I am primarily a researcher and am happy to have found this site.
Computer scientist, 20 years experience all size companies, engineering and business environments.
Belief: Anyone can learn anything with sufficient motivation and effort.
Why I belong here: Research is great, but at certain times contributing is warranted.
Approach: The glass is neither half full nor half empty, someone has discarded it for an undisclosed reason. Knowing the reason has everything to do with determining whether the liquid in the glass is an additive, a byproduct, or a side effect.
sink.critically wrote:I am primarily a researcher and am happy to have found this site.
Computer scientist, 20 years experience all size companies, engineering and business environments.
Belief: Anyone can learn anything with sufficient motivation and effort.
Why I belong here: Research is great, but at certain times contributing is warranted.
Approach: The glass is neither half full nor half empty, someone has discarded it for an undisclosed reason. Knowing the reason has everything to do with determining whether the liquid in the glass is an additive, a byproduct, or a side effect.
We would appreciate it if you could be less ambiguous about your reasons and motives for registering here.
sink.critically wrote:I am primarily a researcher and am happy to have found this site.
Computer scientist, 20 years experience all size companies, engineering and business environments.
Belief: Anyone can learn anything with sufficient motivation and effort.
Why I belong here: Research is great, but at certain times contributing is warranted.
Approach: The glass is neither half full nor half empty, someone has discarded it for an undisclosed reason. Knowing the reason has everything to do with determining whether the liquid in the glass is an additive, a byproduct, or a side effect.
We would appreciate it if you could be less ambiguous about your reasons and motives for registering here.
No problem. I was researching the origin of the recent mars photos and a search turned up this site. As you probably already know the body of analysis on these photos from a scientific standpoint is fairly sparse (so far), and I found the discussion here helpful.
As a person with technical experience, I am extremely skeptical of any claims that expensive equipment was sent out of conventional transmission range without a completed and thoroughly tested installation of software, firmware, and hardware. Unless it was intended to fail in the field as part of an initial plan.
On another note, I have personal knowledge of a fire fighter who went missing on 9/11. I do not draw any final conclusions about his exact circumstances, but his family is receiving his death benefits.
I registered here to participate in the process of questioning, researching, and discussing mass media (dis)information. I may be a little rusty with proving and/or supporting my views (having been doing this research on my own for years), but I respect the standard you set.
Maat wrote:
Yes, and I'd also like to know how he can say this:
sink.critically wrote:...but his family is receiving his death benefits.
— unless he also claims to have personally witnessed the "death benefits" cheques the alleged family receives?
Perhaps he is issuing those cheques himself?
Seriously now, "sink.critically": Do you expect to be welcome here after claiming you know about a firefighter who died on 9/11 WITHOUT EVEN DEIGNING TO NAME HIS NAME? This crap only happens on Youtube, for chrissakes... Your membership here will be extremely short-lived if you don't make a major effort to convince us of your sincerity and legitimacy.
sink.critically wrote:Perhaps then I don't belong here after all. I come from a long line of nypd/nyfd civil servants and I'm blood related to the person in question.
I have to draw the line at disclosing information that would lead back to me personally.
I am going back to researching on my own. Thanks for the analysis of the mars photos.
Lol.
So what exactly do you fear - by naming a blood-related firefighter who supposedly died on 9/11?
If that really happened - what on Earth would you be worried about?
sink.critically wrote:Perhaps then I don't belong here after all. I come from a long line of nypd/nyfd civil servants and I'm blood related to the person in question.
I have to draw the line at disclosing information that would lead back to me personally.
I am going back to researching on my own. Thanks for the analysis of the mars photos.
Lol.
So what exactly do you fear - by naming a blood-related firefighter who supposedly died on 9/11?
If that really happened - what on Earth would you be worried about?
Yeah, that'd only make sense if he bumped off some 'blood relative' himself!
whatsgoingon wrote:Boy, these people are crazy. They really hope they can make a complete lie real with this type of testimony. I get a belly laugh though each day and I swear to my wife that these crazy attempts to make legit the claims of 9/11 are worth it in entertainment value alone. Don't TBTP realize that trying so hard makes those on the forum that work on this realize they are actually onto something?
Correct me if I am wrong. Why on earth do these people bother at all?
Good question, Whatsgoin'! Believe it or not it is all ego (totally irrational). I wouldn't even credit 'TPTB' with "useful idiot" failures like this one — probably just another roaming wanker/troll. They really do get so caught up in their delusions of adequacy behind a computer screen that they actually believe they can bamboozle anyone with attitude and bullshit. The irony is that they only confirm our findings every time they pull this stupid stunt!
sink.critically wrote:Perhaps then I don't belong here after all. I come from a long line of nypd/nyfd civil servants and I'm blood related to the person in question.
I have to draw the line at disclosing information that would lead back to me personally.
I am going back to researching on my own. Thanks for the analysis of the mars photos.
No you dont, you come from a long line of liars!
You are worried about being recognised as being blood-related to a "victim of nineeleven"? Hahaha!
I'm an older (not quite retirement) Yank. I've been schooled... a lot.
I believe the US is on the cusp of another civil war. The coming war, properly defined, is between the general populaton and those whom consider themsleves Jews. The so-called elites would be nothing without the rank & file support of common Jews (see sayanim). There is no such thing as an innocent Jew, unless you're talking about someone who is very young or imbicilic. Every Jew understands the evil double standards taught in his Talmud. Every Jew knows he is a religious psychopath, yet he remains proud to call himself a Jew. There is a push to frame the conflict in terms of police, Blacks, Whites, Asians, gun owners, Christians or Muslims. Those are diversions.
Most gun owners believe they can win a conflict by professing to shoot whomever comes through their front door. They take this position because they believe it is legally correct. This fatal falacy is obvious. You cannot make war on a government on their terms. It must be a guerrilla war fought on your own personal terms. It is a war of perception and propaganda. As the enemy has never been shy to murder our natural leaders (John Lennon, Gary Webb), it is essential that we remove large numbers of their leaders. The enemy includes members of the CFR, TLC, Bilderburgers, Neocons, FBI, CIA, NSA, Mossad, M15, M16, FEMA, Federal Reserve, Congress, Department of the Treasury, Main Stream Media and Federal judges. Special extra points for Carl Rove and Rahm Emanuel. Hard targets should include all FEMA camps, the new multi-million square foot NSA building in Salt Lake and the Las Vegas AFB (where drone joystick pilots ply their trade). That's my introduction.
Last edited by Hugo on Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.