The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.
Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:08 pm

Let's have a look at the folks behind the soon to be inaugurated...


BOARD OF DIRECTORS: http://www.911memorial.org/board-directors

Chairman : Michael R. Bloomberg - billionaire mayor of New York

Robert A. Iger - President and CEO, The Walt Disney Company

Billy Crystal - actor

Robert De Niro - actor

Jane Rosenthal - co-founder of Tribeca Productions with Robert De Niro in 1988

David Rockefeller - David who? :blink:

Peter G. Peterson - Chairman and Co-Founder of The Blackstone Group. http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Blackstone_Group Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, founding Chairman of the Institute for International Economics (Washington, D.C.) and founding President of The Concord Coalition. Mr. Peterson is the Co-Chair of The Conference Board Commission on Public Trust and Private Enterprises (Co-Chaired by John Snow, currently Secretary of the Treasury). He was also Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2000 to 2004.

Robert Wood Johnson - IV Chairman & CEO, The Johnson Company, Inc. Member of the founding family of Johnson & Johnson, the worldwide health-care company.In the early 1970s, Mr. Johnson acquired American Video Corporation, a pioneer cable-television company, and built it into one of the largest privately held cable-TV systems in the country.

William B. Harrison Jr. - Chairman & Chief Executive Officer JP Morgan Chase & Co

Frank Bisignano - Chief Administrative Officer for JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Maurice R. Greenberg - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Starr Foundation

Kenneth I. Chenault - Chairman and Chief Executive Officer American Express Company

Samuel A. DiPiazza - Jr. Global Chief Executive Officer PriceWaterhouseCoopers International. Member of the Council on Foreign Relations’ Committee on Corporate Affairs

The 11 "victims Family members" ( ALSO ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS )

HOWARD W. LUTNICK - Chief Executive Officer of Cantor Fitzgerald
(which allegedly lost 658 employees in the WTC collapses)

Alleged brother of alleged 9/11 victim “Gary Lutnick” ? here lovingly described by brother Howard:
“If Gary Lutnick had been a stock, said Howard Lutnick, who had envisioned a fraternal Cantor partnership with Gary in the not-distant future, "he'd be the one you'd always want to keep around, always want to bet on. He went in one direction: up."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/14/natio ... gewanted=1
Image(Isn't his index pointing down? :P )

Commissioner of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
Here’s Virginia and Wolf(owitz) visiting troops in Iraq...and weeping :
Alleged widow of “Walter David Bauer”:

Ms. Berry has held several executive positions in publishing at companies including Doubleday, the Economist, Newsweek, Gruner & Jahr and Scholastic.
Alleged widow of “David Berry”:

“David Beamer is deeply committed to educating the public about the story of Flight 93 and 9/11.”
Alleged father of “Flight 93 hero Todd Beamer”:

Board member of "Keep America Safe" alongside Liz Cheney & William Kristol : http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=215
Former producer at Court TV where she covered dozens of civil and criminal legal proceedings ranging from the OJ Simpson trial and the Clinton impeachment hearings to the Microsoft anti-trust case.
Alleged sister of “Charles Burlingame” (alleged pilot of American Airlines “Flight 77”):

http://www.levininstitute.org/ourName.cfm (Levin Insitute is headed by Garrick Utley, for forty years a broadcast journalist on NBC, ABC, CNN.) Owner of Applevision/Vidicom which she founded in 1982. In addition, Ferer serves the Mayor of New York City as the liaison for 9-11 issues. Ferer was also a Commissioner of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
Alleged widow of “Neil D. Levin” director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey:


President of the September 11th Families' Association ? retired firefighter
Alleged father of “Jonathan Ielpi” (FDNY):

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer GreenPoint Financial Corporation. From 1966 to 1969, Mr. Johnson served as a special assistant to the Comptroller of the U.S. Department of Defense in the Pentagon. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and of the Boards of New York's public Television station WNET Channel 13. He also serves on the boards of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), and of the September 11th Fund.
Alleged father of “Scott M. Johnson”:

