If you really are interested in exposing media fakery, I recommend familiarizing yourself more with the research on this forum, especially regarding 9/11. Do this before participating in the discussion.Schpankme wrote:Exposing Media Fakery!
Yes, I would like to be more involved with this subject. I'm not an expert when it comes to video or photography, that's what drew my attention to SEPTEMBER CLUES and eventually this forum.
I knew on 9/11 that the buildings were demo'd, not by watching the Planes, but by production of the White Billowing smoke, and seeing the buildings facade thrown in all directions.
As to who I am? I'm always the skeptic and know that almost everything seen on TV or the MOVIES has been planned.
If there's one thing I'd liked to accomplish, that would be to get people from disposing of FICTION with FICTION.
Example: if you know Nuclear Fission is a hoax, STOP claiming that because the chain reaction is "induced by a neutrons", the reaction would continue to build, etc. etc.; and that is why Nuclear Fission is a Hoax. WHY? - because words-of-art like NEUTRONS - are simply a figment of Physics/CERN imagination. "There will be no end for Particle Physics to invent words and the funding required to investigate."
Your mention of "White Billowing smoke" tells me that you, alas, hold the videos of the collapse as real. Those videos are forgeries. As explained and demonstrated on our forum a zillion times, all the imagery of 9/11 was faked. Hence it is absolutely pointless to draw conclusion about the events from those images.
The towers were very likely demolished with a very standard demolition that, simply put, no common citizen was allowed to witness and document.
Once again, familiarize yourself with the research, because nobody here is going to be patient with a member who will ignore our accomplishments and will, voluntarily or not, hold us back.
As to your second point about the nuclear hoax I tend to agree for one reason: I am not a physicist and I will not pretend to be one. I cannot judge on the veracity of any physics demonstration or explanation nor will try to make use of it. Personally my observations and opinions about the nuke hoax have absolutely nothing to do with the science behind it, and everything to do with the faked imagery. As you see once again media fakery is at the center of the discourse for good reasons.
As to this paragraph of yours in response to fbenario:
These words make little to no sense; you are making no effort to be clear and approachable, but rather are trying to give yourself importance by being mysterious and by suggesting some greater knowledge that you will share in time. We have seen this tactic being used a zillion times and it gets old very quickly.All FICTIONS are spelled with capital letters; that's why your name on your DRIVERS License and all legal documents use all Capital Letters (you are treated as a LEGAL PERSON, not Flesh & Blood). Of course you had no idea that the words written tell a story for those in the know. Do you understand (Stand Under) toddler?
You are also trying to pick a fight or be a bully with other members and this will simply not do. You are merely a prospective member on very thin ice.
)
