REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

How to register at Cluesforum / General administrative topics / and things that every member must read

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby SimSimon on Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:26 am

fbenario wrote:
SimSimon wrote:Hi Forum

You know, choosing the username SimSimon on this forum, of all places, strikes me as a not-so-subtle insult to all of our efforts. You must not be looking to be taken very seriously. Good-bye.

I didn't know a shortened username would be an insult to all your efforts. I just made up one on the spot and if you think it inappropriate I could always have it changed. I never did anybody any harm with my old YouTube channel; in fact I think I promoted tv fakery more than most. I also stuck it to the fake 911 truthers like Alex Jones and crew. I think a bit of a laugh is healthy and to not take things to much to heart. I've taken a lot of stick myself and have given back some. I just wanted to move along TV fakery because its a little lost at the moment except for this fine forum its going nowhere fast.
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:33 am

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby on Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:39 am

batshit !!!
love yr 911Crastings things... how else could we weigh up...
Last edited by on Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby on Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:28 am

batshit... what was that very 1st Crasting upload you put here last time you were 'debunking SeptClues' ?
i cant find it. i think it was 'from a chopper', and it looked like a horizontal split-screen with a white van
going along, but also had some 'real bird', in 'realistic' swooping-style... it looked like the bird had been
added as a direct answer to Simon's 'Some Birds' 9/11 video. I would love to see that 1 again, if you can
provide the link to that exact same very 1st '911Crasting' youtube upload 'video'...
* really lookin' forward to seeing your personal TVFakery findings, you gonna share them here, right ? *
* & what was the 'turning point', the 'eureka' moment; made you crossover from 'the dark side' ? *
Last edited by on Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:42 am

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby pshea38 on Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:20 pm

hello everyone,

i am a 38 year old man from ireland.
i am a mechanical engineer by qualification. i am not working presently.
i have only been looking into 9/11 for about 4 months, previously unquestioningly accepting
the official version of events. i have worked my way through the usual suspects (avery, jones, khalezov etc.)
and landed at septemberclues door over one month ago.
i am in the process of going through everything that has been written but am
very much convinced by the truths unveiled here.
i am not sure how much help i can be research-wise. i did write a thread on ATS pointing out
the numerous similarities between 9/11 victim andrew brunn and tuscan shooter jared loughner.
it didn't go down too well so i gave up on the idea. having just read the thread here regarding the
psy-op that was the tuscan shootings though, i might have a rethink.
i will try to promote the brilliant work done by contributors here where-ever i can.
it is a trying time in ireland at the moment and most people, being pre-occupied with
the basics, do not have an ear to lend to these topics. i tried to explain the nature and
extent of the fakery exposed here (9/11, 7/7, mumbai, madrid, gulf spill, moon-landings etc.) to
the mother of my child but she threatened to call in social services and restrict me access, and
implored me to seek immediate help for serious mental health problems. i don't blame her
much though. it is alot to take in. i will try to re-educate my 8 year old son bit by bit.
it is his future at stake.
as is probably a common experience here, everything i thought i knew has been overturned
and a completely different vision of the world has been burned into my brain.
i still have a few unresolved questions about 9/11, e.g. what of the 1000+ first responders
reported to have died since? are they vicsims also? but i am sure, as i get through
more materials here, the less questions i will have.
i am very grateful to all here for opening up my weary eyes. thank you.
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:40 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby brianv on Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:29 pm ... -are-dead/

"Nine hundred 9-11 heroes have died since the 2001 terrorist attacks."

Yep, socialism for the rich in action! Another 4 Billion of tax-payers money to fund fake political parties and fake attorneys to take out more fake claims for fake dead people!! Great scam!
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby hoi.polloi on Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:51 pm

Gross. And that danged Red Cross is up to their ears in this too. The same Red Cross that investigated radiation effects in Hiroshima and is a notoriously corrupt organization.

Elisa Mizerany, Red Cross volunteer at Ground Zero, urges Tennessee senators to pass Zadroga

Well they chose an appropriate character to get their message across. Is her name close enough to 'misery' for us all? Blech, I am surprised people cannot see through this. I guess cash signs pop up in their eyes and it doesn't matter if it's true or not. They think, "Maybe one day if I become a victim of a [fictional] terror attack, I can get compensation too! We'd better support this!"
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby brianv on Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:27 pm

"Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, Elisa Mizerany traveled from Tennessee to New York as a Red Cross volunteer. She worked from October to January processing victim claims at the old AT&T building on Church St. - a few blocks from Ground Zero. The desks and phones in the office had coats of white dust that had to be cleaned several times a day. Workers had no idea they were breathing in toxic dust."