Former school teacher. Founder of the “September MISSION foundation”. http://www.septembersmission.org/aboutus/
Alleged widow of “Michael Patrick Iken”:

Here’s a fascinating tribute to Michael Iken: “He is within our hearts, souls and minds, not in any real estate.“ http://www.sept11thmemorial.com/last_name.asp?Letter=I

Actress. Anthoula was (coincidentally?) also the liaison to the family members of those who were murdered in the February 26, 1993 terrorist attacks at the WTC which allegedly killed 6 (almost all of which were employees of the NY Port Authority).
Alleged sister of “John Katsimatides” :

THOMAS ROGER Vice President of Gilbane Building Company, a nationally recognized construction management firm that has built such noted national memorial projects as the Viet Nam Memorial and the WWII Memorial.
Alleged father of Jean D. Rog?r (flight attendant on “FLIGHT11”) :

Note: Very few of the 11 individuals/entities pictured above have more than 1 or 2 portraits/photos posted on the internet.

"NIRVANIX" is apparently "collecting information from the families":
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS1007 ... RN20091019

Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:31 pm



http://www.foxbusiness.com/search-resul ... n-9-11.htm

I hate to be rude. Yet, I love to call a spade a spade - and a dickhead a dickhead:

HOWARD LUTNICK (Chief Executive Officer of Cantor Fitzgerald) tells us about his wonderful life fortunes.
Hey, 9/11 apparently zapped his younger brother Gary but it was all a blessing in disguise, wasn't it? :ph43r: ...

Alleged 9/11 victim "Gary Lutnick"

Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:08 pm

I wish to extend my warmest New Year greetings to all the many cool folks on this forum; it started as an experiment (after the sudden closure of 911movement.org) and seems to be working out pretty good - to my pleasant surprise ;) I really think 2010 will be a mighty interesting and exciting year - in every sense. It's been a fantastic 2nd part of 2009 with Hoi Polloi joining me here - a huge boost of energy and inspiration. Here's my end-of-year, tentative summary of the wide 9/11 research. Hope you'll all print it out & read it - and offer suggestions for improvements ! :)

Deconstructing the Grand Deception
by Simon Shack - December 31, 2009

If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Deception should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The Grand Deception plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition. There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, ‘uptown’ legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators. Since they could reliably rely on the fully compliant ‘top-brass’ of the mainstream media, they would have used this unique, exclusive asset to its full potential. Ever since day one, the major hurdle for many people to even start considering 9/11 being an ‘inside job’ has been: “I can’t believe my own government would murder 3000 of their own people”. Once that psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in the process never was an envisaged proposition as it would have encountered severe resistance among the insiders involved. The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy; an outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners used as missiles was orchestrated, supported by digital imagery and special movie effects. How this was done is thoroughly illustrated in my September Clues video analyses.

WHAT DIDN’T HAPPEN ON 9/11 ( the deceptive imagery )

No unauthorized, private imagery was captured on September 11, 2001. Most - if not all - of the imagery we have of that morning’s events is prefabricated and/or manipulated. The September Clues video research ? and many similar independent studies - have amply demonstrated the mainstream media’s unfettered complicity ? insofar as the live TV broadcasts are concerned. The 9/11 morning broadcasts were, by and large, digital computer-animations and all successive, so-called “amateur” video snippets (featuring crashing planes or collapsing towers) have likewise been methodically exposed as a series of poorly crafted forgeries. The defining, real-life ‘action shots’ (fake plane crashes and real tower collapses) of the day were simply not meant to be captured on film - much less aired on television: As it is, no real footage of those crucial time windows is to be found. To be sure, the existence of specific, military-grade technology able to achieve this precise aim is well documented. In all likelihood, electromagnetic weaponry (EMP/HERF) routinely employed in war zones was employed, causing the temporary jamming of all unshielded camera equipment *. With no real footage being captured, the TV networks could ‘safely’ broadcast their substitute, artificial imagery of the morning’s events.
* (see : http://www.septemberclues.info/visual_control.htm )

