson did not trust Hamilton at all and called him a schemer and a dishonest man.

The first central bank in the colonies was the bank of North America and Pennsylvania

But the first central bank for the whole of United States was set up in 1791 by Alexander Hamilton

Within 8 years of 1783 when America finally signed a peace treaty they already had a central bank reinstated.

The cause of the revolution was the changes which the Bank of England had introduced in 1765, namely that the colonists would have to use English money which they did not have and which brought about, within a year, the same conditions in America that Franklin had observed in London with 50% unemployment.

So it was highly ironic that the Americans got rid of one central bank only to replace it 8 years later with another one.

That central bank lasted 20 years after which the congressmen did not want to renew it since they saw that it was not working in their interests. They received direct threats from the Rothschilds that if the central bank wasn't renewed there would be trouble.

They got the Royal navy to attack American naval vessels and also started gun-running to the Shawnee Indians and their chieftain Tecumseh:


As a result, the Indians became very active and started burning down homesteads.

This was all being done by the Rothschilds in order to force the hand of congress to re-introduce and renew the contract for the central bank of America.

Finally they were forced into a war from June 1812 to August 1814. No one really won the war, the result was inconclusive but there was a huge impact on this young nation. They had a war debt of 105 million dollars and a population at that time of only 8 million people.

The slaves in the southern states were mainly used to produce cotton. This cotton was then baled and exported to the west of England in Lancashire where all the cotton mills were, also known as the satantic mills because the employment conditions were atrocious. Children as young as six years old were also being employed there and often picked up horrendous injuries, loss of limbs and so forth. These cotton mills were also mainly in Jewish hands, as well as the coal mines, which were providing the power for the factories.

Once the cotton was produced, it was then exported to India, mainly to Bengal. The people didn't have any money there so it was exchanged for opium. This opium was then exported to China and the Chinese paid for it in silver. So this is what for about 150 years the so-called 'British' empire was all about: slavery, drugs, exploitation and running the circle from West Africa to the Caribbean to the Southern states of America to England to India and China and then they had the money.

Eventually the Chinese silver was exploited to the point where there was nothing left.

Later on when slavery was abolished there was a break in the chain as it were.

The Chinese were turned into a nation of drug addicts and it caused permanent damage which took them a very long time to recover from.

There were actually more white slaves overall than black slaves. They also used to breed Irish slave women with negroes to produce mulattos.

After 1836 Andrew Jackson closed down the second bank of the United States after they had a horrendous inflation / deflation cycle throughout the 1820's.

Andrew Jackson moved the money out of the second bank of the United States into the banks of his friends where they became the ones who speculated.

From 1836 to 1913, America had a relatively stable economic environment, punctuated by various artificially created panics or bank runs induced by the banking fraternity.

The key date is 1873 because up to that time bank notes circulating, including Lincoln's greenbacks, and silver were the sole forms of exchange. In 1873 the senate passed a law and replaced it all with the gold standard. The governors of the bank of England sent someone across with half a million dollars to go and bribe the members of congress. That bribery was effective and they introduced the gold standard.

After the introduction of the gold standard there were between 1873 and 1913 about 7 booms and busts, all artificially created, with the intent to clean-out the working people and reduce the productivity of the farmers. These artificial booms-&-busts were part of the reason they said America needed to have a central bank to prevent those happening in the future.

So the bankers met at Jekyll Island and came up with two 'opposing plans' in order to confuse the public that there are two ways of approaching this problem. In fact, the two proposals were identical except the way that they adjusted the reserves of the proposed bank.

One plan was put forth by Nelson Aldrich who was the grandfather of Nelson Rockefeller and the alternative plan was put forth by Paul Warburg who was the Rothschild agent.

The legislation which was drafted based on these plans was bitterly opposed, not so much in congress but in the senate. One of the leading opponents was Robert La Folette


La Follette and a famous American professor named Irving Fisher put together an amendment which would make the currency dependent not solely on gold and silver but also on commodities.

Fisher was threatened at the last minute to withdraw his input and the amendment wasn't carried through. So they got the bill they wanted. It passed congress in June of 1913 and then in December in the senate Woodrow Wilson refused to allow them to go in Christmas recess until they had passed the legislation.

One of the criticisms of people who want to dismantle fractional reserve banking is:

well, give us an example of where state banking has succeeded. Goodson replies: The State Bank of Czarist Russia between 1860 & 1914 is one excellent example.

In 1815 at the congress of Vienna, they were discussing what to do with Europe after Napoleon's defeat. Of course, Napoleon had been defeated because he had set up a state bank, the Bank de France, in 1800. The whole purpose of the Napoleonic wars was to destroy Napoleon's bank. The Rothschilds used the British army, their usual dupes.

So in this 1815 congress, Czar Alexander I was approached by Nathan Rothschild who said:

Hey, how would you like to have a central bank like they have in England ?

Czar Alexander distrusted him completely because the Russians had been having enormous problems with their Jewish population, usury and the exploitation of the Russian peasants. Jews also controlled the liquor industry since they owned all the distilleries of Vodka.

Three years previously, Napoleon had wanted to form a pact with Russia and Czar Alexander had been willing to go along with it but he said to Napoleon: Look, England provides most of my industrial products. Can you replace them ? And of course, Napoleon couldn't because there were no roads or railroads at that time and the English navy was paramount on the seas. So that's why he invaded Russia.

So the Russian empire distanced itself from fractional reserve banking and in 1860 they set up the Russian state bank. This bank was under the ministry of finance, operated as the bank of the bankers, minted and printed the nation's coins and notes and it regulated the money supply. It also provided the commercial banks with very cheap loans.

In this way Russia built up the largest gold reserves in the world. This was because there was no usury there, there were no major parasites there extracting or creaming-off the industrial production.

This is proven by statistics which are available which show that the national debt of Russia was minuscule compared to France and Great Britain.

Russia at that time produced almost half of the world's barley, oats, rye and wheat and at the end of the 19th century they were ahead of every country in the world in industrial output and mining production.

This also greatly benefited the peasantry as Czar Alexander II freed the serfs, who were about 50% of the population and by 1914 80% of the arable land was all under control of the peasants and so there was no reason whatsoever for a revolution.

The peasants' bank granted loans at a very low rate of interest, allowing them to slowly buy up land. Education was free right up to the university level and they had the finest system of code of laws. Labor legislation was also well-advanced. It was almost a perfect society, so the reasons that are advanced for the Czarist system's demise are all lies. Almost everything that is told about how the peasants were suffering is untrue. What is true is that during the war years of 1914 to 1917 there were disruptions of the food supply and things did deteriorate.

So the Russian state bank of the late 19th century is a perfect example of a state bank that functions for the benefit of everyone. It's a TOTAL UNTRUTH what's been told about Russia in the late 19th century. In fact, they destroyed that country. Tens of millions of people were murdered by the communist regime or sent to gulags to freeze to death. They literally wrecked their entire country.

By the turn of the 20th century there were 16 central banks, all except 2 in Europe:

Indonesia Java

After world war II the numbers expanded phenomenally.

The primary reason for world war I was to destroy the State Bank of the Russian empire. The secondary reasons were to break up the other empires - the Austro-Hungarian, German & Ottoman - into smaller states so that they could exploit them more efficiently through central banks and last but not least: the theft of Palestine.

So after WWI there was this huge expansion of central banks.

At the conference of Genoa in 1922, attended by the governors of the various central banks and the heads of state, Montague Norman, the governor of the Bank of England and a freemason, insisted that central banks should be independent of their governments.

In other words, they would be acting solely on behalf of private banking interests, not the state.

"Despite the audacity of these proceedings they were entirely successful. The paid economists duly discovered that reserve banks were marvellous scientific improvements, the newspapers joined in the chorus of applause, and the politicians of the various States behaved as so many bellwethers leading the sheep into the slaughterhouse. The fact was entirely overlooked that these financiers are in no sense public servants, but simply the paid agents of the shareholders in a banking company whose interests need not in the least be identical with the national interest." ~ A. N. Field ... gs_01.html

All these central banks were also being established at the same time as the establishment of the Bank of International Settlements in Basel which is the central bank of the central banks.