Image ... _bill.html
Posts: 3959
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby simonshack on Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:59 pm

SimSimon wrote:
I didn't know a shortened username would be an insult to all your efforts.
I think a bit of a laugh is healthy and to not take things to much to heart.

Crasting - my poor darling,

so much to learn.... I guess your e-mail address (vicsimSimon@......) is - that too - just a funny joke, eh?

Posts: 6599
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby hoi.polloi on Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:36 pm

We don't need confuserators to come here and 'lighten the mood'. We have our own sense of humor thanks. Better if new folks can contribute something useful to the compiled research of fakery instead. :P

Nice spot, brianv. As I talked about in another thread, AT&T was a notorious CIA interest for having a monopoly on communications and some good people who tried to force anti-trust laws actually got them (temporarily) disorderly. Since then, AT&T and every other communications company for that matter, has been aggressively controlled by the interests who were bitter over the break-up and that neoliberal culture seems to have had a heavy hand in the terror spoof of the last decade. You got any little bit of power? Their MITRE/RAND goons will come in and buy the place or send in board members until it's infiltrated.

Thanks to the paranoids in the CIA and FBI, "corporation" on any major level is a failed legal entity that is now synonymous with "gang" and we need new language to come up with something better.
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:24 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby warriorhun on Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:07 pm

Dear pshea38,

Welcome. I found the Andrew Brunn-Jared Loughner picture case interesting. There are people here who are much more expert on this than me, but I dare to guess maybe the two pictures were generated by the same program.

Now you are older than me, so please forget my impertinence to mouth into your business, but I wanted to tell you two things:

1. Women want us to go hunting in the morning, and on our return with the meat of the Mammut we have slain, to make love to them.
They want us to rule the world, and make it a safe place to them and their offspring.
So, telling your woman you do not rule the world and it is indeed a scary place (there is not much you can do against Media manipulation, unless you apply a 9 pound ballhammer to her TV, and even that can be misinterpreted and may have an adverse effect :D , especially if she bought it with her credit-card ) of course results in a very negative reaction on her part.
The women of the Vikings were not interested what psychological tricks the knights used against their men to defeat them: they only cared about them getting back alive, preferably with booty. They wish the same today, irrespective of if the world is built on media fakery or not.
Also, women are especially targeted in today's media manipulations, and with success. They bought into feminism, into emancipation, and buying into that newfangled gender ideology shit too. Young white women are targeted by media to prefer black men as partners, who are pictured as more manly and the white men as weaklings: just watch a few movies or videoclips. And this is not my "personal racism": I have nothing against race-mixing as personal preference, but I am violently against race-mixing propaganda influencing the personal preference of young minds. All these are designed to fuck up the men-women relations, men-women sexuality, and the women's lives especially.
And make no mistake: to put the world to rights is a men's job, our job. The crazy behaviour of the modern woman is her begging: be men, put the world to rights, and behave as men with us and treat us as women.
So, stopping the media fakery (and monetary system, etc...) which makes other men rule over us, to put the world to rights is our job, a men's job.

2. The people awakened to truth used to be angry with those who remain asleep, they feel they are stupid, some even call them "sheeple". Dead wrong. Tell me: if you see a dead rat in a trap, is it the rat's fault? Make no mistake, the trap is set up with the poisoned cheese because the trapper knows how exactly the rat's mind works. The media trap is set up based on how exactly the human mind works. So calling people "sheeple" just because their mind works as it supposed to work? Dead wrong. An example: adults are building up the popular youth culture, using the media mostly, which is pushing promiscuity and drug use based on how the young mind works, and then adults are scorning the targeted youth for being promiscuous and using drugs?
The good news is, the old rats if they see the cheese, they let the young ones to eat first and they eat a day later if they see those who fed first are alive, and if the others are dead, they won't touch it. Same with humans: we are capable of learning, of investigating and understanding what is happening, and not falling into the traps which are proven disastous to others. We are the old rats, it is us. And it is the old rats' genes which will survive on the long run, not those rats' genes who have been poisoned by the traps, the faked reality. :D
Posts: 514
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:26 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby pshea38 on Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:48 am

to brianv,
thank you for the links.
it is hard for a newcomer to the subject like me to get my mind around the
true extents and enormity of scale of this huge con on humanity.
there are few limits it seems to this audacity.

'Turning and turning in the widening gyre
the falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world....' the second coming... yeats

to warriorhun,
thank you for your insights.
it is clear that if we are to survive that we must adapt,
but adapt to what is the question. to a known falsity, a contrived way of life?
where are lifes goalposts?
as you say, the trappers know their business well.
i guess we are outside looking in at the people inside who don't or
won't or can't take the time to look out.
do we discard our emotional aspects for the sake of survival and endurance?
'unto thine own self be true' may not get us as far as once believed.
but life is not worth surviving under certain circumstances.
divide a modern man emotionally to divide the man.
take away the mans power over his woman and children,
not in the old domineering sense but in the natural sense.
that is the name of their game.
and the game goes on.

Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:40 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby simonshack on Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:18 pm

joey wrote:Hello everyone,

My name is Joey and I live in Las Vegas, NV USA. I've been a long time observer of this forum and this is my first post. I must say, I have been highly impressed with the research done here by many contributors. Hopefully I will be able to contribute in a meaningful way.
Glad to be here,

Welcome on board Joey - it was a pleasure talking with you last night. I just want to say that hearing personal experiences such as yours fills me with hope. The apparent ease with which you have formed your understanding of the sordid 9/11 affair (and other world matters) is encouraging, in my view, and makes my longing of seeing some 'chain-reaction awakening' seem less utopian... :)
Posts: 6599
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby disinpho on Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:16 pm


I'm 28, studying to become an architect and live and work in Denmark. Watching Simon's movie was a real eye-opener and directed my attention to the daily 'news' and how a few large corporations have monopolized information.

I've gone very deep into the rabbit hole, reading a ton about the history of manipulation, the Tavistock Institute and of earlier media manipulated events (JFK (theres alot of new research on the fake Zapruder film), Lucitania, etc.) and also studied the history of the Jesuits and freemasonry as the members of these two organization permeate all of politics and intelligence.

I try to keep my feed solidly planted on the ground tho, and try to rely on sound logic and the scientific method. I do however still enjoy the fantastic stories of shills and manipulators, because alot of information can be ascertained by simply looking at what they put the most effort into concealing.

I hope Ill be able to contribute eventually,

Best regards,
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby Matt on Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:28 am

I spent a lot of time looking into the no planes theory. It was fascinating, but plane debris, swaying tower, DNA, and witnesses added up. The videos I once found suspicious were in poor quality, and seemingly sparse. About my site, bandwidth isn't a problem because YouTube hosts many of my videos.
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:44 am

Re: REQUIRED: Introduce Yourself

Postby Equinox on Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:38 am

Matt wrote:I spent a lot of time looking into the no planes theory. It was fascinating, but plane debris, swaying tower, DNA, and witnesses added up. The videos I once found suspicious were in poor quality, and seemingly sparse. About my site, bandwidth isn't a problem because YouTube hosts many of my videos.

Hello matt! and welcome to the forum, :)
I am familiar with your website and it is put together very well.It is very handy... and as you can see I often resource from it. I would love to hear your views on the below post.
I insist that there was TV Fakery 100% being used on 9/11, I have been studying this hypothesis for quite some time now. Well I have been promoting this one single bit of evidence of TV fakery on the internet for quite some time now. And would love to hear your views on it. I and many others are convinced by this overwhelming proof. And no one has ever debunked it... (I believe it can’t) I will now present...

(some quotes from simonshack)
Final approach of UA 175 as was seen on the TV networks.

-16sec to -15sec: "DIVEBOMBER"(cbs)

-15sec to -7sec: "THE BALL"(nbc)

-6sec to -4sec: "THE WINGTIP"(cbs)

-3sec to 0sec: "INTERNATIONAL SHOT"(ABC)


This truly hits the nail on the head in regards to TV fakery being used on 9/11, Sometimes it isn’t easy for people to understand first go. I will try and explain it a bit.

A Flip book where an animation is on each page, and as you flick through each page quickly the animation has changed its position slightly, and is continuing its course through a motion. Thus when you flip through the book fast it shows a sequence of a moving animation.


Picture, that all 4 live channels... cbs, nbc, cbs (2nd angle), and abc. Are a page in the flip book and the motions are UA175 final approach.

1--So what happens is that on CBS out of the corner of the screen the plane appears, and disappears behind smoke, never to be seen again on that live shot.........

2--.....Amazingly within a second it appears on the NBC shot... same again appears out of the corner of the screen and disappears behind smoke never to be seen again in that shot.....

3--.....Uncannily after it is gone from the NBC shot it appears on the CBS 2nd camera angle shot coming out of the screen and yet again disappears behind the smoke.....

4--......And yet Finally for fourth and final time with in microseconds it appears on the ABC shot, again out of the corner of the screen and disappears not into smoke this time, as it the final approach.. It then disappears into the trade centre.