WHAT DID HAPPEN ON 9/11 (the tower collapses)
The ‘ground operations’ in Lower Manhattan called for a coordinated demolition of the entire WTC complex (9 buildings in all). Just what type of explosive forces caused this destruction is hotly debated among scientists galore ? yet it is but a secondary and ultimately doomed endeavor - since there is no certifiably authentic rubble nor any authentic imagery to examine. We may however assume (as of the events’ timeline) that the demolition process started a full hour after the alleged “plane strikes”, leaving plenty of time to evacuate the area. The briskly displaced bystanders ? as well as more distant eyewitnesses - would have had very slim chances to make out the precise dynamics of the collapses as, most plausibly, smokescreens (military obscurants) started blocking the WTC from view. The time-window of the Lower Manhattan evacuation was “filled in” with two convenient, yet blatantly phony “Distraction Dramas” : The Pentagon and Shanksville mock-events. These two diversions also helped sway the attention away from the absurd absence of helicopter rescues at the WTC. As it is, the improbable tale of 3,000 souls trapped for up to 100 minutes in the WTC top floors (with no rooftop rescues - “due to locked access doors”) may have a simple explanation: The WTC towers were empty. To be sure, all photographs and video snippets depicting people (or silhouettes thereof) falling down the side of the WTC’s have also been comprehensively exposed as digital forgeries. Only time will tell whether any people really were killed on 9/11 - and under what circumstances - but, as things stand, the bulk of available evidence suggests otherwise.

Perhaps ? and probably - none. A ‘fanciful’ contention? No. Not if measured against the thoroughly fanciful, grotesquely contrived and conflicting 9/11 ‘victim memorials’. A close scrutiny of the numerous available listings of alleged 9/11 victims provides countless indications that they are, by and large, outright fabrications. Most of them are still easily accessible on the internet by the general public ? yet some have been (‘mysteriously’) shut down. Of course, if it’s true that the WTC was fully evacuated, thus follows that the many memorials listing the 9/11 victims must, in turn, be fabricated too. As elaborated below, that is precisely what they appear to be. The 9/11 victim memorials simply do not stand up to scrutiny and comparison. The sheer bulk of inconsistencies and absurdities pervasive in those unseemly listings unveils their true nature : Just another piece of the Grand Deception. Let us see why, point by point :

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(1): The totals’ nonsense
At a first glance at the various 9/11 memorials, we see that each and every one reports a different casualty toll. Here’s a selection of total figures, all ostensibly meant to represent official and definitive listings of all victims of 9/11 for WTC, Pentagon and “4 flights”- (minus the “19 hijackers”) :

SEPT11th memorial: “3.181”
CNN memorial: “2.985”
http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/me ... index.html
FOX News: “2812”
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,62151,00.html (full list)
La Repubblica ( Sept11,’09 ): “2.752”
http://www.repubblica.it/2009/09/sezion ... -2009.html
America Forever memorial: “2.467”

As absurd as this may seem, it is a fact that more than 8 years after 9/11, there is still no consensus whatsoever on the total death toll. Indeed, the first and last of the above-listed memorials show a discrepancy of a full 714 names! These are entirely verifiable figures ? in full public view. Of course, even a discrepancy of only 2 or 3 victims should be considered unacceptable at this time. Let’s hope that the National 9/11 Memorial, currently under construction in Manhattan will finally reveal to the world the exact number of the 9/11 victims... Whatever that figure will be (and which names will be retained or discarded), the fact remains that for all of 8 years virtually all memorials have displayed wildly conflicting casualty tolls.

Most will remember that, in the days, weeks if not months following 9/11, the news media kept reporting what, admittedly, were speculative casualty figures ( the “20,000 victims” soon became “10,000”). Yet the first, official casualty toll was still a hefty “6,729” (New York Times). Then, a full 12 days after the event, Major Giuliani went on record with an “estimated 6,333 victims ”, a figure which was touted for some time before gradually - and inexplicably - dwindling to less than half that figure. How, one must ask, could it possibly take weeks to obtain reasonably accurate figures of the WTC tenants’ missing employees? Now, this was no tsunami sweeping unfathomably populated coastlines of Indonesia, Thailand or Sri Lanka; these were two confined building-collapses in civilized Manhattan! Undeniably, in the shocked post-disaster climate, the inflated death tolls effectively boosted the drama and the public outrage over the “murderous Binladen attacks”. However, as weeks went by, Mayor Giuliani’s “6,333” estimate started raising a few eyebrows. In time, the news media came up with a ‘shocking news story’ : As the tale went, a horde of greedy, despicable fraudsters were usurping the 9/11 compensation funds claiming the loss of “non-existing, totally made-up relatives”?
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/nyreg ... wanted=all

A long string of such scams were reported - & denounced with righteous outrage ? for weeks on end. Ultimately, even though a whopping total of 400 such “callous con men schemes” were reported, it did little to account for ? or even remotely explain ? Giuliani’s previous “6,333”estimate (of September23, 2001). The Grand Deception was already creaking and - unbeknown to most ? initiating its own, inevitable collapse.
Now, some people will argue that these wild inaccuracies were brought about by “the havoc and confusion” surrounding the 9/11 events. Fine. Let us not argue about it - and agree for now on at least one incontrovertible fact: Between the first official NYT death toll figure (6729) and the figure found on, for instance, the “America Forever” memorial (2467), we have a discrepancy/margin of error of 4262 ‘units’. These are plain and simple arithmetics. Lastly, let it be said that the vast majority of "9/11 victims" are NOT listed in the SSDI (Social Security Death Index). The few that ARE to be found listed on the SSDI are usually names that have been cited in the press, i.e. more 'prominent' and 'public' victims...

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(2): The ghost names nonsense
So, how do these conflicting death tolls translate as one takes a close look at the various memorials? Does that mean we may find random, ‘ghost’ victims listed on some memorials, complete with tributes and obituaries, who are simply missing on others? Yes. Is there a significant amount of such nonsensical examples, such as to rule out ‘innocent sloppiness’ on the part of the various memorial curators? Yes. Let’s take a look, for instance, at the “Wall of Americans” memorial. At the very top of letter “A”, we find two people named “AALYIGH”.


Inexplicably, the two “AALYIGH”s (as indeed many other names) are found only in some memorials and are absent from others (such as CNN’s). Now, imagine for a minute that your surname is “Aalyigh”. Would you not try contacting (in over 8 years) the ‘offending’ 9/11 memorials and have them correct their listings? Who are the “Aalyigh’s”? Or perhaps we should ask : why are the “Aalyigh’s” to be found only in selected memorials? Is there indeed anyone called “Aalyigh” on this planet apart from Diana Aalyigh (Die-In-A-Lie?) and Justin Aalyigh (Just- In-A-Lie?). One may be tempted to surmise that some brave whistleblower was trying to tell us some truth about 9/11: “it’s all AALYIGH”.
Interestingly, the Wall of Americans memorial has now been shut down. This is the message we may find on the blank internet page which ‘explains’ its sudden closure:


Then, staying with letter “A”, there is the case of Mrs. “Cici AADA”, another of the many ‘ghost names’ to be found bouncing around the various 9/11 memorials. Now, if you google “AADA” you will bump right into the “American Academy of Dramatic Arts”. http://www.aada.org/home/home.html
A coincidence, perhaps. However, since a great deal of characters rotating within the 9/11 saga (Mark Humphrey, Gary Welz, et al) have been exposed as professional actors, one may reasonably wonder whether this also could be the work of a heroic whistleblower. The fact remains that “Cici (See-See?) AADA” and both the “AALYIGH’s” are only to be found on a few 9/11 memorials ? and are simply missing on others (most notably the CNN memorial).
There are plenty more examples of ‘ghost names’ appearing only in selected 9/11 memorials. To list them all in this article (with comprehensive cross-comparisons between all the lists) is not realistic and would surely be a tedious read. So let’s just compare three alphabetical groups (Q, X, Y, Z) which contain moderate amounts of names (so that the reader may easily check out these facts personally).Below is a list of 9/11 memorials; for each one we have the number of people listed under the surname initials “Q”, “X”, “Y” & “Z”:

CNN memorial : http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memori ... index.html
Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:24
VOICES OF SEPTEMBER11 : http://voicesofsept11.org/dev/memorial_ ... ems=1,6,13
Q:8 X:0 Y:20 Z:25
IN MEMORIAM ONLINE : http://inmemoriamonline.net/List_WTC-Q.html
Q:7 X:0 Y:15 Z:19
SEPTEMBER 11TH MEMORIAL : http://www.sept11thmemorial.com/all_names.asp
Q:16 X:0 Y:25 Z:26
FOX memorial : http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,62151,00.html
Q:9 X:0 Y:21 Z:24
CYPRESS TIMES http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/ ... 2001/24432
Q:9 X:0 Y:13 Z:23
PRAYERS FOR PEACE http://www.prayersforpeace.org/wall.shtml
Q:11 X:4 Y:24 Z:26

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(3): The prosaic nonsense
A common aspect of the various 9/11 memorials are the consistently sappy and contrived tributes supposedly posted by families, co-workers and friends. We are talking about thousands of brief writings which, of course, require some steady patience to sift through. However, and for what it’s worth, I can personally testify that it’s hard to find any 9/11 tribute graced with any ring of authenticity. The prevalent impression is that they are written by the same person ? or at best ? by a gang of bored, unimaginative novelists. Naturally, some will retort that this is a ‘subjective’, personal interpretation; I can only encourage everyone to spend some time reading those tributes for themselves. Taken together, those tributes read like an endlessly reshuffled concoction of mawkish and tear-jerking rhetoric. I’m confident that anyone armed with a critical mind ? and a healthy sense of humor - will actually enjoy sifting through these tributes as an eye-opening, entertaining and slightly surreal experience. Best of all, this ‘enjoyment’ comes with an odd sense of relief and appeasment as one gradually comes to realize that:
1. The 9/11 memorials are all in conflict with each other.
2. The 9/11 memorials are anything but credible tributes to real victims of a real terror attack.
3. Perhaps, in the light of these facts, few - or nobody - died in the “9/11 attacks”.

(Author’s appeal: I welcome anyone asserting to be a family member of a 9/11 victim to come forward with documentation ? such as would be admissible in a court of law - of their loved one’s existence and passing. I can be reached on my private e-mail posted here: http://www.septemberclues.info ).

MEMORIAL PROBLEMS(4): The portrait-morphing evidence
Three main observations can be drawn from a methodical cross-scrutiny of the many 9/11 memorials which feature portraits of the “victims” ? henceforth referred to as “entities”:

1: Most of the “entities” found in the memorials are represented with two - and no more than two apparently different portraits.

2: When two seemingly different portraits of a given entity are compared, they reveal more often than not striking similarities in facial expression, pose, angle/perspective, lighting, reflections.

3. Striking similarities are also observed between separate, often alphabetically adjacent entities of same or different sex. While a few such cases might be expected in a list of 2500+ portraits, the sheer frequency of such instances featuring seemingly ‘cloned’ facial attributes cannot reasonably (in a statistical sense) be ascribed to ‘coincidence’ or ‘happenstance’.

Obviously, this topic needs to be visualized by the reader since it deals with photographic issues. Please look up this illustrated article for image-supported descriptions of this issue:
http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims_ ... alyses.htm
(Other interesting issues related to the metadata - or ‘exif’ data - embedded in all the “.jpg” picture files will, in time, be comprehensively expounded and added to this article.)
For a comprehensive study of the 9/11 memorials, please read the “Vicsim Report” by Hoi Polloi:
http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims/ ... Report.pdf

Some of the more prominent ‘casualties’ of 9/11 - such as “Flight93-hero Todd M. Beamer”- have long been exposed as stolen identities from previously deceased namesakes . The Barbara Olson story also turned out to be a fraud when Ted Olson (George W. Bush’s solicitor general) was caught altering 3 times his tale of her alleged phone calls from “Flight77”. Similarly, “the 9/11 victim number 0001”, Father Mychal Judge, was another faith-based saga for devout believers: At least three different versions of the causes/circumstances of his death were published by the news media ? and the evacuation of his corpse from the WTC has also been exposed as another staged photo-op. In other words, the stories surrounding the 9/11 “VIP” casualties are riddled with so many questions as to be divested of any sort of credibility. With such an abundance of deceptive, media-promoted bunkum, it is perfectly reasonable to question every single official newsstory to emerge from the events of September 11, 2001.


Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:48 pm

Unread post by Surcouf » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:28 pm

Deconstructing the Grand Deception by Simon Shack - December 31, 2009

Reading it reminded me the five talents given to the servant in the parable of Matthew .. Intelligence, honesty, heart, perseverance, and hard work are the first five which come to my mind ! Thank you for what you do. Happy new year to you, your family and your close friends.
Everything might not be faked ...

Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 am

Unread post by SmokingGunII » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:46 pm

I will digest the above when I have time, Simon. In the meantime, I wish you a happy new year!

Posts: 1062
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:20 pm

Unread post by Heiwa » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:49 am

Deconstructing the Grand Deception by Simon Shack - December 31, 2009 is a very good summary of events of 911. One objective was to destroy the complete WTC-complex, blame it on some arabs, fool the insurance companies involved, etc, etc.
One weakness of the plot is that towers of any structural design cannot 'collapse' from top to bottom initiated by local failures up top and gravity in spite of various 'scientific' papers presented soon after the incident, e.g. in the ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, JEM.
So I wrote a piece about it and submitted it to JEM and they agreed to publish it - http://heiwaco.tripod.com/blgb.htm . And then nothing happened. However, pushing a bit, ASCE informed on 30 December 2009 that they just heard from the original authors of the paper under review and that a Closure (sic) will be written. JEM has asked them to try and have it to be delivered within the next two weeks. Then hopefully JEM will publish both my paper and the Closure and we will see what happens (except that media will not report anything?)!

ASCE has a nice Code of Ethics:

Fundamental Principles

Engineers uphold and advance the integrity, honor and dignity of the engineering profession by:

using their knowledge and skill for the enhancement of human welfare and the environment;
being honest and impartial and serving with fidelity the public, their employers and clients;
striving to increase the competence and prestige of the engineering profession; and
supporting the professional and technical societies of their disciplines.

Being honest and impartial? The engineering staff of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, which I have corresponded with, has a little to learn! They think that, e.g. WTC 7 was prone to structural collapse and would disintegrate by removing one little bit of it. I have described it at http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm .

Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:27 pm

Unread post by LordJim » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:16 pm

"Among the dead are those who still have to be killed"

Ferdinand Desnoyers, journalist, in 1858 article, within The Oxford Book of Aphorisms, edited by John Gross., p.322.

Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:14 pm


Posts: 295
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:08 pm

Unread post by D.Duck » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:48 pm


It looks like this new year has a good start, its going to be really interesting to see what Ron will do.


Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:54 pm

D.Duck 4 Jan 1 2010, 08:48 PM wrote: ... its going to be really interesting to see what Ron will do.

Report it to the Police ? :D

...or perhaps get in touch with a few 9/11memorial CURATORS?
http://americanhistory.si.edu/September ... rators.asp

...and have a little chat with mrs DELANEY? :ph43r:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/September ... .asp?ID=26

Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:43 pm

Unread post by godzilla » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:44 am

Nice work Simon. Happy new year!
"It's not a matter of what is true that counts but a matter of what is perceived to be true." - Henry Kissinger

Posts: 2232
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Unread post by fbenario » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:50 am

Simon, this is awesome!!!!!!!!

How did you manage to get Ron Paul to publish it?

Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:20 am

fbenario @ Jan 2 2010, 02:50 AM wrote: Simon, this is awesome!!!!!!!!
How did you manage to get Ron Paul to publish it?

I did nothing !... I just googled "Deconstructing the Grand Deception" - and there it was, on top of the google search list.

Posts: 6784
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Unread post by simonshack » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:36 pm

A little shortlist to videos illustrating what video technology might have been employed to :


Morphable Face: Automatic 3D Reconstruction and Manipulation from Single Data-Set Reference Face




John Adams Visual FX (HBO)