The Bank of International Settlements does not pay any tax. It is above and beyond the law, immune from any regulation or oversight and, of course, its ultimate control lies with the House of Rothschild through its investments in various central and private banks.

The purpose of WWII was to destroy the State Bank of Germany, the State Bank of Japan and the State Bank of Italy, followed by the dissolution of the European colonial empires and again to allow another huge proliferation of central banks, so that today we have 155 central banks !!

The only countries that are left outside of the 155 are the so-called 'axis of evil' which is currently Iran, North Korea and Cuba. Former members of this 'axis of evil' that were recently taken out were Iraq, Libya and currently Syria which is still fighting these bastards trying to take it out.

So virtually every country in the world now has a central bank and has to obey the International Bank of Settlements, the central bank of the central banks, because THEY decide the amount of reserves each country has to retain and although it's not a legislative body, everyone follows it, and if you don't, well, people won't trade with you or you'll be excluded from the International Banking Settlement system and you have no choice.

They also starve people into joining the World Trade Organization by putting sanctions against them until they follow through.

A letter was written by an eminent German financier who was writing to the London Times in 1886, and in this letter he said:

"It would constitute an act of treason to sign away the independence of a state in reference to money."

So all these legislators who have passed private central banks into law have actually committed treason because they have taken away the essential power, the essential sovereignty of a nation and made it subservient to an international clique of criminals.

There are 4 things that are essential to independence. You need to have:

Food independence
Energy independence
Military independence

and then above all:

Monetary independence

Without monetary independence the rest do not actually count.

People say that a 'New World Order' is coming but actually it's already been established for at least a hundred years now, the only thing that's not evident is that the coronation hasn't taken place.

Between 1820 and 1910 the American dollar RETAINED its purchasing power. In other words, a dollar was still worth a dollar 90 years later.

Within six years of the Federal Reserve Bank being established, the prices between 1914 and 1920 increased by 56 percent !

Since then, there have been 18 recessions, 2 depressions if you count the current one, and the dollar has lost 97% of its value !

That is a more than sufficient indictment of the total failure of private central banking and the enormous damage it has caused to society, not only through the wars but in the undermining of social ethics, etc.

In 1936 Irving Fisher produced a plan to solve the depression. It was called the Chicago plan. It put forward the conversion of the Federal Reserve into a state bank. This plan of his has recently been examined by two researchers at the International Monetary Fund using mathematical inputs and they have come to the conclusive opinion that this plan would solve all the economic problems in the world.

North Dakota's state banking is very successful but its example has not been followed by any other states. State Bank of California legislation has been on Governor Jerry Brown's desk for 6 months even though California has a deficit of 6 billion dollars and they desperately need it.

State banking will definitely help and solve part of the problem but it will not solve the national problem

The bank of Canada was established in the 1930's. It is a typical Rothschild controlled bank

We already have 9 planks of the famous 10 planks of the communist manifesto in place in the USA

ARE Americans practicing Communism?

Read the 10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto to discover the truth and learn how to know your enemy...

Karl Marx describes in his communist manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power, so as to effect a communist socialist state. Those ten steps are known as the Ten Planks of The Communist Manifesto… The following brief presents the original ten planks within the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart for each of the planks. From comparison it's clear MOST Americans have by myths, fraud and deception under the color of law by their own politicians in both the Republican and Democratic and parties, been transformed into Communists.

Another thing to remember, Karl Marx in creating the Communist Manifesto designed these planks AS A TEST to determine whether a society has become communist or not. If they are all in effect and in force, then the people ARE practicing communists.

Communism, by any other name is still communism, and is VERY VERY destructive to the individual and to the society!!

The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are...

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.

Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.

Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.

Do changing words, change the end result? ... By using different words, is it all of a sudden OK to ignore or violate the provisions or intent of the Constitution of the united States of America?????

The people (politicians) who believe in the SOCIALISTIC and COMMUNISTIC concepts, especially those who pass more and more laws implementing these slavery ideas, are traitors to their oath of office and to the Constitution of the united States of America... KNOW YOUR ENEMY ...Remove the enemy from within and from among us. ... lanks.html
One of the biggest problems of all is in education: People have been brainwashed to think in a certain direction and they are unable to break out of that mold.

Iran does have a state banking system. Unfortunately it is not run efficiently and they're running ridiculously high inflation rates of 12 to 15% (and sometimes as high as 25% ; Iran has never had less than double digit inflation in the 33 years since the Islamic theocracy took over)

Almost all countries have a different agenda than the one that's been fed to us in the media.

The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England by Stephen Goodson

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free" ~ Johann Wolfgang Goethe

Last edited by teriyaki taryaki on Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:04 am, edited 11 times in total.

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:51 am


I really can't decide what would be extra-relevant to whoever might read those outline / transcript combinations, so I just left in anything that stimulates my own thinking or even just amuses me in there but tried to separate everything line by line or points made. It looks really long because of all the spaces but it's not really all that long. People can read it at their own leisure a few bites at a time or just listen to the audio and snatch up whatever they want at whichever point since it's pretty much chronological. And if they want to discuss something, these ideas, if their core analysis is valid, aren't going anywhere, they're just going to come back in a hundred different disguises through a hundred different messengers on a thousand different internet forums and comments sections until some kind of resoluton is reached and people are able to 'unslave' themselves as Michael Tsarion likes to say.

Here's another related audio from a few days ago:

Brian S Staveley, Justin Cooke Interveiw with Anthony Migchels

10-10-12 Dose Of Reality Radio

Usury - Interest - Economics - Central Banking - Alternative Currency For The People - Social Credit ... _final.mp3

Some of the topics covered:

• How Mutual Credit Works
• The Goals of Monetary Reform
• Why Banking must be interest free and how interest is a wealth transfer from the poor to rich.
• How the government creates the monopoly with the legal tender laws and hands it over to the private banking cartel
• A critique of Austrian Economics
• How Libertarianism can be used as controlled opposition if people are not careful; Ron Paul types are there to take the wind out of the sail of the real opposition
• Austrian Economics defense of interest through the 'time factor'
• There are no independent governments


Arnhem, the Netherlands


I'm the initiator of the Gelre, the first regional currency in the Netherlands.

I blog about the nature of money, which reforms are necessary and on the many misconceptions on money

Two of the books mentioned by Migchels in the Audio:

The text of the 1933 version of Major Douglas' book Social Credit, can be found here: ... ouglas.pdf

Social credit is an economic philosophy developed by Major C. H. (Clifford Hugh) Douglas (1879–1952), a British engineer, who wrote a book by that name in 1924. Social Credit is described by Douglas[1] as "the policy of a philosophy"; he called his philosophy "practical Christianity". This philosophy is interdisciplinary in nature, encompassing the fields of economics, political science, history, accounting and physics. Assuming the only safe place for power is in many hands, social credit is a distributive philosophy, and its policy is to disperse power to individuals. Social Credit philosophy is best summed by Douglas when he said, "Systems were made for men, and not men for systems, and the interest of man which is self-development, is above all systems, whether theological, political or economic."[2] Douglas said that Social Crediters want to build a new civilization based upon absolute economic security for the individual—where “...they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid.”[3][4] In other words, Douglas did not seek to build a utopia, but to set the conditions upon which each individual can build their own utopia.

Silvio Gesell - The NATURAL ECONOMIC ORDER translated by Philip Pye M.A.


Silvio Gesell (March 17, 1862 – March 11, 1930) was a German merchant, theoretical economist, social activist, anarchist and founder of Freiwirtschaft. He was a disciple of Proudhon and, like Proudhon, a critic of Marx's understanding of the nature of money.

Gesell was a major influence on the economic thought of Ezra Pound during the 1930s. Pound came to believe during the 1920s that the cause of the First World War was finance capitalism, which he called "usury", and that the solution was C.H. Douglas's idea of social credit, with fascism as the vehicle for reform; he had met Douglas in The New Age offices and had been impressed by his ideas.[64] Pound's allegiance to fascist Italy lay in his belief that Mussolini's regime had the power and the desire to reform economics in a way that would end poverty and war.

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:14 am

Detroit, the left/right paradigm bullcrap peddled by a thousand-&-one clowns just like this one:

full link:

vs. the hard, unbelievable truth not one out of a hundred of them would have the stomach to face, never mind expose and act upon:

Detroit: The Latest Bankruptcy Lie ... uptcy-lie/

In case you haven’t heard, municipal bankruptcy is now all the rage. When smaller municipal corporations (only corporations can declare bankruptcy) had little resistance as test cases for these outrageous claims of fraudulent bankruptcy and default, the larger municipalities gained the confidence that the financially illiterate cesspool of people as citizens don’t know their heads from a hole in the wall when it comes to the financial reporting apparatus of government. The people were determined to be sufficiently ignorant of even the basic checking account balance of the general fund in their local governments and school districts, let alone the massive collective government investment scam robbing them of the entirety of their wealth, making it reasonable to assume that these municipal corporations' financial position would likely never be challenged by that clueless mass of the indentured. And so the latest trend of conspiracy and fraud against those debt-slaves continues… this time in the not so great City of Detroit.

Considering its checkered past; riddled with the disappearance of industry to U.S. funded infrastructure economies like Mexico and China, it would seem to the average citizen that Detroit should have done this bankruptcy thing long ago. Of course, the fact that it did not declare its bankruptcy at all was because this municipal corporation has never been bankrupt, and certainly is not anywhere near being able to claim that legitimate legal declaration today.

And yet here it is, making that very declaration…

This is very important because the legal statement of bankruptcy means nothing as a mere “declaration” until a government court makes that determination to cause it to be official. Thus, the obvious conspiracy of a government appealing to government to get government permission to default on its debt should not be lost on the reader; though in general this governance of government by government itself seems perfectly normal to most people – a regulatory body operating in a completely unregulated fashion as organized crime.

Inherently, of course, this self-governance and self-regulation by government and its BAR judicial is nothing if not a breeding ground for the worst kind of corruption and greed at the expense of the governed. For the people in their state of fear, entertainment, and confusion are certainly not regulating those regulators…

And a corporate judge of the International BAR Association will decide, not the people being defaulted upon.


ALIPAC printed the following “facts,” facts about Detroit that on the surface are absolutely mind-blowing…

1 – Detroit was once the fourth-largest city in the United States, and in 1960 Detroit had the highest per-capita income in the entire nation. ... g-quickly/

2 – Over the past 60 years, the population of Detroit has fallen by 63 percent. ... lined-63-1

3 – At this point, approximately 40 percent of all the streetlights in the city don’t work. ... ont-work-4

4 – Some ambulances in the city of Detroit have been used for so long that they have more than 250,000 miles on them. ... bulances-5

5 – 210 of the 317 public parks in the city of Detroit have been permanently closed down. ... other-50-7

6 – According to the New York Times, there are now approximately 70,000 abandoned buildings in Detroit. ... ht_as.html

7 – Approximately one-third of Detroit’s 140 square miles is either vacant or derelict. ... -City.html

8 – Less than half of the residents of Detroit over the age of 16 are working at this point. ... in-2009-10

9 – If you can believe it, 60 percent of all children in the city of Detroit are living in poverty. ... ancy-down/

10 – According to one very shocking report, 47 percent of the residents of Detroit are functionally illiterate. ... cant-read/

11 – Today, police solve less than 10 percent of the crimes that are committed in Detroit. ... f-crimes-3

12 – Ten years ago, there were approximately 5,000 police officers in the city of Detroit. Today, there are only about 2,500 and another 100 are scheduled to be eliminated from the force soon. ... f-crimes-3

13 – Due to budget cutbacks, most police stations in Detroit are now closed to the public for 16 hours a day. ... s-day.html

14 – The murder rate in Detroit is 11 times higher than it is in New York City.

15 – Crime has gotten so bad in Detroit that even the police are telling people to “enter Detroit at your own risk“. ... r-own-risk

16 – Right now, the city of Detroit is facing $20 billion in debt and unfunded liabilities. That breaks down to more than $25,000 per resident… As Detroit Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr noted last week, it took a very long time for Detroit to get into this condition… ... creditors/


Of course, this article like all others doesn’t mention the legal crime operating behind these horrific scenes and reported in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) – what I have nicknamed the “Achilles Heel" of government. While these facts and figures are certainly important as to the physical state of Detroit, the absence of public information on the actual financial state of that fictional municipal corporation government called “City of Detroit” is never discussed due to the overwhelming lack of exposure and coverage by every news outlet in America about the financial statements required by Federal law for every government entity and corporation in the United States. The greatest open secret in fascist history remains open and secret. In short, these municipalities across the nation in every State have exacted, extorted, and excavated all of the wealth of the people for its organized and collective investment schemes that, not ironically, are only disclosed in the CAFR of government. And collectively the over 230,000 local and state government entities across the nation have been legally required to funnel taxpayer money into investment funds that ultimately never benefit these local or state governments or their people. Instead, they invest in “emerging markets” in countries like Mexico and China – which soon will become the largest economy in the world thanks to the ignorance of the very citizens of the United States that have no idea this has been happening for over 70 years.

One would in general look at the above factoids about Detroit and justifiably assume that the decaying state of that City is a direct reflection of the similar financial state of the government corporation that controls that area. This, however, is patently false – a fallacy built up through media and political misrepresentation.

The true culprit of that misrepresentation is in the form of the hand selected “budget report” that is delivered to the people publicly each year. The people are never told that this “budget” is actually not the original and main financial statement that is created by governments and audited by independent accounting firms. You see, the budget report is nothing but an intentionally dumbed-down version of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which is filed each year as a requirement of the Federal and State legal codes.

What does this mean?

It means that the budget is merely a reflection of what I call the “creative accounting” that is applied to the audited CAFR report so as to make the budget report appear to be in a state of decay, debt, default, and loss. While the CAFR may show assets of millions or billions in cash and investments, the budget report will be creatively manipulated by this special creative accounting process to create an illusionist “balance sheet” that somehow, incredibly, and magically turns an asset into a liability.

Detroit is of course no exception to this rule. For the decaying state of this city has very little to do with the financial state of this municipal corporation. But the fallacy remains that as the city decays so too does the financial state of its government.

Here is a link to the City of Detroit’s 2012 CAFR: ... ements.pdf

**Note that this website takes you to the Detroit government (.gov) website.

While I will not go into the full detail of how this corrupt Municipal Corporation of organized crime has gotten to this point, I will just point out the most important factor in determining whether or not this corporation is actually bankrupt – a factor that I guarantee will be ignored by the government court and bankruptcy judge in this case if the people do not finally rise up and demand that Detroit pay its debt today instead of defaulting on it. That factoid is the promotion of its future debt payments as a current liability effecting today’s balance sheet. The fact is that 99% of the entire structure of municipalities across the nation could be out of debt tomorrow and still have money and investments to spare (be in the black) if it weren’t for the fact that governments enjoy, promote, and profit from the interest (usury) created by debt. In other words, instead of using the money it holds today for services in its investment funds, a government will create a municipal bond and pay that loan off over 20-50 years at interest. Sometimes it is other governments across the nation that are funding those bonds, sometimes banks, and sometimes Public Private Partnerships (PPP) are created in agreement for the loan by private or publicly traded corporations. Ironically, that money that government could have used in lieu of that loan to pay for that service is often invested in such things as corporate bonds – loans to governments, banks, and private and publicly traded corporations. And these bonds are bundled and sold as securities on the bond markets as commodities – debt contracts worth a future value. And the investment scam continues while televisions pump digital airwaves of Stars dancing and Idols singing.

On page 41 of this CAFR we see the illusion blatantly spelled out for us in the basic “Statement of Net Assets”. Of course, this is not the full disclosure of investment fund totals for the City because of other creative accounting within the CAFR designed to minimize those balances shown on this chart, but it shows the scam very well in its full corrupt glory.

The City claims to have over $10.6 billion in liabilities, which it then “balances” against about $10.3 billion in assets. This leaves a “balance” of assets that gets shown to the people of a negative $3oo million dollars.

Just one problem though…

You see, most people would simply consider this balance as the cash balance of the government, having no clue about the investment scam their government has participated in for decades that funnels taxpayer monies out of the taxpayer base and into governments investment funds.

And so for the fiscal year 2012-2013 ending in the month of June last year, the actual current liabilities (due within one year) – which represent debt payments for that fiscal year that would be paid in that fiscal year – only amount to about $309 million.

This means that the other $9.1 billion dollars listed here as “due after one year” is all future debt payments that will basically amount to somewhere around a $300-400 million dollar amortization schedule for the next fiscal year and so on. In other words, for the 2013-2014 fiscal year, Detroit’s actual “current liabilities” are only $300-400 million dollars. The rest of that $9.1 billion still is not due until future payments are made in 5, 10, 20, and up to 50 years in the future!!!

And yet those payments and future debts are somehow effecting the current balance of today?

Can you say creative accounting?

Can you say FRAUD?

The trick here is that, as with all municipalities across the nation, by law these governments are able to and encouraged to not include future assets in the form or fees and taxes that will be collected in those future years that will certainly pay for those future debt payments. So here we see that government is claiming a future liability as a current liability, and yet conveniently disregarding the projected future assets it will receive in the future as current assets to balance the future liabilities.


So what is the true financial position of the government of Detroit?

It can pay off, if it chooses to, all of its future debt today with its current assets.

Of course, this would mean that the interest charges on that future debt and bonds would not be accrued in the future and therefore would not be paid out, bringing the actual total liabilities due today (without future interest charges attached) significantly down it total, since by paying off that future debt today no interest would be charged for anywhere from the next 10-50 years.

For an in depth explanation of this creative accounting trick and how you can identify it on your own municipal CAFR, see my research here: ... -city-usa/

And check this out to see where your tax dollars really go: ... taxpayers/

And so here we stand, another high profile municipality pretending to bite the dust while hiding its real wealth under false accounting principles that are allowed at the very top level of the federal government. Detroit City will act upon the purpose of its incorporation by utilizing the “limited liability” function of that privilege – a privilege once only granted to honorable men who sought to improve and strengthen all men, not just themselves. And this protection of government called incorporation now protects crime instead of the people who are harmed by that crime. For all of government is naught but a limited liability corporation collectively organized in harming the people.


At this point it has been reported that the Detroit government is tearing down up to 350 abandoned homes and buildings per day in that city. Its plan is to create a “model” Agenda 21 city; a green city; one that is built towards the sky with compartmentalized condo housing instead of sprawling out from its center where land may be enjoyed by single family dwellings. This re-imagining of city life will become a beacon of the future of “smart growth” and the “smart grid”, matching lifestyle and technology to create the perfect Orwellian fit for those who love to love their biometric servitude and love to be on camera. It will be a model city built on retracting individual rights in lieu of the collective good of the citizenry as is laid out in the U.N.’s Declaration of Human Rights that has all but usurped the constitution of the United States – this is the future of Detroit Rock City and likely a city near you…

The economic fallacy that 'growth' equals a good economy ultimately and ironically requires the destruction and pestilence we see in Detroit. And so, in order to grow the new city, the old one must be destroyed to make way for the ever-growing economy. It is in the best interests of the government corporation and its investment scheme for this to happen. And even more frightening to contemplate is that bridges, roads, tunnels, buildings, sewers, water, electrical, and other infrastructure is more profitable in decay for that investment scam than it is as a well-maintained infrastructure. Destruction and decay requires investment and promotes growth. This is the model of government and its “economy”.

Detroit is not bankrupt. It has created the illusion of bankruptcy by such common financial trickery as pension pre-funding – where future debt payments must be paid in advance so that government can invest that taxpayer money instead of using it to fix up the broken City. Congress used this same trick to make it appear that the Federal Post Office is broke, while in reality it just created legislation that forced the post office to borrow money from government and corporate sources to pre-fund the Federal Pension funds instead of paying the normal contributions over time. In other words, government is forcing itself to pay future liabilities today – which just happens to have the good-for-government and bad-for-the-people side effect of creating the unnecessary illusion that bankruptcy is needed. And so government is now the largest defaulting entity in history. And the people blindly support what they don’t understand, allowing that fraudulent government machine to place the responsibility for its actions upon the backs of those people in the form of sheer usurious debt, while laughing all the way to the bank.

Imagine such greed and opportunity that would make men in the public trust force the bankruptcy of a city just because they don’t want to wait to receive their pension payments by taxpayers in the future. While this would seem counter-intuitive (destroying a city to support city employee pensions), the truth is that this is just business as usual. For government is not in the business of helping people. It is a financial mega-corporation with branches in every square mile of the United States with investments in the entire world economy.

How many times do I have to say it…?

Government is nothing but the organization of crime. For a government that creates, adjudicates, enforces, and exempts itself from its own laws is thus lawless – a mafia above its own prescribed laws. When the law is lawless, there is no law.


–Clint Richardson (

–Saturday, July 20th, 2013 ... uptcy-lie/

Great comment left by Clint's mentor Walter Burien:

1. Walter Burien
/ July 20, 2013

In your ending statement you said: “a mafia above its own prescribed laws. ”


They still have a code of honor and ethics.

Additionally you will not find elected and appointed attorneys primarily running the show as you will in Government. The Mafia hires attorneys as consultants only. They know better than to let them run the show.

full link:

About CAFR1 - Government's Wealth Exposed

Government now owns it all by investment!

1. What is Taxation? ANS: A revenue source.

2. What is Investment Return? ANS: A revenue Source.

3. What do Enterprise operations do? ANS: Generate a revenue Source.

ANSWER to the Big question of ending taxation?

ANS: Use 2 & 3 to knock out #1

TRF management teams can eliminate taxation one venue at a time.

* Pension management accounts are established to pay salaries and benefits at retirement from the investment return generated.

** TRF management accounts are established to pay local government (City; County; School District; State) general purpose operating costs from the investment and Enterprise return generated. Taxation ended!

Ready to make it happen? If the answer is yes, then pass the WORD and let the cognitive thinking for effective application of the TRF begin!

"The Only Game in Town - 2011" is the only game the population should be playing; The path to ending ALL taxation!

Walter Burien - CAFR1 Trailer - The Only Game in Town - The Way Our Government Can Be - (HQ) Version

Don't Lower Taxation END IT - Taxation is NOT needed - Look and Learn. So what are you waiting for, just DO IT!

To View the complete documentary go to -


Who Am I?

Welcome to my world…

Clint Richardson is my real name. I stand up and take responsibility for any and all content and actions by myself. No Pseudo, corporate, or stage names necessary. For I am living without straw.

This blog represents countless hours of research into the complex structure of society and the organized crime syndicate called “government”. I offer this without profit or motive, without sponsor or advertising. In this way, I hope to promote unbiased and unhindered information that is both based on the ancient liberal arts (trivium) and without fallacy, mixed with my own brand of sarcastic but sharply painful commentary of what is reality.

As a virtual matrix is of artificiality is being built up around us, and as we unwittingly accept and wallow in this destructive social media, this blog is all I can do to cry out in the digital wilderness before we all fall in too deep. The real world is crumbling while this virtual reality is built up and sparkling new each and every year. And as our actions against tyranny continuously get redirected to this false reality of artificiality in an inter-connected trap we call the inter-net, crimes against humanity go unchecked within the real world as un-empathetic corporations are protected from harm by unethical politicians.

And so, with a small and totally independent voice I research and write.

As this artificial digital social world of media repulses me with every new upgrade, my participation in it will likely stay limited to this blog and my movies. I have no desire to be part of a brave new world of trans-humanity…

After nearly four years of continuous contributions to this blog, I must disclaim that many of my previous misconceptions in earlier posts have been changed and corrected in later posts – a necessary learning curve for such a monstrously and purposefully obfuscating history written by the controllers and victors of the past. And I suppose that of the subjects I write about today, I will need this same disclaimer in another four years! The most important lesson is that there is never a final lesson; that the humility of being passionate but wrong is the most important learning tool of all, if one can only recognize the virtue of overcoming ego.

May this information enlighten and provoke you as well to break free of this virtual world before it ensnares you in the helpless frequencies of digital futility and servitude to the real.



"Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank paper, as we were formerly by the old Continental paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures, commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to burden all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits, profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs. Prudent men must be on their guard in this game of Robin’s alives, and take care that the spark does not extinguish in their hands. I am an enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but coin. But our whole country is so fascinated by this Jack-lantern wealth, that they will not stop short of its total and fatal explosion." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Selected letters of Thomas Jefferson on statecraft, banking, currency, debt, bank paper:



Posts: 853
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by bostonterrierowner » Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:33 pm

Teriyaki Terifucky!!!!

I see you keep on trolling our forum tirelessly and shamelessly .

Your guru Clint ,whose golden thoughts you insist on sharing with us is another shill or moron or both . Why don't you post on his shitty website and leave us alone?

To forum members , please check what TT's idol has to say on 9/11 :
What would you say if I told you that if… IF you proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the United States government, G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and anyone else that you think you can somehow connect with what happened on 9/11 where guilty, complicit in, and responsible for 9/11 – that they were acting under the protection of law?

What if I were to tell you that Terrorism as defined in U.S. CODE is legal for the U.S. Government?

Well… this is the God honest truth.

On this 9/11/11, I feel almost obligated to say something about 9/11. After all… I was there. I watched the buildings fall from my roof. And so I finally shared how it felt that day in this interview:

Link Here: ... _Clint.mp3

After so many years of trying to wake up the sleeping masses to the crimes committed on 9/11 by their own government, I now know that acts of “Terrorism” by the U.S. Government and its contractors (i.e. Halliburton and Blackwater) are perfectly legal under the U.S. CODE.

There is not a damn thing we the people can do about it from within the legal system.

And so perhaps we should be focusing on what the law is before we tell others to wake up. All these years of telling others they are sleeping, and it turns out we were all wrong!

We say that Building 7 is the “smoking gun”… But there is no smoking gun when crime is legal.

Terrorism is legal my friends.

Listen and learn…


–Clint Richardson (
–Sunday, September 11, 2011
Dear admins , please discipline our memeber ( unfortunately ) Teriyaki not to litter our media fakery research with his shit or ban him outright . This guy is a total disgrace and being associated with him is a crime against CF

I am afraid to even think of what can be seen from your roof Terifucky :)

I smelled your crap from the very beginning you dumb neo Nazi cunt .

teriyaki taryaki
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:27 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by teriyaki taryaki » Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:31 pm

bostonterrierowner wrote:Teriyaki Terifucky!!!!

I see you keep on trolling our forum tirelessly and shamelessly .

Your guru Clint ,whose golden thoughts you insist on sharing with us is another shill or moron or both . Why don't you post on his shitty website and leave us alone?

To forum members , please check what TT's idol has to say on 9/11 :
What would you say if I told you that if… IF you proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the United States government, G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and anyone else that you think you can somehow connect with what happened on 9/11 where guilty, complicit in, and responsible for 9/11 – that they were acting under the protection of law?

What if I were to tell you that Terrorism as defined in U.S. CODE is legal for the U.S. Government?

Well… this is the God honest truth.

On this 9/11/11, I feel almost obligated to say something about 9/11. After all… I was there. I watched the buildings fall from my roof. And so I finally shared how it felt that day in this interview:

Link Here: ... _Clint.mp3

After so many years of trying to wake up the sleeping masses to the crimes committed on 9/11 by their own government, I now know that acts of “Terrorism” by the U.S. Government and its contractors (i.e. Halliburton and Blackwater) are perfectly legal under the U.S. CODE.

There is not a damn thing we the people can do about it from within the legal system.

And so perhaps we should be focusing on what the law is before we tell others to wake up. All these years of telling others they are sleeping, and it turns out we were all wrong!

We say that Building 7 is the “smoking gun”… But there is no smoking gun when crime is legal.

Terrorism is legal my friends.

Listen and learn…


–Clint Richardson (
–Sunday, September 11, 2011
Dear admins , please discipline our memeber ( unfortunately ) Teriyaki not to litter our media fakery research with his shit or ban him outright . This guy is a total disgrace and being associated with him is a crime against CF

I am afraid to even think of what can be seen from your roof Terifucky :)

I smelled your crap from the very beginning you dumb neo Nazi cunt .
Cry like a baby much Bachman Turner Overdrive ? I'm gonna tell my mommy on you. Boo hoo hoo. What are you 4 years old ? :P

Just because somebody was a plane-hugger in 2011 doesn't make them a plane-hugger today. Clint is very wise to media fakery these days. Just because he's not out there promoting the VICSIMS report yet (I am, but very few others that I know), doesn't make him or anyone else a shill automatically, genius. If you had to dismiss every truther out there based on plane-hugging or No-Planing alone, you'd run out of people very quickly. To tell you the truth, just that Detroit CAFR article alone is more of a contribution to the cause of truth and humanity in general than you'll probably make in 2 lifetimes of dedicated cry-babying and snitching. ;)

Everything that ever needs to be said about the United States government or any other government with a 'constitution' in one chapter:

Irresponsible Power Derived from the "Constitution"

by Lysander Spooner


It is no exaggeration, but a literal truth, to say that, by the Constitution —not as I interpret it, but as it is interpreted by those who pretend to administer it—the properties, liberties, and lives of the entire people of the United States are surrendered unreservedly into the hands of men who, it is provided by the Constitution itself, shall never be “questioned” as to any disposal they make of them.

Thus the Constitution (Art. 1, Sec. 6) provides that, “for any speech or debate [or vote,] in either house, they [the senators and representatives] shall not be questioned in any other place.”

The whole law-making power is given to these senators and representatives, [when acting by a two-thirds vote]* ; and this provision protects them from all responsibility for the laws they make.

The Constitution also enables them to secure the execution of all their laws, by giving them power to withhold the salaries of, and to impeach and remove, all judicial and executive officers, who refuse to execute them.

Thus the whole power of the government is in their hands, and they are made utterly irresponsible for the use they make of it. What is this but absolute, irresponsible power?

It is no answer to this view of the case to say that these men are under oath to use their power only within certain limits; for what care they, or what should they care, for oaths or limits, when it is expressly provided, by the Constitution itself, that they shall never be “questioned,” or held to any responsibility whatever, for violating their oaths, or transgressing those limits?

Neither is it any answer to this view of the case to say that the particular individuals holding this power can be changed once in two or six years; for the power of each set of men is absolute during the term for which they hold it; and when they can hold it no longer, they are succeeded only by men whose power will be equally absolute and irresponsible.

Neither is it any answer to this view of the case to say that the men holding this absolute, irresponsible power, must be men chosen by the people (or portions of them) to hold it. A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. Neither are a people any the less slaves because permitted periodically to choose new masters. What makes them slaves is the fact that they now are, and are always hereafter to be, in the hands of men whose power over them is, and always is to be, absolute and irresponsible.*

The right of absolute and irresponsible dominion is the right of property, and the right of property is the right of absolute, irresponsible dominion. The two are identical; the one necessarily implying the other. Neither can exist without the other. If, therefore, Congress have that absolute and irresponsible law-making power, which the Constitution—according to their interpretation of it—gives them, it can only be because they own us as property. If they own us as property, they are our masters, and their will is our law. If they do not own us as property, they are not our masters, and their will, as such, is of no authority over us.

But these men who claim and exercise this absolute and irresponsible dominion over us, dare not be consistent, and claim either to be our masters, or to own us as property.

They say they are only our servants, agents, attorneys, and representatives. But this declaration involves an absurdity, a contradiction. No man can be my servant, agent, attorney, or representative, and be, at the same time, uncontrollable by me, and irresponsible to me for his acts. It is of no importance that I appointed him, and put all power in his hands. If I made him uncontrollable by me, and irresponsible to me, he is no longer my servant, agent, attorney, or representative. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over my property, I gave him the property. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over myself, I made him my master, and gave myself to him as a slave. And it is of no importance whether I called him master or servant, agent or owner. The only question is, what power did I put into his hands? Was it an absolute and irresponsible one? or a limited and responsible one?

For still another reason they are neither our servants, agents, attorneys, nor
representatives. And that reason is, that we do not make ourselves responsible for their acts. If a man is my servant, agent, or attorney, I necessarily make myself responsible for all his acts done within the limits of the power I have intrusted to him.

If I have intrusted him, as my agent, with either absolute power, or any power at all, over the persons or properties of other men than myself, I thereby necessarily make myself responsible to those other persons for any injuries he may do them, so long as he acts within the limits of the power I have granted him. But no individual who may be injured in his person or property, by acts of Congress, can come to the individual electors, and hold them responsible for these acts of their so-called agents or representatives. This fact proves that these pretended agents of the people, of everybody, are really the agents of nobody.

If, then, nobody is individually responsible for the acts of Congress, the members of Congress are nobody’s agents. And if they are nobody’s agents, they are themselves individually responsible for their own acts, and for the acts of all whom they employ.

And the authority they are exercising is simply their own individual authority; and, by the law of nature—the highest of all laws—anybody injured by their acts, anybody who is deprived by them of his property or his liberty, has the same right to hold them individually responsible, that he has to hold any other trespasser individually responsible. He has the same right to resist them, and their agents, that he has to resist any other trespassers."

~from Lysander Spooner, "No Treason, The Constitution of No Authority" ... &Itemid=28


My favorite passage in Spooner's book is this one:

"In Europe, the nominal rulers, the emperors and kings and parliaments, are anything but the real rulers of their respective countries. They are little or nothing else than mere tools, employed by the wealthy to rob, enslave, and (if need be) murder those who have less wealth, or none at all.

The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents,—men who never think of lending a shilling to their nextdoor neighbors, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest,—stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved.

They lend their money in this manner, knowing that it is to be expended in murdering their fellow men, for simply seeking their liberty and their rights; knowing also that neither the interest nor the principal will ever be paid, except as it will be extorted under terror of the repetition of such murders as those for which the money lent is to be expended.

These money-lenders, the Rothschilds, for example, say to themselves: If we lend a hundred millions sterling to the queen and parliament of England, it will enable them to murder twenty, fifty, or a hundred thousand people in England, Ireland, or India; and the terror inspired by such wholesale slaughter, will enable them to keep the whole people of those countries in subjection for twenty, or perhaps fifty, years to come; to control all their trade and industry; and to extort from them large amounts of money, under the name of taxes; and from the wealth thus extorted from them, they (the queen and parliament) can afford to pay us a higher rate of interest for our money than we can get in any other way. Or, if we lend this sum to the emperor of Austria, it will enable him to murder so many of his people as to strike terror into the rest, and thus enable him to keep them in subjection, and extort money from them, for twenty or fifty years to come. And they say the same in regard to the emperor of Russia, the king of Prussia, the emperor of France, or any other ruler, so called, who, in their judgment, will be able, by murdering a reasonable portion of his people, to keep the rest in subjection, and extort money from them, for a long time to come, to pay the interest and the principal of the money lent him.

And why are these men so ready to lend money for murdering their fellow men? Soley for this reason, viz., that such loans are considered better investments than loans for purposes of honest industry. They pay higher rates of interest; and it is less trouble to look after them. This is the whole matter. The question of making these loans is, with these lenders, a mere question of pecuniary profit. They lend money to be expended in robbing, enslaving, and murdering their fellow men, solely because, on the whole, such loans pay better than any others. They are no respecters of persons, no superstitious fools, that reverence monarchs. They care no more for a king, or an emperor, than they do for a beggar, except as he is a better customer, and can pay them better interest for their money. If they doubt his ability to make his murders successful for maintaining his power, and thus extorting money from his people in future, they dismiss him unceremoniously as they would dismiss any other hopeless bankrupt, who should want to borrow money to save himself from open insolvency.

When these great lenders of blood-money, like the Rothschilds, have loaned vast sums in this way, for purposes of murder, to an emperor or a king, they sell out the bonds taken by them, in small amounts, to anybody, and everybody, who are disposed to buy them at satisfactory prices, to hold as investments. They (the Rothschilds) thus soon get back their money, with great profits; and are now ready to lend money in the same way again to any other robber and murderer, called an emperor or king, who, they think, is likely to be successful in his robberies and murders, and able to pay a good price for the money necessary to carry them on.

This business of lending blood-money is one of the most thoroughly sordid, cold-blooded, and criminal that was ever carried on, to any considerable extent, amongst human beings. It is like lending money to slave traders, or to common robbers and pirates, to be repaid out of their plunder. And the men who loan money to governments, so called, for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob, enslave, and murder their people, are among the greatest villains that the world has ever seen. And they as much deserve to be hunted and killed (if they cannot otherwise be got rid of) as any slave traders, robbers, or pirates that ever lived.

When these emperors and kings, so-called, have obtained their loans, they proceed to hire and train immense numbers of professional murderers, called soldiers, and employ them in shooting down all who resist their demands for money. In fact, most of them keep large bodies of these murderers constantly in their service, as their only means of enforcing their extortions. There are now [1870], I think, four or five millions of these professional murderers constantly employed by the so-called sovereigns of Europe. The enslaved people are, of course, forced to support and pay all these murderers, as well as to submit to all the other extortions which these murderers are employed to enforce.

It is only in this way that most of the so-called governments of Europe are maintained. These so-called governments are in reality only great bands of robbers and murderers, organized, disciplined, and constantly on the alert. And the so-called sovereigns, in these different governments, are simply the heads, or chiefs, of different bands of robbers and murderers. And these heads or chiefs are dependent upon the lenders of blood-money for the means to carry on their robberies and murders. They could not sustain themselves a moment but for the loans made to them by these blood-money loan-mongers. And their first care is to maintain their credit with them; for they know their end is come, the instant their credit with them fails. Consequently the first proceeds of their extortions are scrupulously applied to the payment of the interest on their loans."

~from Lysander Spooner, "No Treason, The Constitution of No Authority" (1870) ... &Itemid=28

Note: giving this link is not an endorsement of the entirety of James Corbett's views, any of the obvious shilleries he engages in, or any particular spin he might try to put on Spooner

Any people out there calling themselves 'freedom fighters,' who are not familiar with every line of Spooner's book intimately are nothing but a joke.

If there are people out there who have problems reading for more than a couple of hours at a time due to years of attention-span-curtailing mass-media programming, I highly recommend listening to the audio version over and over again until these ideas become ingrained and second nature and the subtle virus of collectivist ends-justify-the-means-ism (which feeds on laziness, lack of strict principles and moral vagueness) can no longer take hold and corrupt from within :

Lysander Spooner- No Treason, The Constitution of No Authority - Audio File ... hority.mp3 ... oAuthority


Bachman Turner Overdrive - You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet

full link:

Don't stutter now, BTO, let it all out !! Tell us how you really feel !


Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by hoi.polloi » Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:00 am

Just because somebody was a plane-hugger in 2011 doesn't make them a plane-hugger today. Clint is very wise to media fakery these days. Just because he's not out there promoting the VICSIMS report yet (I am, but very few others that I know), doesn't make him or anyone else a shill automatically, genius. If you had to dismiss every truther out there based on plane-hugging or No-Planing alone, you'd run out of people very quickly. To tell you the truth, just that Detroit CAFR article alone is more of a contribution to the cause of truth and humanity in general than you'll probably make in 2 lifetimes of dedicated cry-babying and snitching.
Okay. You've blown it.

Being a racist bastard is one thing. Being a hypocrite is par for the humanity course. But endorsing and promoting people that certainly don't need promoting, rehashing old information and claiming you are helping out the truth by contacting your "few others" (Who are they anyway? More white supremacists like yourself?) is just too much.

You repeat old information, you insult the mods, users are embarrassed and ashamed of you.

But you call people "cry-babies"? Seriously? Who is going to be a pie-face and stupid-head next? You are ruining this board with your racism, your insults, your childishness and your ad hominem attacks that you claim we are using against you.

Well here's one more for the road; you may find it reassuring since it's true and it's apparently how you love depicting yourself. And this is only ad hominem in the sense that it names you as you are. You are a psychopathic (as opposed to empathic) personality that twists famous words in support of your views. You are a bigot. You are a white supremacist (something you have probably grown proud of). And you are not very intelligent to specifically attempt to provoke every single admin without repercussions.

As for your "help" promoting the Vicsim Report, what a laugh. That's really what you think? You're "helping" us? That's why anyone should value you and put up with your venom? That's what you really think you are contributing? Parading whatever thing you find and braiding it with your hate and antipathy towards others, instead of employing compassion, intelligence, critical thinking and reaching out to community?

Then you should have been banned long ago. Nobody needs you here. Least of all this forum dedicated to at least trying to make the world a better place. And for those who have re-questioned their world and re-discovered its beauty and lack of terrible things that the media has tried to convince us of, and because of Simon's work, your egotism and endorsement of the media doesn't seem to be helping anyone. In fact, you bring ugliness and spite where there was once beauty and joy. You rain on happiness and hope and optimism like a cartoonish villain who revels in making others miserable and insulting their ethnicity or identity and the things that make them the most beautiful and amazing. I am not sure why we've tolerated you for so long. I guess because of the way you painted yourself as someone that would contribute insulting truth rather than just insults.

But the ring of truth never came, and the insults are now polluting the board. I have got some cleaning up to do in your wake. You can be pleased with yourself, as someone who apparently enjoys making a mess of things, that janitorial duties are needed to deal with your smeared bullshit. You are a terrible cyber-house guest. You shame your fake name and the legacy of your world view and those who share it. Now excuse me but you will not be invited back. I am sure you are proud to be banned. Congratulations.

Posts: 853
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:01 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by bostonterrierowner » Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:09 am

Long live the reason ! Thank You Hoi :)

Posts: 2256
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by fbenario » Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:07 am

hoi.polloi wrote:As for your "help" promoting the Vicsim Report, what a laugh. That's really what you think? You're "helping" us? That's why anyone should value you and put up with your venom? That's what you really think you are contributing? Parading whatever thing you find and braiding it with your hate and antipathy towards others, instead of employing compassion, intelligence, critical thinking and reaching out to community?

Then you should have been banned long ago. Nobody needs you here. Least of all this forum dedicated to at least trying to make the world a better place. And for those who have re-questioned their world and re-discovered its beauty and lack of terrible things that the media has tried to convince us of, and because of Simon's work, your egotism and endorsement of the media doesn't seem to be helping anyone. In fact, you bring ugliness and spite where there was once beauty and joy. You rain on happiness and hope and optimism like a cartoonish villain who revels in making others miserable and insulting their ethnicity or identity and the things that make them the most beautiful and amazing. I am not sure why we've tolerated you for so long. I guess because of the way you painted yourself as someone that would contribute insulting truth rather than just insults.
Absolutely beautifully written, Hoi, you make the English language a joy to read.

Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by Flabbergasted » Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:32 am

Two-minute crash course in the essence of the banking industry.

full link:

Critical Mass
Posts: 544
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:33 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by Critical Mass » Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:06 pm

Good news if you're 'British'...

Government to 'retire' some of its WW1 debt
The Treasury plans to cut the annual cost of the debt by re-borrowing money at current market rates. It is the first such move for 67 years.
I imagine my Grandchildren might see the day we've stopped paying for WW1... then again perhaps not.
In addition to the war bonds, some of the debt being refinanced by the Treasury dates back to the 18th Century.

One of these bonds was issued by William Gladstone in 1853 to consolidate the capital stock of the South Sea Company, which was founded in 1711.

The South Sea Company collapsed during the South Sea Bubble financial crisis of 1720, leaving behind it a lot of debt.

Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by ICfreely » Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:47 pm

Mazel tov, it's a celebration bitches, L'Chaim
I wish for you a hundred years of success but it's my time
Cheers, toast to crime

--Jay Z

The only thing I have to say to people who think the POTUS runs the country is JIGGA PLEaZe! :puke:

Shylock, what say ye?

Greenspan Admits The Federal Reserve Is Above The Law & Answers To No One

full link:

Spoken like a true merchant of menace!

Isn’t it interesting that the loan shark’s enforcer (IR$) has the power to determine whether an organization is considered a church?

Watching an economic ‘increase/decrease taxes vs. government spending’ debate is as fruitful as watching a ‘creation vs. evolution’ debate. Why can’t these ‘geniuses’ figure out that it’s mathematically impossible to pay off the national debt?
The Money Myth Exploded by Louis Even
“The Money Myth Exploded” was one of the first articles of Louis Even, and remains one of the most popular to explain how money is created as a debt by private banks. It is available in the form of an 8-page leaflet (tabloid format) that you can order from the “Michael” office, in several languages: English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Polish, Portuguese.
Louis Even does a good job of explaining the problem. However, I'm not sure if he's covertly hyping 'carbon credits' under the guise of 'social credits.' Let's not forget that according to the P.L.E.Z. usury will eventually be terminated.

Posts: 1078
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by ICfreely » Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:06 am

Just to reiterate the fact that the BIG Bankstas run the $ho’ in da D to da C, here’s a clip of a young Gip' poppin’ $ome BIG ol’ $hiz’nit:

Ronald Reagan On The Holocaust Lie 1967

full link:

ADMIN NOTICE (simon): Funny, as I try watching the above video, a black screen appears - with this caption: "This video is not available in your country".

Luckily, I went to Youtube and found this other version:

And here’s a clip of the ol’ Gi(m)p’ actin’ like a li’l Pisa $chitt:

Speed It Up

full link:
Don Regan, then CEO Merrill [ :angry: ] Lynch [ :angry: ], White House Chief of $taff tells Ronald Reagan to '$peed it Up'.

D :angry: n Regan: $peed it up, you li’l bitch made jigga!
R :unsure: n Reagan: Whoa, Yes $ir Massa’ Don. I $hoah will!

Awe $chitt Ronnie, you got knocked da fuck out!

$ee me reign H3LL, at a $how just like that,
Even Denzel $ay "Damn, I ain't know it like that?"

May the best man win pot’na!

-T.I. "Big $hit Poppin' (Do It)"

Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:02 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by Apache » Thu Nov 26, 2015 1:22 pm

hoi.polloi wrote:The Bank is kind of an Earthly Religion.
The above is a great title for my posts, which I will do in parts so it doesn't get too large. Basically, I've been asked by Jumpy64 to do a post on money being created out of thin air so here are some extracts from my research. I apologise if any of this has already been covered elsewhere on CF. ... 1914001070
International Review of Financial Analysis 36 (2014) 1–19

Can banks individually create money out of nothing? — The theories and the empirical evidence
Richard A. Werner
Centre for Banking, Finance and Sustainable Development, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

It was examined whether in the process of making money available to the borrower the bank transfers these funds from other accounts (within or outside the bank). In the process of making loaned money available in the borrower's bank account, it was found that the bank did not transfer the money away from other internal or external accounts, resulting in a rejection of both the fractional reserve theory and the financial intermediation theory. Instead, it was found that the bank newly ‘invented’ the funds by crediting the borrower's account with a deposit, although no such deposit had taken place. This is in line with the claims of the credit creation theory.
Thus it can now be said with confidence for the first time – possibly in the 5000 years' history of banking - that it has been empirically demonstrated that each individual bank creates credit and money out of nothing, when it extends what is called a ‘bank loan’. The bank does not loan any existing money, but instead creates new money. The money supply is created as ‘fairy dust’ produced by the banks out of thin air.32
Cool, an academic empirical test that money is created out of nothing by banks :)

A "mortgage" is literally translated as "death pledge".
The word mortgage is derived from a "Law French" term used by English lawyers in the Middle Ages meaning "death pledge", and refers to the pledge ending (dying) when either the obligation is fulfilled or the property is taken through foreclosure.[1]
I think "death pledge" is fairly apt for something people are tied to for 30 years or more. Essentially, the creation of the bank loan is contingent on the borrower's signature. The borrower gives the bank permission to create a loan out of nothing and the borrower then pays back the money he created plus interest for the next 30 years or so with his sweat and his labour. If the borrower defaults on the "created out of nothing" loan the bank has lost nothing, repossessing houses and selling them off during pre-created banking "bust" cycles as a disenfranchisement exercise.

Origins of money/credit creation - temple priests.
For example, the oldest coin currency that we know is a Sumerian bronze piece dating from before 3000 BC. On one side of the coin is a representation of a sheaf of wheat, and on the other, Ishtar, the goddess of fertility.

The Sumerians called it the "Shekel" where "She" meant wheat, "Kel" was a measurement similar to a bushel, hence this coin was a symbol of a value of one bushel of wheat. (The word "shekel" survives in modern Hebrew as Israel's monetary unit.) The original shekel had as its purpose payment for sacred prostitution at the temple of Ishtar, which was the temple of life and death. The temple, as well as being a ritual center, was the storage place for the reserves of wheat that supported the priesthood, and also the community in lean times. So farmers fulfilled their religious and social obligations by bringing their contributions of wheat to the temple, and receiving in exchange a shekel coin, entitling them to a visit with the temple prostitutes at the festival time. All this also must be understood in its cultural context: The sacred prostitutes were representatives of the goddess, and intercourse with them was intercourse with the goddess of fertility herself, nothing to take lightly. At that time fertility was truly a matter of life and death. If the crops failed, there was no alternative, and everyone starved or at least went hungry until next year. And, of course, completing the magic ritual properly insured the fertility in crops, animals and children that was necessary for future prosperity.

The shekel is by no means atypical: Throughout history, virtually every society has conferred some mysterious sacred qualities on its currency. Two thousand years after the Sumerian shekel, the first Greek coins were tokens proving that a citizen had paid his dues and could thus participate in the annual "hecatomb" or sacred meal to be shared with the Deities (where half of all victuals were burned in their honor). The English word "money" derives from the Goddess Juno Moneta and the first Roman mint was in the basement of her temple.
The mint may have been in the basement of Juno's temple, but the wealth of Rome itself was kept in the Temple of Saturn, bearer of the wheat sheaf.
Until very recently, it was still the fashion to design banks to look like temples, and reverence lingers inside them: Central bankers, in particular, shroud their doings in priestly secrecy, while a hearing of the Chair of the Federal Reserve in the U.S. Congress has just as much ritual and studied ambiguity as the Eleusinian mysteries of ancient Greece. As William Greider puts it in his well-named bestselling book on the Federal Reserve Secrets of the Temple: "Like the temple, the Fed did not answer to the people, it spoke for them. Its decrees were cast in a mysterious language people could not understand, but its voice, they knew, was powerful and important."
Excerpted from Bernard Lietar's The Future of Money: Beyond Greed and Scarcity Toward a Sustainable Capitalism ©1997.

Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:02 am

Re: The Banks' War Against Us

Unread post by Apache » Thu Nov 26, 2015 1:44 pm

Part 2
Speaking about the early civilizations in the Mesopotamia basin and their transition to urban culture, Erkanal highlighted economic development in the region 5,000 years ago and said the monetary unit was discovered at that time by Sumerians, leading to the Lydians producing coins later on.

“Economic development 5,000 years ago led to the construction of big structures like a ‘winter palace’ as a result of the trade of production surplus, and money was used for the first time. The first materials used in producing money were rings made of gold, silver and other metals. These were developed and turned into bullions made of the same materials. This was the first monetary unit discovered by Sumerians, and the Lydians also went on to print money and produce coins,” he said.

Money was not in coin form at that time [3,000 BC], although words like minas and shekels — used in connection with coinage and perhaps familiar from the Bible — were applied to the weights of the ancient Mesopotamian form of money. For instance:” The average well to do woman wore golden earrings (sometimes large) and silver rings on the arms and the feet. Those silver rings have a standard weight (5 shekels…) identical with standard fractions of the bride price, and it is possible that the rings actually represented the price paid.
“Women in Mesopotamia,” by M. Stol Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 38, No. 2, Women’s History (1995), pp. 123-144. (Qtd from Fast Facts About Mesopotamia)
1. Saturn was the god of agriculture in ancient times.
2. Most images of Saturn depict the god holding a wheatsheaf.
3. Most images of Saturn depict the god riding a chariot.
The Temple of Saturn housed the state treasury and was the administrative headquarters of the quaestors, the public officials whose duties included the oversight of the mint. It was among the oldest cult sites in Rome – and was the location of an ancient altar before the first temple was built in 497 BCE.
No link for the next quote but it is generally known:
In ancient Hebrew, Saturn is called 'Shabbathai'. Its angel is Cassiel. Its intelligence or beneficial spirit is Agiel (layga) and its spirit (darker aspect) is Zazel (lzaz). In Ottoman Turkish, Urdu and Malay, its name is 'Zuhal', derived from Arabic زحل.
The body of every thing was likened to a rock, trued either into a cube or more ornately chiseled to form a pedestal, while the spirit of everything was likened to the elaborately carved figure surmounting it. Accordingly, altars were erected as a symbol of the lower world, and fires were kept burning upon them to represent that spiritual essence illuminating the body it surmounted. The square is actually one surface of a cube, its corresponding figure in plane geometry, and its proper philosophic symbol. Consequently, when considering the earth as an element and not as a body, the Greeks, Brahmins, and Egyptians always referred to its four corners, although they were fully aware that the planet itself was a sphere.
Traditional Meaning: Limitation, restriction, discipline. Time as Chronos, father of Aether, Eros and the Hours. Sorrow and hardships. Father. Malefic. Modern: Form as definition, focalization, differentiation, personal identity.

Formative Meaning: 2/Bayt forms Shabatai, responsible for the containers of cosmic life on all levels of abstraction. Under the impact of the cosmic breath (Sheen) Shabatai builds a container (Bayt) to serve as the Tabernacle (Tav) of cosmic Aleph in existence (Yod). The life of all containers, from body to consciousness. Depth of Above/Otherness in the Cube of Space. Higher goals and aspirations. Duality: Hhaim-Mot (alive-dead) in Ghedi/Deli (Capricorn/Aquarius) -- a new birth or the death of structures.

Shabatai (Saturn) is formed by Vayt-Bayt on the upper surface of the cube and thus graces us with the blessing of the Sabbath.

Black Cube is a private intelligence agency, which operates out of London and Tel Aviv, and is the trading name of BC Strategy Ltd. The company was founded in 2010 by former Israeli intelligence officers Dan Zorella and Avi Yanus and draws its manpower from elite and secretive Israeli intelligence units. The company’s personnel are known to maintain close ties to the Israeli government and intelligence agencies.
Sabbatai Zevi (שַׁבְּתַי צְבִי Shabbetai Tzvi, other spellings include Sabbatai Ẓevi, Shabbetai Ẓevi, Sabbatai Sevi, and Sabetay Sevi in Turkish) (August 1, 1626 – c. September 17, 1676) was a Sephardic Rabbi and kabbalist who claimed to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. He was the founder of the Jewish Sabbatean movement. His name literally meant the planet Saturn, and in Jewish tradition "The reign of Sabbatai" (The highest planet) was often linked to the advent of the Messiah.
Alexander S. Holub, Ph.D:
The term Kabbalah traditionally has been used to represent the esoteric teachings of Judaism and Jewish mysticism. The first time that the teachings were referred to as “kabbalah” was in the 13th century of this current era when Eleazer of Worms used the term in his writings about the angelic and Divine Names which were used in magic. Prior to that time the term “kabbalah” was used in the Talmud and post-Talmudic literature to denote the Oral Law.

For the mystical aspects of Judaism, the expression Kabbalah is only one of the many terms used. The Talmud itself speaks of Sitri ha-Torah and Razel ha-Torah (Secrets of the Torah) and a secret tradition called Ma’aseh ha-Merkabah (The Work of the Chariot).
Astrological Saturn has always been associated with the letter of the law and Gnostics and Kabbalists have identified Saturn with the god of Early Scripture, whom they regarded as a tyrannical father, obsessed with rigid enforcement of the law. There is a symbolic link between Saturn and the God of Early Scripture through the use of Saturday. Saturn's Day, the seventh day of Scripture, the holy day of rest.
From the "Jewish Daily Forward" The Sabbath Planet By Philologos Published January 05, 2007, issue of January 05, 2007:
A second bit of evidence, also cited by Ben-Yehuda, comes from Tacitus, a Roman historian. Writing in the late first or early second century C.E., Tacitus tells us that the Jews rest every seventh day, and let the earth lie fallow every seventh year, in honor of Saturn, the seventh and highest of the heavenly bodies. Although he does not say that the Jews worship Saturn, Tacitus does state that it is considered by them to be the planet with the most powerful influence on human life.
I make no claims about the association between temples, priests, money, prostitution, Saturn, the black cube, and the Jewish Kabbalah. Correlation is not causation, and I only show the interesting journey that my research took me on.

My next post is about Barclays Bank, where a non-Jewish family made their fortune in the credit industry, but which oddly enough loops back around to good ole Saturn again. ;)

Post Reply