"This is the 16-second sequence of the "second airplane approach" These four clips are the ONLY LIVE IMAGES (of the alleged "Flight 175") still to be found on the official 9/11 TV archives. I have put them together sequentially to highlight this 'curious coincidence': Is it plausible that 4 cameramen just happened to film a 'slice' of the full airplane approach, all 4 'slices' then combining into a seamless, full 'airplane approach sequence'? Or is this - more plausibly perhaps - a prefabricated sequence of computer-animated imagery? "


"Yes, you better believe it...This is what what was shown on the US TV NETWORKS on 9/11: a ludicrous, pre-fabricated animation simulating 4 cameras capturing the approach of "FLIGHT175". None of the 4 shots overlapping - as if 4 cameramen had been apportioned with their very own slice of time to film the event !
Moreover, consider this: ALL 4 segments showing the "plane approach" are not only perfectly sequential, but each one of them also features the same "now-you-see-me-now-you-don't" dynamics: PLANE ENTERS FROM EDGE OF SCREEN / THEN DISAPPEARS BEHIND EITHER SMOKE OR THE WTC."

"In the real world, the odds for this sequence to occur are, of course, astronomically remote. Much as the endless string of bizarre 'coincidences' pushed by the official 9/11 storyline, this extraordinary occurrence challenges our very limits of credulity.

Indeed, these 4 seamless "plane-shots" never overlap each other, as if each of the 4 "cameramen" were assigned to capture only their own, exclusive chunk of the "plane-approach" ! Now, what are the odds of THAT occurring in the real world? More likely, what I call the "16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE was a prefabricated animation, cut in 4 pieces and distributed on the various phony TV broadcasts."


So how did they execute... this piece of TV fakery…?

The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades reported a seismic spike at 9:02.54.

- The official timeline (released by the media and the FAA) claims that "FLIGHT 175" hit WTC2 at 9:03.11.

"There is a seemingly inexplicable 17-second discrepancy between these two timelines. Now, let's assume the seismic Observatory's timeline is the more credible one (as they recorded underground explosions of the WTC demolition job). This would mean that, for some reason, the official version had to lie by a margin of 17 seconds. "

They had 17 second audio cue which can be heard on all the networks… “BEEP BEEP”

Why? Why 17 seconds????

"Because they had a (pre-fabricated) 16-second "plane-approach" video animation ready to be aired on TV (from their centralized 9/11 studio). "(Which I interpreted as a "GO!" signal), precisely 17 seconds before "FLIGHT175" is seen impacting on TV. This common, synchronized audio signal heard on all networks would support the contention that all the 9/11 broadcasts were managed in the same studio. So, again - why do we hear it 17 seconds before the televised explosion? I propose the following explanation to this occurrence:

The "GO!" signal was given to the central TV studio producer at 9:02.54 (as the WTC explosions went off) to make him launch the pre-fabricated video sequence illustrated in the animated gif below(THE MAGIG 16-SECOND SEQUENCE). This was most likely an obligatory safety measure (imagine if something went wrong with the explosives, and the TV 'planecrash' sequence was aired on TV without the WTC exploding in reality!) So, as the explosives went off in WTC2, a signal was given to launch the 16-second "plane-approach" sequence. Of course, this meant that the televised explosion was in fact, aired (give or take) 16/or 17 seconds after the real WTC explosion. This is why the official version had to go with the (fake) 9:03.11 explosion timeline.(in order to match with any recorded world clock data, etc...)"

The beep/beep is heard on the ABC Network loud and clear… If you go to the TV ARCHIVES…..

And listen to it. For yourself… there is also… sound cues heard on all of the other channels as well.

Here is the Beep Beep being heard on ABC TV 17 seconds Before the Explosion in the nth tower….



"The central TV studio had to be connected through a real time audio feed with the WTC demolition crew. Of course, the prefabricated 16-second sequence could not be aired LIVE before/or after the WTC demolition charges actually went off. Realistically, the risk of any kind of last-minute hitch/problem/delay with the WTC 'fireworks' had to be accounted for and their precise timeline could not have been pre-programmed into the prefabricated 'live morning broadcasts' part of the TV studio was to send that 16-second sequence as soon as the GO! Signal arrived from the demolition crew."

As proven with the verifiable seismic survey readings, and the 9/11 TV archives.

* Explosion, in the nth tower @ 9:02.54

* Demolition crew send audio cue (beep, beep,) through to central TV studio desk @ to start 16 second animation. @ 9:02.54

* TV animation crew start 16 second animation sequence @ 9:02.55

* Last approach of plane animation strikes tower on ABC @ 9:03.11.

* Official story always states the impact was @ 9:03.11.

The real smoking gun of 9/11 has just been proven with the

:) :) :)
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am


Return to HOW TO REGISTER at CLUESFORUM - and other tips

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests