Is there evidence that lower Manhattan was cordoned off before the buildings were hit? Are you saying no one was in the towers or other WTC buildings? Are you also saying there were no rescue personnel on site when they collapsed? You haven't found one real victim in your research?
Yes, there is as much evidence, so to speak, as there is that the media was "in the know" about exactly what they were supposed to say, which means they were under some kind of "top down" order (e.g.; military) to spread a story that glued reality to the simulation.
So we must ask, what is a reasonable faked story that people on the street could not find contradiction with? Something behind a smokescreen, yes. But there were probably two smokescreens used that day. One, very conventional, and which most intelligent people can see through: the idea that all police and firefighters (and stock brokers?) are all the nicest blokes imaginable, they never lie together as a gang does, to protect its interests. They never work with the government. These ideas are stupid at best. And if you believe these, I am afraid you may be too naive to do research for yourself.
The other kind of smoke screen was probably a bit less conventional, and which was meant to block everyone
from understanding the events outside of television's story — not just the naive. It's likely they used a military obscurant of some kind.
As such, with both naive and rebellious types blocked from the official information, we must ask ourselves why the entire news media was spreading the story that people were being herded and controlled on 9/11. This is probably a stretch of the truth to make it seem as though the whole area wasn't controlled until after the first plane hit. But indeed, this would have been a perfect excuse to explain why the herding operation was in operation anyway.
Please review http://www.SeptemberClues.info
research here: http://septemberclues.info/power_of_imagery.shtml
We haven't found one real victim in our research, that's absolutely correct. In fact, the only people that appear to have been "real" are tied up with religious institutions, show business, "intelligentsia" or all the above. It seems some might not have even been using real names, but this is our latest area of research: http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1921
So congratulations on getting here! You are among the small population of the planet that has actually researched 9/11 rather than repeating speculations and conspiracy theories handed to us by military intelligence groups trying to control the conversation. Hopefully as you shed that habit, you find yourself willing to do research for your own sake and the sake of your community, and hopefully the world community at large.
Please remember that when you post in threads where you are not being "interrogated" to post cogent relevant posts that succinctly capture your best points rather than giving us your every single speculation. Help people narrow the possibilities to your most reasonable
and potentially provable speculations, when speculating. If that makes sense. However, point taken. We shouldn't be arguing about things outside this thread and let's not.
Better yet, don't take arguments personally. It's not about personality — but about getting the best information out. And not making it more confusing than it already is for the average person to read and understand.
Yes, I was joking about deleting your account. The point is that you consider yourself and others so difficult to contain or control and my point is to the contrary: people obey authority, especially when threats are involved.